Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Trump said Israel owes its continued existence to the United States and him personally


THANKS MF




Shaiel Ben-Ephraim

@academic_la

Israel feels that in the last few days Trump has turned against it. They are worried the change is permanent. But Israeli sources are not claiming Trump is being unfair necessarily, they are describing a trap of Netanyahu's own making: 

1) Israelis read the rebuke as deliberate humiliation. A senior official close to Netanyahu told Channel 12 that Jerusalem was "stunned" by Trump's criticism and called it "a resounding slap in the face." The Times of Israel 

2) Israelis accept they oversold the war and got caught. Former PM Ehud Barak, on Israel's public broadcaster, said "Israel is paying the price of Netanyahu's hubris and blindness, and the price of the manipulations that he tried to pull on Trump." 

3) Israelis believe Trump now sees Netanyahu as a possession. A critic quoted in Israeli media warned that Netanyahu "is turning us into a client state that takes orders about its national security." Maariv columnist Ben Caspit put it more sharply: "Israeli policy is dictated by Trump's social media posts." 

4) Israelis read the Netanyahu "won't run again" remark as Trump reaching into their politics. After Trump floated that it was an open question whether the 76-year-old wants to continue his political career, Likud was forced to publicly confirm Netanyahu would run. 

5) They see Lebanon signals as abandonment of a front they consider existential. Nadav Strauchler, a former Netanyahu adviser, conceded to the Times of Israel that the premier was counting on Trump's support in the election, and how the war ends will affect the result more than anything. This lands hard given fourteen IDF soldiers killed by Hezbollah since the April ceasefire. The Times of IsraelThe Times of Israel 

6) Israelis see Netanyahu boxed in with no answer. Yair Golan, the center-left party leader and former general, posted on X that Trump "signs an agreement that funnels billions to the Ayatollahs' regime, leaves the nuclear infrastructure intact, preserves the ballistic threat as is, and throws a lifeline to the murderous regime in Tehran." 

7) Netanyahu's camp is minimizing the rift, which is the tell. Strauchler argued the perception of a rift was overstated, yet a senior Israeli source briefed on the relationship conceded the leaked call was not helpful to Netanyahu ahead of an election he is polling to lose 

Bottom line: the Israeli interpretation is not that Trump betrayed a loyal ally. It is that Israel overpromised a war, Trump caught on, and Netanyahu now has no leverage, no alternative patron, and no way to answer a public humiliation except to deny it is happening.


***


Times of Israel:



Trump: Israel’s war on Hezbollah is too long, too deadly; Syria should fight the group instead


‘Without me, there’d be no Israel,’ president claims at G7 summit; threatens ‘ultimate consequences’ if Iran seeks nukes; MOU to be signed Friday in Swiss mountaintop resort

16 June 2026, 7:31 pm



US President Donald Trump meets with Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, not seen, during a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit, June 16, 2026, in Evian-les-Bains, France. (AP/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)


US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Syria should replace Israel in the fight against Lebanon’s Hezbollah, arguing that the Jewish state’s war on the Iran-backed terror group has been too prolonged and indiscriminate, and adding that Israel would have been “blown off the face of the earth” if not for him.

He also threatened unspecified “ultimate consequences” if Iran acquires a nuclear weapon in defiance of the US-Iran agreement to end the war, which was signed digitally on Sunday.

Speaking at the G7 summit of global leaders in France, Trump criticized Israel’s conduct in its fight against Hezbollah. He said that the conflict has gone on for too long, suggesting that Israel has been killing too many noncombatants.


“Israel is fighting Hezbollah too long and too many people are being killed,” Trump said. “And you don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody. Because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses. And they’re not all Hezbollah, that I can tell you.”

Trump said later: “I’m not happy with the way Israel has handled themselves with Lebanon and with Hezbollah. They should have been able to do the job faster. It just goes on forever. And when that happens, it throws a negative light on the big deal, and that’s the deal with Iran.”


He reiterated that he was upset about Israel’s strike on Hezbollah in Beirut on Sunday, shortly before the interim peace deal between Iran and the US was announced.

“I didn’t like where, two hours before we’re signing the agreement, that there was an attack in Lebanon, in Beirut,” he said.

Israel launched the strike after Hezbollah fired several rockets into Israel.


He referred to Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former Islamist rebel leader and now the president of Syria, saying that he would more effectively lead the fight against Hezbollah.

“I suggested to Israel to let Syria take care of Hezbollah,” Trump said. “Because to be honest with you, I think they’d do a better job of doing it.”

He said of Sharaa: “He’s very capable. And he’s been very good for me. He’s protected everything that I’ve asked for… And if Israel can’t do the job without killing everyone else, he’ll do the job. Syria will do the job.”

