Monday, December 15, 2025

Muhyiddin’s credibility now at stake after Dr M’s claims, says analyst


FMT:

Muhyiddin’s credibility now at stake after Dr M’s claims, says analyst


3 hours ago
Predeep Nambiar

Awang Azman Pawi says the issue is now about personal trust, rather than how a government is run


Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Muhyiddin Yassin fell out in 2020 after Bersatu left Pakatan Harapan, with Muhyiddin forming a new government as prime minister.



PETALING JAYA: Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin’s political credibility is now at stake even if accusations by Dr Mahathir Mohamad about the theft of party funds is disproved, says political analyst Awang Azman Awang Pawi.

While bad blood between the two men is not new, “in politics, repeated claims and public views often matter more than facts,” Awang Azman told FMT.

Muhyiddin now stands to lose political credibility, even if the authenticity of the video clip of Mahathir is disputed, he said. The issue would revive old doubts about trust and leadership within the opposition and could weaken Muhyiddin’s support among undecided Malay voters.


“It now involves matters of personal trust, rather than how the government is run,” he said.

Azmi Hassan of Akademi Nusantara said the claims were serious because they involved matters of money and trust. However, he also questioned why Mahathir had recently raised the issue.


“I don’t understand why this is happening when both figures are part of the opposition,” he told FMT. Azmi said the remarks could hurt opposition unity at a time when Perikatan Nasional was trying to strengthen its grassroots base. “This disrupts what the opposition has built so far,” he said.

Azmi and Awang Azman both said the issue would die down if no proof emerged, but the repeated focus on party funds could hurt Muhyiddin in the long run, especially as he remains PN chairman and a possible prime minister candidate.

Muhyiddin has denied the claims, made in a short video clip widely shared online recently, in which Mahathir appears to accuse Muhyiddin of stealing party funds and keeping the money at his home, and of seeking the prime minister’s post to avoid being imprisoned.

Johor Bersatu Youth chief Alias Rasman has said Mahathir was not talking about Muhyiddin and claimed the video was edited for political gain, saying legal action would be taken against those behind the recording.


Once allies, Mahathir and Muhyiddin fell out after the 2020 Sheraton Move, which led to the collapse of the Pakatan Harapan government and saw the latter emerge as prime minister. However, the two former prime ministers have had more cordial relations recently, with Muhyiddin deferring to Mahathir.

Muhyiddin has been contacted for comment.

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia’s Shamsul Amri Baharuddin said the episode was unlikely to resonate with voters, describing it as an elite-level issue. “This will be discussed in upper and middle circles, not by the rakyat, who are already bored with the antics of political leaders,” he said.

Shamsul also said Mahathir no longer held decisive sway; while political figures may still listen to the former prime minister, “they won’t take his words seriously”.


Thailand locks down border districts as fierce clashes with Cambodia escalate





Thailand locks down border districts as fierce clashes with Cambodia escalate



A Buddhist monk leads a procession as soldiers carry the flag draped coffins of four Thai servicemen killed in border clashes with Cambodia. — Reuters pic

Sunday, 14 Dec 2025 5:04 PM MYT


BANGKOK, Dec 14 — Thailand announced a curfew in its southeastern Trat province on Sunday as fighting with Cambodia spread to coastal areas of a disputed border region, two days after US President and would-be peacemaker Donald Trump said the sides had agreed to stop.

The South-east Asian neighbours have resorted to arms several times this year since a Cambodian soldier was killed in a May skirmish, reigniting a conflict that has displaced hundreds of thousands of people on both sides of the border.


“Overall, there have been clashes continuously” since Cambodia again reiterated its openness to a ceasefire on Saturday, Thai Defence Ministry spokesman Rear Admiral Surasant Kongsiri told a press conference in Bangkok after announcing the curfew.

Thailand is open to a diplomatic solution but “Cambodia has to cease hostility first before we can negotiate,” he said.


Thai forces on Saturday said they had destroyed a bridge that Cambodia used to deliver heavy weapons and other equipment to the region and launched an operation targeting pre-positioned artillery in Cambodia’s coastal Koh Kong province.


Cambodia accused Thailand of striking civilian infrastructure.

Thailand’s curfew covers five districts of Trat province that neighbour Koh Kong, excluding the tourist islands of Koh Chang and Koh Kood. The military had previously imposed a curfew in the eastern Sakeo province, which remains in force.


Thailand and Cambodia have exchanged heavy-weapons fire at multiple points along their 817-kilometre (508 mile) border since Monday, in some of the most intense fighting since a five-day clash in July that ended with Trump and Malaysian mediation.

Trump said he spoke to Thailand’s caretaker Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul and Cambodian premier Hun Manet on Friday, and said they had agreed to “cease all shooting”.

On Saturday, Anutin vowed to keep fighting “until we feel no more harm and threats to our land and people”.

