Pages

Tuesday, April 01, 2025

Australian Zionist Federation Files Complaint in Federal Court Against Journalist for Reporting on Gaza




Consortium News
Volume 30, Number 91 —Tuesday, April 1, 2025


Australian Zionist Federation Files Complaint in Federal Court Against Journalist for Reporting on Gaza


The Zionist Federation of Australia has filed a formal complaint against journalist Mary Kostakidis in federal court after accusing her of anti-semitism for her reporting on X.




Mary Kostakidis appearing on CN Live!, where she has been a frequent guest. (CN Live!)

By Joe Lauria
Special to Consortium News




Prominent journalist Mary Kostakidis is the subject of a formal complaint filed Monday in Melbourne federal court by the Zionist Federation of Australia, which has accused her of anti-semitism for her reporting on Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza.

Four days before filing the complaint, Federation CEO Alon Cassuto was in Israel attending a anti-semitism conference with Issac Herzog, the Israeli president.

Cassuto had filed an initial complaint in July 2024 to the Australian Human Rights Commission about two Kostakidis retweets from January 2024, both of which contain video of a speech by the now Israeli-assassinated Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah in which he allegedly called for the ethnic cleansing of Israel.

In Kostakidis’ retweeted video, the late Hezbollah leader says: “Here, you don’t have future, and from the river to the sea, the land of Palestine is for the Palestinian people and for the Palestinian people only … “

Above this Nasrallah quote in one of her retweets, Kostakidis wrote: “Israeli govt getting some of its own medicine. Israel has started something it can’t finish with this genocide.”

Cassuto claims this is “antisemitic” and wants Kostakidis, who was a long-time presenter on the SBS evening news, to apologize, remove the allegedly offensive materials from her X account; promise not to post similar tweets in future and pay his legal costs.

The two sides entered into mediation but reached an impasse last December. Kostakidis then posted a statement on X in January. She said:


“Six months ago a complaint was filed against me under 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act over posts I made on X sharing a speech of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. A number of highly defamatory and gratuitous comments were made about me by several parties around the time of that filing.

On 11 December I engaged in Mediation with the Complainant at the Australian Human Rights Commission. The matter has not resulted in an agreement.

Consequently I have decided to post the following statement with respect to my posts of Nasrallah’s speech, the offence taken, and accusations I am an antisemite, in the hope that it resolves any dispute.

‘I condemn anti-Semitism and racism of any kind.

I did not, and do not, endorse the content of the speech made by Hassan Nasrallah, which I shared on my X account on 4 and 13 January 2024. I accept that some of his comments may be seen as anti-Semitic but that is not a barrier to reporting them.

To the Jews and/or Israelis in Australia who took my posts as an endorsement, I am sorry for their hurt, distress and pain.’”



Alon Cassuto, CEO of the Australian Zionist Federation, at a press conference on July 14, 2024 in which he announced action against Mary Kostakidis. (Australian Zionist Federation/YouTube)


Cassuto responded on X the next day:

“In July 2024, I lodged a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission against former journalist Mary Kostakidis after she shared a call by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah for Jews to be ethnically cleansed ‘from the river to the sea.’

This rhetoric, from a proscribed terrorist organisation, constitutes unlawful hate speech, deeply offending and intimidating our community. Yesterday, Ms Kostakidis apologised for the hurt she caused and acknowledged that the content of Nasrallah’s speech she reposted was antisemitic.

She did so, while continuing to regularly post deeply offensive content, including conspiracy theories about the firebombed Adass synagogue in Melbourne. As a result, I am considering my options.

Let’s be clear about what Ms Kostakidis’ statement does say: when Hassan Nasrallah declared, ‘Here you don’t have a future. From the river to the sea, Palestine is for the Palestinians only’, it was antisemitic hate speech. Echoing such calls in Australia constitutes unlawful hate speech.”

Kostakidis sent an email statement to Consortium News and later posted a lengthy tweet in response to Cassuto and an article in The Australian newspaper.

