Pages

Friday, December 26, 2025

Belgium joins South Africa's genocide case against Israel at UN court




Belgium has become the latest country to join a case brought by South Africa before the International Court of Justice that accuses Israel of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.


Issued on: 25/12/2025 - 10:28
Modified: 25/12/2025 - 12:05


A pro-Palestinian demonstration in Brussels on 21 January 2024. Belgium is the latest country to join South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the UN's top court. © AFP - NICOLAS MAETERLINCK

By:RFIFollow


The UN's highest court, based in The Hague, said in a statement on Tuesday that Brussels had filed a declaration of intervention.

Belgium's intervention does not mean it fully supports South Africa's accusations, nor that it defends Israel, but that it intends to clarify its interpretation of international law in the context of the case.

By joining the case, Belgium intends to reaffirm its commitment to enforcing the UN treaty on genocide and in particular argue that an ongoing military conflict should not prevent the court establishing whether a war crime had taken place, the country said in its official filing.

Several other countries – including Brazil, Colombia, Ireland, Mexico, Spain and Turkey – have already joined the case.

South Africa brought a case at the United Nations' highest court in December 2023, alleging Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN convention on genocide.

Israel denies the accusation.


'Recognition brings obligation’: How declaring genocide could reshape war in Gaza


A final decision on the core of the case could take years.

In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine.

The orders are legally binding, but the court has no concrete means to enforce them.

Israel has criticised the proceedings and rejected the accusations.


Recognition of Palestine

Belgium was among several countries to recognise the State of Palestine in September – though it said it would not formally take the step until Hamas has been excluded from Palestinian leadership.

Nearly 80 percent of UN member states now recognise Palestinian statehood, including France.
South Africa has long championed the cause of Palestinians, likening their plight to its own oppressed people under apartheid – a comparison Israel strongly rejects.

The United States, Israel's closest ally, has rejected South Africa's case as baseless and cut aid to the country over its land reform policy as well as the genocide claim.

The US has also imposed sanctions on members of the International Criminal Court, which issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, along with former Hamas commander Mohammed Deif.

The US has also imposed sanctions on members of the International Criminal Court



2 comments:

  1. No country has ever been found guilty of committing genocide by an international court such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Genocide was first recognised as a crime under international law in 1946 by the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/96-I).

      It is a specific term coined in 1942 by Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959) and first used in print in his 1944 book, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Since then, many zionists & their sympathizers have purposely reserved that term as the horrific suffering experienced by the WWII Jews under the reign of Nazi Germany.

      ooop… what say u about the holocaust?

      Mmmm… is that WHY now u r switching to NAKBA!!!!

      Do a mfering u, knows that holocaust is an assertion that tragedy happens to the Jewish people as a punishment for their sinfulness BY THE TORAH?

      Not a SINGLE judgment from ICJ on genocide!

      Such a know-nothing fart about ICJ jurisdiction.

      The ICJ doesn't try individuals for war crimes; that's handled by national courts or tribunals like the Nuremberg Trials. The ICJ's role here was about state responsibility and immunity, not prosecuting individual leaders directly.

      In essence, the ICJ's interaction with the legacy of individual country focuses on the legal frameworks of state immunity and international responsibility, rather than retrying war crimes.

      War crimes r been handled by a separately setup TRIBUNAL, ie The Nuremberg Trials.

      FYI, with the conviction of Jean-Paul Akayesu, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) issues the world's first conviction, in an international tribunal, for genocide. Akayesu was judged guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity for acts he engaged in and oversaw as mayor of the Rwandan town of Taba.

      Delete