Thursday, July 23, 2026

'What was their crime?': BBC visits Iran school where strike killed 120 children





'What was their crime?': BBC visits Iran school where strike killed 120 children


4 hours ago
Nawal Al-Maghafi
Senior international investigations correspondent, Minab, southern Iran


BBC


This report contains distressing descriptions of the deaths of children.

Amaineh Nademi walks carefully through what is left of her old school. Chunks of broken concrete hang precariously from the damaged upper floor. A few classrooms are still standing, their brightly coloured walls decorated with painted balloons and flowers.

The 33-year-old teacher knows exactly what was where - the girls' classrooms on the upper floor, the boys' classrooms below, the headteacher's office, the prayer room.

Rubble is all that remains of her classroom, where she taught first-grade girls at Shajareh Tayyebeh Primary School in Minab, a small city in southern Iran.



Children's chairs and decorated walls can still be seen in the damaged classrooms


On 28 February, in the opening hours of the US-Israeli war with Iran, a strike on the school transformed an ordinary Saturday morning into one of the conflict's defining tragedies - and its deadliest single incident for civilians.

In total, 156 people, including 120 children, have been confirmed killed, including a pregnant woman and her unborn child, according to the Minab prosecutor's office.

Experts say evidence indicates that US forces hit the school, which is next to an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) compound that satellite images show was struck several times.


The US has not admitted responsibility, though US media have reported that military investigators believe it is likely that US forces carried out the strike unintentionally.


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Girls were taught on the upper floor of the primary school while the boys' classrooms were below


The pain of what happened here is still raw. Teachers tell us they pray at the site every day. Rescue workers are still searching for remains of those killed here.

Much of the upper floor collapsed into the one below. "You can't call it a school," says Amaineh – just "walls that smell of death, grief and the blood that was shed here".

The Iranian authorities were keen for us to visit the school – it is evidence, they say, that a campaign presented by Washington as an attack on Iran's military and security apparatus has instead inflicted a devastating cost on civilians.
'We were all sent flying'

The school day had begun as usual, Amaineh says.

Because it was the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, the children gathered inside the prayer hall to recite the Quran, she recalls, before she began teaching her pupils a new letter of the Persian alphabet.


But, as the first attacks of the war unfolded across Iran, she says the headteacher announced the school would be closing, and teachers began contacting parents, urging them to collect their children.

Only five of Amaineh's 15 first-grade pupils were left in her classroom on the upper floor, she says, when she first heard an explosion not far from the school. She says she was in the corridor and rushed back for the children.

"Just as I went to leave, a missile struck the school," says Amaineh. "Something hit my head and my students' heads - we were all sent flying."

Then, she says, thick black smoke filled the classroom: "I couldn't even see the pupils I was holding in my arms. We couldn't breathe."

She says she remembers hearing another explosion, as well as the sounds of screaming, children crying and then the school itself collapsing – "destroyed all at once".

"Blood was pouring from me and the students," she adds.


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Teacher Amaineh Nademi says there was smoke so thick she could not see the children she was holding


When the smoke briefly cleared, she says she passed the injured children down to people below and clambered past fire and rubble towards the school gate, where she saw a crowd of parents. Many had rushed to the site without even putting shoes on, she recalls.


She says she could not understand why the parents were running towards the school, believing in her shock and confusion that everyone else had already escaped the building: "I didn't know that all of them were under the rubble."

Amaineh had taught first grade at the school for six years. She lists the names of students and colleagues killed that day: Adrina from her first grade class, who she says was killed on the stairs with her mother, Fatemeh in second grade, and many others including students in sixth grade she remembers teaching the alphabet to, as well as the headteacher, deputy head, PE teacher and Quran teacher.
'Find my son'

Within minutes, emergency workers began arriving.

Reza Besharati, a worker with the Iranian Red Crescent Society, says he was among the first rescuers on the scene, and found the roads near the school filled with traffic as desperate families rushed to look for their children.

Minab is a small city. As Reza made his way through the crowd and into the wreckage, he says he recognised people he knew, including some of his own relatives.

"We started to find the people, thinking maybe someone would be alive," he says. "But unfortunately, nobody was."


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Reza Besharati says he cannot forget what he saw when searching the collapsed building


He says the dead were found grimly disfigured: "Maybe just a hand, maybe just a leg… Nobody had a complete body." Many families recognised their children by their shoes or clothing, he adds.