She wrote:

“An error both have made is deeming I apologised for my post, which is not the case – I apologised for any distress and hurt it caused. There is a very big difference and I’m surprised The Australian failed in their comprehension of the statement.

Apologising for the post would be an admission I should not have posted the speech, and as such that I would not re offend, so to speak. That is not the case. Journalism cannot be tailored around not causing offence. In this case, the complainant sought legal redress for hurt feelings, which the law permits.

Alon Cassuto asserts Nasrallah’s speech was unlawful, and ‘echoing’ his call is unlawful, thus implying my post was unlawful. I disagree with both assertions.

Another error in his understanding of my statement is that I accepted the excerpt of Nasrallah’s speech ‘was antisemitic’. I in fact stated some of his comments ‘may be seen as’ antisemitic. That is contested, and here is why:

In the clip of the speech I posted Nasrallah did not call for all Jews to leave. He clearly called for dual passport holders to leave. This is an important distinction and goes to the heart of the Middle East conflict.

He is objecting to the long term circumstances that have lead to the genocide – the push to drive Muslim Palestinians out through demographic engineering, with the mass expulsion of Palestinians born there (and rendered stateless), with no right of return, and dual citizenship for Jewish people born anywhere in the world (and, as we know, periodic massacres Israel refers to as ‘mowing the lawn’).

Furthermore, in Julian Assange’s half hour interview of Nasrallah some years ago, the Hezbollah leader articulates his vision for a just peace: one State, where Jews, Muslims and Christians ‘live in peace in a democratic state’ – live together with equal rights. Is that antisemitic? It is certainly anti- Israel. Is being anti-Israel unlawful?



Hassan Nasrallah during a discussion with Iranian officials in 2019. (Khamenei.ir, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)


That goes to the heart of the push to redefine antisemitism to include criticism or rejection of the apartheid state which at present is conducting a genocide.

With regard to the offence at the phrase From the River to the Sea, Israel also uses that phrase, enshrined in law — sovereignty only for Jews from the River to the Sea, and it was the stated policy of the Likud Party since its inception.

Zionists take umbrage at any other party daring to make assertions they regard as their own exclusive God given right. This is not what was granted to Israel in 1948 and they have ignored every UN Resolution since with respect to their creeping land theft.

Since this complaint against me was lodged, there have been 2 Findings/Orders issued by the ICJ confirming the illegality of the occupation, and ICC arrest warrants issued. Israel and its supporters have deemed the ICJ, ICC, UN Secretary General, UN Rapporteur, Amnesty Int’l, HRW, B’Tselem, and The Pope among others are all antisemites, so I am in good company. …

We have all shared Israeli leaders’ far worse comments in regard to the Palestinians — threats they are actually carrying out.

Can you imagine how distressed Palestinian Australians are at the comments of Israeli leaders? No one gives that a thought. Palestinians all over the world have to worry about more than their own feelings. Their families may be under rubble, not counted in what is likely now a grossly inadequate death count.”



Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief of Consortium News and a former U.N. correspondent for The Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, and other newspapers, including The Montreal Gazette, the London Daily Mail and The Star of Johannesburg. He was an investigative reporter for the Sunday Times of London, a financial reporter for Bloomberg News and began his professional work as a 19-year old stringer for The New York Times. He is the author of two books, A Political Odyssey, with Sen. Mike Gravel, foreword by Daniel Ellsberg; and How I Lost By Hillary Clinton, foreword by Julian Assange.


16 comments:

  1. If everyone has a home there will be peace.

    Russians have Russia
    Spanish have Spain
    French have France
    Chinese have China
    Malays have Malaysia
    Thais have Thailand
    Indians have India
    Japanese have Japan
    Germans have Germany
    Arabs have Saudi, Iraq, Mesir, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Qatar, Emirates, Yemen, Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon, Syria, Abu Dhabi, Sudan, Jordan….thats 99,5% of the land mass of Middle East and North Africa.

