Sunday, November 23, 2025

Where’s Hero Akmal When FIFA Insults Malays Special Rights?





Where’s Hero Akmal When FIFA Insults Malays Special Rights?


November 22nd, 2025 by financetwitter



Caught with his pants down lying through his teeth, disgraced Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution is nowhere to be found. Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh, meanwhile, has proven to be a quick learner in “tai-chi”, arguing that she does not have the power to sack officials of the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) over a document forgery scandal, or has the authority to interfere in any investigations.



It appears that while the Home Minister has “unlimited power” to grant citizenship to seven foreign-born footballers – glorified as heritage players – to the extent of either fabricating or assisting in falsifying birth certificates, the Sports Minister has zero power over the FAM. In short, the Home Minister can do anything, including breaking the law, but the Sports Minister can do absolutely nothing.



The hilarious contradictions in the Madani government are breathtaking. While a former Malaysian judge, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, and Johor regent Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim have accused FIFA of exceeding its authority by declaring Malaysian government-issued documents fake, Hannah said FIFA has full authority and any government interference in the national football body could trigger a FIFA suspension.



Can they make up their mind whether FIFA has full authority and jurisdiction over FAM or not? If FIFA does not have the authority to question Saifuddin’s discretionary power in issuing birth documents (although they were fake), then why is Hannah so terrified of FIFA? On the other hand, if FIFA has full jurisdiction, then FAM and Saifuddin were partners in crime and Hannah should not play dumb and pretends to seek updates from Saifuddin.



Crucially, if the Malaysian government cannot interfere in the national football body because it was supposed to operate independently as claimed by Hannah Yeoh, does that mean the FAM is so “powerful” that it could engage in dubious business such as corruption, forgery or other types of crimes? In the same breath, why should taxpayers’ hard-earned money be spent to fund the FAM?



And if even the Malaysian government does not have any authority to sack officials of the Football Association of Malaysia, then who does? Based on Hannah’s argument, it appears FIFA has the power to do so. Unless the FAM is untouchable, surely someone has the jurisdiction and authority to act against officials of FAM who have committed crimes like forgery or corruption, no?




Backdoor minister Saifuddin is now trapped with his own lies after FIFA’s appeal committee released its 64-page report, which among other things revealed how the seven suspended “heritage” footballers had told the FIFA that they do not speak Bahasa Malaysia, despitethe Home Minister’s initial claim that they passed the requisite national language test for their citizenship application.



As everyone tries to save their own skin, not only the seven naturalized Malaysian players banned by FIFA might sue the FAM, they have denied involvement in document forgery but admitted to a lack of supervision and acknowledgement, claiming they were unaware of their lineage and signed legal documents without reading them – an excuse which the FIFA Appeal Committee (FAC) rejected.



In summary, the 64-page ruling released by the FAC on November 18, following 12 days of hearings for the players in the U.S., has found that all the seven players – born in Spain, Argentina, or Brazil – have claimed that they did not review the documents when they gave them to their agents. Worse, they also did not ask their agents again after learning about the falsified documents and related sanctions from FIFA.




The players said they trusted their agents, did not know what happened, insisted they had submitted original documents and denied any involvement in the falsification, blaming the cheating case entirely on FAM. The players admitted to signing the citizenship application documents and appearing before the Malaysian authorities, but denied having read or understood the contents of the documents that they had signed.



However, the Appeal Committee rejected the narrative that they were “passive victims of an orchestrated scheme”. It said – “A reasonable professional player would have questioned how they could represent a country with which they had no genuine connection. The Appeal Committee finds that the idea they could play for Malaysia without asking a single question defies logic and professional responsibility,”



The players are seasoned professionals with international careers, and not minor parties unfamiliar with contractual obligations. “Their conduct – signing without reading, failing to verify, and blatantly ignoring their responsibility for processes that affected their careers to a significant degree – falls far below the standard of care expected in international football and amounts to a situation of recklessness beyond repair,” – it said.




It’s not rocket science that either all the seven naturalized players were incredibly stupid for not understanding what they had signed, or pretending to be stupid after caught with their pants down and banned by FIFA. But the FAC isn’t stupid. It found no evidence that the players’ grandparents were born in Malaysia, simply because all the seven players were unable to prove it.



The seven are: Spain-born Gabriel Felipe Arrocha, Facundo Tomas Garces and Jon Irazabal Iraurgui; Netherlands-born Hector Alejandro Hevel Serrano; Argentina-born Rodrigo Julian Holgado and Imanol Javier Machuca; and Brazil-born Joao Vitor Brandao Figueiredo. Even after the forgery was exposed, the despicable FAM still insisted it was merely an “administrative error”.



Despite FAM’s laughable excuse, FIFA’s Appeal Committee has revealed a deliberate and coordinated cheating and forgery – FAM handled all procedures to secure Malaysian nationality for the players, birth certificates of their grandparents were altered to show Malaysian details, and FAM knowingly submitted the falsified documents to FIFA, benefiting from player eligibility approvals.




The best part is some suspended “heritage” footballers’ Malaysian passport application was approved on the same day that they submitted their forms – suggesting a systematic plan by the FAM, National Registration Department (NRD), and Home Ministry to cheat from the beginning. But exposing the falsification of documents that enabled seven foreign-born players to play for the national team was just the appetizer.



Apart from the FIFA fine of 350,000 Swiss francs (RM1.8 million), there is another major investigation against the association. Asian Football Confederation (AFC) general-secretary Windsor Paul John said FAM will be investigated by FIFA over how the forged documents were submitted, who handled them and the systemic lapses.



“This part has not even started. What you see now is the disciplinary case. The other case starts only when FIFA begins its investigation. The first case is about the matches. The second is about responsibility,” – said Windsor. FIFA investigators are expected to grill senior FAM officials, including acting president Yusoff Mahadi and other key figures once the second phase of the process officially begins.




FIFA also slammed FAM’s suspension of its secretary-general Noor Azman Rahman in October amid the controversy, calling the move “primarily a public relations exercise” as Noor Azman continued to appear at high-profile events, such as at an event last month attended by FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who visited Kuala Lumpur in conjunction with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Summit.



FIFA’s secretariat has also been instructed to notify the competent criminal authorities in Brazil, Argentina, the Netherlands and Spain – where the seven players were born – as well as Malaysia so that “appropriate criminal investigations and proceedings may be pursued”. Even if the Malaysian government tries to cover up, it’s hard for the Brazilian, Argentine, Holland and Spanish governments to also do the same.