Hezbollah had assisted former Syrian dictator Bashar Assad in keeping control during the more-than decade-long Syrian civil war. Sharaa was only eventually able to rout Assad’s forces after Israel severely weakened Hezbollah and killed much of its leadership in late 2024.


US President Donald Trump (L) shakes hands with Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the White House in Washington, DC, on November 10, 2025. (Handout of the official Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) / AFP)



Israeli troops are currently stationed deep within southern Lebanon, and the Israeli military has struck targets throughout the country, ever since the Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group attacked Israel on March 2 in support of Tehran.

Later Tuesday, Hezbollah’s media relations office told Reuters that the Shiite organization had received assurances from its backer Iran that it would demand a withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon in its next phase of talks with the United States.


An IDF withdrawal will be the result of, and not a precondition for, continuing talks between Tehran and Washington, following the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the two countries on Friday, Hezbollah said.

The group said there would be “no nuclear deal between Iran and the United States unless the Israelis withdraw” from Lebanon.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has publicly warned that any Israeli attack on Lebanon or continued presence in Lebanese territory would constitute a violation of the agreement with the United States.


Location announced for formal signing ceremony


On Sunday, US President Donald Trump announced that Washington and Tehran had signed a memorandum of understanding to extend their ongoing ceasefire by 60 days and to open the Strait of Hormuz, while holding negotiations on a long-term resolution to the conflict over Iran’s nuclear program.

The MOU, already signed digitally, is set to be signed formally in Switzerland on Friday. That same day, Iran and the US will start a new round of negotiations to reach a final agreement.

According to Axios, Trump aides Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner will attend the meetings, alongside US Vice President JD Vance, as will Araghchi and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf.


A military helicopter hovers as leaders arrive to take part in the ‘Summit on Peace’ in Ukraine at the luxury Burgenstock resort, near Lucerne in central Switzerland, on June 15, 2024. (Ludovic MARIN / AFP / File)


The signing ceremony is expected to be held at the Burgenstock mountaintop resort in central Switzerland, according to a statement issued by the Swiss government on Tuesday. The site, located near Lucerne in central Switzerland, is difficult to access and therefore easily secured.

The Swiss foreign ministry said in a statement that it had been in close contact with the US, Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar, regarding the possible signing of a memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran.


“At this stage, the signing is scheduled for Friday, June 19, at Burgenstock in the canton of Nidwalden. The location was proposed by the Pakistani and Qatari mediators, as well as by the US and Iran,” the ministry said.

Vance said Monday that he believes Israel will become a party to the emerging US-Iran deal at some point in the future, adding that the MOU is “about a page and a half, so it is a very general document,” and that many details have been left for the next phase of negotiations.

An administration official, briefing reporters on Monday, said that the text would likely be released in the next 24 to 48 hours, though Trump himself said Monday that it would only be released after the Friday ceremony.


‘Israel would not exist right now’


Also in his comments at the G7, Trump said Israel owes its continued existence to the United States and him personally.

“If it weren’t for the United States of America — with me, because Obama was the opposite — Israel would not exist right now. Israel would have been blown off the face of the earth, 100 percent. And every smart person in Israel knows that,” the US president said.

“Without us, without the United States, there would be no Israel. Without me, there’d be no Israel,” he stressed, “because no other president was willing to do what I did [in tackling Iran].” He said Iran was “two weeks away from having a nuclear weapon” and would have used it against Israel if the US had not intervened.

Trump also praised his relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, following a series of negative comments he made about the premier in recent days, including saying that the premier was “crazy” and had “no fucking judgement.”


US President Donald Trump meets with Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani during a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit, June 16, 2026, in Evian-les-Bains, France. (AP/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)


Asked whether he is frustrated with Netanyahu after the two clashed over Israel’s bombing of Hezbollah targets in Beirut on Sunday, Trump said: “We have a very good relationship… an unbelievable relationship.”

Trump also warned that “all hell will rain down” on Iran if it attempts to develop, purchase, or otherwise acquire a nuclear weapon.


“They’re not going to acquire a nuclear weapon. If they do, all hell will rain down on them,” Trump said.

He added that the preliminary deal “says it loud and clear. They’re not going to develop it. They’re not going to buy it. They’re not going to do anything with it. And if they do, they suffer unbelievable consequences.”

He said that he only agreed to sign the document after Tehran agreed to adjust the wording so that it prevented them not only from developing a nuclear weapon, but also from purchasing one or acquiring it through some other means.

Trump did not specify what the consequences for doing so would be, however, saying: “I won’t even tell you the consequences. But the consequences are the ultimate consequences. And with that being said, I hope we have a very good relationship.”

“I think it’s going to go pretty quickly,” Trump told reporters about the next phase of negotiations with Iran, stipulated with a 60-day deadline.

