Monday, May 18, 2026

Can Rafizi Break the Cycle?

 

Dennis Ignatius

 

~ Provoking discussion, dissent & debate on politics, diplomacy, human rights & civil society.

Can Rafizi Break the Cycle?

Tags

, , , ,



[1] The long-awaited moment has finally arrived. In a bold and imaginative move, Rafizi Ramli — ever the political maverick — has broken with PKR and entered the fray under the banner of Parti Bersama Malaysia. A long dormant party has suddenly been reenergised as the new standard bearer for reformasi, democratic renewal and political change.

[2] The contrast with Pakatan Harapan could hardly have been starker. While Anwar Ibrahim and other PH leaders gathered at their national convention recycling the same tired talking points that few Malaysians seem to believe anymore, Rafizi was reigniting a sense of hope  across the political landscape.

[3] Many Malaysians — particularly non-Malays increasingly disillusioned with both PKR and DAP — now appear to be flocking to Rafizi’s banner. The hall was packed for his announcement, and, within hours, donation appeals were circulating widely across chat groups. There’s real excitement and a growing sense that the spirit of reformasi — stifled and suffocated under Anwar’s leadership — may finally be stirring once again. And to those who long taunted critics with the dismissive question, “If not Anwar, then who?”, Malaysians may now finally have an answer.

[4] Like many of my friends and colleagues, I find this latest development genuinely exciting. It recalibrates the political landscape and offers voters something Malaysian politics has lacked for years: the possibility of a genuine alternative. For too long, the country has been trapped in a stagnant political cycle dominated by tired personalities, recycled narratives and coalitions held together more by fear and expediency than conviction or vision. Politics has become little more than a contest between competing elites offering variations of the same tired formula while ordinary Malaysians grow increasingly cynical and disengaged. Rafizi’s move disrupts that stale equilibrium and may be precisely the shock needed to force a long overdue political renewal.

[5] I want Rafizi to succeed. Years ago, when he had stepped away from politics, I went with my friend Dr KJ John to urge him to return. Even at that stage, many of us sensed that reformasi was losing direction and slowly degenerating into little more than another vehicle for political survival and elite accommodation.

[6] But much has happened since those days. I am far more cynical and far less trusting now. Before we rush to anoint Rafizi as the new political messiah, we ought to ask what he actually stands for beyond the increasingly hollow rhetoric of reformasi. Malaysians have repeatedly invested their hopes in politicians who promised justice, unity and reform only to govern through the same sectarian calculations and cynical compromises once power was secured. After every election, we arrive at the same bitter realisation: the faces change, the slogans evolve, but the underlying political order remains untouched. Malaysia cannot afford another imposter.

[7] Before I give Rafizi my support, I want to hear clearly what his vision for Malaysia actually is — especially regarding the long-neglected and increasingly marginalised non-Malay-Muslim community. Of course, he must remain sensitive to the concerns of Malay-Muslim voters; no serious politician can ignore them. But a reformist leader of a multiracial party must also articulate a fairer and more inclusive national agenda — one that addresses Malay-Muslim concerns without once again pushing everyone else to the margins. After all, that was one of the main reasons many non-Malays turned away from Anwar Ibrahim.

[8] I also want to hear how Rafizi intends to address the longstanding grievances of Sabah and Sarawak. Successive governments have marginalised the Borneo states while paying only lip service to MA63. Their demands for fairness, dignity and genuine partnership within the federation can no longer remain unanswered.

[9] So I intend to attend Rafizi’s rallies and hear him out carefully. I genuinely hope he succeeds because Malaysia desperately needs a new political beginning. But he will still have to convince me that he is sincere about building a Malaysia where all citizens genuinely feel they belong before he earns my support – for whatever little it may be worth.

[Dennis Ignatius |Kuala Lumpur | Monday, 18th May 2026]



‘Just leave and vacate seat’: Tony Pua says to MPs waiting to quit but holding on till GE





Former Damansara MP Tony Pua said lawmakers who no longer want to be in their party should also vacate their seat if they quit, as they were elected on the party’s platform. - Facebook pic, May 18, 2026


‘Just leave and vacate seat’: Tony Pua says to MPs waiting to quit but holding on till GE


Don’t be “ball-less, self-serving chickens who can't bear to lose the remaining months of their MP allowance”, says DAP’s former Damansara MP


Keran Raj
Updated 2 hours ago
18 May, 2026
1:52 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR – Former Damansara MP Tony Pua has criticised lawmakers who plan to leave their parties but refuse to vacate the parliamentary seats they won on the party’s platform.

Without naming names, Pua said politicians who had already decided to part ways with their parties should leave immediately instead of remaining in office while preparing for the next general election.

“People who have already decided to leave their parties, should just leave,” the DAP’s disciplinary committee chief said on Facebook today.

He was commenting on the announcement by former PKR leaders, Pandan MP Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and Setiawangsa MP Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad yesterday, to resign from PKR and vacate their seats. They will also lead their own party by taking over Parti Bersama Malaysia (PBM).

“They are right to quit the party and vacate the seats which were won on the party platform,” Pua said, adding that he however disagreed with their decision to do so.

Pua then took aim at other elected representatives who have expressed intentions to stand against their own parties in the next general election without resigning their current positions.

“Others who actually have the gall to express their intent to stand against their own party in the next GE, but do not want to quit or vacate their seats are just ball-less, self-serving chickens who can’t bear to lose the remaining months of their MP allowance,” he said.

Pua added that such politicians should be rejected by voters regardless of which party they eventually represent.

“They should be dumped regardless of which party they ultimately stand for in the coming elections. In fact, their voters should immediately petition for him to resign from their seats,” he added.

