Friday, September 03, 2021

Beaten and humiliated for being a Muslim in India

BBC:

Beaten and humiliated for being a Muslim in India


IMAGE SOURCEANIimage caption

A Muslim man was paraded through the streets as his crying daughter begged the mob to stop hitting him

Unprovoked attacks on Muslims by Hindu mobs have become routine in India, but they seem to evoke little condemnation from the government.

Last month, a video that went viral on social media showed a terrified little girl clinging to her Muslim father as a Hindu mob assaulted him.

The distressing footage showed the 45-year-old rickshaw driver being paraded through the streets of Kanpur, a city in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, as his crying daughter begged the mob to stop hitting him.

His attackers asked him to chant "Hindustan Zindabad" or "Long Live India" and "Jai Shri Ram" or "Victory to Lord Ram" - a popular greeting that's been turned into a murder cry by Hindu lynch mobs in recent years.

He complied, but the mob still kept hitting him. The man and his daughter were eventually rescued by the police. Three men arrested for the attack were freed on bail a day later.

A few days later, another viral video surfaced showing a Muslim bangle-seller being slapped, kicked and punched by a Hindu mob in Indore, a city in the central state of Madhya Pradesh. The attackers could be heard abusing Tasleem Ali and telling him to stay away from Hindu areas in future.

In a police complaint, he later alleged that he had been "beaten by five-six men who hurled communal slurs at him for selling bangles in a Hindu-dominated area and robbed him of money, his phone and some documents".

But in a strange turn of events, Ali himself was arrested the next day after the 13-year-old daughter of one of his alleged attackers accused him of molesting her. His family and neighbours have strongly denied the accusation. They said it was inconceivable that the father of five would do something like that.

And eyewitnesses, quoted in the Indian press, said he was attacked because of his religious identity and the molestation accusation against him seemed to be an afterthought.

The two attacks were among several instances of anti-Muslim violence in August, but the last month by no means was cruellest for India's biggest religious minority group, with a population of more than 200 million.


IMAGE SOURCEGETTY IMAGESimage caption

Critics say anti-Muslim violence has risen sharply since 2014 under the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Similar attacks were reported in the preceding months too - and many made headlines.


"The violence is overwhelming. It's rampant and common and also very acceptable," says Alishan Jafri, a freelance journalist who's been documenting attacks on Indian Muslims for the past three years.

He says he comes across "three-four such videos every day" but is able to verify only one or two which he then shares on social media.

Religious faultlines have existed in India for a long time but, critics say, anti-Muslim violence has risen since 2014 under the Hindu nationalist government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

"Communal violence is not a recent phenomenon, but it grows in sync with the strategies of those in power and political mobilisation," Prof Tanvir Aeijaz, who teaches politics science at Delhi University, told the BBC.

"The distrust was always there but cleavages have been sharpened now by religious nationalism and ethno-nationalism."

During Mr Modi's first term in power, there were numerous incidents of Muslims being attacked by so-called "cow vigilantes" over rumours that they had eaten beef, or that they were trying to smuggle cows - an animal many Hindus consider holy - for slaughter.

The prime minister did not condone such attacks, but was criticised for not condemning them quickly or strongly enough either.

Prakash Javadekar, a senior BJP leader, told the BBC that "the government believes that lynching is bad, wherever it happens. But law and order is a state subject and it is their responsibility to deal with it".

He then went on to accuse the media of "biased and selective journalism" by focusing on attacks on Muslims.

"If you look at official data, there were 160 Hindus among the 200 people who were lynched. People of all faiths were targeted," he said, but did not give details of where the data could be found. India does not gather such data.

In 2019, a fact-checker website that counted "hate crimes" in India reported that more than 90% of victims in the past 10 years were Muslims.


IMAGE SOURCESHURAIH NIYAZI/BBCimage caption

A screen grab of the viral video showing a bangle-seller being assaulted in Indore

And the perpetrators of the attacks remain unpunished amid accusations that they enjoy political patronage from Mr Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party after a government minister garlanded eight Hindus convicted for lynching a Muslim.

"Such attacks have become so common in our country today only and only because of the impunity these thugs enjoy," says Hasiba Amin, a social media co-ordinator for the opposition Congress party.

"Today hate has gone mainstream. It is cool to go attack Muslims. The hate mongers are also rewarded for their actions."

Critics say since Mr Modi's return to power for a second term in 2019, the anti-Muslim violence has expanded in its scope.

Sometimes, the violence is not even physical and takes a more subtle, insidious form that appears aimed at vilifying and demonising the minority community. For example:

Last year, as Covid-19 began to take hold of India, Hindu leaders, including Mr Modi's ministers and party colleagues, accused Muslim men, who had attended a religious gathering in Delhi, of "corona jihad" by indulging in behaviour that would spread the virus
Then followed "roti jihad" which included wild allegations that Muslim cooks were spitting on roti - handmade bread - to spread the virus to Hindus

In recent months, several states have introduced laws to curb "love jihad" - an Islamophobic term fringe Hindu groups use to imply that Muslim men prey on Hindu women to convert them to Islam through marriage.

The laws are being used to harass and jail Muslim men in interfaith relations with Hindu women. Last December, the plight of a pregnant Hindu woman, who was forcibly separated from her Muslim husband, made headlines when she suffered a miscarriage.


IMAGE SOURCEGETTY IMAGESimage caption

Muslims protest against the mob lynching of Tabrez Ansari in June 2019

Muslim women haven't been spared either - in July, dozens of them found they had been put up "for sale" online. In May, many of them, including Ms Amin of the Congress party, were offered in a mock online "auction".

And last month, participants at a rally, organised by a former BJP leader in Delhi, shouted slogans calling for Muslims to be killed.

"It's a very sustained, organised campaign by nationalist politicians to radicalise Hindus into believing that Muslims need to be marginalised if Hindus are to progress," says Mr Jafri.

Prof Aeijaz says the attack on working class Muslims, such as tailors, fruit vendors, electricians, plumbers and bangle sellers, is also an attempt to take control of the political economy and jobs through religious nationalism.

"The religious divide has deepened. The distrust has deepened. But the hate is also for profit. The idea it to make Muslims the other, the enemy.

"The process of creating the other is by propagating the idea that if we don't destroy the other, we will be destroyed. So you stoke hate, create fear, and violence is part of this larger narrative."

But religious nationalism, Prof Aeijaz says, is a dangerous idea that can lead to sectarian violence.

"The buck stops with the political executive in a parliamentary democracy. How long can they look the other way?"


Thursday, September 02, 2021

Should Anwar step down?





Should Anwar step down?

by Wong Chin Huat

COMMENT | Should Anwar step down? The short answer is “yes” because no political leader is indispensable. We really do not need another Dr Mahathir Mohamad who thinks otherwise.

For the record, Anwar’s career as Malaysia’s opposition leader effectively started on this day exactly 23 years ago, when he was sacked by Mahathir as deputy prime minister.

The longer and the more relevant answer is two inter-related questions: “When?” and “How?”

These questions need to be contemplated by both opposition supporters and other Malaysians who want a healthy multiparty democracy.

The calls for Anwar’s withdrawal have grown stronger with his failure to take power after Muhyiddin Yassin’s resignation.

Some have compared Anwar’s failure to British or Australian opposition leaders who resign after their party failed to win elections to both assume responsibility and allow renewal.

Such logic is principally correct but a proper application needs to be contextualised in at least two ways.

First, what caused the Malaysian opposition’s defeat under Anwar? Second, how were replacements in the British and Australian parties found?

Responsibility for opposition’s defeats

Anwar has had the record of two electoral defeats (1999 when he was in jail and 2013) and four attempts to seize or reclaim power by way of parliamentarian support (September 2008, February 2020, September-December 2020, and finally August 2021).

