Thursday, June 04, 2026

Wankee Factoid of Tiananmen Square massacre


From the FB page of:


WHITE MALES: It's sad, but when I say "there was no Tiananmen Square massacre", people sneer, but then I show them cuttings of white males saying the same thing and they believe it. Sigh.






14 comments:

  1. There was a bloody massacre in Beijing on Jun 4 1989 carried out by the People's Liberation Army against protesters who had congregated around Tiananmen Square for weeks before that.

    The courage of The Tank Man standing up to the PLA tanks will be forever on record

    Only CCP Ball Carriers and Arse Lickers like Nutty Vittachi deny that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you remember the Tank Man standing up to the PLA tanks. I'm thus assured that you recall how the leading tank tried several times to manoeuvre around the Tank Man who stood resolutely in front of the tank column. When such a sight ensued, it bespeaks a lot about the attitude of the tank commander, hardly that of soldiers who would massacre their own people.

      Use a bit of logic and don't let your personal prejudice blind you to logic

      Delete
    2. Ah So, I should add Only CCP Ball Carriers and Arse Lickers like Ktemoc deny that massacre in Beijing.

      Delete
    3. wakakaka, so would be anyone who doesn't agree with you

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. Nearly 20 brand-new commercial airplanes, worth a staggering 5 billion euros, are being held hostage on the tarmac because Beijing is losing its patience.

      China’s Civil Aviation Administration is weaponizing red tape, slapping deliberate administrative holds on ready Airbus aircraft destined for Chinese airlines. This is not a manufacturing glitch or a safety oversight. It is a high-stakes, geopolitical shakedown designed to pressure European regulators into fast-tracking the safety validation of China's state-built jet, the COMAC C919.

      The ultimate irony is that while Beijing proudly markets the C919 as a "homegrown" triumph to challenge Western aviation, the plane is largely an empty shell of domestic technology. Experts estimate that a staggering 80% to 90% of the C919’s high-value, critical systems are actually designed and built by Western companies. The aircraft is completely dependent on foreign engineering to even get off the ground, relying on a US-French joint venture for its engines, alongside American and European firms for its avionics, flight controls, and landing gear.

      Despite this total reliance on foreign innovation, Beijing is furious that European safety regulators refuse to be rushed through their meticulous validation process, which could stretch until 2028 or beyond. Because Europe won't cut corners on international safety timelines, China is abusing its massive market power to retaliate. They are holding advanced European planes hostage, proving that in the eyes of the regime, global safety protocols and multi-billion-dollar contracts are completely secondary to strategic dominance.

      #AviationGeopolitics #Airbus #COMAC #C919 #China #EU #TradeWar #AviationSafety

      https://x.com/unveiled_chinax/status/2062558166999789619?s=46&t=8K6fzabO3g6uaj4KxwSSjg

      Delete
    6. this mfering DemoNcratic ball-licker is too highly drowned with those repeated June4 massacres in Tiananmen Square farts to be able to exercise ANY logical thinkings!

      Delete
    7. Mfer, what about the wishy-washy hold-ups of the European regulators into safety validation of China's state-built jet, the COMAC C919?

      Tic for tak mah!

      Besides, if the total reliance on foreign innovation used in C919 stands up to yr mfering fart, then there r even less reasons for the safety approvals by the European regulators.

      Mmmm… perhaps those mfering European regulators know something about the reliabilities of those yankee/europe engines, avionics, flight controls, and landing gear!

      Delete
  2. CCP suppressed an continues to suppress all mention and discussion of what happened in Beijing on 4th June 1989.
    If everything is peachy , including humane attitudes by tank commanders, why is there a total suppression?

    Logic and common sense shows something terrible occured in Beijing on 4th June 1989.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wakakakaka…

      '…suppressed and continues to suppress all mention and discussion of what happened in Beijing on 4th June 1989'

      Mfer, just bcoz u DON'T read about those news within yr fart chamber, yr mfering deductions MUST be the only truth!

      Yr mfering logic & 'common sense' show something terrible occured in Beijing on 4th June 1989 with ur choosing!

      Delete
  3. The Epoch Times is a publication of Falun Gong (also known as Falun Dafa), wakakaka

    ReplyDelete
  4. I asked QWEN how many civilians were killed by the People's Liberation Army in Beijing on 4th June 1989 - it returned an error message and logged me off.

    I asked DeepSeek how many civilians were killed by the People's Liberation Army in Beijing on 4th June 1989 - it returned a "Beyond my area of knowledge" message and asked me to change topic.

    CCP-controlled AI is indeed stupid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooop…mfer, have u tried ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude by Anthropic, Perplexity AI etc for yr search?

      How about this piece searched via DeepSeek, using mandarin connotation:

      File:CIA Archives Chinas Great Leap Forward 1958.webm

      !!!!???

      Either, u DON'T know how to utilize AI searching tools, or u r just simply fart!

      Delete