Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Tian Chua eyes Parliament comeback, open to contesting Batu again





Tian Chua eyes Parliament comeback, open to contesting Batu again


6 hours ago
Minderjeet Kaur


The PKR veteran says he still has the energy to serve as an MP and that Batu constituents want him back


Tian Chua, who was Batu MP for two terms, could not stand for re-election in 2018 when his nomination paper was rejected over a RM2,000 court fine.


PETALING JAYA: PKR veteran Tian Chua says he hopes to return as a member of Parliament and is open to contesting Batu again, citing what he described as strong support from constituents.

However, the 62-year-old said the final decision on where he contests would be up to the party leadership as part of its election strategy.

“In the short term, of course, I think I still have the energy to contribute in Parliament, and I would like to go back to Parliament,” he told FMT in an interview.


Tian Chua was the Batu MP for two terms from 2008. He was barred from defending the seat in the 2018 general election after the returning officer rejected his nomination on grounds related to a RM2,000 court fine.


He then backed independent candidate P Prabakaran, who won the seat and then later joined the party.


Tian Chua was sacked by PKR in January 2023 after contesting Batu as an independent in the 2022 general election against Prabakaran, whom the party had chosen to defend the seat.

He said he has maintained a close relationship with the constituency. “For the community in Batu, they have been expressing a strong desire that I would come back to serve them because I have been connected to them for a few decades now.”

PKR as a permanent political force

Beyond his own parliamentary ambitions, Tian Chua said his larger political goal was to ensure PKR survived and developed into a political institution that could be passed on to future generations.


“I think the main goal is that PKR wants to leave a legacy so that this political party’s name, Parti Keadilan Rakyat, is here to stay,” he said.

He said the party should continue championing inclusivity and equality while building a political base that could withstand changes in electoral fortunes.

Tian Chua pointed to long-established political parties in Western democracies, such as the Labour, Conservative and Liberal parties of the UK, which had survived for generations despite electoral victories and defeats.

“They go up and down,” he said, adding that such parties nevertheless remained permanent features of their respective political systems and continued to represent particular sections of society and political values.

He said PKR should aspire to build a similar lasting political institution. “So for me, that is the main thing that I hope to leave for the future generation,” he said.


Freedom to practise in peace





Freedom to practise in peace

Sunday, 23 Aug 2026 | 6:00 PM MYT


Article 11 belongs to Muslims too. — K.T.GOH/The Star


RELIGION, in its many forms, has played an important role throughout human history. Whatever one's personal beliefs may be, it is difficult to deny its influence upon the development of societies and civilisations.




At various times, religion provided communities with moral frameworks, social discipline and a sense of common purpose. It inspired charity, learning, institutions and social reform. Of course, religion has also been abused to justify conflict and oppression. Like many powerful forces in human affairs, its historical record is complex.



Islam is no exception.


The coming of Islam transformed the Arabian Peninsula. It brought together communities divided by tribal loyalties and contributed to the emergence of a civilisation whose achievements in scholarship, philosophy, medicine, mathematics, law, architecture and other fields became part of humanity's intellectual inheritance.

I say this not merely because I am a Muslim. The contribution of Islamic civilisation to world history is well documented. Other religious civilisations, too, have made their contributions to humanity.

But as a Muslim, I am particularly concerned about what we are doing to Islam today.

I was undoubtedly influenced by my Islamic upbringing and increasingly by my own study of the Quran. At the same time, intellectual honesty requires me to acknowledge that there are many interpretations of Islam throughout the world. Muslims themselves have disagreed for centuries on theology, jurisprudence and religious practice.

Differences of interpretation do not trouble me greatly so long as they do not produce hatred, injustice or violence.

Indeed, the Quran itself praises those "who listen to what is said and follow the best of it". That is a remarkable invitation to listen, reflect and exercise judgment.

No human being has a monopoly over God's words. Surely humility requires every Muslim, scholar and layperson alike, to remember the simple qualification Muslims have uttered for generations: Allah knows best.

What's troubling Muslims in Malaysia

What troubles me in Malaysia is something else – the politicisation of Islam.

There is an important distinction between Islamising politics and politicising Islam: the former seeks to bring Islamic values such as justice, integrity and compassion into political life; the latter uses Islam as an instrument for political advantage. My concern here is with the latter.

