Saturday, September 13, 2025

Kelantan police nab man in cartoon costume suspected of sexually assaulting six-year-old at Pantai Irama playground





Kelantan police nab man in cartoon costume suspected of sexually assaulting six-year-old at Pantai Irama playground



Bachok police reminded parents to closely monitor their children and report suspicious behaviour after a six-year-old girl was allegedly assaulted at a playground in Pantai Irama, Bachok, Kelantan on September 11, 2025. — Unsplash pic

Friday, 12 Sep 2025 8:23 PM MYT


KOTA BHARU, Sept 12 — A 36-year-old man was arrested yesterday for the alleged sexual assault of a six-year-old girl at a playground in Pantai Irama, Bachok.

Bachok deputy police chief, DSP Mohd Azrie Sulaiman, said that the incident occurred at approximately 6.20 pm and was recorded by a member of the public.


The suspect, who was reportedly wearing a cartoon costume, was observed hugging, kissing, and inappropriately touching the victim.

The victim was immediately taken to a hospital for a medical examination, which confirmed that no physical injuries were sustained.


“Initial screening tests found the suspect positive for methamphetamine, and he has multiple prior criminal records. The case is being investigated under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017.


The suspect has been remanded for seven days from today until Sept 18 for further investigation,” he said in a statement today.

Mohd Azrie urged the public to monitor their children’s movements and report any suspicious behaviour immediately. — Bernama


***


Happened in M'sia's most Holy Land


Tucker Carlson Claims Israeli Spies Knew About 9/11 Attacks

 



Tucker Carlson Claims Israeli Spies Knew About 9/11 Attacks

 

Israeli intelligence knew beforehand of the 9/11, American journalist Tucker Carlson has claimed. The topic, as well as other long-buried facts, will be explored in his upcoming documentary series on the attacks.

Carlson made the remarks on Tuesday when he appeared on Piers Morgan’s Uncensored News. The journalist pointed out the Israeli leadership never actually hid its attitude to the attack and believed they had a positive impact on the US-Israel ties.

“Of course I didn’t allege that the Jews did it. I don’t even know what that means. I think, in fact, saying things like that is a way to discredit real questions,” Carlson said. “Benjamin Netanyahu on camera, right after [the attacks] he said it was a good thing because it brings the United States into a conflict that we’ve been involved in on an existential level for decades,” he added.

Carlson apparently referred to the remarks Netanyahu made back in 2002 during the US House hearings, when he said that the democracies “sometimes have to be bombed into going to war” and likened the 9/11 events to the Pearl Harbor attack.

The journalist also invoked the “Israeli art students” affair, stating that the public knowledge about it has been very limited, with reports on it ultimately vanishing. – RT




 Our Take: Tucker is going at the heart of the beast, it seems. We’ll have to see exactly what his documentary includes before we can make any real evaluation; but it appears that this could end up being a great companion documentary to Brad Zerbo’s CODEX 9/11 which definitively demonstrates that 9/11 was an inside job and presents the most compelling theory on what actually happened with the planes that I have seen. (Remote-piloted drones)

The Zeitgeist has shifted, and it appears that the American People are finally prepared to confront the hard truths surrounding 9/11.


– GhostofBasedPatrickHenry

Iran Receives 40 Chinese J-10C Fighter Jets, Declares It’s ‘Ready for War’ Amid Rising Tensions




Iran Receives 40 Chinese J-10C Fighter Jets, Declares It’s ‘Ready for War’ Amid Rising Tensions


Iran Receives 40 Chinese J-10C Fighter Jets, Declares It’s ‘Ready for War’ Amid Rising Tensions





In a dramatic show of military realignment and defiance, Iran has announced the delivery of 40 advanced Chinese J-10C fighter jets, signaling a strategic shift in its air force capabilities and escalating concerns about a potential new arms race in the Middle East.

The acquisition, which Tehran confirmed through state media early Tuesday, marks Iran’s most significant airpower upgrade in decades. Iranian military officials say the move comes after prolonged delays in Russia’s promised Su-35 deliveries, prompting a pivot to Beijing for more immediate defense solutions.


“Our skies are no longer vulnerable,” declared Brigadier General Hamid Vahedi, commander of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF). “With the arrival of these jets, we send a clear message: Iran is ready to defend its sovereignty and respond decisively to any aggression.”


From Moscow to Beijing: Iran’s Strategic Shift

The deal with China represents a turning point in Iran’s procurement strategy. For years, Tehran had been negotiating with Russia for the advanced Su-35 fighter jets, originally intended as part of a post-embargo upgrade plan following the 2020 expiration of UN arms restrictions.

But repeated delays attributed to Russia’s own war in Ukraine and internal production constraints left Tehran increasingly frustrated. Defense insiders say Iran began quietly negotiating with China in late 2024, culminating in the rapid delivery of 40 Chengdu J-10C multirole fighters over the past month.

The J-10C, known for its active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, long-range precision strike capability, and modern electronic warfare systems, is considered a formidable platform comparable in some respects to Western fourth-generation-plus fighters.

Iran’s announcement comes amid heightened tensions following a series of airstrikes attributed to the U.S. and Israel in recent months, including the targeted destruction of radar sites and missile depots inside Syria and western Iran. Tehran claims the new jets will restore “strategic equilibrium” and prevent further violations of its airspace.