I don’t know if anyone would fault him for losing the 1999 election as a jailed leader or the 2013 election for losing the election despite winning the popular vote.

So, the basis for Anwar to take responsibility must come down to his failure in getting MPs to cross over.

Should he be punished because courting MPs’ crossover is as immoral as opposition supporters passionately believe when they talk about the “backdoor government”?


The late DAP veteran Karpal Singh

If so, Anwar’s qualified successor must be someone who principally opposes party-hopping. The only name that comes to mind, unfortunately, is the late Karpal Singh.

Now, if Anwar’s fault is not about courting MPs to cross over, but only his failure of doing this excellently, unlike his help for Mahathir in bringing down the PBS state government in 1994, then two alternatives can be considered - Shafie Apdal and Mahathir.

Immediately after Anwar’s loss to Ismail Sabri Yaakob, Shafie asserted that the opposition could have won power if he was the opposition’s candidate because “There were colleagues coming from Bersatu, from PKR and from Umno too. They are quite close to me too. And there were also some from Sarawak.”

This assertion is as credible as Anwar’s claim of a “strong, formidable and convincing majority”.

Why should Umno parliamentarians enthrone Anwar or Shafie, who will be buried by angry Umno grassroots the next election, instead of one of their own? Likewise, why should Bersatu or GPS parliamentarians abandon their powers and perks in an Ismail Sabri government to make Shafie the first East Malaysian PM?

Anwar is indeed guilty for repeatedly selling his political fairy tales but will the opposition do better by opting for another chaser of “number bubble”?

Where are his replacements?

Let’s move on to the next question. Can we emulate the British and Australian parties? Of course, you can but you might first want the opposition to emulate their British and Australian counterparts by forming a shadow cabinet.

Take, for example, British Labour, whose leaders Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn resigned after their party’s electoral defeats in 2015 and 2020. But where did their successors come from?

Ed Miliband was shadow secretary of state for energy and climate change in acting leader Harriet Harman’s shadow cabinet (May - September 2010). In turn, Harman, who took over after Ed Miliband’s resignation, was his deputy for five years (2010 - 2015).


Jeremy Corbyn

Jeremy Corbyn was the first and so far the sole outsider parliamentary opposition leader. However, Corbyn’s successor Keir Starmer was his shadow secretary of state for exiting the European Union (2016-2020).

Why must there be a shadow cabinet? Why can’t British parties just choose the best political talent?

Simple. The UK is not a presidential system and parliamentary democracies require teamwork and lay down two constraints on the choice of party leader.

First, the leader should be a sitting MP. Second, the leader must command the support of his/her parliamentary colleagues and can work well with senior colleagues. That’s why leadership succession in British parties do not happen in a vacuum.

The situation is only more complicated for Malaysia where parties form pre-election coalitions, where leadership changes may happen with the passing of the baton from one party to another. When that happens, will the new leader privilege his own party over others?

This is not at all saying the next opposition leader must come from PKR. No party or individual must be given such a monopolistic claim.

In Germany, the conservative bloc was twice led by the leader from the Bavaria-based CSU rather than the national CDU. This didn’t cause the coalition to break up like how Mahathir’s and Muhyiddin’s governments ended because rules are clearly laid.

For the opposition to have an orderly and peaceful transition, there must be a shadow cabinet. Ironically, this was rejected by not only Anwar and other Pakatan Harapan parties, but also by Shafie’s Warisan, who dismissed the call for a shadow cabinet as “politicking”.

Harapan’s ‘deep society’ challenge

Many think that Anwar must go for the opposition to win GE15, never mind if it takes a bloody and messy fight.

Some see Anwar as a damaged good, “too liberal” to be acceptable by Malay-Muslim nationalists in both the political establishment and society.

Others don’t trust Anwar for his Islamist roots. Many liberals who see East Malaysia as the last line of defence for inclusion and multiculturalism are rooting for a new leader from the East, and Shafie appears to be the man of the hour.


Warisan president Shafie Apdal

However, if Shafie’s election tagline that charms the liberals, “we are here to build a nation, not a particular race or religion” were to appear on banners in every Malay kampung in the peninsula, would Shafie become as toxic as Anwar for the Malay-Muslim market?

Pakatan Harapan’s ultimate problem lies not in the “deep state”, but in the “deep society”. Malaysia is so deeply divided along ethnoreligious lines that Malay-Muslims and ethnic minorities may be united by their rejection of Umno’s authoritarianism and corruption, but they can be easily split over NEP and Islamisation.

To win a solid majority, the opposition would need to mellow its stance on interethnic equality and cultural freedom but that, in turn, would alienate its non-Muslim and liberal base.

The way out of this trap is not to win a good-versus-evil war against the Malay-Muslim parties. Instead, it requires institutional reforms that transform politics from ethnoreligious jealousy to professional competition over policies that cut across, not along, communal lines.

The pandemic actually offers a golden opportunity to reorient Malaysian politics, when Malay unity turns out to be a false promise that cannot prevent #kerajaangagal and #duadarjat. However, the federal opposition and its three state governments have failed to offer a clear alternative.

Not only did it adamantly resist calls to form a shadow cabinet, but it also could not present a shadow budget, which it did for seven years before winning power.

In the naked pursuit of vast incumbent advantages to win GE15, Harapan’s futile attempt to restore the GE14 mandate without offering alternative governance programmes only makes it self-serving and disconnected.

Now, talking about GE15, Harapan still shows no sign that it would get serious on governance as a real government-in-waiting.

Be a bridge to the future, not a roadblock

The biggest problem for Harapan is not Anwar, but a sense of pseudo-realism that seeks quick fixes, craves incumbent advantages, takes policy matters lightly when in opposition and gets obsessed with personalities.

Harapan needs a leader who can form a shadow cabinet, beat the government with better policies and delivery, bring its Muslim and minority-liberal constituencies to agree on strategic compromises and prepare an orderly transition when the time is up. He/she should be a bridge to a better future, not a roadblock.

This leader needs not to be Anwar. It also does not need to be anyone but Anwar, as long as he or she is younger, never mind if he or she would fix or continue Harapan’s problems and flaws. Nor should the change be a messy fight at all cost.

It is time to be realistic, replacement must not be worse than the incumbent.


WONG CHIN HUAT is an Essex-trained political scientist working on political institutions and group conflicts. Mindful of humans' self-interest motivation while pursuing a better world, he is a principled opportunist.


Why you have to pay extra taxes





PMO: Hadi to continue as Special Envoy to the Middle East

The new cabinet has agreed to reappoint PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang as Malaysia’s Special Envoy to the Middle East, said the Prime Minister’s Office.

In a short media statement, the office announced that Progressive Democratic Party president Tiong King Sing and Serian MP Richard Riot, who is with Sarawak United People’s Party, are also reappointed as the Prime Minister’s special envoys to China and East Asia, respectively.

“The first cabinet meeting held on Sept 1 has agreed to continue the appointment of Abdul Hadi Awang as the Special Envoy to the Middle East, Tiong King Sing as the Special Envoy to China, and Richard Riot as the Special Envoy to East Asia,” the statement said.

All three politicians, who are also MPs, were appointed to the same positions, which come with ministerial rank, last year by the then prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin.

It is understood that when Muhyiddin resigned last month, all cabinet members and special envoy appointees that were made in his capacity as the country’s top executive also resigned.

Muhyiddin was replaced by Umno vice-president Ismail Sabri Yaakob, who was sworn in as Malaysia’s ninth Prime Minister on Aug 22, after securing a simple majority in Parliament from 114 MPs.