Religion has increasingly become a convenient political weapon. Quranic verses and religious expressions can be selectively deployed to support one's political position, condemn opponents, frighten voters or portray one group as somehow more Islamic than another.

Politics being politics, politicians will seek advantage wherever they can find it. But there must surely be boundaries when religion is involved.

When Islam is constantly dragged into partisan warfare, ordinary Muslims pay a price.

I want to practise my Islam peacefully. I want to read the Quran, reflect upon it, pray, question, learn and try to become a better human being without being constantly told by politicians, influencers or self-appointed religious gatekeepers whom I must hate, distrust or politically support in order to be a good Muslim.

Increasingly, the noise does not come only from politicians. Social media influencers and, regrettably, even some academics and religious personalities sometimes make statements that inflame suspicion between Malaysians, including among Muslims themselves.

This is where I believe we should understand the Government's concern over the so-called 3R issues – race, religion and royalty. The purpose should not be to suppress legitimate discussion about religion. Religion must remain open to scholarship, debate and thoughtful disagreement. But deliberate provocation, incitement and the exploitation of religious sentiment to generate hostility are something altogether different.

By law of the land

There is also a constitutional dimension that deserves greater attention.

Article 3(1) declares Islam to be the religion of the Federation while expressly providing that other religions may be practised in peace and harmony. Article 11(1), meanwhile, provides that every person has the right to profess and practise his religion.

We usually invoke these provisions when discussing relations between Muslims and non-Muslims. But perhaps we should consider another dimension.

Muslims, too, are entitled to practise their religion in peace.

That peace can be disturbed not only by attacks upon Islam from outside. It can also be disturbed from within – when religion is relentlessly politicised, when Muslims are divided into supposedly "good" and "bad" Muslims according to political allegiance, or when disagreement over politics is transformed into judgment about another person's faith.

Article 11 belongs to Muslims too.

I hope that our judges will consider this dimension too the next time an Article 11 issue comes before the courts: that the constitutional freedom to profess and practise one's religion must surely include, for Muslims as well, the freedom to live their faith in peace, without unnecessary political intrusion, intimidation or interference.

Protecting Islam therefore cannot mean merely punishing those who insult it. It should also mean protecting the religious space of Muslims from those who exploit Islam for political power, personal influence or commercial popularity. We see the consequences even in Parliament, where the politicisation of Islam can sometimes derail or overshadow serious debate on bread-and-butter issues affecting the people. Important questions of governance, the economy, education, healthcare and public welfare should not be displaced by unnecessary religious political theatre.

The Quran does not require Muslims to surrender their minds to the loudest religious voice in the room. It repeatedly calls upon human beings to think, reflect and consider.

Perhaps one of the greatest services we can render Malaysian Muslims today is therefore surprisingly simple: allow them to think, to disagree, to learn and to practise their faith in peace, without politicians constantly turning God into an election campaigner. Islam deserves better than that, and so do Malaysian Muslims.



Senior lawyer Dato Seri Dr Jahaberdeen Mohamed Yunoos is the founder and chairman of Yayasan Rapera, an NGO that promotes community-based learning activities and compassionate thinking among Malaysians. The views expressed here are entirely his own.


Why Hadi Wanted To Hide Tabung Haji’s Corruption & Ponzi Scheme

 

Why Hadi Wanted To Hide Tabung Haji’s Corruption & Ponzi Scheme



Save


Aug242026
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Save
Linked In

From accusing Democratic Action Party (DAP) of seeking to eliminate the Malays and Islam to defending the United Malays National Organization’s (UMNO) corruption and Ponzi scheme in the Tabung Haji’s scandal, Abdul Hadi Awang has again weaponized race and religion as political tools. The goal remains the same – to distract Malays’ corruption by blaming the Chinese.

 

By manufacturing a false narrative that the government was selectively enforcing anti-corruption, therefore unfairly targeting Islamic institutions like Tabung Haji, the despicable PAS president was shifting the fault – from a corrupted pilgrimage fund board to political rivals. The Anwar administration is accused of tarnishing the religious branding just because Tabung Haji’s mismanagement, corruption, and whatnot is being unveiled.

 

Had the Anwar government kept quiet and continued its cover-up of the Lembaga Tabung Haji Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) findings on its management and operations from 2014 to 2020, the Malay-Muslims would not lose face as its corruption culture would be hidden and the Islamic financial institution mismanagement would not be ridiculed. That was Hadi Awang’s twisted logic.

