Tuesday, December 09, 2025

$38 Billion Gift To Taliban: How U.S. Taxpayers Armed The Taliban Twice & Set The Af-Pak Region On Fire



Tuesday, December 9, 2025


$38 Billion Gift To Taliban: How U.S. Taxpayers Armed The Taliban Twice & Set The Af-Pak Region On Fire


By Sumit Ahlawat
-December 9, 2025


It’s a well-known fact that during the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989), the U.S. government funded the Afghan Mujahideen movement through the CIA under Operation Cyclone. However, what is not very well-known is that this funding of the Afghan Taliban through U.S. taxpayers’ money continued right until 2021.

In fact, ironically, the billions of dollars of U.S. money that were poured into Afghanistan during the two-decade-long ‘War on Terror’ (2001-2021) for infrastructure development and military aid ended up in the hands of the very forces the U.S. Army was fighting in Afghanistan, the Afghan Taliban.

Taken cumulatively, the Afghan Mujahideen movement that later morphed into the Afghan Taliban has received most financial and military support from none other than the U.S. taxpayers, running close to USD 40 billion, and some of the most advanced weapons systems, according to a new report by the US government’s Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).

These weapons systems, which were left behind during the US’s hasty and disorganized retreat from Afghanistan in 2021, include combat aircraft, armored vehicles, machine guns, night vision helmet devices, High Mobility Multipurpose Vehicles, and millions of rounds of ammunition, and now form the backbone of the Afghan Taliban government’s defense infrastructure.

Worse, many of these advanced weapons systems are reportedly sold on the black market and are even ending up in the hands of terrorist organizations such as the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), also known as the Pakistan Taliban, fueling insurgency in Pakistan.

Notably, the TTP has been recognized by the US government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization since 2010.

The story underscores the futility of the U.S.’s longest war, which, according to Brown University’s Costs of War Project report, cost the U.S. taxpayers a whopping USD 2.3 trillion, and the death of 2,450 American troops.

How U.S. Taxpayers Armed & Funded The Afghan Taliban

According to a new report by SIGAR, from 2002 through mid-2021, the United States Congress appropriated approximately US$144.7 billion for Afghanistan reconstruction—far more than it spent on the post-World War II Marshall Plan in inflation-adjusted terms.

However, during the abrupt withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, US and coalition forces left behind billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment, which is now a key part of the Taliban government’s defense infrastructure.

According to the report, the United States left behind over US$38 billion in military equipment and infrastructure, both military and civilian.

“The U.S. obligated at least $38.6 billion equipping and building infrastructure for the ANDSF (Afghanistan National Defense and Security Forces) and constructing civil infrastructure for the benefit of the Afghan people,” it said.

Of the US$38 billion, the Department of Defense (now Department of War) had earlier estimated that at least US$7 billion worth of weapons were now under Taliban control.

According to the report, the United States has provided 96,000 ground combat vehicles and more than 51,000 light tactical vehicles to Afghan forces.

The list also included 23,825 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles, nearly 900 armored combat vehicles, 427,300 weapons, 17,400 helmet-mounted night-vision devices, at least 162 aircraft, and other items.

As of July 31, 2021—approximately two weeks before the Taliban takeover—DOD records indicated that the Afghan Air Force had 162 U.S.-provided aircraft in its inventory, of which 131 were usable.

Most of these weapons systems could now be under the control of the Afghan Taliban.

Notably, in July this year, US President Donald Trump called the Afghanistan troop withdrawal “the most embarrassing moment” in US history.

Taliban take over Kabul airport and USA military equipment (via Platform X)


Trump also pointed to the loss of military equipment and the Bagram Airbase, which he said had strategic significance.

Trump said: “They left all that equipment behind and every year they have a parade down from street with the equipment. With all that equipment that they left, they should have taken every ounce of it. Every screw, every bolt, every nail you take out of there. And Millie said, I remember one time, so we’re better off leaving the equipment.