Following Rafizi and Nik Nazmi’s exits, Subang MP Wong Chen hinted at a future move to PBM, signalling a possible exit from PKR.

“If I decide to stand in the next general election, it will be as a Bersama candidate,” Wong told Scoop yesterday.

PKR has confirmed and accepted Rafizi’s and Nik Nazmi’s resignations which are effective today.

The party also said it would review the membership status of several other MPs who were present at the political briefing attended by Rafizi and Nik Nazmi. – May 18, 2026


Ampang PKR urges Rodziah to vacate seat over Bersama link





Ampang PKR urges Rodziah to vacate seat over Bersama link


Division deputy chief Daing Reduan Bachok says the Ampang MP is no longer loyal to the party's leadership


Ampang MP Rodziah Ismail was among the PKR MPs who attended Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad’s press conference on taking over Bersama yesterday.



PETALING JAYA: A divisional PKR leader has urged Rodziah Ismail to resign and vacate her Ampang parliamentary seat, saying she is no longer loyal to the party’s leadership.

Ampang PKR deputy chief Daing Reduan Bachok cited Rodziah’s links to Rafizi Ramli’s Parti Bersama Malaysia (Bersama), having attended the announcement of the party takeover yesterday.

Daing said such political movements were an attempt to weaken PKR from within and betray the people’s mandate given to the party and Pakatan Harapan in the 15th general election.


“To preserve the dignity of PKR’s struggle and respect the people’s mandate, I urge Rodziah to immediately resign and vacate the Ampang seat,” he said in a statement.

Former ministers Rafizi and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad announced yesterday that they would be taking over Bersama to chart a new political direction for themselves and their supporters.


They also announced their resignations as Pandan and Setiawangsa MPs, respectively.

Five PKR MPs appeared in a photo session with the duo, namely Rodziah, Bakhtiar Wan Chik (Balik Pulau), Wong Chen (Subang), S Kesavan (Sungai Siput), and Zahir Hassan (Wangsa Maju).

Daing said the Ampang PKR grassroots remain firmly behind party president Anwar Ibrahim and would not compromise on any action that could threaten party stability or undermine public confidence in its struggle.

FMT has reached out to Rodziah for comment.

Rafizi, Nik Nazmi still bound by RM10mil party bond, says Fuziah





Rafizi, Nik Nazmi still bound by RM10mil party bond, says Fuziah


Elill Easwaran


PKR secretary-general says the party has evidence suggesting that the two former MPs joined Parti Bersama Malaysia before vacating their seats


PKR secretary-general Fuziah Salleh said tomorrow’s political bureau meeting is expected to discuss the possibility of action against Rafizi Ramli (left) and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad.


PETALING JAYA: Former PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli and former vice-president Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad are still bound by the party’s RM10 million bond, despite their assertion that they vacated their parliamentary seats before leaving the party, says PKR secretary-general Fuziah Salleh.

She said PKR had evidence suggesting that the two former MPs joined Parti Bersama Malaysia before vacating their seats, based on information published on the party’s website.

She said the conditions of the party bond would therefore still apply.


“They are saying the anti-hopping law does not apply. But we have evidence that they had already joined Parti Bersama Malaysia, with the timestamp showing May 17,” she told FMT.


Fuziah said while PKR would leave the matter to the party’s legal team, it is also expected to be discussed at tomorrow’s political bureau meeting, including the possibility of action against the two former party leaders.


Under the bond, candidates who win their seats on PKR tickets are required to pay RM10 million within seven days if they resign from the party, join another party, or become independents.

Yesterday, Rafizi said he and Nik Nazmi were not bound by the RM10 million bond, and that their decision to first vacate their parliamentary seats in Pandan and Setiawangsa was the key reason they would not face disciplinary or legal action.

According to Rafizi, the bond only applies if an MP quits the party and joins another party without vacating the seat won on a PKR ticket.

The duo also submitted letters to Dewan Rakyat Speaker Johari Abdul, notifying him of their resignations from their seats effective today.

In a statement, they said the “right and respectable move” for them is to return the mandate to voters, “as we were elected on a Pakatan Harapan ticket in the last general election”.

“We thank the voters of Pandan and Setiawangsa for choosing us to represent them in Parliament for two terms. Our service centres will operate as usual and continue assisting voters,” they said.


Some 5,000 attend rally in solidarity with Selangor sultan





Some 5,000 attend rally in solidarity with Selangor sultan


2 days ago
Nur Alif Hazmi


Umno and PAS leaders were among the participants of the rally held in response to DAP's remarks on pig farming


The rally-goers, many dressed in yellow, gathered at 4pm and marched to the state secretariat building in Shah Alam.



SHAH ALAM: About 5,000 people, including some leaders of Umno and PAS, took part in a rally this evening in solidarity with the Selangor sultan.

Selangor PAS chief Ab Halim Tamuri, Selangor Umno chief Megat Zulkarnain Omardin, Selangor Umno Youth chief Imran Tamrin and members of several private organisations were among those at the rally, organised by PAS Youth.

The rally-goers, many decked in yellow, gathered outside the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah mosque as early as 4pm before marching to the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah building, which houses the state secretariat.

Selangor PAS Youth chief Sukri Omar previously said the gathering was in response to the allegedly disrespectful actions and statements by DAP leaders.

The gathering also comes in the wake of a controversy sparked by Seri Kembangan assemblyman Wong Siew Ki who had called for a modern closed pig farming system. Her proposal ignited criticism from detractors who accused her of contradicting the Selangor sultan, who had in February called for a complete end to pig farming in Selangor. The ruler reiterated his call this month.