Tabung Haji Corruption and Ponzi Scheme - Hadi Awang

Because Tabung Haji is a fully government-owned Islamic financial institution in Malaysia, and the management board entirely consists of Malay-Muslims, Mr Hadi could not directly blame non-Malays, especially the Chinese. Still, by hook or by crook, he has to blame the non-Malays – indirectly – with a comical spin that Muslims are less involved in corruption compared to non-Muslims.

 

But the religious bigot knew he could not prove his twisted argument – either statistically or religiously. So, instead of providing data, he blamed the government for not providing an honest statistic, which he insisted would show corruption involving non-Muslims was higher. Still, he acknowledged that some Muslims with weak religious education do become involved in bribery.

 

His argument that Muslims are less corrupt than non-Muslims was both hilarious and insulting. The fake holy man argued that “faith and belief” in accountability makes Muslims less likely to engage in graft than non-Muslims. Coming from the same man caught with his pants down taking RM90 million bribes, Abdul Hadi Awang is the real insult to Islam and Muslims.

Najib Razak and Hadi Awang - Opposition Break-Up and RM90 Million

Political and economic studies indicate that higher corruption in many Muslim-majority countries stems from weak democratic institutions, authoritarianism, nepotism, cronyism, and governance frameworks rather than religious doctrines. In other words, faith and belief, as argued by Hadi, have very little to do with lower corruption committed by Muslims, let alone a Malay like him.

 

On August 21, 2022, right before his final court appeal, ex-Prime Minister Najib Razak – the same disgraced man who bribed Hadi with RM90 million – swore on his faith at the Masjid Jamek Kampung Baru in Kuala Lumpur. In this oath, he explicitly denied knowing that RM42 million deposited into his account came from SRC International, a former subsidiary of the 1MDB state fund.

 

In fact, Najib also recited variations of the Islamic oath on December 20, 2019, during High Court proceedings in July 2020, and on December 8, 2021. Amusingly, despite repetitively invoking Allah and swearing on the Holy Quran, the God didn’t come to his rescue. The crook was ultimately sentenced to 12 years in jail and fined RM210 million in July 2020.

Najib Razak Behind Bars - Prison Jail

Perhaps snake oil salesman Hadi, whom his gullible followers believed was the private secretary of Allah entrusted with golden tickets to the heaven with 72 virgins thrown in, could explain why Najib was sent to prison while his partner-in-crime, Jho Low, remains free? If a Muslim like Najib Razak was less corrupt than Jho Low due to the so-called “faith and belief” formula, why Allah punished only Najib?

 

Does that mean Allah had rejected the faith and belief of a Muslim like Najib Razak? Does that also mean Jho Low’s God is more powerful than Najib’s God? Based on Hadi’s logic, either Jho Low is less corrupt than Najib, contradicting with his lecture that a non-Muslim is more corrupt than a Muslim, or his argument that “faith and belief” plays a major role in corruption is nothing but bullshit.

 

Make no mistake – Tabung Haji was not singled out for scrutiny specifically because of their religious branding. In truth, calling a spade a spade, PM Anwar did try to cover up Tabung Haji’s corruption in the past four years for political reasons. But that didn’t change the fact that financial mismanagement, governance breaches, corruption, and even Ponzi schemes had been committed by some Malay-Muslims.

Tabung Haji Pilgrim Fund - Dividend 2017

The recent public release of the Tabung Haji Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report revealed unlawful profit distributions (“hibah”) despite net losses, questionable share transfers, and deep-seated fiduciary failures that drained billions. To cover up the financial trouble of Tabung Haji, extraordinary “hibah (dividends)” were declared to hide investment misconduct, mismanagement and incompetence.

 

Even if financially illiterate Hadi and his minions do not understand the basic assets and liabilities accounting, they should understand that the pilgrim’s fund had been illegally distributing “hibah” to depositors since 2014, contravening the Tabung Haji Act 1995 where the fund is not allowed to declare dividends if its liabilities are more than assets. This is a simple Islamic teaching.

 

Ahead of the 14th general election on May 9, 2018, the pilgrim’s fund even cooked its books to justify paying a 6.25% dividend, amounting to RM2.7 billion. The Pilgrims’ Fund Chairman, Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim, had conspired with the board of directors to dip their hands into depositors’ savings to pay the dividends – leading to a nearly RM13 billion bailouts using taxpayers’ money.