A White House spokesperson later said Trump expected all parties to honour commitments and that “he will hold anyone accountable as necessary to stop the killing and ensure durable peace”. — Reuters

Bondi terror attack: Death toll climbs to 15 plus gunman in wake of 'evil' terror attack on Jewish festival

ABC (Oz):


Bondi terror attack: Death toll climbs to 15 plus gunman in wake of 'evil' terror attack on Jewish festival

Watch the ABC News Channel live stream

Skip to timeline

Anthony Albanese says the government will do "whatever is necessary" to stamp out antisemitism following the "evil" terror attack on a Jewish festival at Sydney's Bondi Beach.

Fifteen victims have died, including a 10-year-old girl. One of two alleged gunmen has also died, while a further 38 people are in hospital.


Key takeways from that Albanese and Minns update

Tessa Flemming  profile image

By Tessa Flemming

  • The 50yo gunman had a firearms licence, with six registered firearms 
  • Police are not looking for a third suspect 
  • Two NSW police officers are in a critical but stable condition in hospital
  • Chris Minns and Anthony Albanese both say they will be looking at gun legislation
  • Two "basic" explosive devices were found at the scene 
  • Both gunmen were staying at an address in Campsie
  • There will be an increased police presence around Jewish places of worship and community 
  • Police declined to discuss the ideology of the gunmen at this stage

PM says govt will look at 'whatever is necessary'

Joshua Boscaini profile image

By Joshua Boscaini

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia needs to "stamp out" antisemitism in all its forms.

He says he's already had discussions with Jewish community leaders and the antisemitism envoy.

"We need to wrap our arms around Australians. We stand with them, we stand against antisemitism, we will do whatever is necessary to stamp it out," Albanese says.

"Antisemitism is a scourge. It's been around for a long period of time. We need to do whatever we can to stamp it out," he says.

He says the federal government will look at "whatever is necessary", including any legislative response, following the police investigation.



Sunday, December 14, 2025

Thai-Cambodia conflict now a forest fire out of control



Murray Hunter


Thai-Cambodia conflict now a forest fire out of control


Dec 14, 2025



Outside court last Thursday with TLHR



Sorry for my long absence. The floods in Hat Yai destroyed my car and took away everything on the bottom floor of my home. Meanwhile I have been in Bangkok defending my case against the Malaysian MCMC. There are still lots of bail restrictions about what I can write about, and I am missing many important issues going on in Malaysia now.

I am very sorry. Hope to get back to normal again soon.

As we have reached the end of the first week of a renewed round of fighting along the Thai-Cambodia conflict, there is now a realization that there is no longer any mutually trusted mechanism by both sides to attempt to bring fighting back under control and broker a cease fire once again. The conflict is effectively a forest fire burning out of control.

US President Donald Trump and Malaysian prime minister Anwar Ibrahim called for a ceasefire for 10.00 Thai-time on Saturday 13, both parties just ignored it. Thai prime minister Anutin Charnvirakul is spurred on with an immediate rise in Thai nationalism not wanting any cease fire. As of this weekend December 13-14, its at football match fever. This is even though more than a dozen Thai army troops from poor rural families are already casualties of the fierce skirmishes along the disputed border areas.

The Thai military has made deep strikes into Cambodian territory taking out ‘military’ and political targets, while the Cambodian Army are sending in armed UAVs or drones into Thai Territory. Both sides are trying to reinforce their grip on the disputed demarcation lines along contested border areas.

Its not perfectly clear which side commenced the hostilities this time around. Cambodian authorities claim they are victims of Thai aggression, while the Thais claim that freshly laid mines on Thai territory injuring Thai servicemen patrolling disputed border areas.

However, the advent of this second round of hostilities came just a week after Thai premier Anutin was heavily criticized for the unpreparedness of government flood response during the Hat Yai floods. The floods were screened on local Thai TV 24/7 with Thais attacking the government, in particular the prime minister. With the beginning of the conflict with Cambodia a week later, the national media switched completely around towards covering the armed conflict, where Anutin has been portrayed as standing up to Cambodian aggression. Anutin called a snap general election on December 12, which must be held before mid-February 2026, with a surge of popularity behind him.

However, effectively the war effort on the Thai side is run by General Ukris Boontanondha, the current chief of Thai defense forces and his field commanders. Its obvious the Thai military planners had a detailed plan on the ready.

On the Cambodian side, the media is playing the victim card, but as the war progresses this will become less important. The senate president and former prime minister Hun Sen is in charge of the Cambodian war effort, which has prepared new offensive strategies, not unsimilar to what the Ukrainian army uses into Russian territory.

Those who are suffering the most are farming families along the 400 km long border with Thai-Cambodia along with their counterparts on the Cambodia side. With almost constant artillery battes going on along the border, hundreds of thousands have been evacuated on both sides, with Thai bombing reaching as far as Siem Reap province according to reports. Due to the veracity of the fighting its estimated some 400,000 people are involved in relocation efforts.