Noh Omar, a former Bersatu and Umno leader called for Wong to be referred to the state assembly’s rights and privileges committee over the matter. Noh said he was pleased that leaders from both sides attended the gathering.

“It’s heartening to see people put aside their political differences when it comes to issues related to the royalty,” he said.


***


When Nor Omar said “It’s heartening to see people put aside their political differences when it comes to issues related to the royalty,” he was NOT referring to nons (especially pork-eaters)!!! bearing in mind that the issue galvanising the rally was 'pigs farming'.


Bersama needs more than Rafizi-Nik Nazmi star power, say analysts





Bersama needs more than Rafizi-Nik Nazmi star power, say analysts


3 hours ago
Faiz Zainudin


UiTM’s Mujibu Muis says while they have strong urban appeal, a party’s survival depends on its machinery, resources and a convincing narrative


Yesterday, Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad announced their decision to quit PKR, vacate their parliamentary seats, and take over Parti Bersama Malaysia.



PETALING JAYA: Parti Bersama Malaysia may draw urban voter support under Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, but analysts say their popularity alone is unlikely to make the party a serious challenger to the country’s main political coalitions.

Mujibu Muis of Universiti Teknologi Mara said the former PKR leaders, particularly Rafizi, might be seen as popular because of their experience in government, leadership roles in a major party, and image as strategic thinkers.

“However, the survival of a new party does not depend solely on the popularity of its leaders, but also on a combination of current issues, organisational strength, resources, grassroots networks, and the ability to build a narrative that resonates with voters,” he told FMT.


Yesterday, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi announced their departure from PKR and decision to vacate their parliamentary seats in Pandan and Setiawangsa respectively.

They also announced their takeover of Bersama, a party registered in Penang on Dec 2, 2016, positioning it as a third force and a check-and-balance agent.


Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned as economy minister and natural resources and environmental sustainability minister respectively in May 2025.

This was after Rafizi lost the contest for the PKR deputy presidency to Nurul Izzah Anwar. Nik Nazmi, his ally, also failed to retain his vice-president’s post.

Rafizi’s relationship with the PKR leadership reportedly turned strained, and he became increasingly vocal in criticising both the government and the party.

Mujibu said PKR and Pakatan Harapan (PH) would not be crippled by the departure of the two leaders, as they still possess party machinery, influence in the government, and a strong political brand.


However, he said the greater impact could be on public perception, particularly if Bersama succeeds in attracting middle-ranking leaders, activists, and reformist supporters who feel that PKR’s original ideals have faded.

He said Bersama, under Rafizi and Nik Nazmi, might have a chance of gaining support in urban areas such as Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, as well as semi-urban constituencies in Negeri Sembilan.

“However, I remain sceptical that the party can break through in states where politics is still heavily shaped by ethnic and religious identity, such as Kelantan, Terengganu, and much of the rural north of Peninsular Malaysia,” he said.


‘Political start-up’

Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Sabri of Global Asia Consulting said Bersama risked becoming a “political start-up” that might appear fresh and appealing in its early stages, but could remain stunted without a strong grassroots machinery.

“Rafizi’s brand may attract smaller parties, progressive NGOs, and urban voters,” he said, adding that the development could split votes in mixed constituencies that have traditionally been PH strongholds.

He also described Bersama as the “disappointed offspring” of PKR’s failure to manage talent and differing views in the party.


Gentlemanly move or break from political past?

Commenting on the decision to vacate the Pandan and Setiawangsa seats, Zaharuddin said the move might appear “gentlemanly”, but could also be a political gimmick aimed at generating early momentum.

Mujibu, meanwhile, viewed it as a signal that Rafizi and Nik Nazmi no longer wished to rely solely on the PKR logo, but wanted to test whether support for them was rooted in their ideas, track record, and individual strengths.

“But it carries significant risks as they would lose an official platform in Parliament to raise public issues, challenge government policies, and maintain national political attention,” he said.

Infighting and quit rent woes may bite Penang PH, say analysts





Infighting and quit rent woes may bite Penang PH, say analysts


5 hours ago
Dineskumar Ragu


Rafizi Ramli is viewed as being mistreated by PKR, while other voters may be upset by the continuing feud between Lim Guan Eng and Chow Kon Yeow


PKR’s Rafizi Ramli and DAP’s Chow Kon Yeow and Lim Guan Eng are at the centre of controversy in their parties.


GEORGE TOWN: The internal tensions of Pakatan Harapan’s (PH) component parties may weaken the coalition’s performance when elections are held in Penang, say political analysts.

Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid of Universiti Sains Malaysia said infighting in PKR, and the view that former deputy president Rafizi Ramli is being “mistreated” by party leaders, would affect the coalition’s standing among Penang voters.


Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid.


“PH is seen as being ‘too harsh’ on people like Rafizi, to the extent of placing under intense pressure through investigations those who are viewed as having spoken out against PH’s interests while in government,” he told FMT.


Rafizi, who is Pandan MP, is being investigated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in an investigation into a deal made with UK-based chip designer Arm Holdings when Rafizi was economy minister.

Rafizi has described the investigations as being politically motivated, given his criticisms of the government and MACC and its former chief commissioner Azam Baki.


He and Setiawangsa MP Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said on Sunday that they would quit PKR and vacate their seats. They said they would officially join Parti Bersama Malaysia on Tuesday.


Wong Chin Huat.


Political scientist Wong Chin Huat of Sunway University said the infighting in DAP, especially between Lim Guan Eng and Penang chief minister Chow Kon Yeow, would not sit well with voters.