With Saifuddin now in hiding in his closet, his boss – Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim – has no choice but to finally open his mouth about the shameful national scandal. Anwarhas vowed that there will be no cover-up in the probe. As usual, the forked-tongue premier also said that his government was not disputing FIFA’s credibility, but that authorities in Malaysia would not act “purely based on FIFA’s findings”.




Anwar should stop insulting people’s intelligence. Saifuddin, his biggest apple polisher, had earlier tried to cover-up the scandal with lies that the seven players had passed with flying colours in the Bahasa Malaysia test. Besides, if it was true that he was not disputing FIFA’s credibility, then his government should accept the FIFA’s findings that the FAM had deliberately committed a serious crime called “forgery”.



To say Malaysia was not disputing FIFA’s credibility, yet would not act based on FIFA’s findings is both contradicting and conflicting, not to mention speaks volumes about Anwar government’s arrogance and cover-up attempts. Exactly what the prime minister plans to do with his bootlicker Saifuddin for granting dual-citizenship to the seven naturalized players, and for lying about their Malay language proficiency?



Yes, there is one Malay hero who has been missing since the saga started weeks ago. Where is Akmal Saleh, the greatest defender and champion of Malay special rights when we need him the most? FIFA’s sanction and fine on the seven players and FAM were arguably an attack on not only “Tanah Melayu” and “Ketuanan Melayu” (Malay supremacy), but also an insult on Malay privileges and the monarchy.




From the top leadership of FAM to the Director General of NRD, and from Home Minister Saifuddin to Johor Crown Prince Tunku Ismail, they are all Malays with special privileges. Who the hell is FIFA to punish, let alone to lecture FAM on what it can and cannot do? Even if documents had been doctored or fabricated, that was within the special rights of the Malays.



UMNO Youth Chief Akmal should threaten FIFA with his infamous samurai sword, the same way he had previously threatened the minority ethnic Chinese with the Japanese sword when he called for a nationwide boycott of KK Mart over a sock incident. Or does “village champion” Akmal only know how to bully Chinese community, but has no balls to confront an international institution like FIFA?



Akmal, the big talker who had threatened to organize a mega rally to protest against U.S. President Donald Trump’s visit to Malaysia, only to chicken out and allowed pro-Israel Trump to dance on “Tanah Melayu”, should at least defend the Malay language by demanding Saifuddin to explain why seven foreigners who can’t speak Bahasa Malaysia were granted citizenship so easily and so quickly.




Hilariously, not a single Malay champion from the United Malays National Organization (UMNO) has defended the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) or the Malay Ruler despite condemnation from “kafir” FIFA. In fact, Akmal and UMNO should organise a mega rally to protest FIFA’s interference in the internal affairs of FAM. It’s an insult to the Malay dignity that Akmal is as quiet as a church mouse.


***


Hannah Yeoh is NOT scared of FIFA but is of the velle BIG MOUNTAIN behind FAM. Nothing terrifies a manja-sayang pollie like Hannah than meddling around with the 3R's sacred cow.

Akmal prefers to threaten the minority Malaysian Chinese (not China's Chinese).


Israeli forces kill 24 Palestinians in Gaza; Hamas urges US to intervene


al Jazeera:

Israeli forces kill 24 Palestinians in Gaza; Hamas urges US to intervene


Israeli attacks target Palestinians in their cars, shelters and homes in latest violation of the US-brokered truce



Israeli ceasefire violations: More than 20 Palestinians killed in wave of strikes



By Al Jazeera Staff and News Agencies
Published On 22 Nov 2025


Israel’s military has launched a wave of air attacks across Gaza, killing at least 24 Palestinians, including children, in its latest violation of a six-week old ceasefire in the war-torn territory.

The attacks on Saturday also wounded 87 others, according to authorities in Gaza.

Witnesses said the first strike hit a car in northern Gaza City, and was followed by more attacks in central Deir el-Balah and the Nuseirat refugee camp.

The drone attack in Gaza City killed at least 11 people and wounded 20 others, according to the managing director of al-Shifa Hospital, Rami Mhanna. It happened in the city’s Remal neighbourhood.

In Deir el-Balah, at least three people, including a woman, were killed when an Israeli strike hit a house there.

Khalil Abu Hatab, a witness, said the attack caused a “powerful explosion”.

“I looked outside and saw smoke covering the entire area. I couldn’t see a thing. I covered my ears and started shouting to the others in the tent to run,” he said.

“When I looked again, I realised the upper floor of my neighbour’s house was gone. It’s a fragile ceasefire. This is not a life we can live. There’s no safe place.”




‘Systematic violations’

The Israeli attack on Nuseirat also hit a residential building.

Anas al-Saloul, who witnessed the attack, said he was sitting in his home when a missile suddenly hit his neighbour’s house.

“We took the injured and came to the hospital,” he said. “There were injuries and deaths, and everyone in the street was covered in debris,” he added.

According to the Gaza Government Media Office, Israel has violated the United States-brokered ceasefire at least 497 times since it came into effect on October 10.

Some 342 civilians have been killed in the attacks, with children, women and the elderly accounting for the majority of the victims.

“We condemn in the strongest terms the continued serious and systematic violations of the ceasefire agreement by the Israeli occupation authorities,” the office said in a statement.

“These violations constitute a flagrant breach of international humanitarian law and the humanitarian protocol attached to the agreement. Among these violations, 27 occurred today, Saturday, resulting in 24 martyrs and 87 wounded,” it added.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said it launched the attacks after a Hamas fighter attacked Israeli soldiers in Israeli-held territory.

“In response, Israel eliminated five senior Hamas [fighters],” it said in a statement.

There was no immediate comment from Hamas on the slain fighters.




‘Fabricated pretexts’

Earlier in the day, as the attacks unfolded, the Palestinian group accused Israel of violating the truce “under fabricated pretexts” and called on mediators – the US, Egypt and Qatar – to intervene immediately.

It also said Israel has pushed westward beyond the yellow line, where Israeli troops are stationed in Gaza, and is changing the boundary set out as part of the deal.

“We call upon the mediators to intervene urgently and exert pressure to immediately halt these violations,” the Palestinian group said in a statement. “We also demand that the US administration fulfil its commitments and compel [Israel] to implement its obligations, and to confront its attempts to undermine the ceasefire in Gaza.”

A senior official also dismissed reports in Saudi Arabia-owned Al Arabiya that claimed it had called off the ceasefire.

