Friday, May 29, 2026

Failures in Indian Tejas Fighter Program Are Crippling its Wider Combat Fleet: How Can the Defence Ministry Respond?


Military Watch:


Failures in Indian Tejas Fighter Program Are Crippling its Wider Combat Fleet: How Can the Defence Ministry Respond?

South Asia , Aircraft and Anti-Aircraft


Delays to the development of the Indian Tejas lightweight fourth generation fighter have caused serious and worsening issues for Indian Air Force’s combat capabilities, resulting in both the missing of targets for the size of the fighter fleet by a considerable margin, and in major increases to the average age of currently serving fighter types. The program dates back close to four decades, with the first aircraft belatedly making its first flight only on January 4, 2001, after which it took a further 18 years before the aircraft were accepted into service in a limited capacity in February 2019. The fighter’s combat potential remains limited. While the heavily enhanced Tejas Mk2 variant was designed to provide a superior combat capability, it was confirmed in March 2026 that its first flight had been further delayed by two years. 

Tejas MK2 Artwork
Tejas MK2 Artwork

The Indian Air Force currently operates 49 Mirage 2000H and 8 Mirage 2000TH aircraft, which were delivered from 1986 and were scheduled for retirement in the mid-2030s. The service also planned to retire close to 100 MiG-29 fighter jets and approximately 115 Jaguar attack jets at around the same time. Major delays to the Tejas program, including most recently the delays to developing the Tejas Mk2, mean that the Mirage 2000, MiG-29 and Jaguar will need to remain in service for considerably longer. Plans to modernise the Jaguar and procure new engines from the United States were cancelled due to cost. The viability of these three older types of combat jets for high intensity operations has been brought to serious question, and while a portion of the MiG-29 fleet has been brought up to the modern MiG-29UPG ‘4+ generation’ standard, the baseline MiG-29 and the Mirage 2000 are both considered effectively obsolete. 

Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 Fighters
Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 Fighters

While  Indian Air Force doctrine indicates a requirement to field at least 42 fighter squadrons, each with 18 aircraft, the service currently fields just 32 fighter squadrons, several of which have fewer than 18 aircraft. This is largely due to the delays in the development of the Tejas fighter, which the Indian Air Force originally intended to procure to replace the MiG-21 in forming the backbone of its lightweight single engine fleet. The retirement of the MiG-21 and MiG-27 without replacement has left the fleet increasingly thinly stretched. Over the past two decades Air Force fighter procurements have been restricted to continued license production of the Su-30MKI, the current backbone of the fleet and most numerous fighter type in service, as well as small procurements of 36 Rafale fighters and a smaller number of MiG-29UPG fighters. 

Su-57D Twin Seat Fifth Generation Fighter Variant
Su-57D Twin Seat Fifth Generation Fighter Variant

The Indian Air Force has partly compensated for shortages of fighter aircraft by procuring Russian S-400 long range air defence systems, which combine cutting edge combat potentials with low sustainment costs. The delivery of additional systems to equip the seventh and eighth Indian Air Force battalions was confirmed on May 7 to have begun, while the Indian Defence Ministry Defence Procurement Council had two months prior in March approved the purchase of an additional ten battalions’ worth of the systems. In February 2025 it was confirmed that a license production agreement for the Su-57 fifth generation fighter was being considered, while eleven months later the Indian Defence Ministry in January 2026 confirmed that these talks had reached an advanced technical stage. This raises the possibility that the new stealth fighter will be procured in large numbers to enlarge the fleet and provide a major leap in the combat potentials of top frontline units. The Su-57D variant, which first flew in Russia on May 19, appears to have been developed in large part to meet Indian Air Force requirements

Rebuilding US weapons stockpile may ‘take years’ post-Iran war



Rebuilding US weapons stockpile may ‘take years’ post-Iran war

Restoring pre-war stockpiles of critical US munitions will take at least two years, according to CSIS report.