“I doubt Lim’s relentless attacks on his successor, similar to how Dr Mahathir Mohamad criticised other prime ministers, would go down well with voters,” Wong said.

He said Chow and Penang DAP chief Steven Sim may win sympathy votes if they played their cards well.


Although non-Muslim and liberal voters in Penang would be unlikely to vote for Barisan Nasional or Perikatan Nasional, they may consider abstaining from voting altogether, he said.

Fauzi and Wong said a public outcry over increased quit rent rates in Penang may hurt DAP and PH, with Wong saying that it came at a time when Malaysia is experiencing the ripple effects of the Middle East conflict on its economy.

Fauzi said while the Chinese-majority seats on Penang island are safe for PH in GE16, the coalition is vulnerable in Seberang Perai seats with significant Malay majorities, unless internal tensions within Bersatu significantly split the Malay vote.

Wong also said seats with substantially fewer Chinese voters are most likely to change hands due to either a vote swing or voter abstention.


“This might include Bukit Tengah, Bagan Dalam, Perai, Jawi in Seberang Perai, and Sungai Pinang and Datok Keramat on the island. But the main determinant could be the timing of the elections,” he added.

Fauzi suggested that PKR patch things up with the Rafizi-led faction, now that Azam is no longer helming MACC and that there is no need to “beat around the bush in the fight against corruption”.

A recent report by Singapore’s Straits Times quoted anonymous DAP sources as saying PH is likely to lose its supermajority in Penang, with the coalition expected to win only 23 of 40 state seats in the worst-case scenario, and that DAP may lose its unbeaten streak in some of the 19 seats it has dominated since 2008.

Chow has played down the report, saying elections are ultimately a “numbers game”.


***


Guanee just can't 'let go' of his erstwhile powers as CM Penang - I'm gonna blame him if the DAP loses the next Penang state election.




Hannah assures Setiawangsa residents of uninterrupted services





Hannah assures Setiawangsa residents of uninterrupted services


Federal territories minister says DBKL’s Setiawangsa branch will be strengthened following Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad’s decision to vacate the seat


Hannah Yeoh said services under the federal territories department in Setiawangsa would continue uninterrupted. (Bernama pic)


PETALING JAYA: Federal territories minister Hannah Yeoh has assured Setiawangsa residents that local services and assistance will continue uninterrupted following Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad’s decision to vacate his parliamentary seat.

In a statement today, Yeoh thanked Nik Nazmi for his service to Kuala Lumpur during his tenure as Setiawangsa MP.

She said services under the federal territories department would continue as usual, and that she had instructed Kuala Lumpur mayor Fadlun Mak Ujud to strengthen the role of City Hall’s (DBKL) branch in Setiawangsa.


“This includes additional manpower to expedite action on the ground throughout this period,” she said.

Yeoh said residents could continue to submit complaints and seek assistance through the Setiawangsa DBKL branch office.


Yesterday, Nik Nazmi and Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli announced that they would quit PKR, vacate their parliamentary seats, and take over Parti Bersama Malaysia.

Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned as economy minister and natural resources and environmental sustainability minister respectively in May 2025. This was after Rafizi lost the PKR deputy presidency to Nurul Izzah Anwar in the party elections, while Nik Nazmi failed to retain his vice-presidency.

Rafizi’s relationship with the PKR leadership reportedly became strained, and he grew increasingly vocal in criticising both the government and the party.

FMT today quoted analysts as saying that Bersama might attract support from urban voters under Rafizi and Nik Nazmi’s leadership, but that the duo’s popularity alone was unlikely to make the party a serious challenger to the country’s main political coalitions.

Netanyahu: Israel ‘close’ to eliminating Oct 7 attack masterminds





Netanyahu: Israel ‘close’ to eliminating Oct 7 attack masterminds

namely: Babies, children, mums, doctors, nurses, aid workers, reporters




The Texas Televangelist - From Messiah to Meth


From FB:




Three community kitchen workers among five killed by Israel in Gaza



Three community kitchen workers among five killed by Israel in Gaza

Israeli attacks on Gaza have killed at least 871 Palestinians since the so-called ceasefire began last year.

Israeli attacks across the Gaza Strip have killed at least five Palestinians, including three in Deir el-Balah, and others in Khan Younis and Beit Lahiya.

Sunday’s attack on the central city of Deir el-Balah targeted a community kitchen and all three victims were charity workers, according to Al Jazeera’s Hind Khoudary, reporting from Gaza City.

“This shows that Israel is not only targeting people, but also organisations serving the community across Gaza,” Khoudary added.

Reacting to the same attack, Hamas said it was “a deliberate war crime and a renewed scene of the ongoing genocide against our people in the Gaza Strip”.

“This occurs amid an unjustified international silence and inaction that emboldens the occupation to continue its massacres, in blatant disregard for all international values, norms, and laws,” said the armed group’s statement.

According to Gaza’s Health Ministry’s statistics published on Sunday, Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has killed at least 72,760 Palestinians since October 7, 2023, including at least 871 since the so-called ceasefire started last October.

Israel’s military occupies about 60 percent of Gaza’s territory, demarcated by a so-called “yellow line” buffer zone.

In that zone on Sunday, the Israeli army said its forces killed a person saying, without providing evidence, that the victim was armed and posed an imminent threat to soldiers.

The army statement also said a Hamas commander was killed, identifying the man as Bahaa Baroud. There was no immediate confirmation from the group.