“Iran wants to get it done. They have to get back to business, and the relationship is now normalized, so I think it’s going to go pretty quickly,” Trump told reporters during his meeting with Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the United Arab Emirates. “Could go faster, could take longer too, but it could go fast.”

However, European allies have voiced concern that an inexperienced US negotiating team could struggle to secure a robust agreement, potentially leading to a prolonged standoff.

Diplomats and analysts note that Iranian negotiators are highly skilled in nuclear diplomacy, often exploiting weaknesses in their counterparts and buying time to advance their agenda, making the prospect of a comprehensive agreement within 60 days challenging.

In 2015, former US president Barack Obama secured a nuclear deal with Iran in exchange for sanctions relief, a process that took two years to finalize. Trump withdrew the United States from that accord during his first term.

“This deal is a wall to a nuclear weapon. [Obama’s] deal was a road to a nuclear weapon. My deal, they can’t have a nuclear, they get blown up,” Trump said.

Netanyahu made a similar argument in a press conference on Monday evening, saying that while Obama’s deal was not accompanied by a credible military threat if Iran does not comply, the recent war provides such a threat in the case of the current deal.


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a press conference at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, June 15, 2026. (Olivier Fitoussi/POOL)


Iran has long insisted that it does not seek a nuclear weapon, and made such a commitment in the 2015 deal that Trump vilified and withdrew from in 2018.

Both of Trump’s administrations, along with Israel, have refused thus far to take Tehran at its word, something the US president seemed to indicate he was now prepared to do.

Iran, whose leaders frequently call for the destruction of Israel, has always maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but it has enriched uranium to levels far beyond what is necessary for civilian use and has obstructed inspectors from examining its facilities.
Trump claims he does not ‘believe in regime change’

Continuing his remarks, Trump claimed he had “never cared about regime change” as a goal in the US-Israeli campaign against Tehran, while reiterating his belief that the elimination of so many senior Iranian officials effectively amounts to regime change, even though the Islamic Republic’s theocratic system has remained intact and stable.

“You talk about regime change. I never cared about regime change. It [was] never a part. But I guess you have regime change because you know better than anybody, the first group, they’re all dead. The second group, they’re dead. A part of the third group is gone,” he said, referring to echelons of the Iranian leadership.

“And we’re dealing with people that I think are very rational people. They were nice to deal with. They were strong people, smart people. I think actually they’re smarter than the first and second group, but they’re not radicalized and they’re, you know, looking to help their country,” he continued.

“I don’t believe in regime change,” he added. “And I’ve watched regime changes for years. They never work. It has to just happen [naturally].”

On the first day of the war in late February, Trump indicated that the goal of the strikes in Iran was to topple the regime, and called on the Iranian people to seize the opportunity to take over their government, telling them that “the hour of your freedom is at hand.”

“When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations,” he said at the time.



WEST THEN EXPLOITING INDIA AS A PARTNER, NOW ABANDONING HER


From the FB page of:

India is being cut out of the title of the US force dominating Asia, it was revealed just now.
US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth tweeted on X an hour ago that “US Indo-Pacific Command” will revert to its old name, “US Pacific Command”.
This is the latest of multiple moves from the western allies against India.
- The US attacked three Indian ships last week, killing three sailors. The US left the ships to sink, and the surviving sailors were rescued by Oman.
- Earlier this week, the UK armed forces grabbed an Indian-run ship, the Smyrtos, as it passed through the Straits of Dover on its way to India.
Both acts appear to contravene international law, specialists say.
EXPLOITING INDIA AS A PARTNER
The “Indo-Pacific” name was introduced in May 2018 by the US armed forces to emphasize the US's favoring of India and the Indian Ocean area.
In mid-2025, the US military instructed the international mainstream media to use “Indo-Pacific” in place of “Asia-Pacific”. The media obeyed, as Google searches confirm, with a huge spike in the use of that name.
At the time, the US believed it could exploit India as a partner to maintain western domination over Asia--as specified in US foreign policy.
But the US and its vassal ("ally") the UK appear to have changed attitude to India these days, and so the “Indo” is disappearing from the name with immediate effect. US Indo-Pacific Command is now US Pacific Command.
Hegseth’s announcement of the name reversion today echoes his earlier move – to change Department of Defense to the (admittedly more accurate) Department of War.
ILLEGAL UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
The UK seizure is an astonishing story.
On Sunday this week, the UK armed forces grabbed the Smyrtos, as it passed through the English channel on its way to Sikka in India.
The Smyrtos is owned by a Hong Kong-registered company, Zhao Yao Shipping Ltd, and is managed by a company in Tamil Nadu, India.
The UK claimed it was a stateless ship carrying Russian oil – but the seizure would still be illegal under international law, said Craig Murray, former Head of Maritime Section of the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Just because the US or an ally creates a sanction, that has no force of law in a transnational context.
DIRTY TRICK
Murray shared an untold story. When the Smyrtos began its journey, it was flying the Cameroonian flag and was listed on the Cameroonian register.
But after it had set sail, the EU and UK threatened to halt development aid to Cameroon unless they removed Russia-friendly vessels from their shipping register.
“So the UK blackmailed Cameroon into deregistering the ship. Then, before the ship could reach a friendly port, the UK boarded it because it had been deregistered,” said Murray.
It may surprise some people that western nations should do such a dirty trick. “The UK actions are patently – and deliberately – unreasonable,” Murray added.
But the UK public is not hearing the real facts – it is “an astonishing story which the media will not tell you”, he said.
MODI IN A SPOT
These actions put Indian leader Narenda Modi in a spot. He has been energetically cozying up to the United States and Israel, despite their unpopularity among the people of India.
Now his people are asking: when will he give India a more independent, assertive stance?