“Let our enemies be warned,” General Vahedi said during a televised ceremony showcasing the new aircraft. “The Islamic Republic does not seek war but we are fully ready for it.”

Officials from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the Pentagon declined to comment directly on the development. However, senior regional analysts have voiced concern that the new fleet could embolden Iran’s military posture in contested zones such as the Persian Gulf, Iraq, and Syria.


China’s Role: A Quiet Yet Strategic Partnership

China has not issued a formal statement on the jet delivery, but the move highlights growing military cooperation between Beijing and Tehran, both of which are signatories to a 25-year comprehensive strategic partnership signed in 2021.

This latest deal may mark China’s most overt arms transfer to Iran in over a decade, sidestepping Western scrutiny by exploiting the expiration of UN arms restrictions and expanding its foothold in the Gulf region.


Implications for the Middle East and Beyond

With the balance of airpower shifting, regional rivals are already recalculating. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, both longtime U.S. allies, have invested heavily in fifth-generation platforms such as the F-35 and Eurofighter Typhoon. Yet Iran’s acquisition of the J-10C narrows the qualitative gap and could trigger further military spending across the region.


What Comes Next?

While Iran’s air force remains relatively limited compared to NATO-aligned powers, the addition of 40 modern fighter jets marks a leap in capability and ambition. Military observers are now watching closely to see whether Iran begins conducting joint exercises with China or leverages the aircraft for power projection in flashpoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.

Tehran has not disclosed the financial terms of the deal, nor has it commented on training or logistical support arrangements. However, sources close to the Iranian military say Chinese advisors have been seen at multiple IRIAF bases in recent weeks.


Rafizi reminds PAS of PN's role in Kg Sg Baru eviction










Rafizi reminds PAS of PN's role in Kg Sg Baru eviction


Zarrah Morden
Published: Sep 13, 2025 9:45 AM
Updated: 3:51 PM



Summary

  • Rafizi Ramli criticises PAS for “riding” the Kampung Sungai Baru eviction issue, stressing that the land seizure was initiated under the Perikatan Nasional government.

  • The former minister accuses PN of failing to secure better terms for the villagers and warns PAS against exploiting the issue for political gain.

  • He also comments on Bersatu’s internal turmoil, saying party president Muhyiddin Yassin reportedly losing the confidence of over half of all divisions is no small matter.



Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli took aim at PAS for “riding” the Kampung Sungai Baru eviction issue, saying it occurred during the Islamist party’s time in federal power.

He said the MP of the area at the time, Bersatu’s Rina Harun, should have acted on the issue before it reached the courts.

“The one who failed is Perikatan Nasional because this happened right under their nose. They could not, or did not, do enough to negotiate better terms.

“If we want to trace back, for example, who started it, it will get worse - (it started with the) Umno government,” Rafizi said on his “Yang Berhenti Menteri” podcast last night.


Kampung Sungai Baru, Sept 11


He was responding to PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari, who said it was “utterly inhumane” that the operation took place while residents’ appeals are scheduled to be heard at the Court of Appeal on Oct 3.

In 2021, the PN government invoked the Land Acquisition Act 1960 to seize the land before handing it over to developers.

The eviction on Thursday (Sept 11) was the authorities’ second attempt since July to oust 14 remaining residents in the enclave, which is adjacent to Kampung Baru in Kuala Lumpur.


Court bailiffs cooperated with several agencies to conduct the operation, which was carried out via court order to facilitate KL City Gateway Sdn Bhd’s redevelopment of the area.

The majority of residents have moved out after accepting a buyout deal from the company.


Kampung Sungai Baru, Sept 11


Rafizi went on to comment on Fadhli’s warning that the eviction in Kampung Sungai Baru is a teaser of what may happen if the proposed Urban Renewal Act (URA) becomes law.

The Pandan MP sarcastically said PAS might change its tune if it were to take power after the next general election.

“It is better for political parties not to ride the poor and the residents of Kampung Sungai Baru.

“Now who else do they (PAS) want to ride just to stir up sentiments and anger?

“If you look at the records on Kampung Sungai Baru - whatever PAS says, PAS must explain. What did you do while you were in government?” Rafizi asked.

Unrest in Bersatu

Meanwhile, Rafizi drew parallels between his party, PKR, and Bersatu.

He said people had criticised PKR by saying it revolved around its president, Anwar Ibrahim, but the same can be said about Bersatu and its president, Muhyiddin Yassin.

He also noted that more than half of Bersatu’s division leaders have allegedly lost their confidence in the former prime minister, referring to reports that 120 party division heads had signed statutory declarations (SDs) urging the party president to cede power to his deputy, Hamzah Zainudin.

“I understand their intention over the SDs means Muhyiddin no longer has the trust of more than half the party, so the unrest must be significant for it to affect the annual general meeting (AGM),” Rafizi said.

Bersatu has 202 divisions in total.

According to reports, the 120 division leaders are worried that Muhyiddin is unable to lead Bersatu and PN to victory in the next general election.

While the Bersatu AGM approved a motion to retain the Bersatu president, sources told Malaysiakini that a party leader will still be presenting the SDs to Muhyiddin.