A Special Envoy is usually an individual that is appointed by the serving prime minister with the aim of strengthening ties between Malaysia and any particular country or region where the envoy is sent to.



However, in some instances, appointments of special envoys are also seen as a move to reward certain politicians with the high-ranking position and perks that come with it.

Besides Hadi, Tiong and Riot, other politicians who have been made a special envoy previously include former MIC president S Samy Vellu (Special Envoy to India and South Asia), former MCA president Ong Ka Ting (Special Envoy to China), and the late Jamaluddin Jarjis from Umno (Special Envoy to the United States).

Tan Kok Wai, who is the DAP MP for Cheras, was appointed as a Special Envoy to China during Pakatan Harapan’s time as the federal government.

Another individual who has previously been appointed as a special envoy was Khalid Abu Bakar, a former inspector-general of police, but he was not assigned to any specific region.

Instead, Khalid was made a special envoy for combating terrorism, extremism and human trafficking in 2017.


No vaccine, no job, Selangor Sultan warns religious teachers, officials



No vaccine, no job, Selangor Sultan warns religious teachers, officials


The Sultan of Selangor also told teachers who refuse to be vaccinated that they may endanger their students. (Bernama pic)

PETALING JAYA: The Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah has warned religious teachers and mosque officials in the state who refuse the Covid-19 vaccine that they could be barred from carrying out their duties.

In a statement, Sultan Sharafuddin voiced his displeasure that 95 “Kafa” teachers, 11 mosque officials and six matchmakers in the state had refused vaccination.

Kafa is an education programme approved by the department of Islamic development Malaysia (Jakim).

Those who refused the vaccine, the ruler said, were endangering themselves and those around them.

The sultan said Kafa teachers should know that the Covid-19 vaccine can prevent serious illnesses and death.

“Further, I am made to understand that a large number of Covid-19 deaths in Selangor involve those who are unvaccinated.

“I wish to remind the stubborn Kafa teachers that they may not be allowed to carry out their duties (if they remain unvaccinated).”

The Ruler said the same applied to mosque officials and matchmakers who refused to be vaccinated.

Sultan Sharafuddin said he had also been made to understand that 450 primary and secondary school teachers in the state have refused the vaccine.

“This can endanger students in Selangor and the relevant authorities need to look into this,” he said, adding that health experts have confirmed that the vaccine is the only way to overcome the pandemic at this point in time.

Sultan Sharafuddin urged all the people in Selangor to get vaccinated for their own good and for the good of others.

Azhar Harun denies rejecting motions for his replacement

MM:

Dewan Rakyat Speaker Azhar Harun denies rejecting motions for his replacement, says deputy Rashid Hasnon to decide


Speaker Datuk Azhar Azizan Harun speaks during a special Parliament sitting in Dewan Rakyat, Kuala Lumpur July 26, 2021. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 2 — Dewan Rakyat Speaker Datuk Azhar Azizan Harun today confirmed that his office has received several motions from MPs asking him to vacate his position in the coming Parliament sitting.

He asserted that he has never denied blocking any motions submitted by the MPs seeking his replacement.

“My office has received those motions to vacate my position so that another may be appointed as the Yang di-Pertua Dewan Rakyat.

“As soon as my office received those motions, I wrote back to all the proposers that I will not make any decision about them due to conflict of interest,” he said in a statement.

He added that whatever decision that has to be made about these motions has been passed to his deputy, Datuk Mohd Rashid Hasnon.

Azhar was responding to an Utusan Malaysia report yesterday alleging that he had rejected 15 submissions from MPs seeking his replacement.

Azhar said the allegations were lies and slander.

“I will seek legal advice on this matter soon,” he added.

Malay Mail contacted Rashid to find out if he has made any decision on whether any of the motions will be raised in the coming Dewan Rakyat sitting, as delegated by Azhar.

However, the Batu Pahat MP passed the matter back to Azhar.

“You need to talk to him, he is still the Speaker,” Rashid said when asked and declined further comment.

Malay Mail has reached out to Azhar but has yet to receive a response.

However, Rashid told national news agency Bernama that the motions, if approved, would be displayed in the Order Paper on the day of the Dewan Rakyat sitting.

He said that he would consider whether the motions sought conformed to the Dewan Rakyat Standing Orders.

“Each proposer will also get feedback in advance on the status of their motion,” he was quoted saying.

Sources close to two MPs previously told Malay Mail that Bagan Datuk MP Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi who is also the Umno president, had recently submitted a motion nominating Pengerang MP Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said as the next Dewan Rakyat Speaker.

Malay Mail also sighted a letter by Zahid, in which he asked Azhar to vacate his position under Article 57(2)(c) of the Federal Constitution.

The Umno leader cited Standing Order 26(1), to be read together with Standing Order 27(3) regarding the appointment and status of the Speaker as decided by the prime minister.

The letter also quoted a second motion in which Zahid nominated Azalina, the former deputy Speaker and a former law minister, as Azhar’s replacement.

According to the sources, Zahid submitted his motions to the Dewan Rakyat Speaker’s Office on August 30 and was received the same day.

Prior to the latest motion row, Utusan Malaysia reported on August 27 that Azhar had said he will resume his duties as Speaker at the next Dewan Rakyat sitting on September 6, unless it is decided otherwise.

The final day to submit motions is 14 days before the House of Representatives sits again. This means Zahid’s motion could be accepted as the new term has been set to start on September 13.

The first meeting of the fourth session of the 14th Malaysian Parliament was initially set for September 6 but postponed a week after Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob was announced to be under self-quarantine for being a Covid-19 close contact.



Police tracking down group planning to start war in Sabah

MM:

Police tracking down group planning to start war in Sabah


Inspector-General of Police Datuk Sri Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani (centre) witnessing Datuk Hazani Ghazali handing over duties to Datuk Idris Abdullah, September 2, 2021. — Borneo Post Online pic

KOTA KINABALU, Sept 2 — Police are tracking down a group known as “Perjalanan Mimpi Yang Terakhir” (PMYT) that is believed to be spreading deviant teaching, including triggering World War III in Sabah.

Inspector-General of Police Datuk Sri Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani said police were aware of the group’s movements and an investigation was carried out.

Acryl added that the Royal Malaysian Police had dealt with such groups in the past.

“We have not heard of such groups in a while but we have our ways in dealing with such groups in the past.

“Investigation has begun to ensure it will not cause any public concern,” he said a press conference after witnessing the handing over of duties from outgoing Sabah police commissioner Datuk Hazani Ghazali to Datuk Idris Abdullah at the state police headquarters in Kepayan today.

Acryl Sani was asked to comment on a recent online portal which reported that the PMYT group, led by a woman identified as Sittah Annur, had spread deviant teaching, including claims to trigger World War III in Sabah.

The group is said to have about 3,000 followers and with some 22 Telegram groups.

It is also claimed that among the followers are professionals and public servants, including policemen and army personnel.

According to security sources, Sittah, 39, and believed to be from Kelantan but residing at Shah Alam in Selangor, had told her followers that World War III would break out in Sabah and she would lead the group into battle against the enemy.

It was also reported that Sittah had used various social media platforms to share her bizarre claims, believed to be against the teachings of Islam.

Meanwhile, Acryl Sani said investigation will be carried out on the claims that policemen were involved in the group.

“If it is true, we will identify them. We will however not rush the investigation as we need to collect more information, particularly on what the group is teaching.

“We will also consult the Department of Islamic Development (Jakim) for advice in moving forward,” he said.