Israeli strikes hit south Lebanon despite Middle East peace deal






Israeli strikes hit south Lebanon despite Middle East peace deal



People gather at the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted a building in Beirut’s southern suburbs in this file picture dated June 14, 2026. Israeli forces on Wednesday carried out airstrikes on several areas in south Lebanon, state media reported, despite a peace deal in the Middle East war that includes Lebanon. — AFP pic

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2026 2:16 PM MYT


BEIRUT, June 17 — Israeli forces on Wednesday carried out airstrikes on several areas in south Lebanon, state media reported, despite a peace deal in the Middle East war that includes Lebanon.

Lebanon’s National News Agency said Israeli warplanes launched raids targeting the Nabatieh al-Fawqa area and the eastern outskirts of neighbouring town Kfar Tebnit.

The Israelis also launched a drone strike on the town of Ansariyeh in the Zahrani area, NNA reported.

While violence has declined in Lebanon since a US-Iran agreement to end the Middle East war was announced on Monday, Israeli strikes on the south have still killed at least five people since the deal, according to NNA.

The reduction in violence has allowed some south Lebanon residents to return and inspect their towns and villages, but the Lebanese army has urged locals to delay their return, citing “the risk of Israeli violations and attacks”.


The Iran-backed group Hezbollah drew Lebanon into the Middle East war in early March by firing rockets at Israel to avenge the killing of Iran’s supreme leader in US-Israeli strikes.

Israel responded with a massive campaign of airstrikes and a ground invasion.


Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that an end to the conflict would be incomplete “without the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territories it occupied in this war”.

“Any military attack by the Zionist regime on Lebanon from now on and the continued occupation of Lebanese territories from now on will be considered a violation of the memorandum of understanding in our view,” he said.

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday that his country’s forces would remain in Lebanon “for as long as necessary”.

Hezbollah has so far not issued any statements since Tuesday claiming attacks on Israeli targets in south Lebanon.

The group’s leader Naim Qassem is due to make a televised address on Wednesday.

He expressed “profound gratitude” on Tuesday for Iran’s efforts “to compel the Israeli entity to an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts including in Lebanon”.

Lebanon’s health ministry on Tuesday raised the death toll in Israeli attacks since the war broke out to 3,826, as rescuers pull more bodies from the rubble. — AFP


HOW TO STOP A PARASITICAL LEECH, BRING PEACE AND LOWER OIL PRICE

 



Russian warship fires ‘warning shots’ at UK yacht in Channel standoff

 




Russian warship fires ‘warning shots’ at UK yacht in Channel standoff



RFA Tideforce, as seen in the background, monitors the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich in an unknown location in this handout image dated June 4, 2026. — UK MOD © Crown copyright 2026/Royal Navy handout pic via Reuters

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2026 9:51 AM MYT


LONDON, June 17 — Russia said one of its warships fired warning shots Tuesday at a yacht making a “dangerous approach” in the Channel, as the UK evaluated that the shots were “not aimed at the vessel”.

The incident involved the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich and a UK-registered yacht around 20 nautical miles south of the Isle of Wight just outside British waters, a UK defence source told AFP.

The latest at-sea tension between London and Moscow came after UK commandos on Sunday intercepted and boarded a suspected Russian shadow fleet vessel in the same part of the Channel.

The shooting incident coincided with G7 leaders gathering in eastern France and agreeing Tuesday to intensify pressure on Russia to end more than four years of war against Ukraine.

“Following attempts to contact a British vessel in the channel, the Grigorovich fired warning shots. These were not aimed at the vessel and were an attempt to prevent a possible collision,” the UK defence ministry said in an update on the incident.


The ministry insisted that it was an “isolated” incident not linked the UK’s interception of a Russian vessel over the weekend.

