Saturday, April 18, 2026

Why is China mediating the Iran war? Beijing’s energy interests and Trump-Xi summit explained





Why is China mediating the Iran war? Beijing’s energy interests and Trump-Xi summit explained



U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping react as they hold a bilateral meeting at Gimhae International Airport, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, in Busan, South Korea on October 30, 2025. — Reuters pic

Saturday, 18 Apr 2026 7:00 AM MYT


BEIJING, April 18 — China is accelerating its ‌efforts to end the Iran war, walking a diplomatic tightrope as it prepares for a summit next month ​with US President Donald Trump while trying not to alienate Tehran.


President Xi Jinping’s mid-May meeting with Trump is shaping Beijing’s approach to the Middle East conflict even as the world’s top crude oil importer, reliant on the Middle East for half its fuel, seeks to safeguard its energy ‌supplies, analysts say.


China’s modulated approach to the war has protected its back-channel leverage enough that Trump credited Beijing with helping to get Iran to last weekend’s ​peace talks in Pakistan.


Flurry of Middle East diplomacy


“You’ve heard President Trump repeatedly mention how the Chinese talked to the Iranians,” said Eric Olander, editor-in-chief of the China-Global South Project, an independent organisation that analyses China’s engagement in the developing world. “That puts them in the room with negotiators, even if it’s not a seat at the table.”


Considering Trump transactional and susceptible to flattery, China is seeking to advance its goals ​on trade and its claims on Taiwan at the summit, people familiar with China’s thinking told Reuters.

The dominant view in Beijing is to “butter him up, give him a red-carpet welcome and preserve strategic stability”, one person said.


China’s Foreign Ministry did not respond to questions about its diplomacy ahead of the summit, the first visit by a US president in eight years. Trump says it will take place May 14 and 15.

With the US naval blockade of Iranian ports as a direct and growing threat, China has engaged in a flurry of diplomatic activity and refrained from strong criticism of Trump’s conduct of the war so that the summit, postponed once by the ‌conflict, can go smoothly, analysts say.

Xi broke his silence on the crisis on Tuesday with a four-point peace plan that calls for upholding peaceful coexistence, national sovereignty, the international rule ⁠of law and balancing development and security.

After Trump warned Iran that “the entire country can ⁠be taken out in one night”, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning avoided condemnation, saying only that China was “deeply concerned” and ⁠urging all sides to play a “constructive role in de-escalating ⁠the situation”.

Foreign Minister Wang Yi has ⁠held nearly 30 calls and meetings with counterparts seeking a ceasefire, according to a Reuters count, while special envoy Zhai Jun has toured five Gulf and Arab capitals.

Travelling at one point by road to avoid contested airspace, Zhai could hear air-raid sirens, he told reporters.

Xi announced his peace plan in a meeting with Abu Dhabi’s crown prince, Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin ⁠Zayed Al Nahyan, as he sought to deepen ties with a rival to Iran while pressing Tehran towards dialogue.



Cargo ships in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, are seen from northern Ras al-Khaimah, near the border with Oman’s Musandam governance in the United Arab Emirates on March 11, 2026. — Reuters pic



Narrow focus for Trump-Xi summit

China’s “sense of urgency and the mode of intervention at the tactical level are shifting” as the war, which the US and Israel launched on February 28, drags on, said Cui Shoujun, a professor of international affairs at Renmin University.

Still, some analysts say, Iran needs China more than China needs Iran, allowing Beijing to press for a ceasefire while protecting the summit with Trump.

“Beijing’s ideal outcome,” said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, “is the maintenance of no-strings-attached relationships with anti-Western countries like Iran but also preserving its opportunity to achieve ⁠some form of modus vivendi with the US”

While China played a role in getting Iran to talk to the US, its ability to shape decisions is limited, as it lacks a military presence in the Middle East capable of backing up its words.

Some observers say China’s energetic Middle East diplomacy is more ⁠theatre than statecraft.

“While the Iranians are keen to play up their relationship with China and have asked Beijing to serve as a guarantor of a ceasefire, Beijing has shown zero ⁠interest in assuming such ⁠a role,” said Patricia Kim of the Brookings Institution. “Beijing appears content to remain on the sidelines as the United States bears the brunt of the pressure.”

At the summit with Trump, China may agree to buy ​Boeing aircraft, a deal held back for years over regulatory concerns that could be the biggest such order ​in history, as well as significant agricultural purchases.