Father pleads not guilty to children’s drowning in Sungai Linggi, bail request to visit graves denied






Father pleads not guilty to children’s drowning in Sungai Linggi, bail request to visit graves denied



Abdul Rahman Mahmud is brought to the Sessions Court in Seremban September 12, 2025. — Bernama pic

Friday, 12 Sep 2025 12:32 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 12 — A 46-year-old man whose two young children drowned after their car slid into the Sungai Linggi estuary in Port Dickson has pleaded not guilty to causing their deaths.

According to The Star, Abdul Rahman Mahmud entered his plea at the Sessions Court in Seremban before Judge Surita Budin today.


He is charged under Section 304(a) of the Penal Code for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, an offence punishable by up to 30 years’ imprisonment and a fine upon conviction.

The incident occurred at about 11.45am on September 4 in Tanjung Agas.


Deputy public prosecutor M. Pusppa requested a next mention date, explaining that the forensic, chemist, and Puspakom reports were not yet ready.



She added that the prosecution was not offering bail, citing a flight risk.

“If this happens, it will make the prosecution's case difficult,” she reportedly said.


Abdul Rahman, who appeared in court without legal representation, pleaded for bail so that he could visit his children’s graves.

Judge Surita denied bail and scheduled the next mention for November 10 to allow for the submission of documents and for him to appoint counsel.

The incident involved two siblings, aged eight and six, who were said to have been inside the car when it began rolling towards the river.

According to a preliminary police investigation, the father had stepped out of the parked vehicle to smoke a cigarette when the car started moving. The engine was off at the time.

While passersby managed to rescue a female occupant said to be the father’s girlfriend, the children were trapped inside and drowned.

Authorities also noted that the car had previously been reported stolen in Johor in 2022.


***


I cannot comprehend such an evil act


MP SPEAKS | Time for a fair university admission system










MP SPEAKS | Time for a fair university admission system



V Ganabatirau
Published: Sep 13, 2025 10:50 AM
Updated: 12:50 PM




MP SPEAKS | Education is the most powerful tool for social mobility in Malaysia. Public universities, in particular, are the gateway for many young Malaysians to secure their future.

Yet, year after year, we see a painful injustice: top scorers, especially Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) candidates, are denied entry into public universities, while others with comparatively lower achievements from matriculation programmes secure coveted seats.

This imbalance has become the elephant in the room. We cannot pretend the system is fair when stories of straight-A students being rejected for medicine, pharmacy, law, or engineering placements flood the public space.

Parents and students feel demoralised and angry. What is the point of striving for excellence if the path ahead is blocked not by merit, but by an unfair system?

STPM is internationally recognised, rigorous, and demanding. Students spend two full years on assessments and exams that test higher-order thinking.

Many foreign universities accept STPM as an equivalent to A Levels. Yet at home, STPM candidates are sidelined compared to matriculation students, who undergo a one-year programme with different grading standards.



The quota system and weightage given to matriculation results have reduced the chances for STPM students to enter high-demand courses.

Effort and talent are not rewarded equally. If this continues, we risk discouraging excellence while perpetuating structures that divide rather than unite.

Single uni entrance exam

Public universities are funded by taxpayers of every race, religion, and background. They must therefore be open, transparent, and fair in their intake.

When a straight-A STPM student is denied medicine while another with lower grades from matriculation secures a seat, the spirit of education is betrayed.

The solution is clear: Malaysia needs a Common University Entrance Examination (CUEE) for all pre-university pathways - whether STPM, matriculation, Asasi, A Levels, diploma, or foundation.

This single exam should be the gatekeeper for entry into public universities, just as competitive exams are used in the civil service.

A common exam ensures all students are measured against the same yardstick. It removes perceptions of bias, promotes healthy competition, and restores confidence in the system. Most importantly, it places merit back at the heart of admissions.

Malaysia aspires to be a developed nation. But we cannot achieve this if our brightest minds feel alienated in their own country.

A fair education system is not just about university entry - it is about nation building, nurturing talent, and assuring every child that hard work will be rewarded.

The demand for fairness is not new, but it is urgent. Our youths deserve clarity, equality, and opportunity - not excuses and half-measures.

It is time for the government to act decisively. Introduce a common university entrance exam and make meritocracy the cornerstone of higher education. Anything less is a betrayal of our future generations.


V GANABATIRAU is the Klang MP.


***


Poor Ganabatirau, the Malay-led government (of whatever Malay party) is NOT interested in a fair system, but rather one that favours Malay students. There are 2 reasons for this notorious but nurtured nourished inequity, namely:

(i) the Malays feel they deserve it (see above).

Once a man had made it known (indirectly of course) that if M'sia has 10 doctors, 7 must be Malays - if 10 engineers, 7 must be Malays, & if 10 X, Y, Z specialised occupations, 7 must be Malays. But even he has been overtaken by a  new breed of administrators who believe 7 out of 10 specialists being Malays is just not good enough - the answer should really be 9 out of 10, or if so desired, 9.9 out of 10 must be Malays - by whatever means;

(ii) No Malay PM dares to buck this sacred 'holy cow' for his personal political survival. Thus he had/would/will promote it.


Umno slams Umany's call to end matriculation while UM distances itself










Umno slams Umany's call to end matriculation while UM distances itself


Published: Sep 12, 2025 10:20 PM
Updated: 1:21 AM


Summary

  • Umno criticises Umany’s call to abolish the matriculation system, arguing it is vital to level the playing field for underprivileged bumiputera students.