Crooks – Najib Razak with Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim

Trying to divert attention from Tabung Haji’s scandal by dragging the Penang tunnel project to create a perception that Malay-linked Tabung Haji is being given more public discussion than Chinese-linked Penang tunnel also does not change the fact that corruption, financial misconduct, mismanagement, and Ponzi schemes had indeed occurred in Tabung Haji, whilst nothing has been proven in the Penang tunnel project.  

 

Exposing Tabung Haji scandal is not targeting a Malay-Muslim institution with an intention to tarnish Islam’s image. Covering up and pretending that RM13 billion belonging to 10 million depositors of the pilgrim fund was still there when it had already been “songlap” or siphoned, on the other hand, is a bigger cancer that would engulf Tabung Haji if the scandal is “swept under the carpet” as preferred by Mr Hadi.

 

By exploiting and manipulating race and religion, the PAS president hopes to put not only majority ethnic Malays and minority ethnic Chinese at loggerheads, but also to rally Malay voters against non-Malay communities through hatred, xenophobia, Malay supremacy and all forms of bigotry in his evil attempt to gain power. But that was not the worst part.

Hadi Awang - Worried Over Vote Buying

The worst part is Hadi always gets his way in utilizing ethnoreligious rhetoric to frame political contests as a battle for Malay-Muslim supremacy because the Malays (at least majority of them), the Prime Ministers, the government, and the authorities – even the Monarch and DAP – have been playing a role in shaping PAS’ extremism and racism, whether they realized it or not.

 

For example, when PAS extremists spewed false narrative that the Malay-Muslims and Islam were under attack just because the Tabung Haji scandal was being exposed and discussed, the “majority of Malays” kept quiet. Their silence is seen as an endorsement or approval to Hadi’s false claims, further emboldening the PAS president to stir up racial and religious sentiments among the Malays.

 

Had the majority of the Malays courageously – and openly – condemned Hadi’s politics of bigotry, extremism, and lies from the beginning, do you really think Hadi is still interested in stoking racial and religious divisions in the country? The fake holy man still plays the same game because it sells like hot potatoes, knowing that the highly insecure Malays, despite their majority numbers and dominance, would fall in line like lemmings every time Allah, Muslims and Islam are being invoked.

Anwar Ibrahim - Alone Worry

To make matters worse, Hadi believes he is “untouchable”, so much so he actually enjoys immunity because not a single government or authority dares to charge or arrest him, let alone send him to prison for deliberately threatening national security. He could say anything he likes without repercussions because he knew the weak Anwar government has no balls to take any actions against him.

 

Yes, despite 28 police reports being lodged against Hadi Awang in 2022 alone, not a single prosecution has been brought against him. In comparison, a normal netizen of non-Malay ethnicity would have been hunted down, arrested, handcuffed, charged, and sent to prison in less than a week for expressing political, religious, or social views online that were 100 times less threatening than Hadi’s.

 

For almost four years since Anwar Ibrahim was installed as the 10th Prime Minister, his cowardice saw how both PAS and UMNO leaders were allowed to bully, attack, intimidate, and terrorize non-Malays, leading to the perception among the Malays that it was perfectly fine to do so. Heck, even Anwar had to meet and seek the Agong (King)’s consent, before the PM dares to announce a thorough investigation on Tabung Haji’s RCI findings.

Hadi Awang - Liar - Beware Of Lies Ahead Signboard

In the same breath, the Monarch was equally responsible for creating the “untouchable” Ayatollah Hadi Awang. Who was the King who awarded the “Tan Sri” title to the man who was banned from entering Saudi Arabia due to his “extreme ideology” and affiliation with terrorists’ groups? Hadi has in the past mocked, ridiculed, contradicted, and insulted Sultans, but the Monarchs could only keep quiet with tail between legs.

 

Likewise, DAP under the spineless leadership of Anthony Loke Siew Fook has been keeping quiet for the past four years – despite volleys of attacks from PAS extremists on not only Chinese, but also DAP specifically. To cling to power, like his political master PM Anwar, Ah Loke’s childish argument was not to spook the Malay Muslims. Now DAP is paying the price for being a coward.