“Why? It’s cheaper to leave $150 million airplane rather than flying it into Pakistan or India or some place… They left their dignity behind. It was the most embarrassing moment in my opinion in the history of my country.”

Trump has also suggested that the Afghan Taliban should hand over the Bagram Airbase and the weapons left behind to the US, a demand the Afghan Taliban has rejected.

Pakistan has also supported the idea of the US getting back its weapons and the US control of the strategic Bagram Airbase, due to Islamabad’s ongoing hostilities with the Afghan Taliban.

A Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson has said, “Our concern is that these weapons have been found to be used by terrorists in their extremist activities inside Pakistan. We have raised this issue before. If the US makes any effort to return these weapons, it will be helpful for overall regional security.”
Is The Afghan Taliban Giving U.S. Weapons To TTP?

The links between the Afghan Taliban and the TTP (Pakistan Taliban) are well established.

Earlier this year, in February, a UN Security Council report said: “There was increased collaboration between TTP, the Afghan Taliban and Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS, not listed), conducting attacks under the banner of Tehrik-e Jihad Pakistan (TJP, not listed).

Taliban fighters inspect a jet left behind by US troops at Kabul airport. (via Twitter)


“Greater facilitation among these groups and TTP in terms of the provision of suicide bombers and fighters and ideological guidance might transform the latter into an extraregional threat and an umbrella organization for other terrorist groups operating in the region.”

Indeed, Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Afghan Taliban of not only supporting and sheltering the TTP, but also providing it with arms left behind by the U.S. forces.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan has denied these allegations, saying terrorism inside Pakistan is Islamabad’s internal problem; however, Pakistan has launched air strikes inside Afghanistan, citing these allegations.

Pakistan and Afghanistan are currently engaged in a low-intensity war over these allegations.

Meanwhile, in another high-profile attack on December 9, TTP militants stormed a security checkpoint in Pakistan’s northwest near the Afghan border, killing six soldiers.


🚨6 Pakistan Soldiers Killed in TTP Attack 🇵🇰Pakistani #Taliban militants stormed a security checkpoint in Pakistan's northwestern border area with #Afghanistan, killing six soldiers & wounding four others.
4
Reply
Copy link


Islamabad has accused the Afghan Taliban of using US weapons in its hostilities with Pakistan.

The videos released of recent clashes between the Afghan Taliban and Pakistani forces show the Taliban forces mainly using light weapons.

The light weapons currently in the hands of the Taliban government’s army include mostly Kalashnikovs, American M16, M4, and M29 light machine guns.

These include heavy machine guns like the Pika M2 and M240, grenade launchers, as well as rocket launchers and anti-tank missiles like the RPG Seven and AT Four.

According to a Taliban commander, in recent clashes, “night vision goggles and laser-equipped weapons have been effective in nighttime attacks.”

Sami Yousafzai, an expert on Afghan affairs, told BBC Urdu that not only is the Afghan Taliban using the weapons left behind by US forces in its fight against the Pakistani security forces, but these weapons are also being sold in the black arms market.

Sami Yousafzai said, “Anyone can buy these weapons, be it arms dealers, ordinary people, or jihadists.”

He said that TTP militants were also part of the Afghan Taliban forces, which captured weapons left behind by retreating US forces. Thus, these weapons also fell into the hands of TTP militants, and are now also being used inside Pakistan.

He added that no evidence suggests that the Afghan Taliban themselves provided these American weapons to the TTP.

He also said that the Afghan Taliban will not return these weapons to the US as they see them as “war booty.”

For now, these US weapons in the hands of the Afghan Taliban and the TTP have become a headache for the Pakistani armed forces, which are already battling insurgency in many parts of the country.Sumit Ahlawat has over a decade of experience in news media. He has worked with Press Trust of India, Times Now, Zee News, Economic Times, and Microsoft News. He holds a Master’s Degree in International Media and Modern History from the University of Sheffield, UK.