This comes at a time when the tourist high season is just about to swing in. Many western governments have already warned their citizens not to go anywhere near war-torn areas as it very unstable.

With President Trump’s appeal for a ceasefire ignored and current ASEAN Chair Malaysia’s Anwar Ibrahim’s call for a ceasefire ignored, there are no external mechanisms Thailand and Cambodia can rely upon to broker any potential ceasefire. To date, China is staying neutral in the dispute, leaving little room for any potential mediation in the near-term. In Thailand, any ongoing war may benefit conservative political parties aligned with the military during the election campaign over the coming weeks. However, if casualties keep building up this could change. Consequently, this latest breakout in fighting could last a while until military armaments start becoming depleted.

This could see the Thai-Cambodian conflict continuing another couple of weeks.

You might regret this: Zahid warns MIC of political limbo if it leaves BN





BN chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has warned the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) against making a decision it may later regret, cautioning that leaving the coalition could leave the party stranded in political limbo as Malaysia’s political landscape shifts ahead of the next general election. - Bernama file pic, December 14, 2025


You might regret this: Zahid warns MIC of political limbo if it leaves BN


BN chairman urges MIC to carefully consider its decision, citing potential risks as Malaysia’s political landscape evolves ahead of the 16th General Election



Sandru Narayanan
Updated 43 seconds ago
14 December, 2025
6:50 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR – Barisan Nasional (BN) has warned the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) against making a decision it may later regret, cautioning that leaving the coalition could leave the party stranded in political limbo as Malaysia’s political landscape shifts ahead of the next general election.

BN chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the political terrain is certain to change over the next 24 months, making it crucial for MIC to carefully consider its next move.

“The political landscape will change — I am confident it will change — because within the next 24 months leading up to the 16th General Election, many things can happen, and they almost certainly will happen,” he told reporters after officiating the Malaysian Indian Progressive Front (IPF Malaysia) annual general assembly in Semenyih today.

“That is why I say, do not regret a decision that is not made in line with changes in the political landscape.

“I fear they (MIC) could end up in a state of limbo if that situation arises,” he added.

Meanwhile, Zahid Hamidi said BN has yet to receive any formal resolution or letter from MIC following the party’s recent annual general assembly, which passed a motion proposing to withdraw from the coalition.

“I have not seen any resolution or letter from MIC),” he said.

“As such, no decision has been made. However, if they are unable to make a decision, then we (BN) will make a decision,” he added.

Zahid Hamidi also confirmed that no meeting has taken place between BN and MIC since the latter’s 79th annual general assembly.

Separately, when asked whether BN would consider accepting IPF as a core component party, he said the matter would depend on the unanimous consent of all existing BN component parties, in accordance with the coalition’s constitution.

“Under the BN constitution, all component parties must unanimously agree to accept any party as a core member,” he said.

“Because of these constitutional constraints, it is not only IPF, but many other parties as well, that have not been accepted as core component parties,” he added. – December 14, 2025


DAP MPs echo Selangor Sultan’s plea: No more parliamentary pandemonium





DAP MPs from the government bloc have responded to the recent remarks by the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, regarding unruly behaviour in Parliament. - JaPen pic, December 14, 2025


DAP MPs echo Selangor Sultan’s plea: No more parliamentary pandemonium


With Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah's call for order ringing through, DAP lawmakers push for debate over drama in the Dewan Rakyat



Sandru Narayanan
Updated 20 seconds ago
14 December, 2025
9:25 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR – DAP MPs from the government bloc have responded to the recent remarks by the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, regarding unruly behaviour in Parliament, stressing the importance of maintaining decorum and upholding public trust.

The MPs’ responses came after the Sultan expressed concern over chaotic conduct in the Dewan Rakyat, describing rowdy behaviour by certain MPs as “a disgrace” and urging Parliament to rise above theatrics and focus on substantive debates.

The Sultan’s intervention followed several sessions in which disruptions and shouting matches among MPs were widely criticised in the media.

Speaking to Scoop, Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid said that while parliamentary debates can be passionate, there is a clear line between robust discussion and disorder.

“I agree that any behaviour in the House that crosses the line of decorum can damage public trust in Parliament, and the Sultan’s reminder should be taken seriously by all MPs regardless of party,” she said when contacted.

“As for my own conduct, I strive to reflect democratic maturity: I remain firm on issues, respectful towards others, and focused on substance rather than spectacle. Disagreement can be sharp, but it must remain civil.

“The public is best served by facts, scrutiny, and solutions—not chaos. I am also mindful of the message this sends to young Malaysians. I would deeply regret if any moment in the chamber made politics appear as intimidation rather than public service.”

Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid stressed the importance of maintaining decorum in Parliament, warning that any behaviour that crosses the line can damage public trust. – Social media pic, December 14, 2025


Syerleena also highlighted the importance of preparation and evidence-based debate.