One of Reza's relatives was searching and begging "just find my child, find my son", he says. "I couldn't tell her that her son was not alive. We were all just crying."

Reza says the sights he saw while searching the collapsed building have not left him: "I couldn't sleep for a few days," he says. "When I close my eyes… I just remember these things that I have seen here."
Strike investigated

As details of the strike emerged, President Donald Trump first blamed Iran, without providing evidence.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the military was investigating and that US forces "never target civilian targets". He later announced a higher-level investigation, led by an officer from outside US Central Command (Centcom). The Trump administration has still not released the findings.

Several US media outlets have reported - citing people familiar with the US military investigation - that preliminary findings concluded it was likely that outdated data supplied by the US Defence Intelligence Agency led to the school being treated as part of a military site.

Expert video analysis has shown the IRGC complex next to the school was hit by a precision guided Tomahawk missile - a type of cruise missile that neither Israel nor Iran is known to possess. Satellite imagery showed the school and several buildings in the compound had been hit, and verified videos showed the area was hit by a series of strikes. US military maps also confirm American operations in southern Iran – including the Minab area - at the time.


Historical satellite images show the school area was previously part of the IRGC complex, but has been walled off since 2016 and has its own entrances and yards.




Also, information indicating the site was a school was publicly available online. Archived snapshots of the websites for the girls' and boys' sections of the school – taken in the months before the attack - include the address of the site.

The head of Centcom told a congressional committee in May, without giving further detail, that the investigation was "complex" as the school was "on an active IRGC cruise missile base" – which Iran's foreign ministry rejected as a "baseless fabrication".

The IRGC runs some community and medical facilities in addition to its extensive military, security and economic activities. Local residents have told BBC Persian that the site had previously been a base for an IRGC naval brigade, but that they believed its military use had ceased several years ago. Photographs show buildings on the compound included a clinic and a car wash.

The BBC approached the Department of Defense and the US military for comment. Officials said the investigation was ongoing and there were no further updates.


'Identified by her socks'

A short drive from the ruined school is the cemetery where many of the pupils and teachers are buried.


Every evening, families gather beside the graves. Mothers wipe dust from photographs of their children. Parents sit and pray long after darkness has fallen.

Around them, brothers and sisters play between the headstones of siblings whose lives were cut short.


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Nine-year-old Setayesh wanted to be a teacher, her mother says


Masoumeh Mehran Shekhabadi comes to visit her nine-year-old daughter, Setayesh, every day, often staying long into the night.

She was among the parents who ran to the school after the strike. "There was no school," she says, her voice breaking. "There was only smoke, children's hair, a hand on one side, a foot on the other. They had been torn to pieces."

Masoumeh adds: "I kept calling out, not only to Setayesh, but to all the children: 'Children, where are you?'"

Setayesh's family did not receive confirmation of her death until the early hours of the following morning, Masoumeh says. She remembers being repeatedly asked what colour socks the child had been wearing, and replying that they were cream. Setayesh was then identified by her socks, she says.

The nine-year-old had wanted to be a teacher, her mother adds. "She would line up her dolls on the couch and say: 'I am your teacher. I'm in primary school now, so I am a teacher.'"


As for many parents here, grief has become intertwined with anger. "May Trump be destroyed, so these children's blood is not wasted," Masoumeh says.


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Masoumeh says she remembers rushing to the school to find it destroyed and children "torn to pieces"


'They'd gone to learn'

Iran's government has repeatedly invoked Minab in speeches, international forums and state media coverage - even naming a plane carrying negotiators "Minab-168", in reference to the death toll previously given by officials.

The attack offers the Islamic Republic a powerful counter-narrative to Washington's description of its campaign.


JACK GARLAND / BBC
Every evening, families visit the graves of loved ones killed in the strike


The war has divided Iranians. Some celebrated when the air strikes began, angered by the government's history of detaining dissidents and using lethal force during repeated waves of protest. They hoped military pressure from outside might finally weaken or even bring down the regime.

Some opponents of the government have told the BBC they saw the strike at Minab as a huge blow. It made the idea of a clean, surgical war impossible to sustain and allowed the authorities to present themselves as the defenders of the Iranian people against foreign attack.


In Minab, Amaineh visits the cemetery, walking among the graves of her former pupils.

On a nearby memorial wall are the faces of the children, staff and parents who left home that Saturday morning and never returned.

Setayesh's mother still sits beside the grave of her little girl.

