JENAYAH KOPIAH PUTIH - LEBAI SAKAU RM230 JUTA DUIT ZAKAT

 

OutSyed The Box

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

JENAYAH KOPIAH PUTIH - LEBAI SAKAU RM230 JUTA DUIT ZAKAT

 Sila baca komen saya di bawah.

MY COMMENTS:

Tuan-Tuan orang Melayu dengar baik-baik ok. This is what will happen bila tuan-tuan jadi bodoh. Geng-geng lebai ini dari dulu lagi mereka sudah faham betapa mudah nak tipu orang Islam, especially orang Melayu.

1. Dulu bila ada conman declare 'saya pemimpin Islam' beratus ribu orang Melayu percaya dia walaupun dia terlibat seks luar tabii yang kronik. Sampai nama dia tersebut dalam kes Epst--n files. Tapi orang Melayu percaya juga. Why? Sebab dia hafal satu dua kerat habla yabla dus fi zabboora.

2. Lepas itu ada se-ekor lagi lebai tipu orang bahawa dia bela jin. Sampai dia berani kata dia pernah imamkan jin dalam sembahyang sekali.  Dus fi zabboora! Hebat dia punya bohong. Tetapi pada zaman itu ramai orang Melayu percaya.

3. Lepas itu jadi lagi kes satu kumpulan lebai gila seks yang ramai juga  terlibat rogol, liwat dan amang seksual anak-anak dalam reban mereka. Kes itu jadi bising sekejap saja lepas itu nothing happened. I suppose orang Melayu sudah lupa. Dulu Dr Mahathir kata orang Melayu mudah lupa.  

4. Lepas itu jadi kes lebai muallap terlibat kes seks juga dan dihadapkan ke mahkamah. Antara tuduhan terhadap dia ialah dia ambil gambar k*nek dia dan di hantar gambar itu kepada seorang wanita. Mungkin dia terasa k*nek dia handsome kut.

5. Banyak tahun dulu juga keluar video lebai glamour (berkereta mewah) berbogel dengan seorang wanita entah mana. Tapi ramai orang Melayu defend lebai itu - dengan membuat pelbagai alasan video itu palsu dsbnya. Masa itu tak ada AI. 

6. Kurang lebih masa itu juga keluar satu lagi video lebai sec-gen berbogel dan lakukan seks dengan seorang wanita entah mana juga.  

Sekarang ikut berita di atas geng lebai tipu duit zakat pula - RM230 Juta!! Mereka beli kereta mewah, simpan ratusan juta Ringgit dalam bank, beli jam tangan mewah dsbnya. Semuanya dengan menipu duit zakat sumbangan orang biasa. Sumbangan orang Melayu yang memang sangat mudah tertipu oleh sesiapa pun. Especially oleh geng lebai yang guna jenama agama, minta sedekah dsbnya.

Duit atau money memang sasaran mereka nombor satu. No money no religion. Kalau tak ada duit yang terlibat saya rasa hilanglah kelibat mereka. 

Saya ada sedikit soalan kepada Datuk Dr. Abu Tariq bin Jamaluddin (GAMBAR ATAS), Chief Executive Officer / Director General of Inland Revenue for the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (LHDN). Dari dulu sampai sekarang (termasuk kes yang latest dalam berita di atas) kita lihat ramai juga geng-geng lebai ini hidup kaya raya, dengan kereta mewah, rumah besar, bini dua tiga dsbnya. Mereka ini hidup serupa Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous. 

Dulu saya pernah terserempak dengan lebai jin itu di sebuah restoran mewah. Dia boleh belanja makan untuk kurang lebih 10 orang di restoran mewah itu.  Dan bila naik kapalterbang dia selalu duduk dalam First Class.    

These people are very rich. So saya nak tanya sedikit soalan kepada  Datuk Dr. Abu Tariq bin Jamaluddin, Director General of LHDN.  Dia orang ini mesti bayar Income Tax yang lumayan. Betul tak? I mean they are so rich. Income Tax file dia orang ini mesti gemuk-gemuk. They must be paying a lot of taxes. Yes or no?