Acryl Sani added that police investigation also revealed that most of the group’s so-called members were only social media followers. — Borneo Post Online


Penang reps want state to manage Covid-19 pandemic independently of Putrajaya

MM:

Penang reps want state to manage Covid-19 pandemic independently of Putrajaya


Live telecast of the Penang state legislative assembly session in George Town, September 2, 2021. ― Picture by Sayuti Zainudin

GEORGE TOWN, Sept 2 ― The Penang government must start developing its own measures to stop the spread of Covid-19 in the state, several lawmakers told the state legislative assembly today.

Deputy Chief Minister II Prof P. Ramasamy (PH ― Prai) and Lim Guan Eng (PH ― Air Putih) said the state should stop depending on the federal government and instead tailor its own response to the pandemic.

“The state government needs to take mitigation measures on its own to prevent further loss of lives,” Lim said.

He said the state needed to procure more vaccines so that at-risk individuals, especially those above 50 years of age, could be vaccinated as soon as possible.

He said the death rate from Covid-19 in Penang was worrying, with a total 211 deaths recorded in 15 days from August 11 to 26.

“If vaccination rates can be increased and expedited, more lives can be saved,” he said.

He said he hoped that the state health committee chairman, Norlela Ariffin (PH ― Penanti), would pay serious attention to this.

Ramasamy also said the federal government had failed to take into consideration the roles of state government and related agencies in managing the pandemic right from the beginning.

“This is why I think the proclamation of Emergency did not help in controlling the pandemic, the Emergency was just to help the previous administration, it has nothing to do with Covid-19,” he said.

He said the Emergency did not help Penang and did not reduce Covid-19 cases in the state, in reply to a question by M.Satees (PH ― Bagan Dalam).

Other lawmakers such as Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail (PH ― Pantai Jerejak) and Heng Lee Lee (PH ― Berapit) also gave their views on how to better manage the pandemic and the vaccination process.

When it was Norlela's turn to give her winding-up speech, Deputy Speaker Dr Amar Pritpal Abdullah (PH ― Sungai Bakap) reminded the lawmakers not to interject with more Covid-19 questions.

“Covid-19 was mentioned repeatedly yesterday and today so I hope you don't interrupt with more repeated questions on Covid-19,” he said.

Backbenchers Lee Chun Kit (PH ― Pulau Tikus) and Satees protested, stating that the topic is an important issue that must be addressed.

Dr Amar Pritpal said Norlela was only given 20 minutes to give her winding up speech so other backbenchers can only ask questions that were not repeated.


Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision to dismiss RM192.9m forfeiture suit against Umno, Wanita MCA and seven others

MM:

Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision to dismiss RM192.9m forfeiture suit against Umno, Wanita MCA and seven others


Datuk Seri Najib Razak is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court August 23, 2021. ― Picture by Hari Anggara

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 2 — The prosecution failed today to convince the Court of Appeal to overturn the High Court’s decision to dismiss the government’s forfeiture of RM192.9 million against Umno, Wanita MCA and seven others.

This means the parties can keep the RM192.9 million they received from Datuk Seri Najib Razak that had been claimed to be from sovereign investment company 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

Datuk Hadhariah Syed Ismail, who was one was of the three judges in the Court of Appeal, said High Court Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan did not err in his judgment to dismiss the forfeiture suit by the government.

She said the prosecution failed to prove that the money came from 1MDB.

“The respondents had no knowledge, no reason to suspect the monies they received from Datuk Seri Najib were proceeds from unlawful activities.

“The learned trial judge found that it is most unfair to keep the respondent’s monies in the absence of proof by the prosecution that the monies were proceeds of unlawful activities hence the high court judge dismissed the prosecution application.

“We find the High Court judge did not commit any error in law that warrants an appellate intervention. We affirm the order of the High Court,” she said.

The three-panel judge was led by Datuk Karim Abdul Jalil. Datuk Abu Bakar Jais was the third judge.

In a separate appeal, the Court of Appeal allowed the Pahang Umno liaison committee to challenge the High Court forfeiture order of RM2.48 million of its funds.

The money had been part of the haul totalling RM270 million that had been seized by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission in its civil forfeiture suit against 41 people and entities, including Umno.

Hadhariah said the High Court had erred when it gave the forfeiture order as the monies had been spent and were no longer available to be seized. She added that the Pahang Umno liaison committee’s present funds were judged to be from lawful means.

On June 19, the High Court had dismissed the government’s application to forfeit RM192,965,413.61 belonging to Umno; Wanita MCA (RM300,000); Perano, a company that sells hijabs, and Binsabi Sdn Bhd which supplies tents, involved RM337,634.78 and RM827,250 respectively; Habib Jewels Sdn Bhd (RM100,000); K&Z Enterprise Sdn Bhd (RM138,359.60); Kedah Umno Liaison Committee (RM1.05 million) and Hattatex Trading (RM111,590).


Debt-ridden AirAsia’s super app ambitions fly into murky skies



Debt-ridden AirAsia’s super app ambitions fly into murky skies


A Gojek delivery rider clad in AirAsia’s familiar red in Bangkok, Thailand. (airasia.com pic)

SINGAPORE: Gojek motorbike drivers clad in AirAsia’s corporate colour of red have been delivering takeout meals to app users in Bangkok since mid-August.

The Malaysian budget carrier acquired Indonesian ride-hailing and payment company Gojek’s Thai operations in July, part of its effort to expand super app operations.

The purchase was followed by the launch of a ride-hailing service in Malaysia last month. The company first seeks to capture demand among passengers travelling on its flights, letting them use frequent-flyer miles for the rides under a planned arrangement.

With its airline business battered by the pandemic, AirAsia is hurrying to expand its app operations, including food delivery and ride-hailing services. But accumulating losses from carrier operations will make it hard for the company to secure funding for necessary investments.

Developing digital businesses was a goal CEO Tony Fernandes had been pursuing since before the Covid-19 pandemic. Now with the coronavirus-induced slump in air travel, revenue from digital operations made up 39% of the group’s total in the first quarter of this year, up from just 14% for all of 2020.

Even when travel demand recovers, “the contribution from non-aviation revenue will rise to about 50%”, Fernandes has said.

But its finances may not be steady enough to fuel his ambitions. Hit by a price war and the plunge in air travel, the company incurred net losses for seven straight three-month periods from the third quarter of 2019 through 2021’s first quarter.

It sank into negative net worth in the third quarter of 2020, with its net liabilities exceeding RM4.1 billion as at the end of March. With a Malaysian lockdown in June as well as rising Covid-19 cases in Thailand and Indonesia, the carrier is expected to report this month a deep loss for the second quarter.

So while expanding its digital operations, AirAsia has been slimming down where it can. The company last October slashed 10% of its workforce of 24,000 people, including those at long-haul airline AirAsia X, local media reported. It also liquidated its Japan business while selling a majority of shareholdings in an Indian joint venture to its partner, Tata Group.

The airline is also scrambling to secure financing to end its negative net worth and to invest further in digital operations, procuring about RM336 million this year from a group of investors that includes a Hong Kong business owner.

But such fundraising efforts have not kept up with the loss being incurred by the airline business.

By comparison, Singapore’s digital behemoth Grab boasts deep pockets, having raised US$6.2 billion in its latest round of funding from investors including SoftBank Group. Online gaming and e-commerce giant Sea Ltd, another Singapore company, has about US$185 billion in market value on the New York Stock Exchange and pours billions of dollars raised on the market into business expansion.

AirAsia’s digital businesses need to attract customers by spending a large amount of money, but it is “questionable” whether the company has “that scale of fundraising capability”, said Kenichi Shimomura of German consultancy Roland Berger.

AirAsia’s strength is the success of its core low-cost carrier business and its strategy for gaining price-conscious customers. For its newly launched food-delivery service in Thailand, AirAsia is charging restaurants a fee of just 5% on orders through October, aiming to win business away from rivals said to have rates in the 20% to 30% range.

