‘Where is China’ ask delegates at Asian defence forum, as minister, high-ranking officials absent
For the second year running, Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun has given the free-wheeling Singapore security meeting a miss, skipping opportunities to meet US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as well as counterparts from Australia, France, Britain, Japan and other nations. — Reuters pic
Saturday, 30 May 2026 2:44 PM MYT
SINGAPORE, May 30 — The big question hanging over this year’s Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia’s premier defence forum, is: “Where is China?”
For the second year running, Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun has given the free-wheeling Singapore security meeting a miss, skipping opportunities to meet US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as well as counterparts from Australia, France, Britain, Japan and other nations.
In his place, Beijing sent a low-profile delegation of People’s Liberation Army “experts and scholars” - a step down from the usual high-powered presence.
A highlight of the dialogue’s annual programme has been a robust speech by China’s defence minister or senior official laying out Beijing’s defence doctrine and outlook on global tensions. But the speech helmed by China has been dropped from this year’s programme, like in 2025.
Even Hegseth took note.
“I wish my counterpart was here at this conference, but I look forward to other options when we can cross paths and communicate, talk about things where often actions at sea or actions in the air are perceived differently,” he said during his own keynote speech on Saturday.
Australia’s Richard Marles called it a lost opportunity for countries to have frank, face-to-face talks on flashpoints.
Dong Jun however, did meet Hegseth during US President Donald Trump’s visit to China earlier this month.
Zhou Bo, a retired PLA senior colonel and a member of China’s delegation to the meeting, downplayed his absence.
“This is not the first time the defence minister is not attending,” he said. “And academic delegations have come before. But it is true that the level of the delegation is relatively low this time.”
Some analysts point to a more calculated choice: avoiding questions like Taiwan tensions and the effect of military corruption purges on China’s combat readiness.
“My feeling is that they are trying to avoid tough questions,” said Chong Ja Ian, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore.
“The question that comes up with the (Chinese) delegation, since it is so researcher heavy, is their representativeness and authoritativeness.”
Hegseth’s comments on China this year restrained
Diplomats said Beijing may also have wanted to avoid a repeat of last year’s dialogue, when Hegseth described China as a threat in the Indo-Pacific and urged Asian allies to boost defence spending.
Beijing responded at the time by accusing the United States of vilifying China.
This year, Hegseth struck a more measured tone, although he cautioned that “no state, including China, can impose its hegemony and hold the security or prosperity of our nation and our allies in question”.
He added that US-China relations were better than they had been in many years.
China began sending a usually high-powered delegation to the 23-year-old event in 2007. It dispatched its defence minister in 2011 and again in 2019, and continued the practice from 2022 to 2024. The Shangri-La Dialogue was suspended in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bilahari Kausikan, a veteran Singapore diplomat, said the Shangri-La Dialogue was always primarily about anchoring the US in Southeast Asia and ensuring its defense chief comes to Singapore and Southeast Asia at least once a year.
“Whether China is represented by its defence minister is a secondary factor. It would be nice but not essential to have the Chinese defence minister here.” — Reuters
If Eastern Bully keeps snubbing this dialogue then include Taiwan lah in an official capacity, rather than as a non-government participant.
ReplyDeleteWakakaka… has the organizer ball been twisted lah
DeleteKT please allow me a little leeway as the original thread is too far back, I am cutting it here just in case our friend miss this.
DeleteHe said :
"It’s Also A Historical fact that after WW2, Yapan Surrendered to ROC, not CCP gomen. Today the successor gomen to ROC is in Taipei, not BJ."
What’s wrong with that statement?
During the Japanese invasion and WW2 both the communists and KMT fought the Japanese as one China. Japanese surrendered to China/ROC and not KMT. It is not fair for you ignore the sacrifice and the death of the many communists.
KMT does not own China. In a democracy KMT can be voted out and replaced as is now being replaced by DPP, In a revolution the KMT or DPP can also be replaced by the CCP uprising.
Article 4 of ROC constitution clearly described ROC include the territory of mainland China. Technically the PRC and ROC are still in a unfinished civil war fighting over the control of China which include mainland and Taiwan. Today the successor government of ROC is PRC in Beijing not Taipei, ROC doesn’t succeed itself, ROC was defeated and kicked out of mainland in an uncompleted revolution, this is ratified by the UN 193 nations. Signs are showing that the “revolution” will come to an end soon with the end closing of the ROC
China expects to deal with East Asia as a Big Boss, not as a dialogue partner.
ReplyDeleteYes, so? You can only be jealous and complaining. China "is just following" the footstep of your idol the US of A in their actions against the South Americans, against the middle east etc etc, can or not???
Delete