The United States has enough munitions for any plausible scenario in the Iran war, but rebuilding its depleted inventories will “take years”, according to a new report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Restoring pre-war stockpiles of four critical munitions heavily used by US forces during nearly 40 days of joint fighting with Israel against Iran would take at least two years – and in some cases more than three – the Washington-based think tank said on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

While US officials publicly project confidence in weapons stockpiles, analysts have said that dwindling munition supplies may be shaping Washington’s calculations over whether to resume the war on Iran.

“Campaigns against Iran and its proxies – and, for Patriot interceptors, aid to Ukraine – have made the problem more acute,” said the CSIS report.

“Alongside replenishing its own stocks, the United States also has to fulfil orders from allies and partners.”

A finding by the think tank last month said that the four key munitions that had been depleted to more than half their pre-war inventory levels included the Land Attack Missile (TLAM), the Terminal High Altitude Area Defences (THAAD) interceptors, Patriot missiles, and the SM-3 and SM-6 ship-based surface-to-air missiles.

The Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) and Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) will take several months to a year to replace, CSIS said. The pre-war PrSM inventory was low because the system had just begun production, while JASSM, though heavily used in the Iran war, will see large deliveries from recent procurements, it added.

“Decisions on how to allocate new production have already created bilateral friction, and this friction will continue for the next few years as demand outpaces supply,” the report warned.

The main problem is not funding but production time, limited manufacturing capacity and long procurement lead times, with CSIS noting that past procurement levels were relatively low for many systems, slowing replacement efforts despite recent increases in defence spending.

“There will be a window of vulnerability for several years until inventories return to their previous levels and another several years before they get to the levels that war planners desire,” said CSIS.

‘Strategic inventory shock’

US combat experience in recent conflicts may still help preserve deterrence against China during the replenishment period, it added.

Emerging evidence of depleting stockpiles of weapons has surfaced in recent weeks.

The Washington Post revealed earlier this month that the US used more of its advanced missile-defence interceptors to defend Israel than even Israel itself during the 40 days of the Iran war.

The US Navy last week paused $14bn in weapons sales to Taiwan that Congress has approved but President Donald Trump needs to sign off on. The navy’s secretary stating that it needs munitions for the Iran war.

Omar Ashour, a professor of security and military studies at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies in Qatar, previously told Al Jazeera that while the Iran war did not empty the US arsenal of weapons, it burned through some of the most important and strategically valuable layers of it.

“It’s not tactical exhaustion, it’s just a strategic inventory shock if you wish, because that depletion will affect other theatres [of war],” Ashour said.

CSIS said last month that while the US has enough missiles to continue fighting the Iran war, the risk “which will persist for many years, lies in future wars”.

5:19
Trump claims regime change in Iran but ideology unchanged, former US diplomat says

DISGUSTING Israel added to UN blacklist’ for conflict-related sexual violence



UN ‘adds Israel to blacklist’ for conflict-related sexual violence

Israeli ambassador to the UN says Tel Aviv will cut ties with UN chief Antonio Guterres over the upcoming report.

The United Nations has “added Israel to the blacklist of sexual violence in conflict zones”, prompting Israel to cut ties with UN chief Antonio Guterres, the country’s ambassador to the UN says.

“We are done with this secretary-general,” Israeli ambassador Danny Danon added in a video posted on X on Thursday, denouncing the upcoming report from Guterres’s office.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The UN secretary-general’s annual report on conflict-related sexual violence is customarily presented to relevant states before publication. Last August, the report warned that Israel could be added to the list of parties suspected of, or responsible for, sexual violence in situations of armed conflict.

“The decision to blacklist Israel and accuse us of using sexual violence as a weapon of war is an outrageous decision,” Danon said.

“The secretary-general and his team continue to spread lies against Israel. To put us and Hamas terrorists on the same list, that’s unacceptable.”

The Israeli mission to the UN said in a statement that it will have no contact with the secretary-general’s office as long as Guterres serves as head of the organisation.

The country’s foreign ministry also expressed anger over the upcoming report.

“The shameful and absurd UN decision to include Israeli entities in the annex to the CRSV (conflict-related sexual violence) report is further proof of the UN’s true nature: a politicised and corrupt organisation that has abandoned its founding principles and systematically targets Israel as its primary mission,” Oren Marmorstein, a spokesperson for the Israeli foreign ministry, said on X.