According to the UK defence source, the Russian frigate appeared to have been “drifting rather than being manoeuvred under power, which may have made her feel more vulnerable”.


The Russian defence ministry said “signal flares were fired and audible signals were sounded” to get the attention of the yacht on Tuesday.

“Despite these measures, the vessel continued its dangerous approach,” Moscow said in a statement.

Following this, “the frigate’s commander decided to fire warning shots in the vessel’s direction using the ship’s small arms,” it added.


Russia ‘baring teeth’

Steve Prest, an associate fellow at the RUSI think tank and retired British navy commodore said the warning shots could have been the warship “getting a bit nervous”.

“However, in the context of what’s been going on with the (Russian) Dark Fleet, the Royal Marines seizing that ship, I think this is the Russians baring their teeth,” said Prest in written comments shared with AFP.

Labour MP Tan Dhesi, head of the parliamentary defence committee, warned that delays in defence investment, and the resignation on Thursday of UK defence minister John Healey over a defence spending row, “have slowed us down at a time when we need to invest in defence”.

The UK-registered yacht alleged that the Russian vessel had fired the warning shots at a distance of approximately 500 yards (450 metres, 1,500 feet).

No injuries nor damage was reported by the yacht, which was continuing its journey after a welfare visit by a seaboat dispatched from British naval vessel HMS Tyne.

It is understood another British naval vessel, HMS Mersey, was monitoring the Russian ship at the time.

The UK’s Royal Navy said it had deployed multiple patrol ships in April to monitor the Grigorovich, which reportedly escorted tankers part of Russia’s “shadow fleet” of sanctions-busting ships through the Channel.

It added that the frigate had escorted Russian-flagged ships “heading to and from the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Baltic”.


Shadow vessel captain

Sunday’s interdiction saw British commandos board the sanctioned oil tanker Smyrtos — suspected of being part of Russia’s shadow fleet — in a dramatic operation hailed by Kyiv and London as a blow to Moscow’s war machine.

The operation took place off the southern English coast, with the commandos fast-roping from a helicopter in the dark, according to defence ministry footage released.

British prosecutors on Monday charged Ajay Pant, the Indian captain of the Smyrtos, with contravening UK sanctions imposed on Russia following its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The 38-year-old appeared Tuesday at Southampton Magistrates’ Court by videolink from Bournemouth police station for a preliminary hearing.

He spoke only to confirm his name and date of birth, and to gave his address as being in India. He also gave no indication of his plea and his solicitor requested the case be sent to the crown court.

Pant was remanded in custody, ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing at Bournemouth Crown Court on July 16. — AFP

Muhyiddin says Bersatu ready for ‘all out’ war with PAS after split






Muhyiddin says Bersatu ready for ‘all out’ war with PAS after split



Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia President Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin speaks during a press conference after chairing the Bersatu Supreme Leadership Council meeting at the Bersatu headquarters in Kuala Lumpur on June 16, 2026. — Bernama pic

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2026 9:03 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, June 17 — Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has declared that the party is prepared to “go all out” against PAS following the latter’s recent decision to sever ties with them.

Muhyiddin made the remarks to reporters after chairing the party’s Supreme Council meeting at its headquarters here last night, Free Malaysia Today reported.

“If they have made their decision, we are ready to fight on all fronts,” Muhyiddin said when asked if he accepted the split between the two parties.

The fallout follows a statement from PAS President Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang last week, who asserted that his party was obligated to cut ties with Bersatu, claiming the latter had become power-hungry and failed to prioritise Malay-Muslim unity.

Despite the rift, Muhyiddin insisted that Bersatu would still contest under the Perikatan Nasional (PN) banner in the impending Johor and Negeri Sembilan state polls.

“We will stand firm on this position as we helped found PN,” he said, reiterating his earlier claim that the party would remain in the coalition due to its “strong brand.”

However, Muhyiddin expressed frustration over the current state of the coalition, claiming that PN chairman Datuk Seri Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar had yet to call a meeting to discuss preparations for the state elections.

He noted that, previously, PN would always meet to coordinate strategies for any by-election.

“Such meetings are critical. But now, it is a free-for-all,” he said, alluding to the lack of coordinated seat negotiations.

The Johor state election is fixed for July 11, while the poll for Negeri Sembilan will be held on August 1.

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Dark Times was from 1981 to 2003


I have decided NOT to publish the piece of news "warning Malaysians of dark times"


😌😌😌😇



Selamat Awal Muharram Mateys 👍😁💖

 




Six firms probed over alleged RM5.7m AADK tender cartel, says MyCC






Six firms probed over alleged RM5.7m AADK tender cartel, says MyCC



MyCC chairman Tan Sri Idrus Harun said investigations conducted by the commission found indications that the companies had engaged in information sharing and collusion during the preparation and submission of their tender bids. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2026 2:44 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — The Malaysian Competition Commission (MyCC) has issued a Proposed Decision against six companies over suspected involvement in a bid-rigging cartel linked to a RM5.7 million food supply tender under the National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK).