The meeting is likely to be narrowly focused, ‌analysts say, avoiding ambitious topics such as AI governance, market access and manufacturing overcapacity.

“There is zero chance China will ​reach some sort of grand bargain with the United States,” ​said Scott Kennedy, trustee chair in Chinese business and economics at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. — Reuters


Did the US win anything in Iran?




Did the US win anything in Iran?



Sunday, 05 Apr 2026

Still standing: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC )is estimated to have more than 190,000 active personnel. — AFP


US President Donald Trump has declared that the United States has won its war against Iran, and that the conflict could end in a few weeks as the “objectives have been met”.




It’s certainly good news for the world because we can all get on with our lives with his victory claim, even if it sounds hollow.



If he says the US has won, so be it, as long the US attacks really stop in the coming weeks. Thank you very much, Trump. You had our attention.


But we have all got used to his mood swings, tantrums, bullying, insults, and constant change of deadlines.

First, he issued a deadline for March 27, then he adjusted from seven days to 10 days, and then on March 26 Trump announced a further delay, pushing it to April 6.

He warned that if the Strait of Hormuz – a critical artery for global oil – is not opened by this time, he would blow up Iranian energy infrastructure, including desalination plants.

In a post on his Truth Social platform on April 1, he said that until the Strait of Hormuz “is open, free and clear” the US would be “blasting Iran into oblivion, or as they say, back to the Stone Ages”.

It would not be wrong to suggest that many do not think the US has really won the war despite the extensive bombing of Iran’s military assets and the deaths of over 100,000 Iranians, including children.

From the outset, the US entered the war with a shifting set of objectives: crippling Iran’s military, halting its nuclear ambitions, weakening its regional proxies, and forcing a regime change.

Trump’s victory declaration is no more than a political narrative. Eliminating Iranian leaders – with the help of Israel – is hardly a regime change.

These leaders may have been assassinated but they can be replaced. The regime structure remains.

The Revolutionary Guard still operates. Its regional influence has not collapsed. And crucially, there is no clear political settlement in sight.

Trump’s statements have been notably inconsistent – declaring the war nearly over, already won, and yet still ongoing, sometimes within the same week.

The world is wondering if he even has a plan.

Trump has declared that the US has won its war against Iran and that the conflict could end in a few weeks. Can we believe him? — Bloomberg



More telling is the quiet dilution of aims. Early priorities, such as reopening the Strait of Hormuz, are no longer central to the exit strategy.

Instead, the administration now signals that it may leave even without achieving such outcomes.

It looks like the US can’t do much if Iran refuses to open the Strait except to friendly nations or demands payment – in Chinese yuan – from less favoured countries that need to use the waterway.

Trump has also threatened to “obliterate” or seize Iran’s key oil hub, Kharg Island, by suggesting potential control of the terminal, possibly by deploying ground troops.

If that happens, we will see a major escalation of the war. We will see real combat between American/Israeli and Iranian troops.

Trump talks of ending the war, but has increased the American military presence, including soldiers and marines, to over 50,000 personnel. Hundreds of elite forces have also arrived to guard the Strait.

If these US soldiers set foot on Iranian territory, we can expect some serious combat.

Bodies being brought home in coffins wrapped in the Stars and Stripes will certainly be horrible optics ahead of the US mid-term elections for the House of Representatives and Senate.

This raises a fundamental question: If core objectives can be abandoned, what exactly constitutes success?

How can it be a victory for the US – or anyone – when the war has destabilised the Middle East, disrupted global economies, spiked oil prices and inflation, and strained alliances, with European partners distancing themselves from Washington?

In the US, the political cost is mounting. A significant majority of Americans now favour ending the war – even if objectives remain unmet.

American consumers are fuming that they have to pay more for the gas they are using in their cars and for the food on their tables.

This is not the profile of a nation confident in victory. It is the profile of a country seeking an exit.

The danger of Trump declaring a premature victory, however, masks unresolved threats and leaves underlying conflicts to fester.

The US may have signalled its intention to walk away but stopping the bombing does not necessarily end the war – or secure the region.

Israel hasn’t said anything about ending the war. It has not respected any ceasefire agreement in Gaza and it has continued to bomb the place.

In short, peace has not been respected or secured. The same will happen in Iran even if the US stops its attacks.

Without a diplomatic framework, without a stable post-war order, and without clarity about what has been achieved, military success risks becoming strategically hollow.

So has the US really won the war, met its objectives, destroyed Iranian assets, toppled the regime, and stopped Iran from building a nuclear bomb?