"What was these children's crime? Did they carry weapons? A pencil, a book, a notebook and a schoolbag. They had no weapons… They'd gone to learn," she says.

Additional reporting by Jasmin Dyer


***


Idiot Trump - all for his OverLord Satanyahu






Rising costs remain top challenge for Malaysian Chinese businesses, ACCCIM survey finds






Rising costs remain top challenge for Malaysian Chinese businesses, ACCCIM survey finds



Lee Heng Guie, executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Centre (SERC), a think tank under ACCCIM, said higher raw material prices were cited by an overwhelming majority of respondents in the Malaysia’s Business and Economic Conditions Survey (M-BECS). — Picture by Raymond Manuel

First Published: Thursday, 23 Jul 2026 3:30 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Rising production costs continued to weigh on Malaysian Chinese businesses in the first half of 2026, with higher raw material prices and operating expenses emerging as the main challenges, according to the latest survey by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia (ACCCIM).


Lee Heng Guie, executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Centre (SERC), a think tank under ACCCIM, said higher raw material prices were cited by an overwhelming majority of respondents in the Malaysia’s Business and Economic Conditions Survey (M-BECS).

By sector, the construction industry was the most affected, with 81.1 per cent of respondents citing higher raw material prices as a concern, followed by manufacturing at 71.2 per cent and wholesale and retail trade at 59.7 per cent.


High operating costs were the second biggest concern, cited by respondents in the construction sector (56.9 per cent), manufacturing (54.1 per cent) and wholesale and retail trade (50.7 per cent).


For the professional and business services sector, high operating costs were cited by 41.4 per cent of respondents, followed by changing consumer behaviour at 38.3 per cent.

“Changing consumer behaviour is linked to the rising cost of living and inflation where they are becoming more cost-conscious in their purchases, comparing prices, buying only essential items, looking for promotions and increasingly turning to online digital purchases,” Lee said.


Despite the challenges, he said most businesses expected continued increases in the cost of local and imported inputs in the second half of 2026.

“For 1H 2026, 50.9 per cent of respondents said domestic sales have weakened and that will continue into the second half of this year with a forecast of 40.6 per cent.

“For business production, 42.5 per cent of respondents said production levels had declined, with an improved forecast of 32.5 per cent in the second half of 2026,” he said.

The 2H 2026 outlook showed financial management, particularly cash flow conditions, was expected to remain largely unchanged, with 61.3 per cent of respondents expecting similar conditions compared with 61.2 per cent in the first half of the year.

Price conditions were also expected to improve for both domestic and export markets, with 25.1 per cent and 18.2 per cent of respondents respectively anticipating better conditions in 2H 2026, compared with 33.9 per cent and 21.1 per cent in 1H 2026.

However, input costs remained a major concern, with 67.2 per cent of respondents expecting local input costs to worsen in 2H 2026, while 62.1 per cent expected imported input costs to deteriorate.

This compared with 70.4 per cent and 65 per cent respectively in the first half of 2026.

The survey polled 791 businesses between June 4 and June 30.

Umno leaders cool to Hamzah Zainudin’s ‘Perikatan Barisan Nasional’ proposal





Umno leaders cool to Hamzah Zainudin’s ‘Perikatan Barisan Nasional’ proposal



Umno leaders Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail, Datuk Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki and Datuk Seri Jalaluddin Alias today dismissed Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin’s proposed ‘Perikatan Barisan Nasional’ name, saying it was neither agreed upon by BN’s leadership nor a priority. — Pictures by Yusof Mat Isa/Bernama


Summary

  • Umno leaders have reservations about the proposed name "Perikatan Barisan Nasional" for the BN-PN cooperation, deeming it irrelevant.
  • The BN-PN partnership is a temporary understanding to contest the Negeri Sembilan state election and avoid multi-cornered contests.
  • Umno stresses that the proposed name was never discussed or approved by BN's leadership, prioritising cooperation to maximise election chances rather than the new name.


By Malay Mail
First Published: Thursday, 23 Jul 2026 2:54 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Several Umno leaders have expressed reservations over Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin’s proposal to name the Barisan Nasional (BN)-Perikatan Nasional (PN) cooperation “Perikatan Barisan Nasional”.

Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail described the proposed name as irrelevant, saying it did not reflect the nature of the current arrangement, which is not the formation of a new political coalition, Malay daily Sinar Harian reported today.