***


Same thing when the wanks hightailed it from Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City now) - left tons of military equipment for the Viets. Blardy good. To be fair, prior to their great escape, the wanks did ask around SE Asian countries like Malaysia as to what equipment we would like, but everyone was cautious about picking up probably useless wankee stuff. In the end, Malaysia declined.


DAP leaders demand end to police dress-code barriers after accident victims turned away in Melaka





Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo Poay Tiong has criticised the actions of police personnel in Melaka after a woman and her daughter involved in a road accident were allegedly turned away from the Jasin district police headquarters because they were wearing a “pant-skirt”. - Bernama file pic, December 9, 2025


DAP leaders demand end to police dress-code barriers after accident victims turned away in Melaka



Gobind Singh Deo and Khoo Poay Tiong call for urgent SOP reforms after a woman and her daughter were denied entry to a police station over their attire



A. Azim Idris
Updated 8 seconds ago
9 December, 2025
7:54 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR — Two senior DAP leaders, Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo and Kota Melaka MP Khoo Poay Tiong, have criticised the actions of police personnel in Melaka after a woman and her daughter involved in a road accident were allegedly turned away from the Jasin district police headquarters because they were wearing a “pant-skirt”.

Gobind said police stations are meant to safeguard the public and ensure that reports of crimes and accidents — which are legally required in many instances — can be made without obstruction.

“Denying a person the right to file a police report because of how they are dressed is not just an abuse of authority but is also obstruction of justice,” he said.

“The immediate and primary focus of the police officer on duty should have been to assist the victims in recording the details of the incident and not turning them away as in this case.”

He urged the Inspector-General of Police to issue clear instructions ensuring that no individual seeking to report an accident or crime is denied access on the basis of attire.

“People don’t dress up in anticipation of crime,” he said, stressing that what matters is the urgency of the incident, not the clothing of those seeking help.

Gobind added that he would raise the matter with the Home Minister and push for a review of all SOPs that restrict access to police stations, emphasising that such incidents must not recur.

Khoo likewise described the episode as an example of excessive bureaucracy and a failure by frontline personnel to follow ministerial directives.

“I am shocked and disappointed by the recent incident in Melaka where a female driver, after being involved in a car accident, was denied entry into a police station due to her attire,” he said.

He reminded officers that Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail had already stated in 2023: “The police must accept reports from the public, regardless of what the person is wearing.”

Khoo said dress codes in government agencies were intended for formal settings — such as official meetings or ceremonies — and should not apply to counter services that assist the public with emergencies, payments or basic enquiries. “Imposing these dress codes on ordinary government counter services is entirely unreasonable,” he said.

He questioned whether victims of robbery or trauma would also be subjected to clothing scrutiny before being allowed to report a case. Khoo said he plans to table amendments in Parliament to clarify dress-code guidelines and exempt all frontline counter services — particularly police reporting and emergency assistance — from such requirements.

Earlier, Melaka police chief Datuk Dzulkhairi Mukhtar said the incident occurred at around 5pm and that investigations were launched after receiving a complaint.

He confirmed that the woman and her daughter had arrived at the Jasin district police headquarters to file a report on a road accident.

He said the officer on duty had asked them to return home and change into attire deemed more appropriate. “This was because both women were not injured,” he said.

According to Dzulkhairi, the pair returned at 5.40pm in different clothing and were then allowed to lodge their report without further issue.

He said the public is expected to follow dress-code guidelines at police report counters, though exceptions may be made for emergencies requiring immediate attention.

The woman later told a Chinese-language daily that she was unhappy about being prevented from lodging a report solely because she was wearing a skirt above the knee. – December 9, 2025


***


Sack those arrogant incompetent public servants


Dr M "Steps Up" Attacks On Anwar: But What About His Own "USD40 Billion" Wealth Allegations..?!!!





OPINION | Dr M "Steps Up" Attacks On Anwar: But What About His Own "USD40 Billion" Wealth Allegations..?!!!