MyCC chairman Tan Sri Idrus Harun said investigations conducted by the commission found indications that the companies had engaged in information sharing and collusion during the preparation and submission of their tender bids.

According to him, the alleged conduct involved agreements that had the effect of significantly preventing, restricting or distorting competition in relation to public procurement for the supply of raw, fresh and dried food products.

“These companies were found to have successively breached Section 4(1), read together with Sections 4(2)(d) and 4(3) of the Competition Act 2010 [Act 712]. The tenders involved carried a procurement value of RM5.7 million,” he said in a statement today.


However, Idrus stressed that the Proposed Decision represents only a preliminary finding and should not be interpreted as conclusive proof that the companies had violated Act 712.

He said all six companies have been informed of the proposed financial penalties that may be imposed should the findings be upheld.

The companies have been given 30 days from the date of receiving the Proposed Decision to submit written representations and will also be allowed to present oral representations before the commission at a later date.


“MyCC will only issue a Final Decision after taking into account the representations submitted by the companies together with all evidence gathered throughout the investigation process,” he said. — Bernama

PKR says it will contest Puteri Wangsa in Johor election, seat previously ceded to Muda





PKR says it will contest Puteri Wangsa in Johor election, seat previously ceded to Muda



Johor PKR vice-chairman Jimmy Puah reportedly said PKR will contest Puteri Wangsa in the coming Johor election. — File picture by Yusof Mat Isa

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2026 2:59 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — PKR is reportedly set to contest Puteri Wangsa in the coming Johor election, taking over a state seat that was given to Muda under its previous electoral arrangement with Pakatan Harapan (PH) in 2022.

Free Malaysia Today reported that Johor PKR vice-chairman Jimmy Puah said the arrangement had been agreed among PH parties, including Amanah, which had also been eyeing the constituency.

“I can confirm that PKR will contest Puteri Wangsa. Our candidate will, of course, be someone who can win,” the Tebrau MP was quoted as saying.

His remarks come after Johor Amanah chief Aminolhuda Hassan reportedly said discussions over Puteri Wangsa and Larkin had not yet produced a final outcome.

FMT reported that Amanah is likely to be fielded in Larkin, a seat contested by PKR in the previous Johor state election.

Muda’s Amira Aisya Abd Aziz won Puteri Wangsa in 2022 by 7,114 votes, while Barisan Nasional’s Hairi Mad Shah defended Larkin with a 6,178-vote majority.


Prawn dispute a rising threat to Thai-Malaysia relations


Murray Hunter
Jun 16, 2026



Prawn dispute a rising threat to Thai-Malaysia relations


What began as reciprocal concerns over food safety has morphed into a retaliatory ban with outsized economic and political consequences, exposing deeper vulnerabilities in bilateral ties






My latest from The Vibes


A SEEMINGLY niche trade spat over shrimp is rapidly escalating into a diplomatic irritant that could undermine the historically cordial and economically intertwined relationship between Thailand and Malaysia.

What began as reciprocal concerns over food safety has morphed into a retaliatory ban with outsized economic and political consequences, exposing deeper vulnerabilities in bilateral ties.

Since June 1, 2026, Malaysia has suspended imports of five key Thai shrimp species — brown tiger prawn, banana prawn, whiteleg shrimp, giant tiger prawn, and blue shrimp, while tightening scrutiny on Thai sea bass.

Malaysian authorities frame the move as a necessary food safety measure in response to Thailand’s earlier restrictions on Malaysian seabass following detections of chemical residues.

Thailand, however, sees it as disproportionate retaliation.

The economic stakes are significant. Official Thai estimates put affected monthly exports at 300-400 tonnes, but opposition figures and industry players, including People’s Party deputy leader Veerayooth Kanchoochat, warn the real volume approaches 3,000 tonnes.

Redirecting this surplus into Thailand’s domestic market risks a price collapse, hammering already struggling shrimp farmers in the south.

Thailand’s once-dominant shrimp industry has shrunk dramatically from 640,000 tonnes annually at its peak to around 270,000 tonnes today.

The industry is plagued by persistent disease outbreaks and lagging innovation compared to agile competitors like Ecuador.

Beyond immediate losses estimated in tens of millions of US dollars, the dispute threatens broader ripple effects.

The Southern Thai provinces, heavily reliant on cross-border seafood trade, face livelihood threats that could fuel local discontent.

Thailand has signalled readiness to escalate the matter to the WTO and ASEAN if bilateral talks falter, moves that risk airing grievances in multilateral forums and drawing unwanted regional attention.