Jangan pula ada kes lebai-lebai kaya raya ini tak ada fail atau nombor Income Tax pun. No Income Tax file.   Datuk Dr. Abu Tariq bin Jamaluddin let me remind you - zaman sudah berubah. Sekarang ini kita berada dalam zaman Kerajaan Kena Tendang (zaman Kick Them Out).  Tak lama nanti akan ada pilihanraya sekali lagi. Percayalah kerajaan akan berubah. 

So lets say kerajaan baru akan masuk dan mereka jadi penyapu baru pula - nak cuci bersih segala kekotoran rejim lama.  And then kalau depa jumpa kes-kes lebai kaya yang tak ada Income Tax file atau nombor Income tax pun, then you will have to answer.

So please pastikan geng lebai kaya ini semua ada Income Tax file, ada nombor Income Tax dan mereka bayar cukai yang lumayan daripada duit mereka yang lumayan.

Kami orang yang sudah retired dan berusia lebih 60 tahun pun terpaksa isi borang LHDN pada setiap tahun. Kalau lewat boleh kena denda lagi. 

Kepada ahli politik Melayu yang dungu dan mati akal, tak tahu macam mana nak berkhidmat menolong orang Melayu, dengar baik-baik ok - anda semua kini berdepan risiko besar ditendang keluar kerana awak semua tidak tahu macam mana nak membantu orang Melayu atau bagaimana cara untuk berkhidmat demi kepentingan awam. Izinkan saya memberi sedikit cadangan.

Anda mesti menggubal undang-undang yang melarang sepenuhnya mana-mana pihak daripada mengutip wang daripada orang ramai atas nama agama. Jika sesiapa ingin membayar zakat, maka hanya jabatan agama sahaja yang sepatutnya mengutip bayaran zakat dan mengeluarkan resit rasmi bagi kutipan tersebut.

RM230 juta adalah jumlah wang yang sangat besar. Jika setiap orang yang kena tipu itu menyumbang RM100 duit zakat, ini bermakna 2.3 juta orang telah ditipu. Percayalah kesemua 2.3 juta orang ini tidak akan mengundi anda. Percayalah anda akan ditendang keluar. 

So you better mengubah undang-undang dan jadikan-nya satu kesalahan bagi sesiapa pun selain jabatan agama untuk mengutip duit zakat.

Kepada tuan-tuan orang Melayu pula - when are you going to grow up? Sampai bila nak bersifat childish kebudak-budakan? Bila orang datang berbalut kepala, cakap habla yabla dus fi zaboora dan tuan-tuan terus serah duit, serah tanah, kerusi meja dan maybe anak dara sekali kepada mereka. What is wrong with you?  

وَمَا كَانَ لِنَفْسٍ أَن تُؤْمِنَ إِلَّا بِإِذْنِ ٱللَّهِ ۚ وَيَجْعَلُ ٱلرِّجْسَ عَلَى ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ ١٠٠

Surah 10:100  Dan tiadalah sebarang kuasa bagi seseorang untuk beriman melainkan dengan izin Allah dan Allah menimpakan azab atas orang-orang yang tidak menggunakan akal (   لَا يَعْقِلُونَ ).

So please gunakan akal at all times.   

Iran seizes two vessels in Strait of Hormuz after ship comes under fire

Iran seizes two vessels in Strait of Hormuz after ship comes under fire

The IRGC says the aggression came in response to what it described as the US seizure of an Iranian commercial vessel

Cargo ships in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz, in the United Arab Emirates [Reuters]

By Caolán Magee
Published On 22 Apr 2026


Iran has seized two foreign commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and transferred them to its coast, in a further escalation that comes hours after US President Donald Trump said he would extend a ceasefire with Iran.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the vessels had violated maritime regulations and entered the strategic waterway without coordination, according to Iranian state media.

The seizure follows Wednesday’s incident, in which an Iranian gunboat fired on a container vessel near Oman, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre.