“Personally, I prepare with supporting data, avoid personal attacks, and support firm action against repeat offenders—not to score points, but to protect Parliament’s integrity and public confidence,” she explained.

On December 11, Sultan Sharafuddin took aim at some MPs who descend into shouting matches and disorderly behaviour.

“It’s a disgrace. Despite numerous calls in the past advising these MPs to behave, some continue to be rowdy,” he said in an interview with Bernama.

His Royal Highness said these errant lawmakers should serve as role models especially to the younger generation but instead “they behave like bullies.”

Last month, two MPs were ordered out of Parliament after a verbal altercation.

There have also been numerous occasions when Parliament erupted into chaos this year as tempers flared.

The Ruler said the Dewan Rakyat must be a model of mature democratic discourse.

Meanwhile, Segambut MP and Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh echoed the sentiment, emphasising the educational role of Parliament when used responsibly.

“I recognise Parliament is a place where MPs come to find answers for their constituency. All my debates and answers are factual and precise.

“I take time to prepare each question and response, providing data not just for MPs but also for the media, as sessions are broadcast live.

Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh emphasised the importance of using Parliament responsibly, stating that if misused, it risks becoming a circus instead of a platform for serious debate and education. – Scoop file pic, December 14, 2025


“If used correctly, this platform educates and explains our initiatives for youth and sports. But if used irresponsibly, it turns into a circus,” she said.

Scoop’s attempts to reach MPs from other political parties, both in the government and opposition blocs, for comment on the issues raised by the Sultan of Selangor were unsuccessful, as calls went unanswered and text messages were ignored. – December 14, 2025


How Anti-Chinese PM Anwar Rejects UEC Without Rejecting It





How Anti-Chinese PM Anwar Rejects UEC Without Rejecting It


December 14th, 2025 by financetwitter



Besides being a good liar, one of Anwar Ibrahim’s many skillsets is to say something without saying anything. This communication style is very useful when you face a crisis in which you are trying to run away or don’t have a solution, but have to pretend that everything is under control. In short – it’s the ability to bullshit. Most snake oil salesmen possessed such marvelous skills.



The Malaysian Prime Minister also likes to throw “Big Words” in his speeches and social media, which sometimes, amusingly, forces the public to consult a dictionary and can be perceived by some as a way to sound profound without being easily understood. It gives a “fake impression” that he was very sophisticated and knowledgeable. It’s actually political rhetoric – “all talk and no action.”



He is such a big talker that he might even defeat Donald Trump in a U.S. presidential election – promising to end Ukraine war within one hour after being elected, conquers North Korea within one day, makes the U.S. a manufacturing giant again in just 4 weeks, creates a billion affordable housing with an executive order, slashes gasoline prices by half the next day he wins election and whatnot.



Mr. Anwar has also mastered during his prison time the skill of using ambiguity and nuance to scam audiences when trying to avoid sensitive issues like the UEC recognition. When he said his government has no problem recognizing UEC provided the students must first master the Malay language, he was actually rejecting UEC without directly rejecting the Unified Examination Certificate.



“This is Malaysia. The Malay language is the national language and whoever is trying to bring the message of a language must remember that Malay must be elevated as the language of knowledge that is mastered by all Malaysians,” – PM Anwar tried to be philosophical on Friday (Dec 12). Anwar, who is also the Finance Minister, said the dignity of the Malay language must be elevated in accordance with its position in the Constitution.



“If this is clear, to raise the issue of the need to increase the use of English, I agree. But Malay, the language of new technology, the language of AI (artificial intelligence), the language for knowledge, must be strengthened and there must be mastery of the language among all Malaysians. All streams – Chinese, Tamil, English, they must master the Malay language and this is also a condition we impose on international schools,” – he continued with his babbling.




Not sure where he got the idea that the Malay language is the language of AI, but perhaps the brilliant prime minister could explain why Sabah and Sarawak can recognize the UEC without any rejection from him. In fact, not a single Malay leader, nationalist, defender, hero or extremist has raised any concerns about Malay dignity when the Borneo states publicly declared the recognition of UEC.



Exactly where were Anwar Ibrahim, former premiers like Mahathir Mohamad, Najib Razak, Muhyiddin Yassin, and Ismail Sabri, as well as other Malay heroes like Akmal Saleh when Sarawak began its recognition of UEC since 2014? Is Anwar trying to say that in Borneo, despite UEC’s lack of mastery in the national language as claimed by Anwar, Sabah and Sarawak can belittle and insult Malay language due to their autonomy in education?



If UEC in Borneo can be recognized, but not UEC in Malaya, doesn’t that mean double standards and hypocrisy? All UEC graduates stressfully took UEC together with SPM examinations, with many scoring distinctions in the Malay language paper. They could write and speak (unlike imported foreign footballers), even won debate competitions in the national language – better than many Malay school’s students.