The company boasts a “wealth of customer data from its aviation business”, Fernandes has emphasised, counting on synergies by linking the data to the digital businesses.

When Fernandes entered the carrier business, no one expected a success story, says the CEO, who bought a bankrupt airline for a mere single ringgit and launched AirAsia with just two planes.

He is undoubtedly one of the most successful entrepreneurs, but the business environment has drastically changed over the past two decades.

“AirAsia has a powerful brand, but for its aviation business to stay competitive, reorganisation is needed,” said an analyst in Malaysia.


Yeo Bee Yin: The Government shouldn’t just rely on vaccinations



Yeo Bee Yin: The Government shouldn’t just rely on vaccinations



BAKRI MP Yeo Bee Yin has renewed her calls for the Government to take actions to improve the Find, Test, Trace, Isolate and Support (FTTIS) approach.

In a statement today, she pointed out that the Government cannot rely solely on vaccination to manage the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic as efforts are underway to reopen the country’s economy.

“A multi-pronged strategy is needed and an effective FFTIS is definitely one of the most important elements to be added,” she explained.

According to the former energy, science, technology, environment and climate change minister, a number of health experts and members of parliament have been calling for more testing to be done according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation of a positive rate of 5% or lower.

“In fact, countries which are successful in controlling the spread of the virus such as China went way below 1% in their positive rate,” she added.

The Health Ministry had recently released more granular testing numbers which showed that from Aug 11 to 26, the positive rate of all states or territories (except Labuan) recorded above 5% with more than 10 states or territories above 10%.

Meanwhile, four states – Kedah, Kelantan, Sabah, and Selangor – are above 15%.



Image from Yeo Bee Yin’s Facebook page

“In short, we are severely under-testing our population and our daily positive cases number, although high, is under-reported.

“Not only that, our contact-tracing mechanism is almost fully manual while other countries, which are successful in controlling the spread of virus, are using much better and sophisticated data analytics to allow for more comprehensive tracing to be done on close contacts.

“MyTrace, which is a tracing application launched by our current minister of health when he was minister of science, has not been making any significant impact in tracing, nor is MySejahtera,” Yeo noted.

According to Yeo, the current testing and tracing system is totally incapable of tracing the pattern of spreading of the virus.

“With severely insufficient testing and primitive method in tracing, it is impossible to isolate the positive cases effectively to prevent further spreading in the community,” she added.

The health expert and opposition parties have been demanding the Government to strengthen the FTTIS approach, which was perceived as the weakest link in Malaysia’s pandemic management strategy. – Sept 1, 2021


The unfortunate death of a Malaysian Indian guard

MM:

Bad time to die, the unfortunate death of a Malaysian Indian guard



SEPTEMBER 2 — The CCTV footage is surreal. Perhaps not as much as our national realpolitik and its effects on justice at local levels.

Covid-19 had a supporting role in kicking this off.

This happened at the tail-end of 2020. Guest and security staff disagree on swimming pool usage at an Ipoh condominium due to pandemic SOPs.

Upset, man slams a table on the frail-looking employee and leaves him lying on the floor with a bleeding head on December 29, 2020.

The bedridden guard endured almost nine months in a hospital and eight surgeries only to return home and die days later on August 27, 2021. In the patriotic month coinciding with a new prime minister.

It is immeasurably sad.

To suffer through most of the year in hopes of healing only to succumb to injuries, what cruelty!

With his death, the case has changed dimensions with the Attorney General's Chambers expected to escalate the charges to murder. Next week, court convenes.

S. Thava Sagayam, born in 1957, did not last till 2021’s Merdeka Day.

He will not be mentioned by name in social conversations, referred casually as the Ipoh condominium security allegedly killed by guest rage.

Though the Indian name matters.

For any number of reasons. He’s from Buntong, the ethnic enclave in the Perak capital, famous for kacang putih and cooking sensation S. Pavithra — with her own personal tragedies. Gangs, poverty and trouble are synonymous with the area, not unlike my own childhood patch, Kuala Lumpur’s Kampung Pandan.

Buntong is one of the three state constituencies under Ipoh Barat, therefore naturally its parliamentary member and prominent lawyer M. Kulasegaran took the lead to represent the widow E. Philomena.

The former minister from the disgraced Pakatan Harapan administration is lead for many Malaysian Indian related causes like the Indira Gandhi child custody battle. Fair to sum up his forte in his party, DAP, is representing Indian causes nationally.

The columnist here is Malaysian Indian.

Which tends to colour the whole process to get justice done for the deceased.

The man charged initially with the attack is a Malaysian Malay allegedly from a different state holidaying in Perak during the incident, residing at the said condominium.

Here’s where technology does help us mere mortals — inclined to tribalism and cultural bias — to decide. Very few can empathise with the assailant after viewing the spliced video of two camera angles.

Yet, it is far from clear cut.

Not a time for mistakes

Malaysia’s political stalemate renders leaders on either side of the aisle to be circumspect about race relations, more so when it ends in death.

These latest events recall developments from 2018 when Pakatan Harapan was in its first and only year in power.


Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran speaks during a press conference in Ipoh March 5, 2021. — Picture by Farhan Najib

Pakatan's Indian leaders, not the least Kulasegaran, in the 2018 Seafield temple related riots appeared critical of police even when they were in government. And shortly after, the hurting of fireman Muhammad Adib Mohd Kassim — who died weeks later — turned the episode fully racial. The right bayed for blood and Kulasegaran’s name was mentioned most.

The noise drove community sentiments one way and was a key reference point to allege the Pakatan government was anti-Malay. The Pakatan government collapsed less than three months later in February 2020.

Which is why Barisan Nasional, Perikatan Nasional, BN plus minus or PN minus plus, or whatever the latest version has to be called, is extra wary of race relations.

Umno and Bersatu form the government together while vying for the heartstrings of rural Malay voters to defeat the other at the next general election, it is not wise to be on the wrong side of Malay sentiment.

Umno and Bersatu, what a pair.

To look collected as a government, to look at odds as parties, and fight for the same votes come polling day. It is diabolical.

The complications are myriad.

Prime Minister Ismail Sabri has to contend with Umno President Zahid Hamidi for numero uno in the unofficial race to be the better Malay leader, first in the party and then in the country.

Former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad set mad standards on what is to be an out and out Malay leader which every leader in all parties compete to best.

Zahid is from Perak, where Ipoh and more pertinently the court which presides over the Thava Sagayam death sits. Ismail will be extra careful when things occur in the president’s state.

Home Minister Hamzah Zainuddin leaves it to police and the attorney general to take the lead in the case. For the record, the Bersatu secretary-general won Perak’s Larut as an Umno candidate in 2018, and all of Umno Perak prepares to unseat him at GE15. Former colleagues plot his fall.

PAS, the third force inside the current administration, lets the two play it out and shape their strategy on avoiding any mistakes they commit.

It is not that these blokes are burning the candle at both ends but that they are shocked there are only two ends to light up.

Setting the tone for the “awareness” is new Communications and Multimedia Minister Annuar Musa, original Umno Baru member and parliamentarian from Kelantan. An ally of Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin, just as Ismail was or still is.

After the prime minister, he is the most important man when it comes to containing news and information, including coverage of court cases.

What about the individual Malay politicians?

With Umno and Bersatu memberships interchangeable, every Malay MP and every potential candidate for a Malay majority seat does not want to appear overeager to be multicultural. The usual suspects are quiet over Thava Sagayam for the same reason.