The British maritime monitoring agency said the ship’s captain reported that the ship had been approached by a vessel of IRGC before shots were fired.

It “has caused heavy damage to the bridge. No fires or environmental impact reported,” the agency added. No casualties were reported, and all crew members were said to be safe.

The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, remains one of the world’s most strategically significant waterways.

Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi, reporting from Tehran, said “this is in line with what we heard from the IRGC previously, saying that any passage of ships, vessels or oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz should be with the permission and coordination of the IRGC”.

He said the seizure reflected Iran’s continuing strategy to impose control and authority over maritime traffic through the chokepoint, adding that Iranian officials were now discussing charges and transit fees for vessels using the route.

British maritime security firm Vanguard Tech said the container vessel that came under fire was sailing under a Liberian flag and had been informed it had permission to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

Iranian news agency Tasnim, however, said the vessel had ignored warnings issued by Iran’s armed forces.

The incident followed a warning from the IRGC’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters after what it described as the US seizure of an Iranian commercial ship in the Sea of Oman, the IRNA news agency reported.

It accused Washington of violating the ceasefire and carrying out “armed piracy” after allegedly firing on the Iranian vessel and disabling its navigation systems.


Trump extends ceasefire

Trump earlier announced he would delay a planned military attack on Iran after requests from Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump said the decision was made because Iran’s government was “seriously fractured” and needed time to present a unified position.

“We have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal,” he wrote.

He added, however, that the US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would remain in place and said the military had been ordered to stay “ready and able”.

The announcement marked a shift from comments made a day earlier, when Trump said it was “highly unlikely” he would extend the truce beyond Tuesday.

‘Positive and negative signals’ from Tehran

Tohid Asadi added that Iranian officials were sending mixed messages over the ceasefire and the prospects for negotiations.

“Tehran is saying they won’t negotiate under imposed terms and conditions … when we compare the initial 10-point and 15-point proposals by the Iranians and Americans, we can understand that the two sides are poles apart,” he said.

“The atmosphere is also clouded by this mistrust in Tehran towards the United States, as well as the simultaneous military rhetoric related to a potential failed negotiation … It is a warning that another round of confrontation may be ahead.”

He said Iran still viewed the Strait of Hormuz as a key source of leverage in any talks.

“It’s trying to exercise authority over the ships and vessels transiting this strategically significant chokepoint,” he said.

Asadi added that Iranian officials framed their regional position as based on mutual security. “Iranians are saying that the basis of their foreign policy behaviour, particularly when it comes to Israel, is security for all versus security for none,” he said.

Rohingya influx in Pandan Perdana a public safety concern, says rep

Rohingya influx in Pandan Perdana a public safety concern, says rep


2 hours ago
Anne Muhammad


Teratai assemblyman Yew Jia Haur wants the Selangor government to address the matter before it leads to inter-community tensions

Teratai assemblyman Yew Jia Haur said the rising number of homeless Rohingya in Pandan Perdana can no longer be treated as a mere social issue. (Facebook pic)

SHAH ALAM: Teratai assemblyman Yew Jia Haur has described the rising number of homeless Rohingya in Pandan Perdana as a serious public safety crisis that can no longer be treated as a mere social issue.

Debating a motion at the Selangor state assembly today, the DAP assemblyman said their presence over the past one to two years had affected cleanliness, safety, and the well-being of residents.

He claimed that some were living on sidewalks and in parking areas, and setting up illegal settlements between commercial buildings and recreational areas.


Others were also reported to have trespassed into vacant premises to use them as shelters without permission.

“What is unfortunate is that their presence is not just about seeking shelter. It has also caused various disturbances that test the patience of local residents,” he said.

“The issue of cleanliness has become a state concern, with rubbish being dumped indiscriminately, foul smell filling back lanes, and the reckless use of public facilities without regard for local sensitivities.”

Yew also said there were reports of aggressive behaviour and illegal activities.