Guterres’s spokesperson said they were aware of Danon’s remarks.

“For our part, the secretary-general’s door remains open,” Stephane Dujarric said.

0:54

Systematic pattern of abuse

Last August, the UN cited “credible information” regarding sexual violence committed by Israeli security forces against Palestinian detainees in prisons and other detention centres, and said UN inspectors had been denied access to the facilities.

“We invited the representative of the UN to come to Israel to check those ridiculous allegations. They chose not to come,” Danon said.

Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons, especially those taken from Gaza during Israel’s brutal war since 2023, have long revealed how they suffer dehumanising treatment by guards and soldiers, including torture and sexual violence. According to international human rights organisations, these testimonies are part of a broader and systematic pattern.

Furthermore, a report from the West Bank Protection Consortium last month found that sexual violence and other forms of gender-based abuse committed by Israeli settlers and soldiers are spurring Palestinians to leave the occupied West Bank.

Even foreigners, namely those on board a recent Gaza-bound aid flotilla, say that freed activists who were abducted from international waters faced abuse while in Israeli detention, including at least 15 separate cases of sexual assault or rape.

Earlier this month, Israel also rejected accusations of rape by its forces, which were detailed in a column by longtime New York Times journalist Nicholas Kristof. The Israeli government had responded to the report by stating that it would take the extraordinary step of suing the paper. Kristof’s reporting was based on the accounts of 14 male and female Palestinian victims.

Relations between the UN and Israel are fraught and have reached an all-time low since October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack that preceded Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, which has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians.

Israeli authorities have criticised Guterres and other UN officials for their condemnation of its brutal conduct in Gaza. The UN chief was declared “persona non grata” in Israel in 2024.

1:06
Israel killing at least one child a week in occupied West Bank, UN says

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Weak and subservient DAP must step up










Weak and subservient DAP must step up


Published: May 28, 2026 8:30 AM
Updated: 10:30 AM




YOURSAY | “Loke is not only a weak leader, but also lacks strategy.”

COMMENT | How to salvage DAP's political fortunes?




Headhunter: Many believe DAP is better suited to the role of opposition than governing. Even as the dominant coalition partner, it’s often seen as weak and subservient to PKR, with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim treating it more as a token than an equal ally.

It’s almost inevitable that it will suffer losses in the next general election, much like MCA did when it assumed it was untouchable and ignored voters’ demands to stand up to Umno.

If that happens, DAP, like MCA, could spend years trying to recover its footing, if ever.

Ranjit Singh Malhi: I concur with G Vinod that there is a growing perception that some DAP leaders have compromised too many of their principles in exchange for the privileges and influence that come with political power.

DAP national chairperson Gobind Singh Deo, for instance, is often compared unfavourably with his late father, the highly respected former DAP strongman Karpal Singh, who was widely admired for his courage, principled stand, and unwavering defence of constitutional supremacy and justice - even when it was politically costly.

Many had expected Gobind to carry forward that same fearless spirit.

DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke, too, has disappointed some supporters who had hoped for stronger and more courageous leadership.

Critics view DAP deputy secretary-general Steven Sim as placing excessive emphasis on public image and self-promotion rather than more forcefully championing the broader interests of the rakyat and the nation.

In contrast, leaders such as Jelutong MP RSN Rayer and DAP national legal bureau chairperson Ramkarpal Singh are often seen as being more outspoken, principled, and willing to speak truth to power.

There is also growing frustration with PKR and Anwar. Many Malaysians who once placed enormous hope in reformasi feel let down by what they perceive as unfulfilled promises, inconsistent positions, and compromises that have weakened public trust.

If Bersama is able to present a credible, principled, inclusive, and forward-looking alternative centred on good governance, justice, moderation, economic competence, and national unity, then Malaysians should at least give it a fair opportunity to prove itself.

Anonymous_3f4b: The philosophy and mantra of DAP from its founding fathers show that it is more suited to be a socialist democracy on the cries of equality, meritocracy, and transparency.