“Israel is fabricating pretexts to evade the agreement and return to the war of annihilation, while it is the one violating the agreement daily and systematically,” Izzat al-Risheq, member of the Hamas political bureau, told Quds News Network.

Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud, reporting from Gaza City, said the latest attacks were traumatising for Palestinians.

“This is a reminder that the ceasefire is quite fragile, and in fact, [the] violence never ended at all,” he said. “What was going at a very fast pace in the past few years has now turned into this slow and steady pattern of killing,” he added.




West Bank attacks

Meanwhile, more Israeli military and settler violence was reported on Saturday in the occupied West Bank amid what the United Nations has described as a record-breaking surge in attacks on Palestinians.
Advertisement


The Palestinian news agency Wafa said Israeli settlers assaulted Palestinian farmers southeast of Masafer Yatta, in the West Bank’s South Hebron Hills area.

Separately, Wafa said Israeli soldiers also wounded two Palestinians during a raid in Dura, a town south of Hebron.

Israeli attacks in the West Bank have increased in the shadow of Israel’s war on Gaza, which has killed nearly 70,000 Palestinians in the coastal enclave since October 2023.

They also come as members of Israel’s far-right government push to formally annex the territory.




Last week, a spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights noted that 260 Israeli settler attacks were recorded in October – more than in any month since 2006.

“The surge in violence comes as Israeli authorities have ramped up home demolitions, the seizure of property, arrests, and movement restrictions, alongside the unabated building of settlements and outposts and the forcible displacement and transfer of thousands of Palestinians by Israeli settlers and the military,” Thameen al-Kheetan said in a statement.

“Permanently displacing the Palestinian population within occupied territory amounts to unlawful transfer, which is a war crime. The transfer by Israel of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies also amounts to a war crime.”


PMX can deny the emergence of eldest daughter as future Selangor MB but political foes aren’t fools





PMX can deny the emergence of eldest daughter as future Selangor MB but political foes aren’t fools






DETRACTORS have revived the Madani nepotism narrative at the recent naming of PKR deputy president Nurul Izzah Anwar by Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari to be his successor as he seeks to migrate to the Federal ministership level.


In a recent Keluar Sekejap podcast episode, Amirudin who is also one of the four national PKR vice-presidents had expressed strong agreement when asked by host Khairy Jamaluddin if the eldest daughter of Prime Minister’ Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should be given the opportunity to lead the state government.



That PMX might have dismissed such talk as “personal view” on grounds that the Selangor Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman “has never discussed the matter with me” is unlikely to fool his political foes who have wised up to his slew of denials.

One good example is how PMX had similarly dismissed a Bloomberg report in April this year over the prospect of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki’s tenure being accorded a third extension as sheer speculation only for it to crystalise a month later.
Bursa Malaysia Stocks






Former Barisan Nasional (BN) strategic communication deputy director Datuk Eric See-To recounted how PMX who was then then the Opposition leader had back in February 2014 even “nominated himself” as the Selangor MB to replace the late Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim should he win the Kajang state by-election.

“His party once nominated his wife as Selangor MB. So, it wouldn’t be wrong if his daughter is also nominated for the post of Selangor MB,” snubbed the opposition-slant influencer and loyalist of incarcerated former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak who blogged under the moniker Lim Sian See.



“If it’s Father, Mother, Daughter, then it’ll be a complete package. If possible, I hope their house cat can also be nominated in the future.”

A better perspective on the succession pipeline is perhaps that proffered by community centre Radar Selangor on its Facebook page: “Amirudin has previously stated that the proposal had been discussed but the final decision depends on the party’s (PKR) mechanisms and the approval of the central leadership.”





Well, many Selangorians are seemingly not favourable with Nurul Izzah’s appointment with many hoping that the Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah would not consent such idea.



Others wondered if “there aren’t any male candidates around” while echoing the nepotism narrative raised by See-To.



At the end of the day, one commenter hit the nail on the head by contending that it makes little sense for Nurul Izzah who could not even defend her family’s so-called Permatang Pauh fortress during the 2022 national polls to helm Selangor as its first woman MB. – Nov 23, 2025




Group in sexy video controversy cancels concert over permit issues










Group in sexy video controversy cancels concert over permit issues


Published: Nov 23, 2025 10:49 AM
Updated: 1:56 PM


Dolla has cancelled its Dec 6 concert in Kuala Lumpur, due to issues regarding approval permits from the authorities.

The girl group, recently entangled in a controversy over appearing too sexy in a music video, explained that it wanted to avoid further delays or last-minute cancellations if the permits were still not granted several days before the event.

“Unfortunately, the promoter and the team were unable to get the necessary permits and regulatory approvals completed in time. Without those approvals, we are unable to carry on with the concert.

“With that, Dolla and our team were not willing to take the risk with the possibility of a cancellation two or three days before the concert,” said member Wan Sabrina Wan Rusli, or popularly known as Sabronzo, in a video published on social media last night.

Concert organisers SAH Entertainment and Universal Music Malaysia had also apologised in a statement for the cancellation of the “Dolla: Good Girls Gone Bad Live Concert”, citing the prioritisation of safety and quality.

The organisers assured that refunds would be automatically processed within the next few weeks.

Criticism over attire

Last week, Dolla, which also consists of Tabitha Ariel Lam (Tabby) and Angelina Chai (Angel), courted flak from conservatives on social media over the members’ revealing attire in a music video for their song “Question” released on Nov 6.

Following public backlash, including from Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Religious Affairs) Na’im Mokhtar, the video was subsequently removed from YouTube and prompted an apology from Universal Music Malaysia.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Religious Affairs) Na’im Mokhtar


Na’im had described their clothing as inappropriate and disrespectful to cultural and religious sensitivities and suggested that he would consider filing syariah offence charges against its Muslim member.

He would also urge the Islamic Development Department and the Federal Territories Mufti’s Office to re-evaluate clothing guidelines for Muslim celebrities.

The censorship drew criticism from lawyer Latheefa Koya, who reminded that Na’im had no business making such threats, adding that ministers cannot investigate or prosecute citizens.


Alternative event for fans


In yesterday’s social media video, Dolla reiterated its gratitude towards fans.

The group revealed that it planned to host an alternative event to meet fans on the scheduled concert date.

“We know you have waited so long to see us on stage, and we will continue to work very, very hard to give you guys a good show in the near future.

“This isn't the end, if anything, it is the start of a new era. We promise that we will come back from this with a great show that is truly worth the wait,” Angel said.