Yes, militarily, it has inflicted damage but strategically, the answer is far less clear.

It is clear that Iran is not defeated, the regime has remained, and most likely the war itself may end not 
with resolution but with withdrawal.

To put it bluntly, it is a pointless war, and even if it is quickly ended, the bottom line is how little it ultimately changed the political equation in Iran.

If Trump was hoping for a quickie result like the arrest of Venezuela president Nicolas Maduro recently, he got his calculations all wrong.

The reality is, the world has to pay the price for the stupid war started by Trump. Even if he orders a pullout in the coming weeks, we will still bear the consequences for a long time.



National Journalism Laureate Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai is the chairman of Bernama. The views expressed here are solely his own.


Umno opens doors to KJ, Hishammuddin and Syed Hamid






Friday, 17 Apr 2026 | 11:15 PM MYT





PETALING JAYA: Umno has approved the unconditional return of former Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin, former vice president Datuk Seri Hishamuddin Hussein and Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar.

Umno secretary-general Datuk Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki confirmed the reinstatement of the trio's party memberships in a Facebook post on Friday night following the party’s leadership meeting held in Melaka.


Hishammuddin previously expressed that he was ready to return to Umno should his suspension be lifted and had reportedly submitted an application to rejoin the party president.

Khairy had also reportedly submitted a letter of appeal after being sacked in January 2023.


Meanwhile, Syed Hamid quit Umno to join Bersatu in 2018, stating that he had lost belief in the party. However, he, too, had recently expressed his intentions to rejoin the party.

Party president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi previously stated that doors remained open to former members who wished to return to the party.

6,252 former members were readmitted through the Gagasan Rumah Bangsa initiative.

The council also amended party membership rules to enable online registration, aimed at easing recruitment, particularly among youths.

In light of rising living costs driven by fuel price hikes and global inflation linked to the Iran conflict, Umno urged its-led states to step up targeted assistance for affected communities.

The party announced key programmes for its 80th anniversary celebration from May 1 to 5 in Kuala Lumpur, including conventions, education congresses, and entrepreneurship events.


What has Trump said before possible US-Iran talks and what could it mean?



What has Trump said before possible US-Iran talks and what could it mean?

In rapid-fire posts, Trump says Iran will give up nuclear material and ‘never close’ the Hormuz Strait. But questions remain about the accuracy of his claims.

Washington, DC – United States President Donald Trump has posted a series of rapid-fire messages on the US-Israeli war with Iran, claiming that his government secured major concessions before a possible next round of ceasefire talks.

Posted on Truth Social on Friday, Trump’s statements claimed that Iran had agreed to open — and “never close” — the Strait of Hormuz.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

He also alleged that Tehran would turn over its “nuclear dust” and that Israel would be “prohibited” from launching attacks in Lebanon.

Iran has confirmed reopening the Strait of Hormuz for the “duration” of the current pause in fighting, which is set to end early next week, barring a new agreement. However, officials have pushed back on claims regarding its nuclear stockpile, with a source telling Al Jazeera negotiations remain at a preliminary stage.

Despite the outstanding questions, the US president struck a celebratory tone, calling Friday “A GREAT AND BRILLIANT DAY FOR THE WORLD!”

Separately, he told Bloomberg News that he expected talks to move forward on Sunday with a permanent ceasefire deal in sight.

“We’re not seeing the full picture,” Yezid Sayigh, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Middle East Center, told Al Jazeera, pointing to Trump’s penchant for hyperbole and several unresolved issues.

“But this does suggest a positive momentum towards something that may end up being a comprehensive deal.”

Sayigh added that Trump could have ulterior motives in striking an upbeat tone, at a time when the chokehold in the Strait of Hormuz is driving up prices for everything from fuel to fertiliser.

“It is very interesting that President Trump is putting such a positive spin on things, not only to encourage markets and talk down oil prices and talk stock market prices up,” Sayigh said.

“But also, I suspect, because he’s preparing the ground for more revelations about what is being negotiated with Iran.”

Trump says Iran will ‘never close’ Strait of Hormuz

Part of Trump’s social media claims appeared to be confirmed in a separate statement from Tehran. But the details showed distance between Trump’s position and Iran’s.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced on Friday that, in light of a 10-day pause in fighting in Lebanon, “the passage for all commercial vessels through Strait of Hormuz is declared completely open for the remaining period of ceasefire.”

Trump swiftly echoed that claim on social media, writing that the strait is “FULLY OPEN AND READY FOR FULL PASSAGE”.