He claimed that local residents faced difficulties lodging complaints with authorities such as the immigration and social welfare departments, with cases often ending without resolution as each agency cited jurisdictional limitations.

“To this day, no government agency appears to have taken decisive action to fully address this issue. It is as if we are passing the buck while residents of Pandan Perdana continue to suffer,” he said.


Yew said the issue had also affected property values, disrupted local businesses, and raised concerns about the safety of women and children.

He urged the state government to take proactive steps to address the matter before inter-community tensions arose due to enforcement failures.

He also questioned the actions of some UNHCR cardholders who, he alleged, used the document as a “shield” to live as homeless individuals in public areas.

He said UNHCR refugee status should not be used as a justification to violate local by-laws or trespass on public property.


Yesterday, another DAP assemblyman said foreign nationals residing in the Kesidang state constituency in Melaka, particularly Rohingya individuals, were not allowed to organise events or celebrations in open areas to avoid disputes or disturbances to local residents.

Kesidang assemblyman Allex Seah advised the Rohingya community who still wanted to host events in the area to do so at restaurants or halls.

He said a previous community event held by Rohingya residents at Kampung Limbongan caused discomfort and disrupted harmony among local residents because of the loud music and the presence of groups from outside the village.

Ex-MB: N Sembilan chieftains sacking of ruler valid, but amicable solution needed

Ex-MB: N Sembilan chieftains sacking of ruler valid, but amicable solution needed

N Faizal Ghazali
Published: Apr 22, 2026 9:01 AM
Updated: 1:46 PM


INTERVIEW | Negeri Sembilan’s Undang Yang Empat’s move to depose Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir as Yang di-Pertuan Besar is valid, opined former menteri besar Rais Yatim.

However, Rais, who is also a scholar of adat perpatih - the Minangkabau customary law - suggested that the royal crisis be resolved amicably so as not to tarnish the customs and the names of any quarter.

He explained that the chieftains or undangs of Sungai Ujong, Jelebu, Rembau, and Johol - who hold the power to appoint the Yang di-Pertuan Besar - also have the right to depose the state ruler under Article 10 of the Negeri Sembilan constitution.

He noted that the four undangs must meet two conditions: first, there must be a complete report; second, the alleged offences must be listed.

“After that, the document can be sealed, and the customary narrative carried out, and at the bottom, the menteri besar must sign as a witness.

“If the menteri besar refuses to sign as a witness, he may be considered negligent in fulfilling the Negeri Sembilan constitution.

“The Yang di-Pertuan Besar cannot exist without the Undang Yang Empat.

“If they no longer support the Yang di-Pertuan Besar due to any wrongdoing or matters that affect reputation, the execution of duties, or customs, then the Yang di-Pertuan Besar may be deposed by the Undang Yang Empat (with those two conditions),” he said in an interview with Malaysiakini in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.

The clash between the Undang Yang Empat and Tuanku Muhriz erupted on April 17 when the Negeri Sembilan Council of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the Ruling Chiefs (Dewan Keadilan dan Undang) was reported to have accepted a decision by Sungai Ujong nobles to sack its undang Mubarak Thahak over purported transgressions.

Mubarak and the other three undangs - Maarof Mat Rashad (Jelebu), Muhammad Abdullah (Johol), and Abdul Rahim Yasin (Rembau) - then retaliated on April 19 by declaring that Tuanku Muhriz was deposed and naming Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar as his replacement.

This was after they allegedly launched their own investigation into Tuanku Muhriz on March 5 for alleged transgressions in his royal duties. They deemed the unspecified transgressions to have been committed deliberately, thus besmirching the royal institution.

However, Menteri Besar Aminuddin Harun said the chieftains’ proclamation was invalid, due to Mubarak being sacked earlier.

Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar Aminuddin Harun


The Negeri Sembilan state constitution, however, states that a decision can be made by at least three undangs, or by however many are alive at the time of the decision.

Call for dialogue and review

Rais said that while the decision by the undangs was valid, he nevertheless recommended that the state administration return to the root of the issue.