BN Going Solo & Rafizi’s New Party – A Slap In The Face Of PKR & DAP






BN Going Solo & Rafizi’s New Party – A Slap In The Face Of PKR & DAP



May 17th, 2026 by financetwitter



UMNO Johor has declared war on allies PKR, DAP and Amanah, the three component parties of Pakatan Harapan. The United Malays National Organization (UMNO), which is the backbone of Barisan Nasional, has announced that it will contest all 56 seats in the next Johor election – effectively leaving no space for cooperation or negotiation with Premier Anwar Ibrahim’s coalition.

The decision to contest all 56 seats in next Johor state election is a “clear offer to the people that we are ready to continue to form a stable, strong government and fully serve to the development of the state and the welfare of Johor”, said Johor Chief Minister Onn Hafiz in a Facebook post on Saturday (May 16). This means Barisan Nasional will not cooperate with other political parties or pacts.

While Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Harapan (PH) are governing partners in the multi-coalition Unity Government at the federal government, both are rivals at the state level in Johor and Melaka. Besides UMNO, BN is made up of smaller – and obedient – parties such as the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC).





Essentially, not only UMNO-led Barisan Nasional believes it is strong enough to retain power in the Johor state after winning 40 out of the 56 seats in the 2022 state polls, it is also confident of defeating Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Harapan (PH), as well as the Perikatan Nasional (PN) or the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA) in the opposition camp.

Johor’s state election is only due by mid-2027, but Johor UMNO leaders and the party machinery have been working – quietly – for an election as early as August or September this year. It’s not a coincidence that UMNO Johor made the announcement to go solo less than a month after UMNO Negeri Sembilan attempted to topple the PH state government in Negeri Sembilan led by Aminuddin, a vice-president of PKR.


Even though the betrayal to seize power in Negeri Sembilan did not fully succeed after the 14 UMNO-BN state lawmakers withdrew their support for Menteri Besar (Chief Minister) Aminuddin Harun, the political maneuvering has started the ball-rolling for a return to BN’s former glory. The latest announcement by Onn Hafiz to go alone is a message that UMNO isn’t interested in sharing power with Anwar’s PH.





If victorious in early state polls in Johor, Negeri Sembilan and Melaka, it would allow BN to rebuild momentum independently of the federal unity government, positioning itself more strongly ahead of the 16th General Election due by early 2028. While Anwar is dragging his feet – indecisive about a concurrent national and state elections – the “untrustworthy partner” UMNO decisively wanted an early polls.

BN has a strong incentive to call early state polls rather than align them with the next general election, as lower turnout in standalone contests tends to favour the incumbent while putting its main rival PH at a disadvantage. In the 2022 Johor state polls, PH won 12 seats, with DAP winning 10 and PKR and Amanah taking one each. Perikatan Nasional won three seats while Muda secured one.

Because BN had secured a two-thirds majority 4 years ago, it has no reason to work with PH. Unlike Pahang or Perak, where BN and PH formed coalition state governments, Johor remains under a BN administration with only loose cooperation involving PH. Crucially, UMNO wants to use Johor as a testing ground to see if BN is capable of winning a national election on its own.





UMNO’s gameplay is to first win strategic states like Johor, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan. From there, they could justify going solo at the federal level and returning to power like the old days. Even if BN decides to play safe by working with PH at national polls to prevent three-corner contests, they could flex muscles and use their big wins in those state elections as bullets to demand the lions’ share of parliamentary seats.

Heck, not only BN could easily blackmail and threaten PH under the weak leadership of PKR president Anwar Ibrahim and DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke Siew Fook to surrender some strategic parliamentary seats to be redistributed among UMNO, MCA and MIC, the power-hungry UMNO could even demand the post of Prime Minister as part of conditions for cooperation.

More importantly, UMNO – arguably the current most united political party – is cocksure both PKR and DAP do not have the balls to retaliate by severing relationship at the federal level due to Anwar’s obsession with premiership. Because there is room for BN and PH to work together again to form the Johor state government, Anwar and his obedient sidekick Anthony Loke would most likely keep silent.





It’s a game of brinkmanship which PKR and DAP are set to lose, if Anwar and Loke’s past cowardice in facing UMNO’s relentless bullying, backstabbing and betraying are any indicator. Even within Anwar’s own party Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR or People’s Justice Party), the party president is seen as a weakling who dares not offend UMNO at state level.

It was only last month (April) when PKR president Anwar Ibrahim – with tail between legs – told Johor PKR to use the “right channels” to hold seat talks for the next state election with its unity government allies, especially UMNO. That clearly sends the wrong message that UMNO could bully the PM’s own party in Johor because Anwar told his boys and girls to bend down to be screwed.

Yes, when Malaysia’s most powerful man is reduced to a fabulous coward, choosing to lecture his own party chapter not to rock the boat and suck up to the bully instead of reprimanding the leadership of UMNO president Zahid Hamidi, it’s a matter of time before even UMNO state leaders started disrespecting the Premier. Mr Anwar deserves every insult and humiliation.





It’s a slap in the face of both PKR and DAP. Worse, the spineless Democratic Action Party, despite possessing 40 parliamentary seats – the biggest party in the unity government – is behaving like it has only 4 seats. Minion Loke is waiting for his political master Anwar for enlightenment, but the indecisive Prime Minister could not make up his mind on the next strategy except “bragging and yapping” every day.

To save face after being humiliated, Johor Pakatan Harapan now expects everyone to believe its claims that it had anticipated Barisan Nasional’s decision to contest all 56 state seats on its own in the upcoming state polls. Left with no option, Johor PH said it will also contest all 56 state seats – a decision seen as damage control rather than strategic planning ahead of the state election.