***


Meanwhile Menteri will stick to teaching Romans how to build sampans and Chinese how to suck eggs


After reviewing Fifa ruling, Hanipa tells FAM not to waste time and money










After reviewing Fifa ruling, Hanipa tells FAM not to waste time and money


Published: Nov 23, 2025 8:40 AM
Updated: 11:49 AM



Former deputy law minister Hanipa Maidin said that if he were representing the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM), his advice would be straightforward - don’t waste time or money challenging the decision on the “heritage” players issue.

He told Malaysiakini this after reviewing the full written judgment issued by the International Federation of Association Football’s (Fifa) appeal committee, a detailed document spanning 64 pages and 304 paragraphs.

“Reading like a court’s full judgment,” said Hanipa, adding that the ruling lucidly articulates several established legal principles and correctly applies them to the factual matrix of the case.

“In short, the decision was well articulated. In my considered view, the decision is profoundly sound.

“Needless to say, the decision has also revealed a slew of mind-boggling facts. The alleged forgeries seem, to me, like deliberate acts - though I hope I am wrong to say that.

“If I were the lawyer representing FAM, I would sincerely, truthfully, and frankly advise it not to waste time, let alone money, to proceed further. My sincere advice to FAM is that it ought to bravely own such fatal and embarrassing mistakes and errors, and in turn be truthful to the rakyat,” he added in a statement to Malaysiakini.



Previously, Johor Regent Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim, a vocal critic of Fifa’s decision, had offered to cover all expenses, including legal and travel costs, for FAM’s bid to bring its case to the International Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

The Fifa appeal committee’s decision, released on Nov 17, ordered a full investigation into FAM’s internal operations following sanctions against the association and seven foreign-born heritage players for forgery and falsification.

The committee also instructed the Fifa disciplinary committee to alert criminal authorities in Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, the Netherlands, and Spain about the offences committed.

Its findings revealed a deliberate and coordinated scheme, including the alteration of players’ grandparents’ birth certificates, which FAM knowingly submitted to Fifa as authentic records.

The committee was also critical of FAM’s suspension of its general secretary, Noor Azman Rahman, stating that the terms and scope of the sanction were neither clearly articulated nor meaningfully observed.

1MDB-level reputational damage

Hanipa highlighted how this episode had tarnished the nation’s reputation globally, likening its impact to the 1MDB scandal.



“Lack of integrity remains our chronic ailment.

“In Hoodless & Blackwell v FSA (2003), it was, inter alia, held that ‘In our view, ‘integrity’ connotes moral soundness, rectitude, and steady adherence to an ethical code. A person lacks integrity if unable to appreciate the distinction between what is honest or dishonest by ordinary standards’,” he added.

On Friday, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim reiterated that there would be no cover-up in the FAM scandal, while Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh confirmed that no additional grants will be given to FAM until the matter is fully resolved.


***


Kerbau-ing domestic market only lah 😂😂😂


‘Not good enough’ — European leaders scramble to fix Trump’s Ukraine peace plan





‘Not good enough’ — European leaders scramble to fix Trump’s Ukraine peace plan



Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy shake hands during a press conference at Moncloa Palace, in Madrid, Spain, on November 18, 2025. — Reuters pic

Sunday, 23 Nov 2025 9:12 AM MYT


JOHANNESBURG, Nov 23 — European and other Western leaders said on Saturday a US peace plan was a basis for talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine but needed “additional work”, part of Western efforts to eke out a better deal for Kyiv before a Thursday deadline.

Meeting on the sidelines of a G20 summit, European and other Western leaders scrambled to come up with a coordinated response to US President Donald Trump’s demand for Ukraine to accept his 28-point peace plan with Russia by Thursday. Trump said in brief remarks later that his proposal was not his final offer, signalling potential room for adjustments as Ukraine and its European allies stressed that the plan could serve as a foundation for negotiations but required changes. The European and other Western leaders agreed national security advisers from the E3 – France, Britain and Germany – would meet European Union, US and Ukrainian officials in Geneva on Sunday for further discussions.


US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will be in Geneva for the talks, a State Department official said. Italy would also send an official, diplomatic sources said. Washington’s plan, which endorses key Russian demands, was met with measured criticism from many US allies. Leaders sought to balance praise for Trump’s attempt to end the fighting with recognition that some terms in his proposal are unpalatable for Kyiv.

“The initial draft of the 28-point plan includes important elements that will be essential for a just and lasting peace,” said the leaders of the EU, Germany, France, Britain, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, Finland, Italy, Japan and Norway.


“We believe therefore that the draft is a basis which will require additional work,” they said in a statement.


Leaders adopt ‘lion-like spirit’ in talks about plan

“There are many things that cannot simply be an American proposal, which requires broader consultation,” said French President Emmanuel Macron, adding that an agreement had to allow for peace for Ukrainians and “security for all Europeans”. The leaders met after President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Friday that Ukraine faced a choice of either losing its dignity and freedom or Washington’s backing. He appealed to Ukrainians for unity.


That signal prompted European leaders to rally.

A German government source said they had met in a room in Johannesburg called “lion” and that the leaders had adopted the animal’s “spirit” in talks to seek a better deal for Ukraine.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz underlined the importance to Europe of supporting Ukraine.

“If Ukraine loses this war and possibly collapses, it will have an impact on European politics as a whole, on the entire European continent. And that is why we are so committed to this issue,” Merz said on the sidelines of the G20 summit.

“There is currently an opportunity to end this war, but we are still quite a long way from a good outcome for everyone.” On Saturday, leaders of eight Nordic and Baltic nations said they had spoken with Zelenskiy and pledged to keep supplying arms. In a joint statement, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden said: “Solutions that respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and that will bring Ukraine and Europe greater security and stability have our full support.”

Zelenskiy appealed to his country for unity.

“Now, Ukraine can face a very difficult choice – either losing dignity or risk losing a major partner,” he said in a speech to the nation on Friday. “I will fight 24/7 to ensure that at least two points in the plan are not overlooked – the dignity and freedom of Ukrainians.”

On Saturday, he signalled that security guarantees were imperative to “ensure that nowhere in Europe or the world does the principle prevail that crimes against people and humanity, against states and nations, can be rewarded and forgiven”.

On the frontline, one Ukrainian soldier, 33-year-old Vitalii Traikalo, questioned why Ukraine should be forced to give up territory after three years of gruelling fighting to fend off Russian assaults.

“Are we defending our borders here just to give them away? What’s the point of all this, of all these sacrifices?” he asked, while manning an artillery position near the eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk.