However, a senior Iranian military official told state media that only nonmilitary vessels would be allowed to transit the strait — and only with permission from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy.

Then, Trump went further with his claims of free maritime traffic, saying, “Iran has agreed to never close the Strait of Hormuz again.”

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Alexandru Hudisteanu, a maritime security expert, said there has been no confirmation from Iran that such a long-term pledge had been made.

“We know, for instance, that over the last six weeks or so of the war, the Iranian leadership grasped the fact that its control over the Strait of Hormuz gave it the kind of deterrence that its nuclear programme, its ballistic missiles, its regional proxies, had never actually given it,” he said.

“So, I don’t think that the Iranian leadership would have made this kind of commitment unequivocally and irrevocably.”

There were also lingering questions about another post Trump made, concerning the US decision to blockade the strait.

Trump posted that the ongoing US naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Gulf “WILL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS IT PERTAINS TO IRAN, ONLY, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS OUR TRANSACTION WITH IRAN IS 100% COMPLETE”.

But media reports indicate that Iran might close traffic in the Hormuz Strait if such a blockade were to remain in effect.

Iran’s Fars News Agency, which is closely aligned with the IRGC, reported that Tehran considers the continuation of the US blockade a violation of the current ceasefire and would again close the strait if it were not lifted.

Then there were the questions of mines in the strait. On Truth Social, Trump also said that “Iran, with the help of the U.S.A., has removed, or is removing, all sea mines!”

But the news agency Reuters reported that a US Navy advisory warned on Friday that the “status of TSS mine threat is not fully understood. Consider avoidance of that area”. The statement referred to the Traffic Separation Scheme, the two-way shipping lane in the strait.

Trump says US will get all nuclear ‘dust’

A major sticking point in the negotiations between the US and Iran has been the future of Iran’s nuclear programme. While Iran has denied seeking a nuclear weapon, the US and Israel have claimed their initial attacks in the war, on February 28, were designed to prevent Iran from constructing one.

On Friday, Trump again appeared to claim that Iran would turn over its enriched uranium stockpile, writing on Truth Social that “the U.S.A. will get all Nuclear ‘Dust'”.

The term “dust” appears to be a reference to the US decision to bomb three key nuclear sites in Iran on June 22, 2025. Trump has repeatedly claimed that those attacks “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear programme, despite conflicting evidence.

On Friday, after his post, Trump told Reuters that the US would work with Iran “at a nice leisurely pace, and go down and start excavating with big machinery” to retrieve the uranium stockpile at the sites.

“We’ll bring ⁠it back to the United States,” he added. He also told Bloomberg that Iran had agreed to suspend its nuclear programme indefinitely.

Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera correspondent Ali Hashem said there has been no confirmation on such an agreement.

“This is a big claim here, because the Iranians have always said that they’re not going to accept such a condition,” Hashem said. “What we’ve heard from our sources is that the issue of enrichment and the sunsets of any conditions is going to be left till the end of the talks.”

Later on Friday, Iran’s Tasnim news agency quoted Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei dismissing Trump’s claim: “Enriched uranium is as sacred to us as Iranian soil and will not be transferred anywhere under any circumstances,” he said.

Trump also maintained that “no money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form”, another claim that has not been confirmed by Iran.

Hashem added that the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian funds, the lifting of US sanctions and reparations for war damages have been key priorities for Tehran. He believes Iran will leverage issues like the free flow of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to extract concessions.

“What’s the price for this?” Hashem said. “And what are the Iranians going to take in return? These are big questions.”

Trump says Israel ‘prohibited’ from bombing Lebanon

Another issue that has threatened to disrupt the ceasefire talks was Israel’s ongoing bombing campaign in Lebanon. Iran and mediators in Pakistan had maintained that Lebanon was included in the initial ceasefire, but the US and Israel denied that it was part of the agreement.

But on Thursday, a breakthrough was announced: Israel had agreed to a 10-day pause in its invasion and bombardment of Lebanon.

On Friday, however, Trump seemed to imply that the stoppage was to continue into the long term.

“Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer,” he wrote. “They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!!”

He added that Washington will work with Lebanon and “deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner”.

Reporting from Washington, DC, Al Jazeera correspondent Alan Fisher said the statement represents a particularly hard US line on Israel, but it remains to be seen if Trump would indeed seek to punish Israel if they do not comply.

“That’s not what the United States tends to do,” Fisher said.