For the past three years, the top leadership of PKR and DAP has been warned that UMNO cannot be trusted. However, Anwar, a former UMNO deputy president before he was sacked by former PM Mahathir Mohamad in 1998 for sodomy and corruption, thought he was super clever and could control UMNO. Meanwhile, silly DAP chief Loke naively thought UMNO had turned over a new leaf.





In fact, Anthony Loke almost orgasm when he made national headlines by becoming the first DAP leader in history to attend the UMNO annual assembly in 2023. Subsequently, he has attended and made appearances at several UMNO assemblies. The moron thought he was popular within UMNO and was so cocksure that BN and PH would cooperate in the next 16th General Election that he mocked opposition Perikatan Nasional’s jealousy in the strong PH-BN relationship.

The best part was when pro-Anwar bloggers, propagandists, cyber troopers, YouTubers, TikTokers, who have been blindly praising UMNO and were convinced that BN and PH would cooperate come rain or shine, are now shocked, stunned and flabbergasted when news flashed about BN Johor going solo – effectively giving the middle finger to Anwar-led PH.

Perhaps they could cook up another stupid story that both UMNO president Zahid Hamidi and deputy president Mohamad Hasan were not aware of UMNO Johor’s decision to contest all 56 seats, just like how they argued that the UMNO top leadership was kept in the dark over 14 UMNO-BN state lawmakers withdrawal of support for Negeri Sembilan Chief Minister Aminuddin Harun.





Sure, PH could gloat and fantasize about past achievements in capturing the Johor state government for the first time after defeating BN in the 2018 general election. However, there’s a reason why PH won only 12 seats four years later, and lost the state to BN. There’s no more 1MDB or GST issues today like in 2018. Anwar today lacks the pull factor that Mahathir had back then.

Worse, PH supporters are split, with an increasing number of PH voters disappointed and upset with Anwar than with UMNO Johor. Not only are there none Palestinians to vote for PKR, the Chinese community who had previously voted for DAP in droves has little motivation to vote for DAP this round, let alone PKR and Amanah. The ethnic Chinese would most likely stay home.

Adding salt to the wound is the emergence of a new “Third Force” led by former PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli. The former Economy Minister has broken away from the toxic ruling Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), which is struggling with safe seats even for supremo Anwar, after taking over the leadership of the fringe Malaysian United Party – also known as Parti Bersama Malaysia – on Sunday (May 17).





A splinter of the Chinese-majority Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and registered in Penang in 2016, the new multiracial party launched by Rafizi would certainly contest in Johor to both split PH’s votes and to test the water. Mr Rafizi, a vocal critic of Prime Minister and PKR president Anwar Ibrahim’s leadership, could create tremendous trouble for PH as it attracts fence sitters and young voters.


Sunday, May 17, 2026

How Gen Zs Could Rewire Malaysian Politics – Lessons from Tamil Nadu


Murray Hunter
May 17, 2026



How Gen Zs Could Rewire Malaysian Politics – Lessons from Tamil Nadu






In Tamil Nadu, actor-turned-politician Vijay delivered a stunning upset, shattering the state’s decades-old political duopoly and leaving established parties reeling. The story offers intriguing parallels for Malaysia, where a youthful, digitally native electorate is increasingly frustrated with entrenched coalitions, dynastic politics, and slow progress on jobs, corruption, and cost-of-living issues.

For six decades, Tamil Nadu’s politics alternated between the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK). Last week, that era ended. Vijay’s newly formed Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) won 108 seats in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election. Vijay was sworn in as Chief Minister, forming a government with support from the Congress, left parties, and smaller allies after passing a confidence motion with 144 votes.

The result was historic. A party barely two years old had upended the system. Vijay, 51, a superstar known as “Thalapathy” to millions of fans for his high-octane films portraying underdog heroes fighting the establishment, successfully transferred his on-screen charisma into real-world politics.


A power shift driven by Gen Z

Political observers credit young voters as the decisive force. Gen Z, tired of the familiar “Rising Sun” versus “Two Leaves” symbols, saw in Vijay a fresh alternative. First-time and young voters mobilized heavily on social media, turning frustration over unemployment, exam leaks, corruption scandals, and perceived family rule into votes.

Vijay acknowledged this after the win: “One of the deeper reasons behind this extraordinary election has been the children who guided their families with their sense of conviction.” He called his online supporters “virtual warriors.”

This youth-driven surge echoes growing sentiments in Malaysia. Malaysian Gen Z and millennials, who will form a larger share of the electorate in coming cycles, are vocal on platforms like TikTok, X, and Instagram about issues such as graduate unemployment, housing affordability, racial politics, and governance fatigue. Traditional parties often appear disconnected from this cohort’s aspirations and digital-native worldview.


Vijay’s appeal and promises

Vijay positioned TVK as a clean break from the past. He promised zero tolerance for corruption (“I won’t take even a paisa of public money”), women’s safety, and a strong Youth Agenda. Key pledges included education loans up to 2 million rupees without collateral, monthly stipends for students, a Tamil Nadu Youth Advisory Council, startup support, structured recruitment, and an ambitious AI-driven economic vision.

His campaign blended cinematic storytelling, short videos, and direct influencer-style engagement — tactics highly effective with younger voters. Candidates were framed as “family members” of the people rather than career politicians.

In Malaysia, similar ingredients exist. A popular public figure — whether from entertainment, business, sports, or social media — who builds authenticity, leverages social platforms, and offers concrete solutions on youth unemployment, education reform, and anti-corruption could potentially disrupt the current landscape. Malaysia’s history already shows independents, new coalitions, and youth-led movements gaining traction. For example, the 2018 “ tsunami” and strong youth turnout in recent state polls. A charismatic outsider untainted by old scandals could consolidate this energy.