Trump gives Ukraine a tight deadline

On Friday, Trump threw down the gauntlet to Ukraine, saying Zelenskiy had until Thursday to approve his 28-point plan, which calls on Ukraine to cede territory, accept limits on its military and renounce ambitions to join Nato.

“He’ll have to like it, and if he doesn’t like it, then you know, they should just keep fighting, I guess,” he said. “At some point he’s going to have to accept something he hasn’t accepted.” Recalling their fractious February meeting with Zelenskiy, Trump added: “You remember right in the Oval Office, not so long ago, I said, ‘You don’t have the cards.’”

In their statement, Western leaders said they were “concerned by the proposed limitations on Ukraine’s armed forces, which would leave Ukraine vulnerable to future attack”.

“We reiterate that the implementation of elements relating to the European Union and relating to Nato would need the consent of EU and Nato members respectively.”

At Sunday’s meeting in Geneva, European nations are keen to suggest changes to Trump’s plan, which Russian President Vladimir Putin described as the basis of a resolution to the conflict. — Reuters

Anwar denies Malaysia interfered in Thailand-Cambodia tensions, says role was limited to dialogue facilitation





Anwar denies Malaysia interfered in Thailand-Cambodia tensions, says role was limited to dialogue facilitation



Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said Malaysia’s involvement was based purely on its position as a close and trusted neighbour, and at no point did Putrajaya dictate how Bangkok and Phnom Penh should resolve their issues. — Bernama pic

Sunday, 23 Nov 2025 9:31 AM MYT


JOHANNESBURG, Nov 23 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim quashed claims that Malaysia had interfered in the recent diplomatic tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, saying it merely facilitated dialogues for an amicable solution.

He said Malaysia’s involvement was based purely on its position as a close and trusted neighbour, and at no point did Putrajaya dictate how Bangkok and Phnom Penh should resolve their issues.

“Let us clear the air. Firstly, as neighbours, we are naturally concerned. But we are not involved, nor do we give any specific prescription on how they should achieve a settlement,” he told the Malaysian media at his exit press conference here today.

Anwar, who is also the Chair for Asean 2025, said that Malaysia’s role was limited to enabling key officials from both sides to communicate, including facilitating discussions between the Armed Forces chiefs and encouraging contact between their respective Foreign Ministers.


“I only spoke to both prime ministers to ask whether they could talk. They set their own parameters and decide on the issues,” he said, adding that the United States President Donald Trump had also spoken to both parties during the process.

Anwar said that Malaysia’s effort was guided by the long-standing trust both countries have in Putrajaya as a friendly partner that could help open lines of communication when needed.

“We just try to engage with both sides because they consider us friends,” he said.


It was therefore inaccurate for anyone in Thailand to portray Malaysia’s role as interference, he said.

“I do not know what their internal or domestic political considerations are, but to suggest that we interfere is simply not right. No way do we interfere,” he said.

He said both Thailand and Cambodia have the legitimacy, competence and sovereign right to resolve their own matters, and Malaysia respects that fully.

Nevertheless, Anwar said he believes that this topic would be a point of discussion during the visit of his Thai counterpart, Anutin Charnvirakul visit to Malaysia.

“It is a normal joint consultation between leaders of both countries. (But) I am sure he will mention the subject and I think consistent with his position is that the Thais will of course want to protect their border.

“And I will have to listen to him and I will facilitate if necessary. But it is important to ensure that there is peace,” he said.

On other development, Anwar said he had met with his counterpart from Vietnam, Phạm Minh Chính, who wants to hasten the Asean Power Grid from Vietnam to Singapore.

“After that, Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong reminded that the bilateral meeting with Singapore in December should be more substantive in resolving several outstanding issues,” he said. — Bernama

Netanyahu: ‘There Will Not Be a Palestinian State,’ Even At Cost of Ties With Saudis

 



Netanyahu Brushes Off Saudi F-35 Deal, Says US Will Ensure Israel’s Military Edge

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio guaranteed him that Israel’s “qualitative military edge” will remain intact in a phone call following US President Donald Trump’s announcement this week that he would sell F-35 warplanes to Saudi Arabia.

Israel is the only Middle East country operating the F-35, regarded as the most advanced warplane in the world. US law guarantees Israel a “qualitative military edge” in the region.

“Regarding the F-35, I had a long conversation with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who reiterated his commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East,” Netanyahu said in a lengthy Hebrew-language interview with “Abu Ali Express,” a popular account on the Telegram messaging app.

Netanyahu said that Rubio assured him the US is “committed to maintaining Israel’s qualitative edge in all areas, including Israel’s advantage regarding the supply of F-35 aircraft,” noting that the advantage is legally guaranteed.

“Beyond that, I prefer not to elaborate,” he added. – The Times of Israel

AND

Netanyahu: ‘There Will Not Be a Palestinian State,’ Even At Cost of Ties With Saudis

 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that there will not be a Palestinian state, even at the cost of normalization with Saudi Arabia, during an interview aired on Thursday evening.

“There will not be a Palestinian state. It’s very simple: it will not be established,” the premier said in the wide-ranging interview with Abu Ali Express, a popular local Telegram channel.

Asked by the interviewer if his opposition holds even if it jeopardizes normalization with Riyadh — which insists on a credible pathway to Palestinian statehood in exchange for such ties – Netanyahu said: “The answer is: a Palestinian state will not be established. It is an existential threat to Israel.”

Asked about what has prevented normalization with the Saudis, Netanyahu said the war in Gaza strained progress, but that “the conditions could develop” now that the war is winding down. – The Times of Israel

Our Take:

So while I didn’t quite stick the landing with the call on the Qualitative Military Edge (QME), I did anticipate that it was going to become a headline. I remain skeptical that this story is even true— that we are effectively sabotaging the F-35 planes going to Saudi so that Israel maintains a strategic advantage over them in a potential conflict. I will be very disappointed if this story is true.

But the fact that this is now a story and something that the Republicans have to explain— as they are in the midst of defending against claims that they are all puppets of Israel— is absolutely fantastic. Watching these scumbags squirm as they justify these ridiculous moves makes all the song and dance worthwhile.

As for the Saudi normalization, we addressed that, too, on Tuesday’s Badlands Daily.

Netanyahu and his cohorts have done everything they can to leverage the things that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman wants (F-35’s, a nuclear deal, a defense agreement) to force him to capitulate and normalize relations with Israel without the condition of Palestinian Statehood. And for years, every analyst in the world assumed that at some point, the Saudis would relent and sell out the Palestinians.