Instead, he said the BN-PN partnership was merely an understanding to contest the Negeri Sembilan state election together.

“His (Hamzah’s) statement is outside the scope of what we had discussed previously. To me, the term is not relevant because this is only a temporary cooperation. I also do not know what his interpretation is,” he told reporters after a state election campaign event in Palong 4, Jempol, last night.


Umno secretary-general Datuk Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki, who was also present, stressed that BN’s leadership had never discussed or approved the proposed name.


He said the cooperation with PN was based solely on an understanding to avoid multi-cornered contests and maximise their chances of winning the Negeri Sembilan election.

“As for ‘Perikatan Barisan Nasional’, that is his statement. We, as the leadership, have never agreed to it.


“Let us work together with mutual understanding, avoid overlapping seats and win the Negeri Sembilan state election together.

“If we can cooperate well, God willing, Negeri Sembilan will become the starting point and catalyst for the unity long desired by the Muslim community as a whole,” he said.

Asyraf also urged all parties to embrace the cooperation sincerely so the alliance could be strengthened and govern the state effectively if given the mandate by voters.

Meanwhile, Negeri Sembilan Umno chairman Datuk Seri Jalaluddin Alias said the name of the BN-PN cooperation was not something that should be a priority.

“That is merely Hamzah’s proposal and it will be determined by the top leadership of both parties.

“But I do not think it is a major issue or something we should be focusing on,” he said.


***


SNUBBED kaukau Hamzah, MALU LAH - if I were you I'd be so embarrassed I'll jump into the Linggi River, wakakaka


Ingrates amputating hands that saved them


From the FB page of:


Australians against zio onanism




‘Malay-Muslim unity’ narrative hampers PH’s efforts to woo Malays, says Fahmi





‘Malay-Muslim unity’ narrative hampers PH’s efforts to woo Malays, says Fahmi


2 hours ago
Elill Easwaran


The PKR information chief says the coalition will counter such narratives by focusing on its performance in government


PKR information chief Fahmi Fadzil said PH would work harder to show that Malay-Muslim interests had not been sidelined under the coalition’s administration.


SEREMBAN: Pakatan Harapan has acknowledged that the Malay-Muslim unity narrative Barisan Nasional and Perikatan Nasional are pushing made it difficult for the Anwar Ibrahim’s coalition to woo the Malay electorate in Negeri Sembilan.

PKR information chief Fahmi Fadzil said the narrative had proven effective at the Johor polls earlier this month, which saw a landslide victory for BN.

He said PH would counter such narratives by focusing on its performance in government.


“The narrative has indeed proven effective in Johor, where we saw Malay votes, particularly those from PAS, being consolidated and added to the support for Barisan Nasional candidates. So yes, it is a challenge,” Fahmi said at a press conference.

Negeri Sembilan DAP secretary Cha Kee Chin and Amanah communications director Khalid Samad were also present.


Khalid, meanwhile, said the Malay-Muslim unity narrative threatened nation-building, arguing that when people were divided and pitted against one another along racial lines, it would create problems.

“PH sees this as a threat not only in elections but also in efforts to foster unity among Malaysians. Unity is good, but the purpose behind that unity is equally important.”

He questioned the objective behind calls for Malay unity, especially if they were framed around confronting non-Malays.

“If Malays unite because they are being told there is a threat from non-Malays, as is implicitly suggested in such calls, it will only lead to racial division and tension.”


Khalid however said PH would be able to respond more effectively to such narratives in the run up to the Negeri Sembilan polls as BN and PAS’s cooperation was out in the open.

In Johor, PAS and BN cooperated “behind closed doors”.

“Here (in Negeri Sembilan), it is being done openly, so the narrative is much clearer and voters can see for themselves the dangers of such an alliance,” he said.

He urged voters to unite and vote for good governance.


Who truly represents Malay-Muslim interests?

Fahmi also said some political leaders had sought to create the impression that only one group could claim to represent Malay-Muslim interests.

“If that is the case, then are Khalid and I not Malay-Muslims? Politics that is this exclusive does not reflect the diversity and pluralism of our country. It only plants the seeds of division that Khalid spoke about earlier.”

He said PH viewed the narrative seriously and would work harder to engage Malay voters by demonstrating that Malay-Muslim interests had not been sidelined under the coalition’s administration.

Fahmi pointed out that more mosques had been built in Negeri Sembilan under Aminuddin Harun, while zakat collection had more than doubled.