In case Anwar did not realize, or pretends to be clueless, Bahasa Melayu or Malay language is a “compulsory subject” in the UEC curriculum at Chinese independent schools. The PM might not like the fact, but the ethnic Chinese students’ pass rate in the Malay language SPM subject has consistently exceeded 96% in many years. So what type of mastery was Anwar bullshitting?



Worse, in spite of requirement for UEC students to score at least a credit in Bahasa Melayu, Anwar’s latest vague, ambiguity and nuance remarks appear to be shifting the goal post, demanding Malay mastery in other subjects too – ranging from science to technology. Essentially, UEC, which uses Mandarin as the medium of instruction, is not qualified to be recognized.



Likewise, UMNO deputy president Mohamad Hasan said the government would have no objection to recognizing the UEC if it were conducted in the national language. But if UEC is forced to change its Mandarin to Malay as medium of instruction before recognition could be granted, then it would not be called Unified Examination Certificate anymore, would it? Might as well call it Malay schools.




Yet, neither the Premier nor any racist UMNO-Malay leaders could explain why A-Levels, IB, IGCSE certificates – where the medium of instruction is “kafir” English – are gladly accepted by Malaysian public universities through their “backdoor” Direct Channel (also known as Saluran as or Open Channel) admission pathways, which serve as an alternative to the main UPU entry.



The PM was basically asking all Chinese schools to close shops and join the government schools if the non-Malays wish to further their studies at public universities. The argument is no longer about Chinese students’ proficiency in the Bahasa Melayu paper, but also every single subject just to make life difficult for the minority race. This discrimination creates obstacle after obstacle to block the Chinese from accessing public universities, despite the ethnic paying 90% of income tax.



But the Chinese community is avoiding government schools conducted in the national language with a 10-foot pole for a reason – deplorable quality. The “Malay schools” have become religious schools, where bullying and raping become a normal routine and a place to groom students for the afterlife, with 72 virgins thrown in, instead of educating students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.




Even if all the Chinese schools are fully converted to Malay schools 2.0, there’s no guarantee that the government would not flood the schools with substandard Malay teachers obsessed with transforming students into Hamas terrorists or Islamist preachers. Clearly, Anwar wanted to destroy and eliminate the Mandarin language masqueraded as mastering Bahasa Melayu.



The despicable prime minister and UMNO try to spin and twist the UEC as a certificate that cannot be recognized just because it is in Chinese. They deliberately and conveniently ignore the fact that UEC is equivalent to the Sijil Tinggi Pelajaran Malaysia (STPM), the local variant of the A-Level qualification. It’s obvious why the government recognizes Malay-based STPM and Engish-based A-Level, but not Chinese-based UEC.



At best, Anwar Ibrahim is all along a racist who is incredibly anti-Chinese. At worst, Mr. Anwar is jealous of the Chinese education system, where its students can excel in every challenge thrown at them to the extent that recognizing UEC would risk creating a bigger gap in terms of academic performance between the pampered Malay students and the Chinese students.




The Higher Education Ministry under Zambry Abdul Kadir, another UMNO-Malay racist, said the recognition of the United Examination Certificate (UEC) should be based on the Federal Constitution, in line with the Rukun Negara and National Education Philosophy. Perhaps he should clarify under which article of the Constitution it actually recognizes A-Levels, IGCSE, or IB certification.



It’s laughable and contradictory to say UEC cannot be recognized because its medium of instruction is Mandarin, but at the same time vernacular schools in the country that uses Mandarin and Tamil are recognized within the framework of the Constitution, while A-Levels, IGCSE, and IB are also recognized despite their medium of instruction in English colonial language.



Which part of A-Levels, IGCSE, or IB syllabus that is in line with the Rukun Negara and National Education Philosophy that the UEC isn’t? Why weaponize Malay language when targeting UEC, but close both eyes when coming to A-Levels, IGCSE, or IB? If Anwar was really serious about the dignity of the Malay language, he should also stop UTM from using English as the primary medium of instruction.




Yes, should not UTM (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia), the university specially designed for only Malay students under the government’s Apartheid education system, insist on the mastery of the Malay language for its programmes instead of glorifying foreign English language? This shows that racist Anwar and UMNO’s demand for UEC to master the national language is not only double-standards, but was hatched out of “bad intention”.



In reality, the UEC is just a piece of certificate like A-Levels or STPM. The endless dispute over UEC recognition has nothing to do with the mastery or importance of the Malay language, but everything to do with discrimination and oppression on ethnic Chinese and their Mandarin language to assert “Ketuanan Melayu”, the ideology of Malay supremacy first espoused by UMNO for political survival.



Anwar’s real problem, and UMNO for that matter, is not the UEC against the Constitution but the political implications of recognizing it. The ability to consistently suppress and oppress the ethnic Chinese education system is seen as a major victory to winning Malay votes, which Anwar’s PKR (People’s Justice Party) and the Malay nationalist party UMNO are fighting tooth and nail for.