  • Umno Youth exco member Wan Zuhir Ghazali warns that relying solely on STPM would favour wealthier, urban families.

  • UM distances itself from Umany’s stance, with its vice-chancellor stressing that while freedom of speech is valued, it must be exercised responsibly.


Umno today criticised the Universiti Malaya Association of New Youth (Umany) for calling for the abolition of the government’s matriculation programme, stressing that the scheme is vital to level the playing field for underprivileged bumiputera students.

In a statement today, Umno Youth exco Wan Zuhir Ghazali also described the STPM route as one typically taken by those with financial means and better educational resources, unlike the matriculation system.

“There are those demanding the abolition of matriculation, proposing that STPM should be the sole stream because it is more challenging and recognised internationally.

“But the reality is, matriculation was created because many bumiputera students do not have the same quality access as those in urban areas.

“If everyone had to go through STPM, who would benefit the most? Those who can afford tuition, who attend top schools, and who have excellent teachers.

“And who would lose out the most? Children from villages, the interior, fishing families, and Felda settlers’ children,” Wan Zuhir (above) said.




He said that Umany should not “hide behind” the argument of meritocracy if it only serves to benefit certain groups.

“Do not build a castle upon graves. Do not dance upon the tears of rural children.

“You claim that matriculation is unfair, but strangely, you never question the UEC, which does not follow the national education policy. Why the double standard?” he asked, referring to the Unified Examination Certificate.

On Nov 11 last year, Higher Education Minister Zambry Abd Kadir urged for a comprehensive study on the UEC instead of using it as a political tool, recommending a careful and “non-seasonal” approach to the matter.

Speaking in the Dewan Rakyat, he recommended a comprehensive study on the UEC as well as the accreditation of other certificates.

Umany had today urged the government to abolish the matriculation system and use STPM results as the sole benchmark for entry into public universities.

The group’s president, Tang Yi Ze, justified his calls by saying that STPM’s syllabus is proven to be better as it is more challenging and recognised in the international arena.


Tang Yi Ze


Tang said Umany had also approached the Higher Education Ministry on the injustice that exists within the centralised public university admissions system (UPU).

‘Free speech must be used responsibly’

In a statement this evening, UM vice-chancellor Noor Azuan Abu Osman distanced the institution from the student group and called for more responsibility when exercising freedom of speech.

“I wish to emphasise that the said statement does not reflect the official position of Universiti Malaya.

“UM has always upheld freedom of speech among members of the campus community, in line with the spirit of openness and intellectualism that forms the foundation of any institution of higher learning.

“Nevertheless, this freedom must be accompanied by a sense of responsibility and due consideration of the sensitivities and implications of the statements made, particularly those involving public policy,” Noor Azuan said.




He went on to praise the national matriculation system as a comprehensive framework that has proven effective in widening access to higher education for students from diverse backgrounds.

“It is part of the government’s continuous efforts to ensure more inclusive and equitable educational opportunities for all.

“UM remains committed to supporting national education policies based on the principles of justice, accessibility, and human capital development for the progress of the nation,” Noor Azuan added.


***


I recall during my school days one of my classmates (who coincidentally sat beside me in class) came from a VERY VERY VERY poor family - his scrawny mum was by livelihood a laundress (as well as the ironing, patching & despatch of customers dresses), and alas his dad was jobless and sad to say, seemingly a perpetual inebriated bloke. The three lived in a rented rundown shack, and I really mean a truly RUNDOWN 'shack'. What private tuition when the family was merely surviving from hand to mouth, and daily in perpetual threat of being evicted. 

just less than half the size of above shack

He obtained 4 principal A's in his HSC. He was/still is a Chinese. If he had been Type M, the old coot would have personally feted him and sent him off to Yale, Harvard, Oxford or Cambridge. He wasn't thus he went to MTC and subsequently on his own, while as a teacher, completed a 'distance learning' degree course at USM.

I want Umno Youth exco Wan Zuhir Ghazali to know this.








What is the UPU system and is it fair?










What is the UPU system and is it fair?


Qistina Nadia Dzulqarnain
Published: Sep 12, 2025 10:05 AM
Updated: 2:22 PM




KINIGUIDE | Every year, tens of thousands of keen SPM, STPM, matriculation, foundation, and diploma graduates pin their hopes on the centralised public university admissions system (UPU) to secure a place in local universities.

However, the process has often left students confused and frustrated over rejections despite high scores, placement in courses they never applied for, or a lack of transparency in the selection process.

Malaysiakini unpacks how the UPU system works and why controversies continue to surface.

What is the UPU?

Established in 1972 as the Unit Pusat Universiti, UPU was rebranded multiple times before its current name (Unit Pengambilan Pelajar) and position under the Admission Management Division (BPKP) for public higher education institutes under the Higher Education Ministry’s Higher Education Department.

According to the ministry’s website, BPKP is tasked with managing and coordinating admissions into public higher education institutions - namely public universities, polytechnics, community colleges, and public skills training institutes.


Higher Education Ministry, Putrajaya


While the first three decades since its inception saw the UPU imposing ethnic quotas within public universities to provide bumiputera households with greater access to tertiary education, the government abolished such race-based admissions in 2002.