Breaking the duopoly – Relevance to Malaysia

Tamil Nadu had its Dravidian duopoly rooted in regional identity and welfare politics. Malaysia has its own entrenched dynamics: shifting coalitions between Pakatan Harapan, Perikatan Nasional, Barisan Nasional remnants, and regional parties, often coloured by ethnicity, religion, and patronage networks. Voter fatigue with perceived dynasties, elite capture, and recurring governance controversies creates space for disruption.

Political scientists note that Vijay’s success represents a “structural rupture” — the first major challenge in decades not just from a new face, but from a new demographic reality. In Malaysia, where youth bulge meets high internet penetration, a similar rupture is conceivable. Young Malaysians frequently express desire for “dignity in public life,” less bureaucratic hassle, better economic opportunities, and politics less focused on divisive identity issues.

Many of Malaysian political leaders have been active for up to 40 years.

Challenges remain significant. Malaysia’s first-past-the-post system, strong party machinery, and multi-ethnic complexities make it harder for a brand-new outfit to sweep seats compared to a more homogenous state like Tamil Nadu. Coalition-building is essential. Yet the Tamil Nadu precedent shows that with massive youth mobilization and credible anti-establishment messaging, the seemingly impossible can happen quickly.


A new dawn?

Vijay’s victory is being called one of the biggest shifts in South Indian politics in 50 years. For Malaysia, it serves as both inspiration and warning. Established parties ignore the aspirations of Gen Z at their peril. Young voters, empowered by technology and weary of recycled leadership, are looking for authentic change — someone who understands their struggles with jobs, future prospects, and clean governance.

As one young Tamil Nadu voter put it, they grew up cheering for Vijay on screen and now expect results in governance. In Malaysia, a new generation is watching closely. Whether a local “hero” figure emerges to channel this energy remains to be seen — but the conditions for a Tamil Nadu-style surprise are ripening. Malaysian politics may soon face its own youth-led rewrite.


The Malaysian Government Spent More to Capture Murray Hunter than look for Jho Low


Murray Hunter
May 17, 2026


The Malaysian Government Spent More to Capture Murray Hunter than look for Jho Low





In a striking contrast that has raised eyebrows among observers of Malaysian governance and justice, the resources deployed to pursue Australian writer and commentator Murray Hunter appear to have exceeded the visible efforts to apprehend Jho Low, the fugitive financier at the heart of the multi-billion-dollar 1MDB scandal.

Hunter, a long-time resident of southern Thailand known for his critical Substack articles on Malaysian affairs, was arrested at Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi Airport in September 2025 while attempting to board a flight to Hong Kong. The arrest stemmed from a complaint by Malaysia’s Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) alleging criminal defamation over four articles published in April 2024. These pieces criticized the MCMC’s operations, website blocking practices, and alleged conflicts of interest involving its leadership.

According to lawyers familiar with the case, the Malaysian government is estimated to have spent around RM5,000,000 on efforts to secure Hunter’s arrest in Thailand, pursue charges there, and handle related legal actions. Even after the criminal defamation charges in Thailand were eventually dropped following mediation and an apology from Hunter in early 2026, Thai authorities continued to restrict his movement, with his passport confiscated for a period.

Adding to the procedural concerns, the MCMC also initiated a civil defamation suit against Hunter in Malaysia’s High Court without properly serving documents on him, a move that drew criticism for lacking due process. Hunter reportedly only learned of the Malaysian civil ruling after his arrest in Thailand.

Human rights groups and press freedom organizations, including the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Thailand and Human Rights Watch, highlighted the case as an example of transnational repression. They questioned the use of Thai criminal courts and laws to address alleged offenses against a Malaysian government body, especially when Malaysian authorities themselves had not pursued criminal charges domestically.

This level of cross-border coordination and expenditure stands in notable contrast to the pursuit of Jho Low (Low Taek Jho). Low remains a fugitive despite being the alleged central figure in the 1MDB scandal, which saw an estimated US$4.5 billion (over RM20 billion at the time) misappropriated from Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund between 2009 and 2015. Funds were allegedly laundered through global networks for luxury purchases, Hollywood films, and personal enrichment.

While Malaysia, the US, and other countries have recovered substantial assets—billions in total through settlements and forfeitures—Low himself has evaded capture for years. Reports place him potentially in China or elsewhere, with Interpol red notices and Malaysian warrants issued, but public updates on intensive, sustained manhunt operations or equivalent high spending specifically for his extradition have been limited compared to the Hunter operation.

Critics point out that a single blogger living modestly across the border warranted significant diplomatic and legal investment, including engagement with Thai authorities, while the alleged mastermind of one of the largest financial heists in history has proven far more elusive. Media coverage of active, expensive operations targeting Low has been sparse in recent years relative to the scale of the alleged crime.

The Hunter case has sparked broader debate about priorities in Malaysian law enforcement and the use of resources. Supporters of the MCMC action argue it was necessary to protect institutional reputation and deter defamation. Detractors see it as an overreach that diverts attention and funds from larger issues of corruption and accountability.

As of early 2026, Hunter’s ordeal concluded with the withdrawal of charges, but the episode leaves lingering questions about proportionality, sovereignty in legal matters, and how the Malaysian government allocates efforts between high-profile financial fugitives and vocal critics. In an era of tight public budgets, such comparisons fuel public skepticism about whether justice is applied equally or influenced by political sensitivities.

The Malaysian public deserves transparency on these expenditures and priorities. True accountability starts with consistent application of the law—whether pursuing billion-ringgit scandals or handling disputes with individual commentators.