That explains why Anwar has happily allowed UMNO Youth Chief Akmal to attack, bully, intimidate and terrorize the Chinese community. It also explains why the prime minister himself tried – and failed – to ban alcohol in Chinese schools’ halls, despite knowing the existing practice of renting out halls for banquets serving alcohol for Chinese schools, crucial for their community-driven funding.



Some Malay extremists say the UEC graduates should just go study elsewhere except at public universities. Based on the same argument, can the Chinese students not pay income tax since this group of Malays hates and despises the UEC certification so much? Why target and discriminate against the UEC certificates but shamelessly welcome taxes from the UEC graduates?



The burning question is what is DAP’s next action after the Democratic Action Party sparked the UEC recognition demand to salvage its crushing defeat among the Chinese voters in the recent Sabah state election? Prime Minister Anwar has contended that UEC should not be recognized as it might weaken the national language, even though he tried to hide it with bizarre conditions.




PM Anwar is the same liar who had promised that all students with 10As and above in SPM will get matriculation places, only to make a policy U-turn and said automatic admission into the matriculation program was only for students who scored 10 straight A+. If the Madani can’t even fulfill its small promise for SPM graduates, what makes DAP so sure the PM cares about UEC graduates?



Some analysts think DAP has miscalculated when Nga Kor Ming triggered the UEC controversy. However, it could be a calculated political move in preparation to leave Anwar Madani’s government so that DAP could win back its core Chinese support. But if the spineless leadership of Anthony Loke continues to be bullied despite Anwar’s rejection, then DAP deserves another round of annihilation in the next 16th General Election.


MCA, MIC’s future in BN tied to political strategy, not principle - Ti Lian Ker


theVibes.com:

MCA, MIC’s future in BN tied to political strategy, not principle - Ti Lian Ker


Ti warns that the continued role of MCA and MIC within Barisan Nasional (BN) is increasingly guided by political pragmatism and strategic positioning ahead of a possible Cabinet reshuffle

Updated 7 hours ago · Published on 14 Dec 2025 10:31AM


Decision by both political parties is not based on any ideological commitment - December 14, 2025


by Alfian Z.M. Tahir


THE position of the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) within Barisan Nasional (BN) is no longer dictated purely by principle, but increasingly shaped by strategic political calculations, according to former MCA vice-president Ti Lian Ker.


“I am frequently asked whether MCA will remain in BN and as of now, MCA will remain with BN, and MIC will do so as well,” Ti said, noting that both parties’ future in the coalition is closely linked to anticipated political developments, particularly an upcoming Cabinet reshuffle.

He explained that the decision for either party to stay or exit BN is now driven more by political expediency than ideological considerations.

“Power is the central currency of Malaysian politics, where political positions and alliances can shift rapidly in pursuit of influence,” Ti observed.

Ti cited the Democratic Action Party (DAP) as an example of political pragmatism, pointing to its transition from the previously firm stance of “Asalkan Bukan UMNO” (“Anyone But UMNO”) to its current cooperation within a governing framework that includes UMNO.

“This reflects the unsentimental and opportunistic nature of realpolitik,” he said.

The former MCA leader also noted that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is focused on securing a second term in office, but highlighted Pakatan Harapan’s significant electoral setback in Sabah as a serious challenge to that objective.

“The Sabah result cannot be taken lightly,” Ti said, stressing the need for what he described as “political insurance” ahead of the 16th General Election (GE16).

Speaking further, Ti suggested it would not be surprising if MCA and MIC leaders were appointed as ministers or deputy ministers in an upcoming Cabinet reshuffle, a move that could substantially alter Malaysia’s political landscape.

He also offered insight into recent political manoeuvring by DAP, particularly surrounding the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) debate.

Ti argued that the UEC issue is unlikely to be the central concern, but rather a tool for exerting pressure on the prime minister regarding the potential inclusion of MCA and MIC in the Cabinet.

“This could explain what appears to be a form of political protest by DAP — a signal cautioning against opening Cabinet positions to MCA and MIC and ultimately, power is the real agenda,” he said, highlighting the strategic, rather than ideological, underpinnings of current Malaysian political dynamics. - December 14, 2025

Noh Omar pushes for constitutional amendment: 'Prime Minister must be Malay Muslim'




Noh Omar pushes for constitutional amendment: 'Prime Minister must be Malay Muslim'



By DIANA AZIS
14 Dec 2025 03:27pm


Tan Sri Rais Yatim (right) with former prime minister Dr Mahathir and Pengerusi Konvensyen Melayu 153 chairman Tan Sri Noh Omar (left) during the event in Kuala Lumpur on Dec 13, 2025. (SINAR PHOTO)


KUALA LUMPUR – The Federal Constitution should be amended to stipulate that the post of prime minister may only be held by a Malay Muslim, said Malay 153 Convention chairman Tan Sri Noh Omar.

He said although the Constitution already provides for the rights of Malays, recognises Islam as the religion of the Federation and guarantees freedom of religion to followers of other faiths, there was one important aspect that he believes has been overlooked.