Image from www.shutterstock.com


This friction arrives at a sensitive time. Thailand and Malaysia share deep people-to-people ties, extensive border commerce, joint ASEAN initiatives, and cooperation on security and tourism.

Yet recurring trade irritants compounded by occasional nationalist rhetoric on both sides are eroding trust.

The shrimp ban highlights a number of structural issues.

Differing regulatory standards, competitive pressures in global seafood markets, and a tendency toward tit-for-tat responses rather than collaborative problem-solving.

If unresolved swiftly through quiet diplomacy, the dispute could chill investment flows, complicate border management, and foster public suspicion.

Citizens on both sides may perceive the other as protectionist or unreliable, weakening the goodwill essential for deeper integration in areas like the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle.

Both nations have much to lose from prolonged acrimony.

Malaysia gains reliable Thai supply chains; Thailand accesses a valuable neighbouring market.

As two of ASEAN’s more developed economies, they should model mature dispute resolution.

The prawn spat is a deep warning. Small triggers can ignite larger fires when underlying economic anxieties and political sensitivities are involved.

Swift, transparent negotiations focused on mutual food safety standards and market access would not only save the shrimp trade but also safeguard the broader Thai-Malaysian partnership.

Failure to do so risks turning a manageable disagreement into a lasting dent in neighbourly relations. – June 15, 2026

Malaysia’s Middleclass Losers


Murray Hunter
Jun 16, 2026



Malaysia’s Middleclass Losers


The middleclass is under stress



Man in Malaysia. Photo by Firdaus Roslan on Unsplash



Malaysia’s middleclass is being financially squeezed. The middle class is categorized as the M40 group (middle 40% of income earners, roughly RM4,850–RM10,960 per month). This group is facing financial pressure in 2025 due to a combination of economic reforms. While Malaysians are being told they are better off financially, their feelings are contrary. Rising costs, policies and structural challenges are diminishing middleclass spending ability and turning them into financial slaves of society, locked into this by their work and lifestyles they have grown accustomed to after so many decades of growing national prosperity.

Targeted Subsidy Reforms have put many within the middleclass out of range of subsidies their livelihoods were based upon. The government has shifted from blanket subsidies to targeted ones, particularly for fuel (e.g., RON95 petrol subsidies phased out for the T15 group, earning above RM13,000/month) and electricity. Middle-class households, especially those in urban areas like Kuala Lumpur, often fall just outside subsidy eligibility, facing higher costs for essentials. For instance, the removal of petrol subsidies could add RM1,000–RM2,000 monthly to household expenses for some families.

New Tax Measures are eroding middleclass incomes. The 2025 budget introduced taxes impacting the middle class, including a 2% tax on dividends exceeding RM100,000 and an expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) covering services like insurance, financial planning, and private education. These taxes, initially aimed at the wealthy, have hit urban middle-class families who rely on these services, increasing their financial burden.

The rising Cost of Living is eroding a family’s ability to spend. Urban middle-class households face higher living costs, with incomes barely covering essentials in cities like Kuala Lumpur or Johor Bahru. For example, an M40 household earning RM7,000/month may struggle in urban areas due to high housing, education, and healthcare costs.

Many M40 households face “lifestyle inflation,” juggling rising costs and family obligations, such as supporting B40 relatives. A single financial shock, like a medical bill or job loss, can push these households toward financial instability, as they often lack a sufficient savings buffer. This is especially the case after the Covid era, where many families and proprietors of MSMEs are still facing debt repayments. M40 households are facing rising costs inhibiting their ability to save for when they need money to cover unexpected expenses. The relative ease that M40 households can obtain credit cards has played a role in pushing them into a debt lifestyle. The bottom line is households are not saving, they are paying off debt instead.

One of the major challenges to the Malaysian economy today are stagnant wages. Despite Malaysia’s economic growth (projected at 4–4.8% in 2025), wage growth lags behind inflation and productivity gains. The benefits of economic growth are not being passed onto M40 households. The middle class, particularly young graduates, struggles to find high-skilled jobs, with 42% of late primary-school children showing poor learning outcomes, limiting future workforce competitiveness. This compounds financial strain as aspirations for upward mobility and thus higher wages are unmet.

Malaysia has not been immune to pressure on the Ringgit. The ringgit’s volatility, despite a 0.8% appreciation against the US dollar in Q1 2025, increases costs for imported goods, which hit urban middle-class households harder due to their consumption patterns. Global trade tensions and higher shipping costs (e.g., due to Red Sea disruptions) further drive-up prices, squeezing budgets. The rise of the cost of goods in many categories is greater than the official inflation rate.