However, some programmes and entry pathways remain primarily reserved for bumiputera students only.

Some universities also offer potential students a “direct intake” pathway, which typically requires students to pay significantly higher fees compared to those admitted via the partly government-subsidised UPU route.

Who can apply under the UPU?

The UPU is open to several categories of applicants:

SPM leavers: For diploma, foundation, or matriculation pathways.


STPM, matriculation, and foundation leavers: For degree-level entry.


Diploma holders: Depending on the field, they can apply for degree-level entry (sometimes with credit transfers).

The UPU system also designates a separate route for students from four groups: Orang Asli, B40 income households, athletes, and the disabled.

Admissions from students in such categories are processed without having to compete in the primary merit system, but are subject to the fulfilment of admission requirements and availability of places.

How does the application process work?

Having received their SPM/STPM/matriculation/foundation/diploma results, students will submit a list to the UPU’s online system consisting of a minimum of six and up to 12 programme choices, ranked from most to least preferred.


Students with their SPM results


An evaluation process will then be carried out based on academic performance (90 percent) and extracurricular activities (10 percent). The calculated score - or merit - is then pitted against other applicants for the same course.

Results are usually announced mid-year, while unsuccessful applicants can submit online appeals within a stipulated period.

What determines if students get their first choice - or any placement at all?

In a Sept 9 statement, the Higher Education Department said 78,863 candidates were successfully offered places at public universities to pursue their bachelor’s degree.

The candidates were selected from among 109,866 eligible applicants who applied through the UPU system.

Students’ chances of securing their first-choice programme under the UPU system depend on a mix of factors, including competition, entry requirements, and policy considerations.

Highly sought-after courses such as medicine and law have only a limited number of seats compared to the flood of applicants each year, which means that even students with excellent results may lose out if demand far exceeds supply.


Medical students


Minimum subject requirements for varying courses also play a crucial role, as applicants who do not meet certain subject thresholds are automatically filtered out, regardless of how impressive their overall results may be.

How are merit scores calculated across different education pathways?

While the ministry insists that the merit formula is applied consistently, the exact process by which scores are calculated, ranked, and matched against course quotas remains unclear.

The UPU system does not publicly disclose the precise conversion tables for different qualifications (such as how STPM grades are weighted against matriculation or foundation CGPAs), nor does it publish the minimum merit scores required for each programme in a given year.

Some have also highlighted that course quotas, the balancing of science and arts streams, and the allocation of seats across racial or regional lines are not openly explained, further fuelling perceptions of unfairness.

DAP lawmaker Lim Guan Eng previously suggested that a single, standardised examination be set up for STPM, matriculation, and foundation students to ensure fair competition in the fight to secure higher education spots.


DAP lawmaker Lim Guan Eng


In a recent parliamentary written reply, the Education Ministry noted that while the proposal has the potential to streamline the admission system into public universities, its implementation would require careful consideration as it involves multiple ministries, differing academic structures, and varied assessment methods.

Different paths, same race

Although STPM and matriculation follow different curricula and assessment methods, their graduates ultimately compete in the same pool for places under the UPU admissions system.

STPM, a two-year programme also known as Form Six, is often described as one of the most academically demanding pre-university qualifications in the country.

STPM students sit for centralised exams that are benchmarked against international standards, with grading based on subject papers similar to those in A-Levels. With a broad syllabus for its coursework component and stringent examinations, STPM results are recognised not just locally but also by universities abroad.

In contrast, matriculation is a one- or two-year course where, instead of centralised national exams, students are assessed through a CGPA that combines coursework, assignments, and examinations.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim speaking at a matriculation college in Penang, August 2023


A bumiputera quota also applies for matriculation. However, Putrajaya last year announced that all students - regardless of race - who obtain 10As and above in SPM will be guaranteed a place in any matriculation programme.

The programme is structured as a fast-track pathway into local public universities, with fewer places abroad accepting it as an entry qualification.

Every UPU admissions cycle, complaints emerge from STPM students who claim that despite strong results, they lose out on slots for competitive programmes, with places instead seemingly disproportionately filled by matriculation graduates.

On the surface, it may appear that there are more STPM students than those from matriculation.

A common statistic cited in this discourse is that in 2023, there were 41,548 STPM graduates, while 25,239 students enrolled for matriculation. Malaysiakini was unable to find how many graduated from matriculation that year.

However, according to data from the Education Ministry - as obtained by PKR MP Sim Tze Tzin - the percentage of matriculation students who graduated with a perfect CGPA was 16 percent, while for STPM it was just 3.09 percent.

Not only that, but the data also indicated that the number of matriculation students who were accepted into high-demand courses was disproportionately higher than that of STPM graduates.




The higher percentage of top scorers from matriculation is perceived to be due to its more lenient grading system and less rigorous assessment compared to STPM, which is considered to be “harder” with more strenuous examinations.

The disparity between the number of matriculation graduates getting into top courses also inadvertently means more bumiputera students get into such courses, due to the racial quota system in matriculation.

Beyond these two groups, diploma and foundation graduates also feed into the system, vying for the same degree seats.

Foundation programmes, often run by public universities themselves, are tailored as direct pipelines into specific faculties, while diploma holders can sometimes transfer credits into related degree programmes.