9 Dec 2025 • 11:00 AM MYT


JK Joseph
Repentant ex-banker who believes in truth, compassion and some humour



Credit Image: The Malaysian Reserve / Sinar Harian (Photo AFP) / Facebook Dr Mahathir.


It looks like the irrepressible Dr Mahathir has brought in some “big guns” to try take down his sworn enemy Anwar; however, what some critics may ask is: is all that for real – or could there be something else brewing behind the scenes?


Dr Mahathir Mohamad, the peerless and fearless “warrior” whom critics will point out is perennially engaged in a “war” to bring down someone, seems to have upped the ante on PMX.


In fact, only recently, the still active and witty centenarian had lodged a police report against Anwar over the controversial Reciprocal Trade Agreement (ART) between Malaysia and the United States which he insists is unconstitutional.


Dr Mahathir seems unhappy as under the agreement “Bumiputera privileges” can no longer be imposed on American goods or trade!


Meanwhile, in a recent post in his hugely popular Facebook account it would appear that he had managed to persuade some retired army chiefs to join his anti-Madani brigade!


For the record, the two time ex-premier had also highlighted a press conference with the group and had further attached a media statement by General (Retired) Tan Sri Borhan Ahmad on behalf of the Malaysian Armed Forces Veterans; in it the group had expressed its “deep concern” with the way the Madani government has been managing ties with the United States, especially the recent trade deal signed during President Trump's visit here.


According to the statement, with the recent signing of the trade agreement, it appears that Malaysia had “handed over the sovereignty and integrity” of the country to foreign powers which does not bode well for an independent nation.


“Are we now being enslaved, recolonised, or blackmailed into accepting the biased treaty (with the US)?”


The statement from the army veteran group further recalled how the country had fought for its independence through blood and tears, even battled with the Communist Party of Malaya (PKM) to eliminate those threats, and built and developed the country to what it is today.


“If the Malaysian armed forces had failed… would there be the Twin Towers and the iconic 118 tower?”


It then closed with a somewhat sombre warning, seemingly aimed at the current prime minister and his cabinet: let's not pawn the country until it becomes beggars again!


However, truth be told, not many would have been amused by the shrewd Dr Mahathir’s latest shenanigan in roping in the retired top army personnel.


As the agreement with the US mainly centres on the “economy” of two sovereign nations – why bring in the country's armed forces?


Furthermore, by framing the trade deal as something that violated the sovereignty of the nation, was Dr Mahathir really fighting to save the country, or was it actually to discredit his nemesis Anwar – and destabilize the current administration?


While on the subject of sovereignty, what some observers may question is: what about the controversy over Pulau Batu Puteh, the rocky island near Johor that was “lost” to a neighbouring state during his second stint as premier?




In fact, won't many in this country also be reminded of the explosive findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on “Project IC" which proved beyond doubt that tens of thousands of identity cards and birth certificates were issued to illegal immigrants in Sabah to alter the demographics of the state for political reasons? To many in this country didn't that actually border on treason?




Significantly too, didn't all that happen during Dr Mahathir's tenure when he used to rule the nation with an “iron fist” where no one was spared - not the judiciary, not even the royalties? Come to think of it, back in the eighties when “Operasi Lalang” was declared didn't many ordinary citizens also feel that it was unconstitutional?




Have the country's gallant but ageing former war generals forgotten about all those controversial events during Dr Mahathir's rule?


As for the recent jaw-dropping allegation by an international website that he was amongst the world's top billionaires with a net worth of USD40 billion, of course what many in the country may want to know is: given the gravity of the accusation and its impact on the nation's reputation, shouldn't he be pushing his legal team to clear his name immediately, instead of arranging press conferences with some retirees ostensibly to take potshots at his political rivals?




In short, could the hoo-ha over the trade deal, and the latest drama involving the army veterans, be just a smokescreen - to divert the public's attention from the 40 billion dollar question hanging over him?