“Is Donald Trump actually going to change the norms of American politics when it comes to dealing with the Israelis and treat them like he’s treated other countries in the past, and effectively cut them off?”

Trump thanks regional countries, takes shot at NATO

While Trump’s posts on Friday were largely celebratory, he did hand out darts and laurels to various parties in the ceasefire negotiations.

Trump thanked Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar for their “great bravery and help”. He also thanked Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shebaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir, who helped to coordinate US-Iran contacts. He called them “two fantastic people”.

But Trump took aim at NATO, which he has criticised for not supporting the US and Israeli war against Iran, as well as subsequent efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

“Now that the Hormuz Strait situation is over, I received a call from NATO asking if we would need some help. I TOLD THEM TO STAY AWAY, UNLESS THEY JUST WANT TO LOAD UP THEIR SHIPS WITH OIL,” Trump wrote.  “They were useless when needed, a Paper Tiger!”

The Trump administration has signalled it is mulling a withdrawal from NATO, although such a move would require congressional approval.

But despite Trump’s most recent statements, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said European allies had agreed to accelerate military planning for a multinational force to secure the waterway during a summit in Paris on Friday.

Friday, April 17, 2026

Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz as Trump says US blockade will continue until deal is made




Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz as Trump says US blockade will continue until deal is made



Summary



  1. Oliver Smith
    Senior business producer

    Early indications are that commercial ships in and around the Gulf won’t be in any rush to travel through the Strait of Hormuz, despite the Iranian foreign minister’s declaration that it is “completely open”.

    One oil and gas tanker operator, which did want to be named, told the BBC the Iranian statement “doesn’t change anything” for now.

    “We don’t feel like we need to be taking unnecessary risks, and our company approach is that we won’t be the first to go through the strait,” it said.

    Another company, Stena Bulk, which operates oil tankers in the region says it is “monitoring developments closely.”

    It says: “The safety of our crew and vessels governs every routing decision, and we will not transit until we are satisfied it is safe to do so.”

  2. International Maritime Organization 'currently verifying' Iranian announcementpublished at 01:00

    Jonathan Josephs
    Business reporter

    The head of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) is trying to understand the details behind Iran’s commitment to reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

    Even with the fighting on pause there is significant US and Iranian military presence in the area, and as tensions remain heightened there is an ongoing risk to the safety of ships and their crews.

    The IMO’s secretary general Arsenio Dominguez has been at the UK - France summit in Paris and has been looking at how to reopen the important shipping route.

    He has posted on X saying: “We are currently verifying the recent announcement related to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, in terms of its compliance with freedom of navigation for all merchant vessels and secure passage using the IMO established traffic separation scheme.”

  1. Analysis

    Hormuz situation still murkypublished at 00:45

    Frank Gardner
    Security correspondent

    The situation in the Strait of Hormuz and the wider Gulf region is still murky and messy, despite the well-received announcement by Iran’s foreign minister that it is "fully open for commercial traffic while the ceasefire lasts".

    We are not back to where we were on 27 February, before the US and Israel began this latest conflict.

    Will Iran still insist that ships follow its newly designated route to the north of the pre-existing tanker lanes?

    This is a route called the Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) that has been functioning smoothly for everyone since it was first ratified by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in 1968.

    Will Iran still demand military inspections of shipping by IRGC officials? Its announcement also mentions only commercial shipping.

    The US Navy’s Fifth Fleet is headquartered in Bahrain - inside the Gulf and therefore past the Strait of Hormuz. So, the US is not likely to accept having its naval warships locked out of the Gulf.

    Meanwhile it is far from clear if the Islamic Republic will accept the proposed long-term multinational force for the Strait of Hormuz when Iran wants to “exercise its right of sovereignty” over the waterway.

  2. US participation in strait mission 'desirable' - Merzpublished at 00:33

    Merz speaking at news conference

    Finally, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says it is in the “immediate interests” of the parties to increase efforts towards peace.

    He says Germany supports the ongoing efforts to achieve “a quick diplomatic agreement” between the US and Iran and also hails the "historic opportunity" for Hezbollah and Israel to make efforts towards a lasting peace.

    Merz repeats calls for Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz fully in a way that is lasting, secure and “toll free”, and says despite the recent “good news” on this front, there must be no restrictions on its opening.

    Germany is willing to contribute to the mission to promote freedom of navigation through the strait, he says, including the possible participation of its armed forces and activity such as mine clearing.

    Such a plan would need to be approved by the UN and Germany’s parliament, he says, adding that US participation would be “desirable.”

    The news conference has now concluded.