The gripes that won’t go away

The UPU system has also courted backlash from high-achieving students - including those with straight As or near-perfect CGPAs - who claim they were denied places in their first-choice programmes and instead offered unrelated courses they never applied for.

Such complaints have often boiled over into public outcry. In several past admission rounds, well-performing students took to social media after being rejected from medicine or dentistry programmes, only to be offered places in courses such as forestry, agriculture, or arts, which they had not included in their applications.

The cases often go viral, intensifying pressure on the Higher Education Ministry to defend the system’s fairness.

Geography also plays a role, as students from urban schools often have better access to information and guidance to meet UPU deadlines, while those in rural areas risk being left behind.


***


Please don't expect fairness, truths, justice and merit-based selection - we have been like that since 1981


PAS Youth urged to gain non-Muslims' trust, prove party is fair










PAS Youth urged to gain non-Muslims' trust, prove party is fair


Malaysiakini Team
Published: Sep 12, 2025 11:35 AM
Updated: 8:52 PM




PAS MUKTAMAR | PAS Youth delegates to its 66th muktamar in Kedah today were urged to start gaining the trust of non-Muslims and woo their support by showing that Islam is fair to all.

Its chief Afnan Hamimi Taib Azamudden, in his policy speech, said PAS has proven that non-Muslims are treated fairly in the four states it governs.

However, the party’s political enemies have been relentless in trying to paint a bad picture of PAS to scare the community, he said.

“Islam orders us to be good and fair to the non-Muslims. Thus, PAS Youth must uphold this principle. We have proven this in the states that we govern.

“Vernacular schools are given financial allocations, non-Muslim houses of worship are taken care of, and their rights as citizens are respected. They are living safely and peacefully without any racial disruption, animosity, or hostility.

“However, the enemies of Islam continuously try to scare them. They claim that if PAS rules (the country), non-Muslims will be forced to wear a headscarf, and some things will be cut, their houses of worship will be demolished.


Launch ceremony of PAS Youth muktamar, Kedah


“But all these are only the enemies’ propaganda. In reality, the non-Muslims in Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah, and Perlis have been living peacefully,” he said.

Adding further, Afnan, who is the Alor Setar MP, said the Islamist party has also shown how they appreciate non-Muslims through opportunities given to the party’s non-Muslim supporters’ wing (DHPP).

He called upon all PAS Youth members to prove that the party serves all communities through meaningful actions, including holding cross-cultural programmes and making visits during their celebrations.

“All these will help us to get close to them. Show them that PAS is open, caring, and friendly.

“We are not only after their votes. We want to gain their trust. We want them to believe that Malaysia will have a peaceful and prosperous future under PAS,” Afnan, 44, told the delegates gathered at the Kedah PAS Complex in Kota Sarang Semut.

He said PAS Youth members should present facts about successes achieved by PAS-led states to non-Muslims.

“If these states can live peacefully and in prosperity, they should give Perikatan Nasional their trust in the next general election. This is the message that we want to send to them,” he said.


READ MORE: Ex-MCA veep offers ‘tips’ to PAS on courting non-Malays


Afnan’s speech appeared to be in contrast with previous remarks by some PAS leaders that had caused non-Muslim communities to grow distant from the party.

For example, party president Abdul Hadi Awang in 2023 had warned Muslims that Malaysia could be controlled by non-Muslims if Malays have low political awareness.

In February, the PAS Ulama Council rejected an MP’s proposal for the creation of a minister position in charge of non-Muslim affairs.


***


Don't know whether to laugh or cry. PAS itself is its worst eneny in coming to court non-Muslims' votes


‘We understand the concerns’: Eurovision says it will respect boycott decisions over Israel’s participation





‘We understand the concerns’: Eurovision says it will respect boycott decisions over Israel’s participation



The Eurovision Song Contest will respect countries’ decisions on participating in next year’s competition, its chief said yesterday, after several European broadcasters threatened a boycott if Israel takes part. — Reuters pic

Saturday, 13 Sep 2025 10:28 AM MYT


GENEVA, Sept 13 — The Eurovision Song Contest will respect countries’ decisions on participating in next year’s competition, its chief said yesterday, after several European broadcasters threatened a boycott if Israel takes part.

During the past two editions of the competition, the event has been drawn into the controversy over Israel’s devastating war in Gaza. Pro-Palestinian activists protested in Malmo, Sweden in 2024 and in Basel, Switzerland last May over Israel’s participation in the contest.

Yesterday, the Dutch joined a growing list of European countries threatening to pull out of the 2026 contest in Vienna if Israel is permitted to take part again.

Dutch broadcaster Avrotros cited the “ongoing and severe human suffering in Gaza”, in its statement announcing its decision.

Its “participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 will not be possible as long as Israel remains admitted by the EBU,” it said, referring to the European Broadcasting Union, which organises the event.


“If the EBU decides not to admit Israel, Avrotros will be happy to participate next year,” it added.

Their announcement came after seven-time champions Ireland said on Thursday they would not take part alongside Israel.


Back in May, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Israel should be excluded in future.

‘Understand the concerns’

“We understand the concerns and deeply held views around the ongoing conflict in the Middle East,” Eurovision director Martin Green said in a statement sent to AFP.