***


Those ex Generals must remember our (apolitical) military would never ever interfere or be involved in politics, like what the Indons or Thais or Pinoys had sometimes done - it's against the Malaysian Constitution. The Old Man, an ex PM, should have been mindful of that, and could be seditious in recruiting them to his politics.




DAP Unease Deepens as Guan Eng’s Tone Sharpens After Sabah Election Collapse





DAP Unease Deepens as Guan Eng’s Tone Sharpens After Sabah Election Collapse


9 Dec 2025 • 1:30 PM MYT


Kamran
A freelance content creator



Image credit: Malay Mail


DAP’s sweeping defeat in the November 2025 Sabah state elections has triggered a notable shift in the party’s internal dynamics, with former secretary-general Lim Guan Eng emerging as a leading voice of dissatisfaction. The party’s total loss of all eight contested seats — including areas long viewed as dependable Chinese-majority bases — has intensified scrutiny toward the leadership of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and the broader Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition.


The defeat appears to have jolted Lim’s stance. Weeks before the polls, he had been publicly applauding the administration’s economic direction. He had highlighted Malaysia’s first services account surplus in over a decade, firm third-quarter GDP growth, and a stronger ringgit as indicators of responsible fiscal management. He had also pointed to a favourable debt position and gains from earlier Samurai bond issuances as signs of economic resilience under the unity government.


However, what began as praise has now shifted into open concern. The Sabah outcome, widely linked to voter frustration over new tax burdens — particularly heightened sales and service tax applications that affected tuition centres and small businesses — has forced a reassessment of PH’s political strategy. Lim has indicated that non-Malay voters, traditionally reliable supporters of the coalition, may have begun interpreting federal economic policies as insensitive to community pressures.


His recent statements suggest that the Sabah results should be read as a warning from the electorate, particularly those angered by policy decisions they perceive as poorly timed or inadequately justified. He has stressed that elected representatives carry the responsibility of holding the government accountable when decisions fall short of expectations, regardless of political alliances.


Lim’s latest remarks highlight his belief that the prime minister cannot afford to dismiss the sentiment coming out of Sabah. He warns that sidelining these signals could undermine PH’s standing nationwide and weaken DAP’s influence within the coalition. The message appears directed at urging Anwar to deliver more meaningful commitments to non-Malay communities — especially in the areas of education, cultural support, and funding for schools and houses of worship.


This shift in tone reveals deeper cracks within PH. Lim had previously asserted in early 2025 that DAP’s support for the government was steadfast, yet not unconditional. Now, his urgency underscores a coalition under strain as it grapples with the political fallout from Sabah’s electoral shock.


With the 16th General Election inching closer, the unity government faces mounting pressure to recalibrate its policies and restore trust — particularly among voters who once viewed PH as the primary vehicle for reform.


***


Guanee wants to return to mainstream political leadership - he misses the excitement, wakakaka


Is Rafizi Now Blaming MACC for His PKR Defeat?





OPINION | Is Rafizi Now Blaming MACC for His PKR Defeat?


9 Dec 2025 • 9:00 AM MYT



TheRealNehruism
An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist



Image credit: The Vibes / Malay Mail


Former economy minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli has once again thrown a political grenade into the national discourse. This time, he alleges that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was involved—intentionally or otherwise—in actions that affected the outcome of the PKR internal elections earlier this year. The allegation, which surfaced in his “Yang Berhenti Menteri” podcast, has since triggered a rapid-fire exchange between Rafizi, MACC, and anonymous insiders speaking to the media.


To understand the unfolding drama, we need to examine three layers:


Rafizi’s accusation, MACC’s rebuttal, and the counter-narratives coming from Rafizi and internal MACC sources. Only then can we ask the final question—was Rafizi simply nursing political wounds, or is there a deeper rot within the PKR electoral machinery?


Rafizi’s Accusation: A Targeted Investigation During PKR’s Election Peak

In the podcast, Rafizi recounted an incident involving a PKR candidate who was allegedly investigated at the height of the party’s April–May leadership election. According to him, MACC officers had “surrounded” the candidate’s home and conducted an inquiry that he claims could have influenced the outcome of the polls.