“In the national Constitution, Malay rights are there, the rights of Islam are there, and the rights of other religions are also there. Everyone is given freedom. But the Constitution does not state that to become prime minister one must be a Malay Muslim. Perhaps it was overlooked,” he said in his address at the Malay 153 Convention.

He also drew a comparison with the Selangor State Constitution, which stipulates that the Menteri Besar must be from among Malays who profess Islam.


Noh Omar called on Malays to reunite and strengthen their political power to enable such a constitutional amendment to be realised.

“If we return with Malay strength, we amend this Constitution and stipulate that the prime minister must be a Malay Muslim,” he said.


Meanwhile, former Dewan Negara Speaker Tan Sri Dr Rais Yatim stressed that public understanding of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution needs to be strengthened so that the provision is fully and comprehensively understood.

“Article 153 is an intrinsic guarantee rooted in pre-independence agreements and forms an important foundation in the formation of the nation,” he said, while emphasising that protection for Malays and Bumiputera does not negate the legitimate interests of other communities.


Anthony Loke Might Not Know the Meaning of the Words He Uses





OPINION | Anthony Loke Might Not Know the Meaning of the Words He Uses


14 Dec 2025 • 7:30 AM MYT


TheRealNehruism
An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist



Image credit: SCMP


Right after DAP’s abysmal performance in the Sabah election, its secretary-general Anthony Loke stepped forward and solemnly declared that he would take “full responsibility” for the party’s wipeout.


“As the Secretary-General of the party, I take full responsibility for the shortcomings and the failure of DAP to win any seats in the 17th Sabah State Election,” Loke said in a statement on Facebook.


Now, in the normal universe — the same universe that dictionaries exist in — when a leader says he is taking full responsibility, the bare minimum that follows is a resignation.


I say bare minimum because in more honourable political cultures like Japan and Korea, taking full responsibility can sometimes mean even more than stepping down… it can cost you your life, if you know what I mean.


But in Anthony Loke’s case?


Nothing happened.


Not only did he not resign — nobody else in DAP resigned either.


In other words, in Anthony’s special interpretation, taking full responsibility actually means no one is responsible.


That is what “full responsibility” means in DAP’s vocabulary.


The problem isn’t just the phrase “full responsibility”

If you think this is the only instance where DAP doesn’t understand the meaning of the words it uses, think again.


Right after making his “I take full responsibility” speech, Anthony Loke made another grand announcement:


DAP, he said, is now committed to pushing rapid reforms within six months.


Just days later, DAP unveiled its first item under this new “rapid reform” agenda.


And what was it?


Recognising the UEC.


Now, we can debate whether the UEC should be recognised — many will say yes, it’s overdue, it benefits many in the country, and it might brings fairness to the system.


But let’s be clear about one thing:


Recognising the UEC is not reform.


What “reform” actually means

Reform, by definition, deals with corruption and institutional decay.


Corruption is when institutions created to serve a higher purpose — the nation, the public interest, the rule of law — get hijacked for personal or factional gain.


A civil servant who takes a bribe is corrupt because he betrays a higher duty for a lower reward.


MACC or the police become corrupt when their internal culture drifts so far from their founding mission that they serve individuals or political masters instead of the public.


So when DAP promised “reform,” the public understandably assumed it meant confronting this kind of institutional rot.


For instance:

  • Removing Azam Baki, as Rafizi Ramli and even MCA have pushed for, can be considered a genuine reform effort — whether you agree with the accusations or not, the demand is rooted in restoring integrity.
  • Separating the Prime Minister’s office from the Finance Ministry — also reform.
  • Splitting the Attorney General’s office from that of the Public Prosecutor — also reform.
  • Repealing SOSMA, as some DAP backbenchers have urged — definitely reform.

Recognising the UEC is none of the above.


It does not clean up an institution, fix governance, restore a broken system, or address any form of abuse of power.


It may be good policy.


It may be necessary.


But it is not reform.


So when DAP places “UEC recognition” under its “rapid reform” programme, it is simply misusing the word.

And now Anthony says DAP will quit the government if the UEC isn’t recognised…

Anthony Loke has since added that if UEC is not recognised within six months:DAP will leave the unity government, and

He himself will resign from all positions.

At this point, I genuinely don’t know what that means.


“I can lose my position at any time; no problem. But will losing my position really solve all problems? If Anthony Loke stops being a minister today, will UEC be recognised tomorrow? If yes, I’ll resign immediately. But that’s not the reality,” Anthony said, while speaking on his podcast, 关键陆点 (Critical Point with Loke).


Listening to him however, I must that I am not at all sure as to what in the world will Anthony Loke and DAP do in the 6 months, if it does come to pass that the “reform” that they are promising - which is the UEC recongnition - doesn't come to pass.


I am not sure, because I know what you mean when you say you will resign.


I know what I mean when I say I will leave something.