The Bersatu leader also called on all parties to review the next steps after the Undang Yang Empat announced the deposition of the ruler and named his successor.

“This is the right of the Undang Yang Empat; we will not interfere in that matter.

“The menteri besar, whether he likes it or not, given that the meeting fulfilled the requirements of Article 10(i) and (ii), must act as a witness to the document, which is mandatory,” he said.

That document is constitutional and cannot be taken lightly, he added.

“With such a decision, it is hoped that those administering the Negeri Sembilan government will return to the starting point and review what needs to be done.

“In adat, there is also ‘sorong parang, tarik parang’ (pushing a blade forward, pulling a blade back, meaning mutual provocation), but something that has been sliced can be rejoined based on the will of the majority among the Undang Yang Empat, and the royal parties can reach a consensus again.

Former Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Rais Yatim

“This should not be done as a ‘one cut and finished’ action, because ‘flowing water cannot be severed by cutting’, so find a way to return to the council, gather all the undangs, and discuss it there amicably as required by adat so that what has happened can be softened and resolved.

“This is my suggestion if we want to restore the dignity of adat; otherwise, Article 10 will proceed, and the names involved will be tarnished,” he said.

Required conditions not met

Rais, who was the Negeri Sembilan menteri besar from 1978 to 1982, also opined that Mubarak’s dismissal as undang was invalid.

This is because, according to him, the views expressed by the members of the Negeri Sembilan Council of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the Ruling Chiefs were not adopted; instead, the decree or speech of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar was directly interpreted by the menteri besar as a final decision.

“I say that the decision is not final and not valid due to the absence of sufficient conditions. First, the views of those present, such as the tunku besar of Tampin, the datuk syahbandar of Sungai Ujong, and the undang of Johol, were not accepted.

“The three of them objected and advised not to dismiss (Mubarak) yet because the authority body in Sungai Ujong had not made a decision; only one segment, known as ibu soko, made the decision.

“The customary authorities in all luak (districts) are the datuk lembaga who appoint an undang according to lineage, conditions, and the rights of each perut (subclan).

“Therefore, when the menteri besar directly interpreted the speech and wishes of the council’s chair, namely the Yang di-Pertuan Besar, as final and announced the termination of the undang of Sungai Ujong, it was in fact a dismissal, and such a dismissal cannot be made by the council,” Rais said.

From left: Undang Yang Empat Maarof Mat Rashad (Jelebu), Mubarak Thahak (Sungai Ujong), Muhammad Abdullah (Johol), and Abdul Rahim Yasin (Rembau)

He said the Council of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the Ruling Chiefs is only an advisory body, and that any decision to depose an undang must come from within the chieftain’s district.

Rais added that the council has no authority whatsoever to dismiss any of the Undang Yang Empat; they can only be removed or appointed under Article 14 of the state constitution.

“The question here is why the menteri besar interpreted the meeting decree as final. Another factor is that a meeting is not valid until it is confirmed at the next meeting.

“So before the next meeting, the other undang must attend; a decision has been made. In other words, the decree of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar at the council meeting on April 17 remains pending until the next meeting - only then can it be finalised,” he said.


Possible escalation to court

Rais also emphasised the practice in Negeri Sembilan, which has two hierarchies: the Yang di-Pertuan Besar as the reigning ruler, alongside the Undang Yang Empat, who cannot be sidelined.

“Their (the undangs’) views must be consulted in any decision; thus, there are two royal segments,” he added.

Rais - who has been studying adat perpatih since 1963 - described the dispute as one of the most difficult constitutional crises in Negeri Sembilan and an unfortunate development.

“This is because adat itself is a source of peace, beauty of language, harmony, courtesy, and so on.

“But when disputes involve practitioners of adat, government authorities, the Yang di-Pertuan Besar, and co-rulers among the Undang Yang Empat, confusion arises as each uses their power and position without referring to what should actually be done under the law and customary practice,” he said.

When asked how far the Negeri Sembilan royal crisis might reach before a resolution, Rais expected the conflict might end up in court.