But this is a new age, and a new Saudi Arabia. The men running this country practice and observe First Principles, and were therefore steadfast enough in their negotiations that they were able to achieve all of their goals without compromising on their main condition. Netanyahu must now understand this, which is why he is putting out this bravado rhetoric.

Objective observers must see that the Arabs are not the problem in the Middle East. They are not the ones actively seeking conflict or the ones trying to subvert the peace process. In fact, it is the Arabs who have become the arbiters of peace for conflicts around the world.

Which leaves us with Israel. What are we going to do about this problem? This major liability? How can we enter the Golden Age when we have a country like Israel demanding more war and more conflict?


[Clip Link 1Clip Link 2] – GhostofBasedPatrickHenry

Saturday, November 22, 2025

Stop meddling in border dispute, Thai protesters tell Anwar










Stop meddling in border dispute, Thai protesters tell Anwar


Published: Nov 22, 2025 7:10 PM
Updated: 11:46 PM



Protesters gathered in front of the Malaysian embassy in Bangkok today to demand that Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar stop “interfering” in Thailand’s handling of its border dispute with Cambodia.

According to the Bangkok Post today, the protesters are also planning to visit the US Embassy, as they believe Washington has unfairly linked trade negotiations with Thailand’s sovereign right to protect its territory.

The rallies were organised by a nationalist coalition called United Power of the Land to Protect Sovereignty, known in Thai as “Ruam Palang Phaen Din Pok Pong Athipatai”.

Prominent figures who attended the rally included activist Pichit Chaimongkol, former senator Kaewsan Atibodhi, former red-shirt leader Jatuporn Prompan, and lawyer Nitithorn Lamlua.

The group waving Thai national flags and banners arrived at the Malaysian Embassy on Sathon Road with a truck equipped with loudspeakers.




They accused Anwar, in his previous capacity as the Asean chair, of meddling in Thailand’s efforts to safeguard its sovereignty.

They also demanded that he refrain from pressuring Thailand to negotiate with Cambodia over disputed border areas.

Peace accord in jeopardy?

On Oct 26, Thailand and Cambodia signed a joint declaration on a peace deal dubbed the “KL Peace Accord”, marking a formal step toward halting hostilities and restoring peace along their disputed border.

The agreement was signed by Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul and his Cambodian counterpart, Hun Manet, on the sidelines of the 47th Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur.

The signing was witnessed by Anwar and US President Donald Trump.


Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul


However, the agreement unravelled after Anutin decided to postpone it, following a landmine explosion along the Thai-Cambodia border that reportedly injured several Thai soldiers.

Subsequently, Anwar said Chief of Defence Forces Nizam Jaffar has been tasked to resume negotiations on the matter.


Political interference

Pichit further accused Anwar of overstepping his role as Asean chair by ordering Thailand to stop border operations.

He also accused Anwar of “political interference”, claiming Malaysia and the US were attempting to unduly influence Thailand’s decisions.

Kaewsan, on the other hand, accused Malaysia of having large investments in Cambodian casino operations and that Anwar was using the peace dialogue as a political tool despite corruption problems at home.

He called on Asean to ensure Anwar “has no place in the regional bloc”.


US wants Seoul’s subs to counter China


Pearls and Irritations
John Menadue's Public Policy Journal





November 22, 2025


In Asian media this week: 

  • Washington sees global role for South Korean navy;
  • the military cements government control in Pakistan;
  • Palestine is an obstacle to Trump’s new Middle East plan;
  • Japan prepares for drawn-out dispute with China;
  • why South Korea is turning its back on coal power; and
  • boot camps for beauty queens.


The US has told South Korea it wants its future nuclear-powered fast attack submarines to be used in joint efforts counter China.

It also sees a future global role for the South Korean navy.

US chief of naval operations, Admiral Daryl Caudle, said the submarine would inevitably deepen US-South Korean strategic co-operation in the Indo-Pacific region.

Donald Trump at a summit with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung late last month approved Seoul’s ambition to build a nuclear-powered submarine.

Caudle said on a recent visit to Seoul: “Utilisation of that submarine to counter China, I think, is a natural expectation. With that type of capability, the United States would expect that partnership – working as an alliance – to meet our combined goals on what the United States considers our pacing threat, which is China. I think to a large extent Korea shares our concerns with China as well.”

The Korea Herald reported Caudle said the difference between a nuclear-powered fast attack submarine and a conventional one was significant. Nuclear-powered submarines were much more capable.

“A nuclear-powered submarine is truly worldwide deployable,” Caudle said. “As they say in the move Spiderman, with great power comes great responsibility. I think there will be a responsibility for Korea to deploy those submarines globally, to move away from just being a regional navy to a global navy.”

An analytical article in The Korea Times said that Lee, in his pitch to Trump, explicitly cited China, alongside North Korea, as his reason for pursuing nuclear-powered submarines.

Lee had been thought to be sympathetic to Beijing and his sudden naming of China as a security challenge had raised eyebrows, the story said. It quoted retired navy captain Park Bum-jin as saying this was calculated messaging aimed at securing US approval.

“He intentionally mentioned China, along with North Korea, because he knew Washington is pre-occupied with China,” Park said.

North Korea said South Korea’s plan to build nuclear-powered submarines would trigger a nuclear domino effect, The Asahi Shimbun newspaper said. It reported the state news agency KCNA as saying the agreement showed the true colours of the confrontational will of Washington and Seoul to remain hostile to Pyongyang.

A commentary in Global Times, an official newspaper in China, said the submarine development would trigger a chain reaction of military competition and strategic instability in the region.


New law destroys Pakistan’s rule of law

Two judges of Pakistan’s Supreme Court resigned late last week, just hours after a new constitutional amendment was signed into law. They said the amendment was an affront to the judiciary and the constitution. The 27th constitutional amendment placed a new federal constitutional court above all other courts.

The amendment also elevated the army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir to the new position of chief of defence forces and granted lifetime immunity from all legal action to Munir (and future five-star ranked officers) and the president.

Dawn newspaper supported the resignation of senior justices Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Athar Minallah. It said in an editorial critics argued the Supreme Court had been reduced to a glorified district court. “Given the extensive powers handed over to [the new court], that assessment is not off the mark,” it said.

Zahid Hussain, a Dawn senior columnist, said the amendment amounted to the demolition of the independence of the judiciary and the surrender of even the semblance of civilian rule.

The new amendment would provide constitutional cover for the country’s march towards becoming a military state. “It is unprecedented in a democratic country not to hold leaders and state officials to account for their actions,” Hussain said. ”This is not only a negation of democratic norms but also of the rule of law.”