They’ll speak up about how their party even if race exclusive is not race blind in the leadup to Malaysia Day, while their blinkers are on to avoid seeing an old man die in Buntong.

Buntong Ria


People use private vehicles to get around Ipoh, and Philomena headed back and forth to Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun to be with her warded husband for those nine months, did she have a car or motorbike?

It would measure her patience.

How would she look at her national leaders?

She would have appreciated leadership from all those men with great titles, in regards to Thava Sagayam’s failed convalescence or her own spirits in their home.

Instead, she sits at home, a widow, waiting for justice when politics trumps all.

But it is her own leadership of hope which lights up the end of the tunnel for all. She said she’d forgive the assailant if he apologised.

The simplicity of her outlook tells that the overcalculation of all decisions by seasoned politicians may yield electoral results but lacks a superior element, humanity.


Wednesday, September 01, 2021

No Evidence – Biden Not Happy After All U.S. Spy Agencies Still “Inconclusive” Over Origins Of Covid-19



No Evidence – Biden Not Happy After All U.S. Spy Agencies Still “Inconclusive” Over Origins Of Covid-19

After 90 days of investigations carried out by all the U.S. intelligence agencies, there is still no evidence to point finger at China as the exact origin of Covid-19. Newly installed U.S. President Joe Biden issued an order in May to the intelligence community to “redouble efforts” to collect and analyze information, hoping to find a “definitive conclusion” about the origins of the Coronavirus pandemic.



The U.S. intelligence community was given 90 days by Biden to confirm the hypothesis first promoted by former U.S. president Donald Trump that the virus may have escaped from a Chinese laboratory. After his disastrous mishandling of the outbreak in the U.S., Trump had tried to deflect his incompetency and complacency by putting all the blames on the Chinese government.



Not satisfied with calling it as the “Chinese virus” or “Wuhan virus”, Trump then said his government will investigate whether the virus came from a laboratory in China (despite the lack of evidence). Amusingly, top US general Mark Milley had raised his doubt on the similar issue, saying American intelligence suggested the Coronavirus was likely to have occurred naturally instead of being manufactured in a laboratory.



Besides China, Trump had also diverted attention to the WHO and cut US$400 million funding to the World Health Organization. The former president had accused the WHO of promoting Chinese “disinformation” about the virus. His administration basically accused the WHO of having its role in helping China to cover up the Coronavirus outbreak.



Earlier, Trump had accused Beijing of not telling him earlier what was happening so that he could prepare earlier. In truth, as early as January 22, 2020, as the nation saw the first American diagnosed with Covid-19 after returning from China, Trump confidently told CNBC – “We have it under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.”



Later, at a press conference on Feb 10, 2020, Trump even suggested that the highly infectious disease would simply “go away” in April, as temperatures warm. In fact, just hours before the WHO declared the outbreak a global emergency, Trump had even assured Americans that the virus would have “a very good ending for us”.



Interestingly, an unclassified briefing document on the Coronavirus has been revealed by the U.S. military showing that as early as Feb 3, 2020, the United States Army had warned the White House that the pathogen could kill at least 150,000 Americans. The document – “Black Swan” analysis – which was prepared on Feb 3 had projected that between 80,000 and 150,000 people could die.



But Trump administration’s hostile and anti-Chinese policy has become such a convenient tool to divert attention from the incompetence of American leaders themselves. The U.S. also was not impressed that China is threatening the U.S. as an economic superpower. Therefore, blaming the Chinese for the global pandemic is the best and easiest way to undermine China.



As anti-Chinese sentiment in the U.S. escalated, thanks to Republican Trump, Democrats Biden has decided to continue his predecessor’s policy. Like Trump, Joe Biden is committed to a distinctly anti-China global strategy rooted in fears of American decline. The POTUS has sworn that China will not become the world leader, let alone the wealthiest country in the world.



Jamie Dimon, the CEO and chairman of JP Morgan Chase, wrote in his annual letter to the company’s shareholders – “China’s leaders believe that America is in decline. While the U.S. had faced tough times in the past, the Chinese see an America that is losing ground in technology, infrastructure, and education – a nation torn and crippled by politics, as well as racial and income inequality.”



Naturally, U.S.’ claims to find the true origins of the pandemic have been met with strong resistance by China. While Washington says that Beijing has not been “completely transparent” in the global investigation into the source of Covid-19, China says the U.S. is trying to create disinformation, manipulate news media and sensationalize “fabricated evidence” to smear other countries.




After all, in its report in March, WHO has already dismissed the possibility that the Covid pandemic began with a lab leak because it was “extremely unlikely” that the virus was introduced to humans this way. Of course, the White House has rubbished the report, saying – “The report lacks crucial data, information, and access. It represents a partial and incomplete picture.”



Under pressure, WHO has proposed a second phase of investigation, which will involve the audit of laboratories and markets in the city of Wuhan, the area where the virus was first identified. Furious, Zeng Yixin, deputy health minister, said this showed “disrespect for common sense and arrogance toward science”. The proposal was an allegation that China’s laboratory protocols had been violated.



In July, China rejected the WHO’s proposal, accusing it as politically motivated. Mr Zeng said – “We will not accept such an origin-tracing plan. We hope the WHO would seriously review the considerations and suggestions made by Chinese experts and truly treat the origin tracing of the Covid-19 virus as a scientific matter, and get rid of political interference.”



Now that a new assessment by all the U.S. spy agencies have failed to confidently conclude whether the new Coronavirus jumped to humans naturally, or via a lab leak, it would be harder for Biden to continue his crusade to demonize China. The report, which was released on Friday, found that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon.



More importantly, the intelligence community also assessed that Chinese officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak that triggered a global pandemic. While Biden can continue to pressure China to reveal more, which the country won’t, the U.S. spy agencies said they would not be able to reach a more definitive conclusion unless it receives more information.



In retaliation to the U.S. determination to find fault with China, the Chinese have instead called WHO and the international community to open an investigation of the Fort Detrick bio-laboratory, claiming that the Covid-19 virus originated from an American military base in Maryland, about 80 km (50 miles) north of Washington DC.



Formerly the centre of the US biological weapons programme (1943-1969), Fort Detrick currently houses biomedical labs researching viruses, including Ebola and smallpox. The Chinese media argues that it makes more sense that Fort Detrick, home to US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), was the source of the Coronavirus outbreak than the “Wuhan lab leak” theory.



In August 2019, its deadly germ research operations were abruptly shut down following serious safety violations. That incident has been connected to the virus’s origins to a U.S. Coronavirus expert, Dr Ralph Baric, and researchers at Fort Detrick. Apparently, Baric and his team, including researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, were leading the charge in studying bat Coronaviruses.



Known as “The Coronavirus Hunter”, American scientist Baric has been tracking Coronaviruses for decades and working on medications to treat Coronavirus-caused infections. In 2003, a published paper, of which Baric was a co-author, showcased the power of “reverse genetics” technique, which could bring an actual virus to life from its genetic code and “mix and match” parts of multiple viruses.



Hence, if Washington wants Beijing to be “completely transparent”, the U.S. too should show its transparency – open the door of Fort Detrick for international audit and investigation. Other evidence presented in USA Today and The Palm Beach Post shows there were 171 cases linked to Covid-19 in Florida in December 2019, where 107 of the patients had not traveled outside of the U.S.



In the same breath, perhaps the Biden administration should explain why scientists of the University of Cambridge in the U.K. together with researchers from Germany had discovered that Americans who had lived in Wuhan had “type-A” of Covid-19, the root of the outbreak, but most of the Chinese infected in Wuhan had the “type-B”, which can’t exist without type “A”.