But given how Anthony Loke and DAP have used words like “full responsibility” and “reform,” I can no longer be certain as to what Anthony Loke and DAP means when they say that they are going to resign or leave.


For all we know, in Anthony’s Dictionary:“Leave the government” might mean “stay exactly where we are.”
“Resign” might mean “hold a press conference and continue as usual.”

So I suppose we must wait and see what he actually does — only then can we decipher what his words really mean.


Because the dictionary Anthony Loke uses is clearly not the one used in the rest of the English-speaking world.


And that is why, whenever he speaks — especially when it matters — we can hear the words, but we cannot always be sure what he means.


EXCLUSIVE | The FIFA whisperer: Who told FAM not to go to CAS?





EXCLUSIVE | The FIFA whisperer: Who told FAM not to go to CAS?


14 Dec 2025 • 8:00 AM MYT



Citizen Nades
A legally qualified journalist and a good governance champion



Image Credit: Citizen Nades


OPINION: Many of our foreign missions run their own social media accounts, posting notices and updates for Malaysians abroad. Some heads of mission even chronicle their daily movements, on and off duty, and almost all post details of visitors to their respective offices.


This week, one such update from the Malaysian Embassy in Washington, D.C. set tongues wagging.


A Facebook post showed Ambassador Shahrul Ikram hosting a Dec 5 networking dinner at Rumah Malaysia for a visiting Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) delegation led by its president, Hamidin Haji Mohd Amin. Also present were deputy president Sivasundaram Sithamparam Pillai and vice president Saaran Nadarajah.


Sivasundram, if readers may recall, chaired a media conference on Oct 17 where he announced the suspension of the FAM secretary general and stumbled in addressing the issues regarding seven foreign players contracted to play for Haimau Malaya.


What were the trio doing 15,400km away? They were guests of FIFA in the U.S. capital for the FIFA World Cup 2026 Final Draw at the Kennedy Center.


Before anyone jumps to conclusions: no, taxpayers did not fund this all-expenses-paid trip, per diem included.


This is part of a long-standing FIFA practice -- dating back to the Sepp “Septic” Blatter era -- of “rewarding” council members and affiliate presidents with invitations to major events, including the World Cup itself.


(The late) Andrew Jennings, author of Foul and the journalist who investigated the wrongdoings and helped the FBI bring down Blatter and several top corrupt officials, repeatedly argued that such perks were designed to buy loyalty and secure another term in office.


That’s why countries that didn’t even qualify were invited to the party – just come, enjoy yourself, collect the goodies, and remember whom to vote for the next time around. draw


Current president Gianni Infantino appears intent on maintaining this tradition, lest affiliates complain they “missed the party and the goodies.”


Yet Infantino now faces a complaint for breaching FIFA’s rules on political neutrality. At the Washington event, he awarded U.S. President Donald Trump the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize and has since posted interviews and social media content supportive of the 79-year-old leader.


Back home, however, a far more serious allegation surfaced. Johor Darul Ta’zim (JDT) owner Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim claimed that an individual within FIFA had urged FAM not to take the documentation dispute involving seven heritage players to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) over the case of false and forged documents submitted on behalf of seven players.


(The seven foreign-born footballers -- Gabriel Arrocha, Facundo Garcés, Rodrigo Holgado, Imanol Machuca, Jon Irazabal, Hector Hevel, Joao Vitor) were sanctioned by FIFA in September for eligibility issues, after FAM submitted doctored birth certificates to claim they qualified for the national team through ancestry, despite being born abroad. This led to fines for FAM and suspensions for the players, causing significant controversy and image damage for Malaysian football.)


During a session with JDT supporters, Tungku Ismail said the advice was conveyed directly to Hamidin.


“You can ask Hamidin himself. There was someone from FIFA who told him not to bring this matter to CAS. It is very strange, and I do not know why they said not to go to CAS.


“He did not exactly stop us. He said, if possible, do not go. But there was also a threat that there would be a suspension if we were to go to CAS, and something even worse would be done. We will go -- whether we win or lose, we do not know.”


So who is this individual? And where did this exchange take place?


The only plausible setting is Washington, where FIFA rolled out the red carpet and created ample opportunities for officials to rub shoulders with the who’s who of the world football. No FIFA official has visited Malaysia recently, and no FAM official has travelled to Switzerland.


If such a threat was indeed made, FAM must reveal the name of the individual involved. An issue this serious cannot rest on vague phrases like “there was an individual.” Hamidin must identify the person and the position he or she holds within FIFA.


Surely the words of a clerical staffer -- which FAM initially floated as a deflection in its own defence -- cannot be taken seriously. Nor can the musings of the cleaner at FIFA’s Zurich headquarters.


By refusing to disclose the relevant information, the allegation remains just that: a claim, not even a coherent narrative. At best, it is hearsay; at worst, the longest yarn ever spun.


The writer has sought and is awaiting a response from FIFA.