He said such achievements proved that the PH-led state government had not neglected Malay-Muslims.

“The menteri besar is himself a Malay-Muslim, so support the Malay-Muslim leader named Aminuddin.”


***


Stop whining lah - just following Tun's call - wakakaka

Israel building earthen barrier in Gaza to entrench division of the enclave

 



Israel building earthen barrier in Gaza to entrench division of the enclave

The construction of the barrier has fuelled Palestinian fears that most of Gaza will never be relinquished by Israel.

The Israeli army is building a giant earthen barrier to separate the more than 50 percent of Gaza under its control from the rest of the enclave, satellite images show, fuelling Palestinian fears that most of the territory will never be relinquished by Israel.

The barrier consists of an earth berm and a trench and extends well beyond the so-called “yellow line” that is supposed to demarcate the border between Israeli-controlled and Palestinian territory under a US-backed ceasefire agreement signed in October 2025, Israel’s Haaretz newspaper reported on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Haaretz said that in Khan Younis the barrier is about 400 metres (quarter of a mile) past the yellow line, and at one point in the Rafah area it reaches approximately 1,300 metres (4,260 feet) beyond the line.

Built over the past few months, the barrier is already longer than 23km (14 miles), according to the AP news agency. The entire Gaza Strip is around 40km (25 miles) long.

The barrier cuts through Palestinian communities whose homes, infrastructure, and agricultural land have already been destroyed during Israel’s genocidal war that began in 2023.

Israel has also created new roads and established bases on the ruins of Palestinian towns. Palestinians fear that they will never be able to return to their land, and some Israeli officials have openly said they intend to appropriate some of it.

“I intend to establish three Nahal outposts, which is also a military entity, in those places that were in northern Gaza,” Defence Minister Israel Katz told Channel 14 last week

On Sunday, thousands of Israelis, including settlers and right-wing activists, marched towards the border with Gaza and called on the government to re-establish Israeli settlements.

“We are walking today to tell the government of Israel and show all the world that this land belongs to us and that Gaza really belongs to us and that we want to go back there,” said march participant Daniel Sellem.

Palestinians in Gaza, meanwhile, are confined to crowded tent camps in the coastal area west of the yellow line, where they are still being targeted by Israeli airstrikes and facing shortages of aid and supplies.

Asked by AP to comment on the satellite images, the Israeli military said it was building a physical barrier in the area of the yellow line.

The ceasefire deal envisaged the yellow line as a temporary demarcation pending the Israeli army’s eventual withdrawal to the edges of Gaza, to be replaced by an international force.

But Israel has mostly ignored the truce and appears to be digging in, heightening Palestinian fears that the line is morphing into a border.

Israeli forces have killed Palestinians who came close to the line or crossed it. The Israeli military says it fires on those believed to be militants threatening its troops. But those killed have included children and other civilians seemingly unaware of the line. Some soldiers have said they don’t always know who they are firing on and have orders to kill anyone crossing the boundary.



Five soldiers killed in southern Thailand checkpoint attack

 


Five soldiers killed in southern Thailand checkpoint attack

The assault in Narathiwat came a day after a car bombing elsewhere in the province wounded a police officer.

Five Thai paramilitary soldiers have been killed and six civilians wounded in an attack on a security checkpoint in the country’s rebel-hit south, according to the army.

The assault took place on Wednesday evening at the Buketa Sami checkpoint in Narathiwat province.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Attackers used gunfire and pipe bombs against members of Task Force Ranger Regiment 45 while they were guarding the area, the army said. No group has claimed responsibility, and authorities have not announced any arrests.

The army paid tribute to the soldiers, saying their “service and sacrifice will be remembered and honoured with the highest respect”.

The attack was one of the deadliest against Thai security forces in recent years and comes amid renewed concern over violence in the country’s southern border provinces.

The checkpoint assault came a day after a car bomb exploded outside the former Tanyong police station elsewhere in Narathiwat, injuring an officer and damaging the building.

Police were searching for two suspects seen fleeing on a motorcycle after Tuesday’s bombing. It was the first car bombing recorded in the southern border region this year, according to Thailand’s The Nation.

Narathiwat, Pattani and Yala provinces are predominantly populated by ethnic Malay Muslims and have been at the centre of an armed separatist conflict since 2004. More than 7,000 people have been killed, including civilians, security personnel and fighters.