“I think it will reach (the courts). There may be parts the court rejects and parts it allows. But before that, I hope the council and the Undang Yang Empat play their roles, and that role can actually be advised by the menteri besar.

“Right now, he (Aminuddin) is seen as taking sides, appearing to favour the royal party (the Yang di-Pertuan Besar). So now he must appear fair. That is up to the menteri besar; I have carried that burden before - it is not easy,” he said.

Rightist Akmal sought for reaction after NGO top brass nabbed for alleged RM230m zakat fund swindling

Rightist Akmal sought for reaction after NGO top brass nabbed for alleged RM230m zakat fund swindling

SUCH is the shout out from netizens following the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Selangor branch arrest of two company directors and an NGO deputy chairman over RM230 mil zakat (tithe) fund misappropriation yesterday (April 21).


Additionally, posh cars in the likes of Porsche, Mercedes, Lexus, Range Rover and Honda Civic Type R were seized along with properties worth RM11 mil while 33 bank accounts holding RM120 mil were being frozen.

According to a Bernama report, two men in their 50s and 60s were arrested yesterday (April 21) evening in an operation around the Klang Valley while the third man in his 50s was detained at about 2pm when he turned up to give a statement at the Selangor MACC office.

Preliminary investigations pointed to the trio believed to have conspired in the offence between 2018 and 2024. The NGO’s deputy chairman is believed to have transferred RM230 mil into his company’s account for investment and personal purposes.

Investigations are focusing on elements of public fund misappropriation as the NGO received public donations to assist those in need.

According to Selangor MACC director Mohd Azwan Ramli who confirmed the arrests, the case is being investigated under the MACC Act 2009 with all suspects expected to be brought to the Shah Alam Magistrate’s Court this morning (April 22) for remand proceedings.

Given the ‘juicy’ nature of the case, it is little wonder that detractors tend to remember the fiery UMNO Youth chief Datuk Muhamad Akmal Saleh, the self-proclaimed staunch defender of race and religion.

“Where is AKMAL? Any comments or hide like Mouse,” jibed one commenter to the NST Online Facebook post while another wondered “where’re Firdaus (controversial Muslim convert preacher Firdaus Wong Wai Hung), Akmal and the gang?”

NST Online

20 hours ago

[IN PICS] MACC arrests two company directors and an NGO deputy chairman over RM230 million zakat fund misappropriation, seizing Porsche, Mercedes, Range Rover, Honda Civic Type R, properties worth RM11 million, and freezing 33 bank accounts holding RM120 million.

https://bit.ly/3QAAzrI

508

265

161

Even Muslims were dumbfounded with the misappropriation of zakat funds which are supposedly meant to provide financial relief to less fortunate Muslims.

Social media influencer Aliff Ahmad summed up the pretence of his dishonest brethren who abuse the religion for their selfish gain by insinuating that the public has to be careful with those who earn a living by being involved in “NGOs, doing zakat business, claiming to work for Allah or simply, was born rich”.

The FB post by the co-founder of SCRUT.my (vehicle history report service) led to curiosity as to “who is the NGO” to which many suspected it to be “Ikram Hulu Selangor” which is a branch of Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia – an NGO dedicated to dakwah (Islamic outreach), education and community welfare.

Isu Dakwaan Dana Zakat: IKRAM Beri Kerjasama Penuh, Status Keahlian Individu Terlibat Direhatkan

Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia (IKRAM) mengambil maklum laporan berhubung penahanan oleh Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) terhadap tiga (3) individu di Hulu Selangor yang disyaki terlibat dalam siasatan berkaitan pengurusan dana zakat.

IKRAM memandang serius perkara ini dan menegaskan bahawa integriti serta amanah merupakan asas utama yang sentiasa menjadi keutamaan dalam ...

See more

933

477

269

Engineer and social media influencer Zainuddin Omar wondered if this is the case “that was exposed by Minda Merdeka/Pseudoscience Watch” (an online advocacy group recognised for exposing scams, fraudulent activities and individuals abusing religion or public funds).