Malaysia has fallen victim to the “Middle Income Trap”, where middleclass families are unable to transition into the upper-middle class. This is partly a result of stagnant productivity and the failure of corporations to more equally share their profits to their respective labour forces.

While the government has been focusing on programs for the poor, the middle class feels pinched by policies that disproportionately affect their disposable income and limited safety nets. The government’s income classification system is not picking up this problem (or politicians are ignoring it). Malaysia’s statistical system needs an overhaul to better reflect regional cost-of-living differences and multidimensional poverty. The B40-M40-T20 classification system fails to account for these disparities, leaving urban M40 households feeling squeezed.

As a result, many families have been forced to curtail spending decisions. This means deferring holidays, going out less for dinner, wearing old clothes for longer, not buying consumables, and even cutting down on the food they buy outside the house. Come the end of 2025 and into 2026, aggregate household spending will no longer be a major driver of the economy.

With pensions not rising according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), tolls rising, more taxes coming, and living costs rising, the middleclass is being squeezed. This is happening at the same time the T20 is getting a ‘free ride’ from the government. Taxes on the T20 have not risen proportionally to the middleclass.

Politically, the middleclass is a powerful voting cohort for Pakatan Harapan. Pakatan relies on the middleclass vote in urban areas, where it holds many of its seats. Failure to address the above problem will logically cost Pakatan dearly in the seats it holds.

The government still has three annual budgets to address this mostly unidentified issue. Overlooking the middleclass will be an electoral disaster. Budget 2026 needs to be a budget for the middleclass to get them back onboard and maintain a robust economy in 2026.


Ikram member hit with 158 corruption charges over RM98.27m in organisation funds










Ikram member hit with 158 corruption charges over RM98.27m in organisation funds


Farah Solhi
Published: Jun 16, 2026 2:36 PM
Updated: 5:30 PM




A member of Ikram Malaysia was charged at the Shah Alam Sessions Court today with 158 counts of abusing his position for gratification involving RM98.27 million of the organisation’s funds.

Fakhrudin Abd Karim, 56, faces 149 charges of abuse of power as an officer of a public body and authorised signatory to Hulu Selangor Ikram’s bank account.

He is accused of directing RM81.95 million to be transferred to a company, Ehsan Solution Care, which is allegedly linked to him.

He also faces nine additional charges of committing the same offence by directing RM16.32 million to be transferred into two of his personal bank accounts.

Ikram, an Islamic NGO established in 2009, is involved in education, welfare, humanitarian aid, and community development programmes across the country.

The offences allegedly took place through 158 transactions at Hulu Selangor Ikram’s office at Adenium Business Centre in Bukit Beruntung, Rawang, between Jan 6, 2021 and Aug 6, 2025.





The transactions involved amounts ranging from RM100,000 to RM10 million.

All charges were framed under Section 23(1) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and a fine of not less than five times the amount of gratification or RM10,000, whichever is higher.

Clad in a brown jacket, Fakhrudin stood steadily as the charges were read alternately by two court interpreters before judge Nasir Nordin. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.


Bail fixed at RM500k with conditions

MACC senior deputy director of the legal and prosecution division Ahmad Akram Gharib informed the court that the offences were non-bailable, but said the prosecution would not object should the court exercise its discretion to grant bail.

He proposed bail of RM1 million with two sureties, along with additional conditions that Fakhrudin surrender his passport and refrain from interfering with prosecution witnesses.


MACC


Defence counsel N Sivananthan appealed for bail to be reduced to RM300,000, saying his client had no objection to the other conditions.

Sivananthan also told the court that MACC had frozen Fakhrudin’s bank accounts, as well as those belonging to his family members, since April. He added that the accused is a father of 10.

The court granted bail at RM500,000 with two sureties, ordered Fakhrudin to surrender his passport, and barred him from interfering with witnesses.

The court fixed Aug 7 for case management.

Lawyer Ashwida Abd Samad, who held a watching brief for Ikram, told reporters that Fakhrudin has been suspended and barred from participating in the organisation’s decision-making processes.

Yesterday, Free Malaysia Today quoted MACC chief commissioner Abdul Halim Aman as saying an individual would face 158 charges at the Shah Alam Sessions Court, with additional money laundering charges to be brought at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court next week.

He said MACC’s Op Sutra investigation, which centred on allegations of misappropriation of public funds, found that the person leading the organisation was believed to have siphoned off hundreds of millions of ringgit through a network of companies.


***


I wonder if the accused Fakhrudin Abd Karim could be a 'Chinese' (in disguise?) - In a Straits Time report (29 August 2022), Abdul Hadi had claimed that the root of corruption in Malaysia was the influence non-Malays wielded over the economy and politics. "These groups who chase illicit gains... damage our politics as they are the roots for corruption and the majority of them are non-Muslims and non-Bumiputras."