Formal talks between the Thai government and the Barisan Revolusi Nasional, the main separatist group, were expected to resume in June after a rise in violence. The negotiations have struggled to resolve disagreements over self-government, security measures and political representation.


BN-PN Horse-Trading in NS in progress






Jalaluddin Alias among candidates for N. Sembilan MB if BN-Perikatan wins, says Hamzah Zainudin



PN deputy chairman Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin acknowledged that choosing the Negeri Sembilan menteri besar candidate was currently ‘slightly’ challenging but assured that PN would support whoever BN puts forward for the post. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin


Summary

  • Datuk Seri Jalaluddin Alias is being considered for menteri besar if the BN-PN alliance wins the Negeri Sembilan state election on August 1.
  • PN deputy chairman Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin said BN and PN must agree on the menteri besar candidate before informing voters.
  • PN will support BN's choice for menteri besar, with the decision left to BN for the announcement.


By Malay Mail
First Published: Thursday, 23 Jul 2026 10:01 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Negeri Sembilan Umno chairman Datuk Seri Jalaluddin Alias is among the candidates being considered for the post of menteri besar if the Barisan Nasional (BN)-Perikatan Nasional (PN) alliance wins the state election on August 1, said PN deputy chairman Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin.

However, Hamzah said BN and PN must first discuss and jointly decide on the candidate before making an announcement to voters, Harian Metro reported.


He acknowledged that choosing the Negeri Sembilan menteri besar candidate was currently “slightly” challenging but assured that PN would support whoever BN puts forward for the post.

“If possible, the leaders of these two ‘blue’ groups should sit down and think about who we can announce.


“The question (of whether PN will propose Jalaluddin as the menteri besar candidate) is unfair to me because BN should also sit down with us.


“We know who we want, but if BN wants someone else, then we discuss,” he said at a press conference after a public ceramah at the BN Felcra Lakai operations room last night.

Jalaluddin and PAS central working committee member Datuk Dr Ahmad Marzuk Shaary were also present.


Hamzah, who is also president of Parti Wawasan Negara (Wawasan), said the decision would be left to BN to announce the menteri besar candidate.

“We all want it to come from BN, so we leave it to the BN leadership to make the announcement,” he said.


Houthis attack Saudi oil tankers as US-Iran War explodes into new front





Houthis attack Saudi oil tankers as US-Iran War explodes into new front



Armed Yemeni supporters of the Iran-backed Houthi movement brandish their weapons during a protest in Sanaa on July 17, 2026. — AFP pic


Summary

  • Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed to have struck two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea.
  • This came as the US launched a twelfth consecutive night of strikes on Iranian targets.
  • Both the US and Iran exchanged "eye for an eye" threats, escalating regional tensions.

Meanwhile, Satanyahu & Coy sitting back comfortably eating popcorn and grinning away



First Published: Thursday, 23 Jul 2026 9:29 AM MYT


DUBAI, July 23 — Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed to have struck two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea on Wednesday, potentially opening a new front in the US-Iran war engulfing the region.

The claim came as the United States launched a fresh wave of strikes on Iranian military targets, marking the twelfth consecutive night of US attacks on Iran.


The Houthis said they had carried out missile and drone strikes on two Saudi tankers that “violated the blockade”, naming the vessels as the Encelia and the Layla.

British naval security monitor UKMTO said the master of a tanker reported being struck by an unknown projectile about 70 nautical miles southwest of Al Shuqaiq, causing a fire that the crew was fighting.


The Red Sea escalation followed a Houthi threat to blockade Saudi ports, widening the pressure on key Middle East shipping routes already shaken by fighting over the Strait of Hormuz.


US President Donald Trump had threatened to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack on shipping in Hormuz, drawing an “eye for an eye” warning from Tehran as both sides sharpened threats in the escalating war.

Fighting over the vital energy waterway has collapsed a preliminary deal between the United States and Iran, with Tehran reimposing its blockade and firing on vessels that seek to transit.


“Any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT,” Trump wrote on social media.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran would respond in kind to any attack on its infrastructure.

“Our defence doctrine is clear: eye for an eye,” Araghchi wrote on X. “Any aggression against Iran, including our infrastructure, will compel a powerful and decisive response.”

Iran’s state broadcaster quoted the military as saying that US threats “will have no result other than the expansion of the war”.

Trump has faced intense political pressure to end the conflict, which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday had cost the United States US$37.5 billion, up from nearly US$29 billion (RM118 billion) in mid-May.