The organisation said in July it was launching a consultation with all members of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organises the song contest over the issue.

It would discuss “how we manage participation, geopolitical tensions, and how other organisations have approached similar challenges”.

Those consultations were still ongoing, Green said yesterday.

“Broadcasters have until mid-December to confirm if they wish to take part in next year’s event in Vienna,” he said.

“It is up to each member to decide if they want to take part in the contest and we would respect any decision broadcasters make.”

Eurovision is the world’s largest live televised music event. This year’s edition in Basel drew in 166 million viewers across 37 countries.

Austrian singer JJ won that competition, securing Austria the right to host the 2026 edition.

‘Political instrument’

In its statement yesterday, Dutch broadcaster Avrotros linked its decision to Israel’s nearly two-year campaign in Gaza.

That campaign has killed at least 64,656 Palestinians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza that the United Nations considers reliable.

Avrotros denounced a “serious violation of press freedom” by the Israelis, pointing to “the deliberate exclusion of independent international reporting and the many casualties among journalists”.

And it accused Israel of “proven interference... during the last edition of the Song Contest”, in which it came in second, charging that the event had been “used as a political instrument.

“This runs counter to the apolitical nature of the contest,” it added.

Irish broadcaster RTE also said it felt “that Ireland’s participation would be unconscionable given the ongoing and appalling loss of lives in Gaza”.

Israel’s war in Gaza erupted after Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attacks inside Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli figures.

Of the 251 hostages seized during the assault, 47 remain in Gaza, including 25 the Israeli military says are dead. — AFP


Matriculation stays, UM VC says after student group’s scrap call





Matriculation stays, UM VC says after student group’s scrap call



UM vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Seri Dr Noor Azuan Abu Osman said that the national matriculation programme has been key in providing access to higher education for students from diverse backgrounds. — Picture by Firdaus Latif

Saturday, 13 Sep 2025 10:06 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 13 — University Malaya (UM) has clarified that the statement by the University of Malaya Association of New Youth (UMANY) calling for the abolition of the matriculation programme does not reflect the university’s official stance.

Its vice-chancellor (VC) Prof Datuk Seri Dr Noor Azuan Abu Osman said that the national matriculation programme was a comprehensive education system that had played a key role in providing access to higher education for students from diverse backgrounds.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😡

“The matriculation system is part of the government’s ongoing efforts to ensure more inclusive and equitable educational opportunities for all.

“UM remains committed to supporting the national education policy, which is based on the principles of justice, accessibility and human capital development for the sake of national progress,” he said in a statement yesterday.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😡

Noor Azuan said that UM had always supported freedom of expression among campus residents, in line with the spirit of openness and intellectualism that forms the foundation of an institution of higher learning.

“This freedom, however, must come with responsibility and due consideration of the sensitivity and implications of statements made, especially those involving public policy,” he said.

It was reported that UMANY president Tang Yi Ze had called for the abolition of the matriculation programme, proposing that STPM serve as the sole standard for admission to degree programmes at public universities.

In a separate statement, the National Student Consultative Council (MPPK) said the matriculation programme was a vital pathway to higher education, expressing concern that its abolition would limit access for many students and undermine the long-term interests of the country’s educational development.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😡

It said the matriculation programme had proven to play a major role in providing an effective platform for producing excellent students and meeting the country’s needs for skilled workers.

“MPPK condemns any action, call or approach that may affect the well-being of students and cause public unrest. Every education issue must be discussed rationally and professionally and not based solely on emotions or specific interests.

“Education policy planning must be based on the long-term interests of the country, prioritising the human development agenda and ensuring that all Malaysians, regardless of background, benefit from an equitable and quality education system,” the council said.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😡

Therefore, MPPK called for discussions on the future of education to be conducted in a spirit of inclusivity, justice and equality. — Bernama


***


Who wants to give up the trough? 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😂


Friday, September 12, 2025

‘Show of humiliation’ as Israeli army lays siege to West Bank’s Tulkarem


al Jazeera:


‘Show of humiliation’ as Israeli army lays siege to West Bank’s Tulkarem

Palestinians face mass arrests, displacement in the occupied territory as Netanyahu pushes settlement expansion.

Israeli soldiers arrest random Palestinian men during a raid.
Israeli soldiers arrest random Palestinian men during a raid following the reported explosion of an Israeli military vehicle near a checkpoint west of Tulkarem in the occupied West Bank on September 11, 2025 [Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP]

Israeli forces have sealed off entrances to Tulkarem in the northern occupied West Bank, further escalating a campaign of raids, arrests and collective punishment that has displaced thousands of Palestinians as the military relentlessly destroys Gaza.

Footage from Thursday night shared by residents showed soldiers marching Palestinians in lines through the streets in what many described as a humiliating show of force.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Tulkarem Governor Abdullah Kamil appealed to the international community on Friday, urging the United Nations General Assembly, the Human Rights Council, and humanitarian groups to act against what he called “crimes” being committed against the city’s nearly 100,000 residents.

Kamil said Israeli forces were “arbitrarily and unjustly” carrying out mass arrests, storming homes, destroying property and “terrorising children and women”, according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa.

Transparency: The missing key in the UPU system










Transparency: The missing key in the UPU system


Srre Vaishnavi Palanisamy
Published: Sep 10, 2025 11:23 AM
Updated: 1:23 PM



LETTER | Every year, thousands of students in Malaysia rely on the UPU system for a place in public universities.