PKR wants Pakatan to use its party logo because "someone" has given PH logo a bad reputation



Logo tussle knocks PH’s ‘Big tent’ askew



From Terence Netto


Word has it that PKR is pushing for its logo to be used as the Pakatan Haparan emblem in GE15, expected to be held some time after the middle of next year.

Not surprisingly, this push is being resisted by coalition partners, DAP and Amanah. The two argue that since PH is a coalition with its own logo, that emblem should be used, not the logo of a component of the coalition. They say the corporate interest of the PH entity and public recognition of its identity are priorities that should transcend parochial concerns.

The DAP and Amanah sides in this argument say that the decision to use PKR’s logo in GE14 was due to untoward circumstances. The then Registrar of Societies was simply being recalcitrant in not approving the PH logo in time for GE14, held in May 2018.

In the event, the PH logo was approved by RoS mere days after the coalition’s victory in GE14. Also, the same PH logo was used by its candidates in all the by-elections that were held since GE14. Though PH lost most of these polls, the defeats had nothing to do with the logo.

PKR is not without some mildly compelling reasons for its insistence that its logo be used by PH in GE15. One is that the PH logo is irredeemably tainted by what they denounce as Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s treachery towards PH during the final months of the coalition’s 22-month residence in Putrajaya.

That treachery was particularly bitter because several leaders of DAP and Amanah had suffered from the authoritarian ways of Dr Mahathir during his 22 years as Umno president and Malaysia’s prime minister (1981-2002). They had bad memories of their mistreatment but put those aside to accept him as the PH leader because the necessity of removing a corrupt Barisan Nasional from federal power overshadowed all other considerations.

Additionally, PKR exponents argue that as their logo had carried PH to victory in GE14, the PKR colours enjoy a special catchet among the supporters of reformasi, the cry for political economic reform that has highlighted the PKR struggle from 1998 till now.

They assert with some cogency that the PKR logo endorsed by a majority of the Malaysian electorate in GE14 was the first time in 61 years a national poll had rung in a change of government in the history of Malaysia. No small achievement that.

They contend that because the historic vote was betrayed by Dr Mahathir and by the duplicity of Muhyiddin Yassin, the Bersatu president who became prime minister of a new government replacing the PH incumbents, the PKR colours deserve a measure of resurrectory grace.

Understandably, PKR’s resentment towards Dr Mahathir remains high, though a year-and-a-half have passed since he abruptly resigned the headship of PH and premiership of the country.

The passage of time has not softened the wound of that memory and though Dr Mahathir continues to justify the abrupt manner in which he exited, his explanations have commanded steadily diminishing credibility.

General opinion has congealed around the hypothesis that he threw in the towel to prevent Anwar Ibrahim from succeeding him as prime minister. This betrayal rankles in the party’s collective memory.

These narratives are persuasive but to yield to them would be tantamount to a settling of scores. General elections should not be fought to appease parochial concerns. Furthermore, new political parties, like the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA), are emerging on the national political landscape; they should be invited to engage with PH under the “Big tent” concept of a gathering of all opposition parties.

MUDA possesses an appeal to the young who will be empowered when the vote is given to the 18-year-olds and above crowd soon, a demographic that is expected to be at least a few million strong when they come on to the electoral rolls.

What then would parties like MUDA think if the more established opposition parties opt to fight GE15 under a component’s colours rather than the coalition’s logo?

Would they want to get under a “Big tent” when it is seen to be contracting around one of its poles?

PKR must look at the evolving picture of new voter empowerment and how PH can leverage on it rather than content itself with a discharge of rancour over past injustices to it and its supremo.


Saifuddin on recognising Afghanistan - Man Man Lai





M'sia taking unhurried approach on recognising Taliban - Saifuddin

Malaysia has yet to make a decision on whether to recognise the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah said.

He said that Putrajaya will take a very cautious approach in arriving at a decision.

"We are following closely events that are occurring in Kabul, in particular, and the whole of Afghanistan (in general). We are taking a very cautious approach and we will be looking at the situation very closely from all angles," he told a press conference at Wisma Putra today.

"For the time being, we are still observing the situation before we take an official stand because we have been receiving daily various information from various quarters, so we are taking an unhurried approach," he said.



Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid speaking at a military unit at Kabul international airport.

The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan headed by the democratically elected leader of President Ashraf Ghani fell to force and violence by the Taliban on Aug 15.

This came in the wake of US President Joe Biden withdrawing US troops from Afghanistan, 20 years after it invaded the country to remove the Taliban from power.

Some quarters in Malaysia, including PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang, defended the Taliban, saying the organisation which has taken over Afghanistan has changed for the better.

Hadi’s son, Muhammad Khalil Abdul Hadi, also congratulated the Taliban for “liberating” Afghanistan.

When asked if Malaysia believed that Taliban has changed, Saifuddin said that Wisma Putra would not judge another country.

"From the (aspect of) foreign policy, we don't judge another country's government," he said.


Continuous eff-ups in the US' foreign forays from Bush to Biden

Headline from FocusMalaysia:

From Bush to Biden: One war, four US presidents on Afghanistan


Apart from borrowing above FocusMalaysia's headlines, I don't propose to follow its narrative but rather, blog myself on what and how I have seen the sorry affair of yet another arrogant reckless US invasion and occupation of a foreign sovereign nation just to depose that nation's leader (usually by assassination or execution) who the US didn't find useful anymore to its interests (usually a leader with whom the US had collaborated earlier), as the Yanks had done previously in Iraq (Saddam Hussein), Vietnam (Ngo Dinh Diem), Panama (Manuel Noriega).

The US invasion of Afghanistan, as with the invasion of Iraq, was initiated by a Republican President, its withdrawal from Afghanistan announced by another Republican President, but alas for poor old Joe, the final shameful retreat implemented by a Democrat.

In other words poor Joe has to bear the blame, shame and post-withdrawal burden of the fiasco a la the 1975 Vietnam cabut-ing.

But having said that, you know, I believe Joe bit the bullet and did the right thing - the kay-poh-cnee-ness in Afghanistan was an unfortunate reckless step into a mire, an insatiable voracious whirlpool sucking up America's money, human and material resources that have eff-ed up the US financial and socio-political assets for 20 years.

Even with an unnecessary and unjustified NATO involvement, no doubt at US insistent and political bullying plus apprehension at the increasing Islamist aggression in Europe, the Western powers still couldn't turn Afghanistan into a Westernised model of Middle-East democracy - the Brits and Russians had no success earlier. Let the Afghans be what they want to be, have been and will always be.

Much as the humongous shame may be for Joe and America, the withdrawal will save the US a lot of money and further grief. At least Joe recognises the stark truth and the reality the USA is no longer Invincible Rome, and to forget its futile dream of a Pax Americana, as the Poms had long forgotten, quietly and quickly, its Pax Britannica.


We can only hope the US will reflect on its foolish worldwide intervention, intrusions and invasions thus far and cease & desist from re-attempting its bullying with today's China.

Yes, we can only hope - the rest remains with the USA.



Azalina proposes act for voters to rechoose their MPs if they jump ship

theVibes.com:

Azalina proposes act for voters to rechoose their MPs if they jump ship

Right should be returned to those who elected the reps in the first place, says former deputy speaker


Pengerang MP Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said says there have been many occasions where elected representatives have not only turned their backs on their political parties but also the grassroots. – Azalina Othman Said Twitter pic, September 1, 2021

KUALA LUMPUR – Former Dewan Rakyat deputy speaker Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said has proposed a recall elections act to prevent elected lawmakers from defecting to other parties after they are voted in by their constituents.

The legislation, the Pengerang MP said, would allow voters to withdraw their mandate to elected representatives who have turned their backs on them.