But Trump rejected polls showing the war was unpopular as he headed to an airbase for the return of the remains of four US service personnel.

Three were killed in an Iranian attack on a military base in Jordan, and one died during a controlled detonation of an unexploded Iranian drone in Iraq.

“Americans don’t want high gasoline prices but they’re not against the war,” Trump said.

Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, briefly topped US$95 a barrel for the first time in nearly six weeks on Wednesday. Crude futures later shed some gains but were still up about three per cent.


US strikes

US Central Command reported the latest strikes began at 2130 GMT Wednesday against Iranian military targets, saying it aimed to “further degrade Iran’s ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting regional waters”.

Kuwait’s army said early Thursday local time its air defences were intercepting hostile drones, following several days of Iranian strikes on the country.

“Kuwaiti air defenses are currently responding to hostile drone threats,” the army said on X. “Any explosions that may be heard are the result of air defence systems intercepting hostile targets.”

Jordan said it had shot down four missiles and four drones, while air alert sirens sounded in Bahrain, where an AFP correspondent in Manama heard an explosion.

The Iranian military and its powerful Revolutionary Guards confirmed targeting US assets in all three countries.


Red Sea threat

Trump said he would “take care of” the Houthis if they followed through on their blockade threat against Saudi ports.

It remains unclear how fully the Houthis could enforce such a blockade, but the threat could compound the shock of the Hormuz closure, endangering Riyadh’s ability to bypass the strait for some oil exports.

The Houthis had been broadcasting radio warnings to vessels, the International Chamber of Shipping told AFP.

The message warned that “in case of non-compliance of Yemeni armed forces decision, those ships will be in our target, over”.

During the Gaza war that began in October 2023, the Iran-backed Yemeni rebels attacked shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, forcing vessels to make a long detour around Africa and prompting a US bombing campaign.

The latest threats appear to have been enough to encourage several vessels to reverse course before entering waters off Yemen, according to shipping tracker Kpler, though nearly 30 ships still crossed the Bab al-Mandab on Tuesday.

Maritime data analysed by AFP showed that at least nine ships had turned back from crossing the strait after the Houthi blockade announcement, including three that had taken on oil at Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea Yanbu terminal. — AFP


Why Trump Suddenly Slaps 50% Tariffs On Some Canadian Goods

 

Why Trump Suddenly Slaps 50% Tariffs On Some Canadian Goods



Pin It


Jul212026
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Pinterest
Linked In

Just when you thought Donald Trump was too busy with the Iran War, getting ready to bomb the Pickaxe Mountain believed to have been stashed with thousands of uranium-enrichment centrifuges, the U.S. president suddenly dropped started a new round of war. He announced an additional 50% tariff on certain goods from Canada, including wine, hockey sticks, cement, electrical equipment and machinery.

 

The White House said that the tariffs were a response to Canada’s “discriminatory treatment of American products.” Some sectors and goods, including energy, potash and fish or critical minerals, will be exempt from the new tariffs, the White House said. The tariffs will take effect 30 days after they are signed and affect about US$20 billion worth of Canadian goods.

 

Apparently, the Trump administration was upset about Canada’s discrimination of U.S. goods, including cars, dairy products, and alcohol. The White House said the U.S. opposed Canadian policies that require companies to invest in auto production in Canada, rather than the U.S., as well as bans some Canadian provinces have imposed on U.S. liquor products.

US-Canada Tariffs War

However, the good news is the U.S. imported a whopping US$383 billion of goods from Canada in 2025. Therefore, the newly announced tariffs would only affect a small slice of that total. According to research firm Capital Economics, only about 5% of Canadian imports would be affected by the new tariffs – or about 0.6% of total U.S. imports.

 

Still, Trump’s move would worsen the already tense relationship between the U.S. and Canada amid the struggle to renegotiate the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the trade pact Trump signed in his first term and which is under renegotiation this year. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the new tariffs represented “the latest in a series of unilateral U.S. trade actions” to violate the USMCA.

 

“This trade dispute has raised costs for families, particularly in the U.S.” – Carney said. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens.” But Ontario Premier Doug Ford went further, immediately encouraging Canada to retaliate. “If these tariffs proceed, Canada should respond tariff for tariff, dollar for dollar,” Ford said in a post on X.