He portrayed the timing as suspiciously convenient and potentially damaging to the candidate’s image—and by extension—to Rafizi himself, since the candidate was someone within his political orbit.

Rafizi insists this was not a minor inconvenience but a move that potentially disrupted political momentum. He also revealed that he had personally raised the matter with the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, during the peak of the issue—suggesting that the matter had reached the highest levels of the government.


Following the podcast, Rafizi elaborated further in a detailed thread on X, where he argued that the allegation being investigated—linked to the cash purchase of a low-cost flat via auction—was flimsy at best and certainly not justification for an intrusive investigation during an internal party election.


MACC’s Official Response: “Baseless and Inaccurate”

MACC was quick to deny the accusation. In a rare late-night Sunday statement, the commission flatly rejected claims that it had been weaponised for political purposes or that it had detained a supporter of Rafizi.


The commission clarified several points:

  • Officers did not surround the candidate’s home.
  • They were only present to meet the individual and conduct a standard search.
  • Once they confirmed the individual was not home, they left.
  • The candidate later appeared at the MACC office voluntarily and was released without detention.
  • Investigations are triggered by complaints—not political instructions.
  • Anyone dissatisfied can file complaints through official channels.

MACC also cautioned against airing allegations publicly without evidence, warning that such claims could undermine public confidence in enforcement agencies.


MACC Insider Speaks: No Evidence of Bribery, No Fancy Houses, No Corruption

Adding another layer to the story, Free Malaysia Today reported that an MACC insider said the investigation found no evidence of bribery or corruption involving the PKR candidate in question.

The source revealed several key details:

  • All funds used to purchase assets came from personal savings, business proceeds, and company sales.
  • The candidate owned several medium-cost houses and vehicles, all obtained with legitimate bank loans.
  • Claims that the individual owned an “extravagant” house in Port Dickson were false—the property was actually a local authority asset disposed of through normal procedures and bought for RM55,000.
  • The candidate used to run several businesses before entering politics, and although the businesses were sold, the registration was not transferred officially, prompting routine queries from tax authorities.

Crucially, the source reiterated that MACC never detained the individual, aligning with MACC’s official statement.


This insider account attempts to paint the investigation as routine and justified, rather than politically motivated. It also indirectly disputes any idea that the candidate was involved in anything resembling corruption.


Rafizi’s Counter-Response: “Thank You MACC for Confirming It Happened”

Rafizi, however, argues that MACC’s statements—official and anonymous—confirm his core claims rather than deny them.

He identifies two points MACC openly acknowledged:

  • The PKR candidate was indeed investigated.
  • The candidate was not charged with any offence.


To him, this is enough to validate his podcast story.

He further accuses MACC of strategically avoiding two details:

  • The date of the incident, which he insists fell squarely during the PKR election.
  • The nature of the allegation, which he says was over a legally purchased low-cost flat.

Rafizi argues that if the timeline and allegation were disclosed, they would strengthen his claim that the investigation’s timing had political consequences.


He also noted that his communication with the Prime Minister during the incident could be verified through phone bills, should the matter escalate.


Finally, Rafizi urged the Prime Minister to reconsider extending MACC chief Tan Sri Azam Baki’s contract, arguing that the institution’s credibility is now in question.


Sore Loser — or Was the PKR Election Truly Compromised?

So what should Malaysians make of this?

Is Rafizi merely a sore loser, attempting to rewrite the narrative of his PKR election defeat by pointing fingers at MACC?


Is he weaponising a routine investigation to suggest a grand political conspiracy?


Or is he highlighting a real systemic problem—one where poorly timed investigations, lack of transparency, and leadership controversies within MACC cast a shadow over a major political party’s internal election?


Was the PKR election clean, flawed, or quietly rigged by forces no one wants to openly acknowledge?


At this stage, the truth is contested—and may depend less on evidence than on which political story Malaysians find more believable.