“I am very pleased with the discussions between the government of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob, and the opposition and independent MPs to introduce an anti-hopping law.

“However, the right to choose a new people’s representative or to retain the representative should be returned to the voters,” she said in a Facebook post today.

Azalina, who is also an Umno Supreme Council member, said she intends to submit a notice of motion entitled the “Recall Election Bill 2021” to the Dewan Rakyat speaker.

“I hope this motion will be the starting point to introduce ‘recall elections’ in the September parliamentary sitting.

“In addition, I also intend to propose the establishment of a ‘caucus of parliamentary reform and multi-party democracy’ among MPs who are interested. This is to strengthen the institution of Parliament and to uphold its democracy in the country,” Azalina added.

Azalina also said that there have been many occasions where elected representatives have not only turned their backs on their political parties but also the grassroots. They include constituents who have struggled to canvas votes for their favoured candidates by going door to door, as well as those who cast their ballots by placing trust in the candidates as representatives of specific political parties and manifestos.

“Many people have asked about what is the meaning of voting if the elected rep can pawn off the people’s mandate after the election,” she said.

“Leaders of my generation should accept that competition between political parties is positive and beneficial to the people if this competition is based on reasonable rules of the game, and not triggered by political parties splitting up.

“Political competition should be noble, and not eliminated or be filled with hatred or chaos,” she said.

She also expressed appreciation to Bersih 2.0 for its research, which has helped the public understand the mechanism for recall elections. – The Vibes, September 1, 2021


TMJ tells Syed Saddiq to ‘jump off KLCC without a parachute’ in latest roast

theVibes.com:

TMJ tells Syed Saddiq to ‘jump off KLCC without a parachute’ in latest roast

Duo has had fractious relationship since Muar MP won seat in GE14


Johor Crown Prince Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim (left) and Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman have on numerous occasions butted heads in the past. – Instagram pics, September 1, 2021

KUALA LUMPUR – Johor Crown Prince Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim has done little to hide his distaste for Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman in the past, but his latest post on Instagram takes the cake.

In a brief caption posted on his account late last night, Tunku Ismail suggested that the only way the Muda leader would get his attention is if he jumped off the Petronas Twin Towers without a parachute.

He was responding to a question from one of his followers on what Syed Saddiq has to do to capture his attention.

“Go jump off KLCC without a parachute,” his reply read.

The question posed to him was one of dozens that Tunku Ismail responded to on Instagram, after he conducted a question-and-answer session on his account last night.

The Vibes has reached out to Syed Saddiq for comments, but has yet to receive a response.


The offending post on Johor Crown Prince Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim’s Instagram. – Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim Instagram pic, September 1, 2021

Tunku Ismail’s remark did not go unnoticed, with Malaysians calling him out on social media, saying it was insensitive and questioning his loathing of Syed Saddiq.

Some challenged Tunku Ismail to enter the political arena and have the courage to compete against Syed Saddiq in elections.

Others pointed out that, even without jumping off KLCC, Syed Saddiq has already got the attention of the Johor crown prince, saying Muar MP is “living rent free” in the latter’s head.

There are also those who said the comment was unfair as if anyone else were to make such remarks against the royalty, they would face repercussions.

Tunku Ismail and Syed Saddiq have not had a cordial relationship since the latter won his Muar seat in the 2018 general election.

In the past, Tunku Ismail had, on a number of occasions hit out at Syed Saddiq, including accusing him of being a “drama queen” after the former youth and sports minister started a crowdfunding campaign to help settle his legal expenses.

His remarks on Syed Saddiq last night was not the only one that got public attention; he also posted a controversial caption saying Johor does not celebrate the country’s National Day as the state never fell under colonial rule.

“In Johor, traditionally, we only wish Independence Day out of respect. But we don’t ‘celebrate’ because in Johor’s history, we were never occupied.

“That is why in Johor, we fly three of our flags and the Jalur Gemilang only during National Day (August 31) and Malaysia Day (September 16). They will fly two weeks before and two weeks after. After that, it will return to normal, with just the Johor and the respective district flags.”

One user questioned Tunku Ismail’s remark, saying Johor had been under British control in 1914, and shared an article on the matter.

In the article, it said Johor was under British rule when the position of the British general adviser in the Johor sultanate then was elevated to the level similar to that of a resident in the Federated Malay States.

“With the newfound status, the general adviser, a post occupied by Douglas Graham Campbell at the time, had control over the reigning Sultan Ibrahim of Johor on all matters except those related to Malay religion and custom,” the article read. – The Vibes, September 1, 2021


SSR condemns threat, sexual harassment against environmental activist Shakila Zen





SSR condemns threat, sexual harassment against activist

Sekretariat Solidariti Rakyat (SSR) has condemned the threat and sexual harassment experienced by young environmental activist Shakila Zen, who has since lodged police reports over the incidents.

SSR said Shakila had received a package from an anonymous sender, which contained a letter threatening an acid attack as well as a replica of a bloody severed hand, on Aug 30.

One day later, she had received a text message via WhatsApp with sexual elements, that had a picture attached about the spread of an indecent poster containing her personal details.

“Shakila believes the harassment and the threats are coming after a video of her talking about the #Lawan rally on July 31 had gone viral on TikTok.

“Even though she is not a part of SSR, yet these threats, intimidation and sexual harassment are completely unacceptable and has crossed a line,” SSR said in a statement today.

SSR said it is a crime to use such intimidation tactics and sexual harassment targeted towards women activists should be especially condemned by the public.

“We look upon this matter seriously and it can become a dangerous norm if we let this continue,” they said, adding that they stand in solidarity with Shakila.

Shakila (above) has since lodged two police reports over the incidents.

Klang Utara deputy district police chief Mohd Khairi Shafie told Malaysiakini that the case is currently being investigated under Section 507 of the Penal Code.

Section 507 deals with criminal intimidation by anonymous communication.

Work of the Dirty Devious Deceitful Duplicitous Double-crossing Devil in Malaysian Politics





Time to return the rakyat's mandate

by Nik Imran Nik Hussein

LETTER | In line with Independence Day today, I recall those glorious days in 2018 when Malaysians as a whole dethroned the Barisan Nasional under the leadership of Najib Abdul Razak.

It was truly a memorable moment and many of us looked forward to a better Malaysia and a time when Anwar Ibrahim would helm the leadership.

Unfortunately, it was a huge mistake for the Pakatan Harapan leadership to place their trust in Dr Mahathir Mohamad and within a short period, he revealed his true colours and our dreams were shattered with the backdoor government’s entry.

As anticipated, the Perikatan Nasional government did not last long and recently paved the way for another very fragile recycled government.

The rakyat never got their mandate back and once again, Anwar was denied the prime minister position.

It was a free-for-all and suddenly we saw Mahathir’s boy, Mohd Shafie Apdal, joining the chorus to lobby for the premiership.

Personally, I felt very distressed over Shafie’s sudden interest and could only conclude that it was the work of none other than Mahathir.

Shafie was merely following instructions and, as everyone knows, Dr Mahathir will do everything he can to stop Anwar from becoming PM.

Shafie personally lost plenty of respect when he suddenly entered the race to be PM, which was clearly evident with what happened with Upko next.

Shafie has no proven track record to be a prime minister as even his leadership of Sabah when he was the CM did not yield many positive results.

As a Sabahan, I did not see any major improvements for the rakyat and the poor were still very much left neglected.

I hope Shafie realises he is being manipulated by Dr Mahathir and stops this nonsense and instead backs Anwar in the coming GE15.

It is time for the rakyat to regain the true mandate and elect a leader whom they truly respect and want, to lead the nation.

Anwar has paid his dues and has given the nation something to hope for. It is time for him to lead.