An article in The Indian Express said the amendment smashed Pakistan's current constitutional framework. The article, written by Bashir Ali Abbas, a strategic affairs researcher, said the amendment had fulfilled Asim Munir’s ambition to make Pakistan a “hard state”, allowed the military to cement the country’s hybrid model of governance, where the country retained a civilian administration but the military were in charge, and institutionalised the military’s central role in foreign policy.

“It is already evident that the army chief has formally cemented the pre-eminence of his office over the civilian leadership,” Abbas said.


Saudi Arabia wants pathway to two-state solution

The evolution of Saudi Arabia’s relations with the US is at an inflexion point.

The two countries’ close ties date back 80 years, when Abdulaziz Ibn Saudi, the founder of the modern kingdom, and President Franklin Roosevelt forged a partnership based on American access to Saudi oil and American security guarantees to the House of Saud.

This week’s meeting between Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (known as MbS) and Donald Trump was aimed at rebooting the partnership and reaching a new grand bargain, says a commentary in _The Indian Expres_s newspaper.

The agenda, says international affairs academic and contributing editor C Raja Mohan, covered building a broad economic and technological relationship, strengthening security ties and re-ordering the Middle East.

MbS also wants Trump’s support for his looming succession, Mohan says. King Salman, 89, is frail and Saudi successions are rarely straightforward. “American endorsement could be critical,” he says.

Equally important for MbS is strong backing for this Vision 2030 agenda – transforming Saudi Arabia from an extractive state to a diversified, globally competitive economy and a more open society.

Saudi Arabia remains an indispensable US partner. Washington needs Riyadh’s co-operation in stabilising the Middle East and continuing US primacy. Trump also wants Saudi recognition of Israel and expansion of the Abraham Accords between Israel and several Arab states.

Palestine, however, present an obstacle to Trump’s plans. Riyadh insists on a credible pathway to Palestinian statehood as a pre-condition but Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu is under pressure to avoid any gesture towards Palestinian statehood. Trump is pressing him to show some flexibility.

“A Saudi-Israel normalisation and expanded Abraham Accords could herald a different political architecture for the Middle East,” Mohan said. “Yet Israel’s reluctance to concede even minimally on Palestinian statehood, and the resistance of its supporters in Washington to any American grand bargain with MbS, mean expectations of a dramatic breakthrough must be tempered.”

An Al Jazeera explainer notes that Trump recognised Saudi Arabia as a major non-NATO ally, joining 19 other countries (including Australia) and gaining expedited access to US military hardware. Trump said he would authorise the sale of F-35 fighters to Saudi Arabia and said they would not be downgraded in a way that would ensure Israel’s regional military superiority – a departure from previous policy.

The report quotes MbS as saying Saudi Arabia wants to be part of the Abraham Accords. “But we also want to be sure that we secure a clear path [to a] two-state solution,” he said.


Diplomatic row the worst for years

The diplomatic row between China and Japan over Taiwan has now continued for two weeks and Japanese media are expressing concern that it might drag on longer.

Nikkei Asia, the online politics and business magazine, said concerns were growing that the rift might descend into a drawn-out crisis, similar to the dispute more than a decade ago over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea.

In 2012, Tokyo decided to nationalise the Islands, claimed by China as the Diaoyu Islands. High level talks were frozen until Xi Jinping met Japan’s then-prime minister, Shinzo Abe, in 2014.

The row this time is over remarks by new Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi that Chinese military action against Taiwan might constitute a “survival-threatening situation” and trigger Japan’s right to self-defence.

Beijing, which sees Taiwan as part of China, retaliated by warning Chinese people against travelling to Japan, or against studying in Japan, and re-instating a ban on Japanese seafood, imposed over the release of wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant. In reporting the revived ban, The Japan Times said officials were preparing for a prolonged dispute.

China has launched a war of words against Japan. Global Times, an English-language official paper reprinted from the People’s Daily a Zhong Sheng (Voice of China) commentary. The column is regarded as an authoritative expression of the Communist Party’s views.

The commentary said Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan were akin to invoking the spirit of militarism. “Historically, Japan’s militarism has often used the so-called existential crisis as a pretext for external aggression,” it said.

Japan sent a senior diplomat to Beijing to try to smooth things over – but later downplayed the importance of his visit.

A commentary written by Japanese academic Hiroaki Kato and published in The Diplomat, said Takaichi’s remarks did not represent a departure from previous government positions. “What followed was an overreaction to a hypothetical statement about the Japanese government’s range of potential responses to a situation that may never occur,” he said.

But an article written by Wenran Jiang, a Chinese academic living in Canada, and published in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, said her remarks were a strategic pivot away from Japan’s post-war pacifist ethos. “They reflect a calculated alignment with containment strategies aimed at curtailing China’s rise,” he said.

The Asahi Shimbun newspaper said in an editorial Takaichi’s comments went beyond parliamentary statements and official positions of past Cabinets, including that of Shinzo Abe.

“Now there is a need to stop the situation from worsening further and end the unproductive confrontation,” the editorial said.


Drive to restore pledge to phase out fossil fuels

An international commitment to move away from fossil fuels did not appear in a UN climate declaration until the COP28 conference in 2023. Last year, at COP29, hosted by Azerbaijan, an economy that depends on fossil fuels, the pledge went missing from the final text.

This year, Brazil, the host of COP30, was determined to place phasing out fossil fuels at the centre of discussions, Singapore’s The Straits Times reported. Before the conference started, Brazil’s President, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, called on world leaders to draw up road maps to cutting dependence on fossil fuels. Momentum against their use had grown, the paper said.

This was the international context of South Korea’s decision, announced at the start of the second week of COP30, to join a global coalition aimed at phasing out the use of coal.

The domestic context was that a week earlier Seoul had decided on its greenhouse gas targets. The Korea Herald said the goal was to reduce emissions by 53-to-61 per cent from 2018 levels by 2035. Transport and power generation faced the steepest cuts.

In a later story, the Herald reported South Korea had joined the Powering Past Coal Alliance, a significant step in the country’s shift toward a cleaner energy future. The alliance, of 180 national and sub-national participants, seeks to phase out unabated coal power (coal-fired electricity generation without emissions-reduction technologies). South Korea is the second Asian nation to join, after Singapore.

South Korea’s electricity system was still dominated by fossil fuels, the paper said. The country operated the world’s seventh-largest coal-power fleet, by capacity.