“If that’s true, how can a Muslim embezzle zakat money? Aren’t they afraid of retribution in the afterlife?” asked the travel writer since 1978.

Adakah ini kes yang dibongkarkan oleh Minda Merdeka (PW)?

Kalau benar, bagaimana sanggup seorang muslim menyeleweng duit zakat? Tidak takutkah pembalasan akhirat?

****

...See more

1.1K

203

133

He added in a subsequent post: “Rich people who earn their money with their own sweat will not buy 18 luxury cars like this. Only those who obtain money through illegal means would behave in such manner.” – April 22, 2026

Zainuddin Omar

19 hours ago

Orang kaya yang cari duit dengan keringat sendiri tak akan beli 18 biji kereta mewah seperti ini.

Hanya mereka yang dapat duit terpijak berperangai begini.

1.9K

258

131

Do Muslim patrons at no pork, no alcohol Chinese eateries deserve shaming by their brethren?

Do Muslim patrons at no pork, no alcohol Chinese eateries deserve shaming by their brethren?


ONE wonders if the onus is on the proprietor of a “no lard, no pork, no alcohol” eatery (he never claims to be so) to turn away Muslim patrons just because the joint does not possess a JAKIM (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia) halal certification.
Malaysia Security Report




Such clarity is warranted in light of the recent exposé of Muslims dining in Hainanese-styled Sin Bee Chew Restoran in Bagan Luar, mainland Penang by Halal inquiry Company direktori [sic], a Facebook-based watchdog group that probes and shares information regarding the halal status of food premises and products.



“Sin Bee Chew, another harmonious dining spot in Penang,” it jibed while showcasing a few images of Muslim diners savouring their food at the kopitiam ambience restaurant.



What is understood in the food & beverage (F&B) industry is that the onus is not on the proprietor to turn away Muslim patrons but they are strictly prohibited from using “no pork, no lard, no alcohol” or “Muslim-friendly” signs without JAKIM certification to mislead consumers of their halal stratus.



This is deemed fair enough given the Cabinet has rejected mandatory halal certification, keeping it voluntary.

Henceforth, in the case of Sin Bee Chew which never professes to be “no lard, no pork, no alcohol” nor “Muslim-friendly” eatery, the onus is shifted to Muslim diners who must first asked themselves if they are confident enough to dine in a joint with no absolute halal guarantee.


A common-sense assumption is that the patrons are either open minded enough or have full faith in Sin Bee Chew to be dishing out ‘halal’ food and beverages.

The halal watchdog site is surely aware of this (it has no case against Sin Bee Chew), hence its last resort to discourage Muslims from frequenting the eatery is by belittling or shaming ‘delinquent’ Muslims who continue to patronise the restaurant.

In so doing, its one-liner post with a tinge of sarcasm is sure to rally fellow Muslims to turn against their brethren who require regular Chinese food fixes.

“Attire alone doesn’t reflect a person’s faith but a religion faithful will take care of both his/her attire and actions,” insinuated a commenter with reference to tudung/purdah-clad diners at Sin Bee Chew.


Another deemed the action of the Muslim diners “openly eating at non-Muslim joints” as irresponsible given they sent the wrong message to non-Muslims that “halal is equivalent to only no pork” when the concept itself is far-reaching (encompasses the entire supply chain and food preparation, among others).


Well, perhaps Halal inquiry Company direktori [sic] deserves credit for taking its effort to a creative level with a two-minute song – “Sin Bee Chew, Addictive and delicious, Once you taste it, you will definitely come back” to dissuade Muslims from patronising the restaurant.



Whatever the case is, the sure thing is Sin Bee Chew has not committed any halal breaches that warrant the authorities to act against the joint.

As such, perhaps the halal watchdog should probe further as to why Muslims are both comfortable and convinced that Sin Bee Chew ‘s food and beverages have met a certain halal level albeit unofficial. – April 22, 2026