United States - Canada - Sign Board

Trump has publicly threatened to terminate the USMCA, which the U.S. negotiated to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has floated the idea of separating the three-nation agreement into two separate pacts – one with Mexico and one with Canada.

 

Trump last year imposed emergency levies on Canada over its alleged role in the fentanyl trade before the Supreme Court ruled in February that those tariffs were illegal. He has also levied so-called national security tariffs on steel, aluminum, auto parts and lumber from Canada, though the White House said that products covered by those earlier levies won’t be hit by this latest round.

 

Carney last year rolled back many of the counter-tariffs that Canada imposed on U.S. goods, but several provinces such as Ontario have kept their retaliatory bans on U.S. wine and spirits in place, drawing repeated complaints from U.S. officials. After the latest 50% tariffs, Prime Minister Mark Carney responded by saying Canada stood ready to “intensify” trade talks with the US in the coming weeks.

US-Canada Tariffs War - US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney

The US has been maintaining active tariffs ranging from 15% to 50% on Canadian steel, aluminium, and copper. It also charges a 35% tariff on Canadian softwood lumber, alongside a 25% tax on non-U.S. parts in cars. Meanwhile, Canada has its own 25% counter-tariff on selected imports of American steel, aluminium and vehicles.

 

The new tariffs come after smoke from wildfires in Canada drifted into the U.S., blanketing cities including New York, Chicago and Washington. Trump threatened to impose steeper duties on America’s northern neighbour to compensate for the smoke’s impact. Days later, the president was seen speaking with Carney at Sunday’s World Cup Final. Trump told reporters that Canada needed to stop the wildfires.

 

Jeff Guignard, president and CEO of Wine Growers British Columbia, is calling on Canadians to support domestic producers after Trump’s latest tariff announcement. Guignard says he doesn’t understand the logic of the U.S. making Canadian alcohol more expensive and difficult for Americans to purchase, but says the move could hurt small producers in Canada. 

President Trump is testing a new method to impose tariffs – Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930. The law grants the president the power to impose levies on countries that discriminate against U.S. companies, but it “hasn’t been used before” to impose tariffs and could attract legal challenges. If Trump’s use of Section 338 is upheld by the courts, it could become a useful weapon in future trade negotiations.

 

After the Supreme Court ruled in February that the president could not use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to implement sweeping tariffs globally, Trump imposed temporary, across-the-board 10% tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which are set to expire later this week. Last week, the US announced a new 25% tariff on many Brazilian imports under Section 301.

 

There’s another reason why Trump is targeting Canada. The White House said Canada was one of two countries that had chosen to retaliate against US tariffs rather than negotiate – the other country being China. And like Canada and China, Brazil has vowed to retaliate. Surprisingly, Trump told reporters that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping did not discuss tariffs at all during his visit to Beijing in May.

President Donald Trump Meets President Xi Jinping - China Has Stronger Hand

The first Trump administration’s trade war with China in 2018 – when the U.S.-China trade deficit hit its highest point of more than US$377 billion – marked a new decline in relations between the world’s two biggest economies. In his second term, Trump escalated his tariff threats as China imposed export controls on rare-earth minerals, which created a global supply shortage for the materials necessary to build most technologies.

 

Trump’s second administration began its trade war with China by slapping a 10% tariff on Chinese goods. Over the following months, China retaliated, resulting in the two countries rapidly escalating their tariffs on imported goods from each other. By April 2025, this reached a height of 145% tariffs on Chinese goods entering the United States, and a 125% tariff on U.S. imports to China.

 

President Donald Trump eventually reduced specific tariff rates on Chinese goods in late 2025 by halving the 20% “fentanyl” tariff down to 10%. This brought the overall average U.S. tariff rate on Chinese imports down from about 57% to roughly 47% in exchange for Chinese trade and law enforcement commitments.

Donald Trump Tariff On Canada, Mexico and China

Even though the U.S. Supreme Court overruled some of Trump’s proposed tariffs in February 2026, the bulk of the tariffs against China remain in place. After being delayed by the Iran war, Trump and Xi met in May 2026 – which marked the first visit to Beijing by a sitting U.S. president in nearly a decade. Trump was also the last president to make the trip, traveling there during his first term in 2017.

 

The use of a 1930 trade war now could be a tactical move to test the water – to see if the U.S. president has finally found his Holy Grail in tariff war with the world again. As a start, Trump wanted to use that Section 338 as a bargaining chip – to get some leverage over Canada.