The Government had announced plans to retire 40 coal power station units by 2040. A plan for a further 20 plants would be unveiled next year after public discussions of environmental and economic considerations.

As COP30 neared its conclusion, both President Lula and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres arrived at the conference, the Herald said, quoting Greenpeace as saying this was a sign they meant business.

And scores of countries, rich and poor, were pushing for a detailed road map on how to phase out fossil fuels, the paper said.


Why beauty contests create a buzz in developing world

International beauty contests are viewed by many in the West, aside from former Miss Universe owner Donald Trump, as sexist and passe. But in many countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, they are seen as a key to a golden, glamorous future.

In the Philippines, a country whose women have won more beauty competitions (known as “pageants”) than any other, winners are a symbol of national pride. The business of beauty contests is taken so seriously, says Nikkei Asia, that “boot camps” for beauty queens, offering intensive training in how to become a champion, have turned that country into a powerhouse of the beauty contest world.

“Oh my God! You literally have to train here,” said Sanne-Esmee Walstra, from the Netherlands. She was training with boot camp owner Rodin Flores, preparing for a contest called Miss Earth. With her was Divine Ekimini Nelson, a student pilot and computer scientist from Nigeria. “I’m here to get new knowledge,” she said.

Miss Earth is one of the ‘Big Four’ competitions, along with Miss Universe, Miss World and Miss International. The industry’s self-estimate is that it is worth US$1 billion (A$1.54 billion) globally.

In the West, beauty contests have faced criticism since the rise of feminism decades ago. “Beauty pageants are a patriarchal enterprise,” Sofie Zeruto wrote in 2023 in America’s Brown Political Review. “The notion of ranking women based on attractiveness, even with the added modern categories of personality and intelligence, is dehumanising.”

Boot camp operator Flores told Nikkei Asia he has scientific way of producing winners, a holistic system of training. Gerry Diaz, another boot camp manager, said: “We operate like a car assembly plant.” His curriculum involved perfecting a range of skills, such as fitness, poise, mental fortitude and speech and diction.

Criticism within the Philippines is rare, the article said. The success of a Filipina on the international beauty stage, it said, is celebrated with the fervour typically reserved for Olympic gold medallists.



The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.


David Armstrong

David Armstrong is a reporter, editor and media executive with more than four decades of experience in Australia and Asia. He lives in Bangkok

Indira’s lawyer urges home minister to censure IGP










Indira’s lawyer urges home minister to censure IGP


Dania Kamal Arif
Published: Nov 22, 2025 8:34 PM
Updated: 11:34 PM




M Indira Gandhi’s lawyer, N Rajesh has urged Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail to censure Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Khalid Ismail for his failure to adhere to court judgements, which have ruled Indira’s daughter to be returned to her.

Speaking to Malaysiakini outside the Bukit Aman police headquarters in Kuala Lumpur today, Rajesh also criticised Khalid’s absence at today’s solidarity march.

Earlier, Indira and supporters initially planned to deliver her long-lost daughter Prasana Diksa’s teddy bear to the IGP in a symbolic gesture.

However, the IGP failed to show up, despite protesters waiting for nearly four hours, and giving prior notice of today’s gathering.

“It is very disturbing that a member of the public, like Indira, whom everyone knows has suffered for 16 years, despite all the court victories and the 2018 landmark judgement, that the IGP cannot even spend 15 minutes to meet her. (Why) You need the intervention of a cabinet member to set an appointment?

“You serve the public, you are paid by taxpayers, and you have an obligation to address grievances of the public. So for you to sit on your high and mighty horse and refuse to come and meet Indira, even to give an appointment, reflects very badly, not only on the police, but on the IGP personally.

“This is quite unacceptable, and we hope that IGP will be censured by the home minister. The home minister must call the IGP and tell him that you cannot do things like this, it’s completely unacceptable,” he said.


Prasana Diksa’s teddy bear.


Earlier, Rajesh had also communicated with the Dang Wangi district deputy police chief, Nuzulan Mohd Din, who initially said he would liaise with his colleagues to arrange a meeting for Indira and the IGP.

However, Nuzulan later said that the police were not able to schedule the meeting.

Despite this, police said they would allow Indira to continue sitting on the road in front of Bukit Aman and would not take any action against her as there was no obstruction to public safety.

‘Why can’t the IGP explain why he refuses to see me?’

While seated on the road, a teary-eyed Indira had also informed the crowd that they were not protesting against anyone, but only wanted her daughter to be returned.

“We are not against the police, we actually want to work with the police. But we just want to find Prasana. What happened today is very disgraceful for the police, because they haven’t done anything,” she stressed.

Further, Indira criticised the police’s failure to give reasons why the IGP was unable to meet her today, despite prior communication and issuing an advanced notice regarding today’s march.

“I am just a plain citizen who wants to meet the IGP. What’s so difficult about this? I am not even asking for money or anything from him. I only want him to give an answer. Why can’t he see me? He did not even give me reasons why he was not able to meet me today,” she said.




Indira also stressed that she had already said how she is willing to be flexible with her timing, and would still be happy to meet the IGP at a fixed date which suited his convenience.

“If he said something as simple as, ‘I cannot meet you today,’ but will be able to meet you on another specific date, everything could have been resolved very easily.

“We all could have gone home much earlier today. But the IGP will not even bother to give me a date, and he still refuses to answer why he refuses to meet me,” she cried.

Earlier, Indira Gandhi Action Team (Ingat) chairperson Arun Dorasamy said he was informed that the IGP had been at KLCC around noon, before he would head to the Bukit Aman police headquarters to meet Indira and her supporters.

However, by 2.30pm Khalid did not show up, and the protesters escalated by sitting on the road, refusing to leave until the IGP showed up.

They later dispersed around 4pm, after being reassured by Kulasegaran that he would help Indira schedule a meeting with the IGP within these next few weeks. The deputy minister also pledged that he would be present during the meeting.

Arun reprimanded the IGP for his absence, and reminded him to act according to obligations outlined under the Police Act.

He also urged the police to take action before Prasana’s 18th birthday in April next year.

“This case needs to be resolved by April 8, 2026. Failing to do so, this civil case will turn into a criminal case. And it will become (a nationwide scandal) exactly like FAM, and all the details I will only reserve until April 9, 2026. So it is within the best interests of the Madani government to bring back Prasana,” he said

“We do not want to be confrontational, but we are firm in exercising our rights,” he added.


***


IGP has inexcusably not shown himself at the meeting but he has shown himself to be a moral coward. Not fit to be IGP lah