Fairness and accountability, which are the domain of the opposition and not the ruling government of the day, considering the population demographics and the Constitution under the Malaysian sun.

It is not fit to be part of a government that espouses capitalism, demographic politics, religion over self and state-sponsored socio-economic development policies.

DAP's proper role is in the opposition for a brave selected few to voice the minority concerns and fears, and not be in government by the useless dozens, but play no effective role except being sycophants acting like the proverbial three monkeys and subservient to the skewed policies and politics of compromise and belittlement of the government of the day, like what is happening now to the chagrin of many.

PW Cheng:
Loke has a very sentimental attachment to Anwar for reasons best known to himself.

Though he had openly said that if things don't turn out well for DAP by July, all DAP ministers will quit the cabinet.

But unfortunately, under the same breath, he followed up by saying that after quitting, he will still support Anwar.

To me, that's bad political strategy, and to be a bit harsh, that's outright silly.

Perhaps a tell-tale sign that Loke is not only a weak leader, but also lacks strategy.

He is giving Anwar a blank cheque to take you for granted. And that's why DAP is politically weak under Loke despite the voters sending them a gift by electing 40 MPs.

You can always keep the card in your sleeve.

Say with courage and conviction that after leaving the government, DAP will restrategise and chart its next political journey.

"A wise man gets more use from his enemies than a fool from his friends" - Baltasar Gracian

Quigonbond: This is a unity government; Pakatan Harapan doesn't get to do things unilaterally.

Anwar is taking the heat, but could it be that there has been debate within the unity government, and he is acting within agreed constraints?

He'll never say anything in public to preserve the peace, and we may never know unless Umno finally decides to betray Harapan.

Even within this constraint, DAP should remain in government.

I think the red line would be corruption (except for Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, who is the glue of the unity government, an ugly political necessity), and issues.

It's great optically to pull out from the government and to protest. But would it actually change the dynamics?

Harapan hasn't asked yet. Maybe it's not the time.

But I think once the 16th general election comes around, they will implore Malaysians to vote them in for the majority this time so that real reforms can take place without compromises.

I want to ask the readers here, if that happens, what would you do?

Be disillusioned, don't vote or vote against them (maybe Bersama?), and because of the split votes, give Perikatan Nasional a walkover?

Or you give them another chance? I suppose there is no easy answer. Perhaps it requires a lot of research into every minister and MP, and see if they have performed to our liking.

Vinod may think Loke is doing a bad job, but in the end, it is his constituency that matters. Maybe they think he's gone soft, or maybe they think he's doing great, keeping the peace.

Maybe it's teamwork, and some of them are good cop, some are bad cop.

I wouldn't suggest DAP quit, but perhaps they need to relook, and if they think some representatives are not performing, the axe must fall.

HJ Angus: I think some folks are being too idealistic or romantic about DAP being able to sway Anwar and his merry men.

Being in opposition is quite different from being in government, and that is the reason why Umno quickly agreed to join the unity government, although they have acted more like a Trojan horse.

For me, this government should be totally removed from our political history as it has proved totally unsatisfactory, especially the latest policy that requires 50 percent bumiputera ownership for any company that wants to buy GLC properties worth over RM20 million, which will drive the final nail in the coffin for local investors.

I'm sticking with DAP for the time being and will give Bersama a look-in too.

Coward: As the ruling coalition, you do expect to drop a few seats in the next election. That's normal.

As such, what we have to evaluate is whether DAP lost more seats than what is normally expected. This is, unfortunately, a post-mortem move.

It is normal in politics for leaders of a political party to follow the election cycle. They are elected, work up to the final test, which is the general election.

If they pass, they stay on, and note that paint does not mean winning it. If they fail, they pass on the baton to the next one.

Loke worked this one, so it is only fair and right that he leads into the election. Notwithstanding this, it is too short a time before the next election for a new one to establish himself.

July is around the corner. Loke is about to produce his report card and decide DAP's next move. I am expecting him to justify staying and highlighting DAP's "achievements".

However, the true judge is not Loke, but the electorate, come the next general election.