Meanwhile, Hunter is fighting the system for his right to leave Thailand, after a representative from the MCMC convinced the police, prosecutors and court to prosecute this case. A senate committee is currently investigating allegations of torture against Hunter in the police lock-up.


How much will Rafizi, Nik Nazmi hurt Anwar if they quit PKR?












Wong Chin Huat
Published: May 17, 2026 1:30 PM
Updated: 4:14 PM




COMMENT | PKR dissidents Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad are making a big announcement this afternoon on their next political move.

It would not fall short of revealing a new vehicle at least, but may go as far as announcing their resignation from the party, possibly triggering a stream of others following suit.

This would weaken Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s hand, as a loss of, say, 10 MPs would reduce PKR’s seats to 21, Pakatan Harapan's to 71, and the Madani government’s majority, including the six ex-Bersatu independents, to 143, five seats short of the two-thirds majority.

Anwar would need a deal with the Perikatan Nasional opposition to seek support for the two constitutional amendments – on the prime minister’s 10-year tenure limit, and the attorney-general-public prosecutor separation to get through.

But it would not cause a collapse of Anwar’s government. It would just severely weaken his hand in negotiating with BN, Gabungan Parti Sarawak and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah.


PM Anwar Ibrahim


The biggest damage would be a new party to openly challenge PKR, and possibly DAP and Amanah, for the discontented minority and liberal votes.

Anti-hopping law trap

But what differences does it make for Rafizi and Nik Nazmi to quit PKR now instead of after the dissolution of Parliament?

If this had happened before Oct 5, 2022, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi could simply announce a new party in Dewan Rakyat, as Muhyiddin Yassin and Shafie Apdal did in launching Bersatu and Warisan. The quitters stay on as incumbents in the upcoming election.

The anti-hopping law changes (Article 49A of the Federal Constitution), but with a catch. Any sitting MP who quits their party or ceases to be a party member would lose their seat. But MPs sacked by their parties would be free to join other parties or form a new one.

The Bersatu dissidents in the Dewan Rakyat and state legislatures, led by former Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin, are now free men because of the sacking.

The exemption of expulsion as a ground of seat vacancy is to protect lawmakers from being purged by their party leaders, as Muhyiddin did to his rivals. This is perhaps why Anwar did not want to sack Rafizi and gang.


Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin


“Ceasing to be a party member” is the catch that allows parties to tighten their grip on lawmakers by way of party constitution. It is up to parties to decide what behaviour should cause all or certain members, such as lawmakers, to “cease to be members”.

However, as Article 49A gives the power to the respective speaker to ascertain the vacation of seats, this can and has resulted in different interpretations on how party constitutions matter.

Meanwhile, if a seat vacancy happens after Parliament completes its third year, there would be no by-election under Article 54(1).


PKR reps free to be rebellious

DAP, Amanah and Umno had their party constitution amended to cause disobedience of party instructions in allegiance or legislative voting, a ground for lawmakers to lose their membership, and then, under Article 49A (and similar provisions in the state constitution) to lose their legislative seats.

Bersatu tried the same, but only after the seven turncoats, of which one was a Selangor state assemblyperson, switched their allegiance to Anwar and Selangor Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari while remaining Bersatu members.

It got the Nenggiri by-election in Kelantan because the Kelantan speaker from PAS agreed with Bersatu’s new constitutional provision.

There was no Selangor by-election because the state assembly speaker from DAP did not reject Bersatu’s new rule, but rejected it on the grounds that this was retrospective and hence a “planned dismissal”.

Most interestingly, the Dewan Rakyat speaker from PKR simply rejected the constraining power of the party constitution.

To my knowledge, PKR has no such provision to cause lawmakers to lose their seats as long as they do not voluntarily quit the party.

Rafizi’s options

Because of Articles 49A and 54(1), if Rafizi and gang all quit now, it makes things simpler for Anwar. They would all lose their seats without an election.

The less prominent rebels would have to stay relevant while PKR appoints prospective candidates to serve their constituencies.




For now, if the 16th general election is to be called after the October budget session, the quitters would only be absent for two parliamentary sessions, July and October.

However, if Anwar sees Rafizi’s group as the main threat, and the economic crisis makes it risky to call for an early election, Anwar can theoretically serve his full term for GE16 in February 2028 at the latest.

While this is an unlikely scenario, if this happens, many of the PKR parliamentarians may find themselves losing relevance as non-MPs.

The unintended consequence of how the Dewan Rakyat speaker handled the Bersatu 6’s defection is that PKR may not be able to do anything about Rafizi and gang, even if they stay back in the party but openly appear on the new party’s platform.

In other words, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi need not helm the new party for it to take off. They can get a senior leader to run it for them without sacrificing their incumbency in any constituency.

It could be Anwar’s worst nightmare if Rafizi’s faction effectively leads the new party – like the Bersatu 6 serves Anwar – without losing their seats.



WONG CHIN HUAT is a political scientist at Sunway University and a member of Project Stability and Accountability for Malaysia (Projek Sama)


***


Well, Rafizi and Nik did the 3rd option, resigned their parliamentary seats, wakakaka. And Anwar can't do sh*ts.

However, it's not good for PKR, by numbers, stability and optics for these two to leave. I see Rafizi as a 'pampered' childish brat for leaving PKR just because he didn't secure the party's deputy president post.

On a separate issue, I have always eyed Nik (rather than Rafizi) as a future PM for many reasons, but I wonder whether his departure from PKR will diminish his potential-PM prospects??? It'll be a shame if it does, as I luv to see Nik become PM one day - I bet he'll be a good one, if given the opportunity and circumstances.