While the system aims to be fair, it treats STPM and Matriculation students as if their qualifications are equal, even though they are very different.

On paper, both pathways end with a maximum CGPA of 4.0, but the journey to achieving this score is not the same.

STPM, benchmarked against international standards such as the A-Levels, requires two years of demanding coursework and centralised exams that test analytical skills and subject mastery.

The grading is also stricter, with only a small percentage of students managing to achieve a perfect CGPA.

Matriculation, on the other hand, is assessed internally by individual colleges, with marks drawn heavily from coursework, lab work, and internally moderated exams.

With less emphasis on final examinations and a shorter one-year duration, it is generally easier for students to maintain high grades.

Yet both qualifications are treated as equivalent in admissions, despite the greater effort and longer preparation demanded of STPM candidates.

The design of the two programmes adds another layer of inequality.

Matriculation is geared towards STEM subjects and more specialised preparation. STPM offers a broader range of subjects, including arts and social sciences, with a strong focus on exam performance and critical reasoning.

When both groups are judged only by their CGPA, these differences in training are ignored. A 4.0 in STPM is often much harder to obtain, yet it is treated the same as a 4.0 in Matriculation.

Access to these pathways is not equal either. Matriculation seats are limited and often allocated selectively, raising questions about fairness and privilege.

For many students, STPM is the only realistic option, but it is still seen as a disadvantage despite being a more rigorous and internationally recognised qualification.

This perception discourages many capable students from pursuing STPM, even though it should be valued more highly.

The consequences of these differences are most visible when university placements are allocated. Many high-achieving students fail to secure places in their preferred programmes, including medicine, engineering, law, and accounting.

Years of effort can end in disappointment when they are placed in courses that do not match their interests or ambitions. This mismatch wastes talent, leaves students feeling undervalued and limits the growth of skilled professionals the nation needs.

One of the greatest frustrations is that students are told they are far down the list without understanding why. To address this, the system must be clear so students can clearly trace how their placement was decided.

The first step must be transparency. The UPU system should publish granular admission data so students understand how placements are made.

This includes cut-off points, weightage given to academic results versus co-curricular achievements, and the relative positioning of candidates.

To make this clearer, the government could introduce an admission dashboard, where students can log in to view their rank and what factors determine their placement.

If students can see where they stand among thousands of applicants, the process would feel more transparent and less arbitrary.

Transparency should not stop at individual results. The Higher Education Ministry should release annual admission reports that go beyond basic statistics.

These reports should include cut-off scores for every programme, the ratio of applicants to offers, and the distribution of places between STPM, Matriculation, diploma, and other pathways.

They should also present equity indicators, such as the balance of admissions across states and income groups, so the public can see whether opportunities are fairly distributed.

If fairness is truly the goal, the UPU system must change. Recognising the differences between STPM and Matriculation through weighted results, standardised criteria, or forward-looking measures such as manpower-aligned intake and early admissions would create a more balanced system.

Without reform, the promise of equal opportunity remains unfulfilled, and STPM students will continue to face an unfair burden.


DAP and Gerakan 'plundered' Penang Malay villages: PAS Youth rep










DAP and Gerakan 'plundered' Penang Malay villages: PAS Youth rep


Malaysiakini Team
Published: Sep 12, 2025 7:41 PM
Updated: 9:41 PM




PAS MUKTAMAR | A Penang PAS Youth delegate has claimed that DAP and Gerakan, when they led the state, greedily plundered Malay villages and evicted the Malay and Indian Muslim communities.

Speaking at the PAS Youth muktamar, Saiful Rizwan Mahmud also claimed that pig pens were built freely in Malay-majority areas, resulting in disappointment and shame among the local population.

He claimed that this issue was ignored by previous governments.

“We ask that you remember PAS started in Penang and it could also end in Penang if we are complacent and do not defend it,” he said in a speech titled “Continue the Momentum of Victory” at the Kedah PAS Complex, Alor Setar, Kedah today.

Saiful also expressed his frustration over the decision of the Perikatan Nasional leadership to hand over the Bayan Lepas state seat to Gerakan president Dominic Lau to contest in the last state election.


Gerakan president Dominic Lau


The seat, which comprises 64 percent Malays, has been traditionally contested by PAS since 2008.

‘Malays will disappear from Penang’

Saiful claimed that if more seats were to be given up, it would lead to the disappearance of Malay villages and nasi kandar, a popular Penang dish brought by Muslim traders from India.

“I bring the hope and sacred voice of the Indian Muslims and Malays in Penang.

“Penang (PAS Youth) requests that the events that occurred with the Bayan Lepas state seat do not happen again in seat distributions.

“This is because if one seat in Penang is lost, then a Malay village will disappear from the map of Penang.

“If you want to come to Penang to eat nasi kandar, you won’t even have it anymore,” he said.




In 2023, the handing over of the Bayan Lepas seat to Gerakan sparked anger among PAS grassroots in Penang.

Lau lost to Amanah candidate Azrul Mahathir Azizin in a three-cornered contest.

This was the only seat won by Amanah in the state.


***


PAS - from religion-centred to race-centred, a neo-Nazi Party