    Any reason why Jews cannot have a home called Israel, only 0,5%?

    Ishmael already inherited 99,5% but still want to rampas Isaac’s 0,5%?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Palestinians? Jews should have stayed back in Germany, Poland, Ukraine and Russia

      Delete
    2. Malays have Malaysia!

      Mfer, what happened to the Nons who r the key economic providers of M'sia?

      The Nons r been treated as 2nd & 3rd class pariah. Why cant they be treated as equal?

      There lies yr mfering lie of zionist fart!

      Delete
    3. The King of Jordan already declared….Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine. The Queen of Jordan is Palestinian. Most Palestinians living in Jordan have Jordanian citizenship. Ditto those living in Judah and Samaria. But UNWRA, the special UN agency created for pampered refugees register these Jordanians and their descendants as refugees, having the Right to Return to Haifa. Ridiculous. My fren Nguyen Kim Phuong born in Melbourne and have Oz citizenship have no Right to Returm to Haiphong and claim her grandfathers house.

      Delete
    4. "... pampered refugees ..."??? C'mon lah!

      Delete
    5. From UNRWA:

      Following the 1948 War, UNRWA was established by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 302 (IV) of 8 December 1949 to carry out direct relief and works programmes for Palestine refugees. The Agency began operations on 1 May 1950.

      In the absence of a solution to the Palestine refugee problem, the General Assembly has repeatedly renewed UNRWA's mandate, most recently extending it until 30 June 2026.

      UNRWA is funded almost entirely by voluntary contributions from UN Member States

      Delete
    6. There are more than 6 million Palestinian “refugees” registered by UNWRA. Most are children and grandchildren of the original lot that either chose to leave or advised to leave Israel in 1948. Some like the famous model Gigi Hadid are American citizens, but still a “refugee”. YaserArafat was born in Egypt and was Egyptian citizen. But want to kacau Israel.

      Delete
    7. “In the absence of a solution to the Palestine refugee problem, the General Assembly has repeatedly renewed UNRWA's mandate, most recently extending it until 30 June 2026.“

      Every single solution proposed since 1948 have been rejected by the Palestinians, including the two-state one. The only solution acceptable to them is the “final solution” ie “From the River to the Sea”.

      Delete
    8. rejected?

      Wow… aint yr beloved zionist state consistently refused to recognize UN resolution for the establishment of Palestine state.

      United Nations Resolution 181, resolution passed by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly in 1947 that called for the partition of Palestine into Arab and Jewish states, with the city of Jerusalem as a corpus separatum (Latin: “separate entity”) to be governed by a special international regime.
      The zionist state announced their intention to take all necessary measures to prevent the implementation of the resolution. A civil war broke out in Palestine, and the plan was not implemented. In 1948, 85% of the Palestinians living in the areas that became the state of Israel became refugees.

      Delete
  2. Palestinians have Jordan and Gaza. But in Jordan they killed the King and in Gaza they continued to wage war. King Abdullah 1 was killed by a Palestinian in Al Aqsa mosque Jerusalem in 1951 which was then under Jordanian control. The Arabs (Palestinians) who chose to stay in Israel after 1948 are now full fledged Israeli citizens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Full fledged Israeli citizens in name ONLY, with existence worse than gentile, heathen, infidel, pagan!

      Delete
  3. Everybody want to fight for Palestinian home. But nobody fight for Kurds, Yazidis, Druids. Zostastrian and other minorities in ME. No protes in western universities. Why is that? I can suggest answer - no Jews involved there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, u dont know the depth of rejected european Judas' trickery!

      Delete
  4. The West Bank (Judea and Samaria) was annexed by Jordan in 1950 until 1988. Why didn’t they give it to the Palestinians and grant them independence? Why didn’t the West & OIC put pressure on Jordan then? Let me suggest the answer - because no Jews involved then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same same as shoved!

      Mfer, it's better for u to reverse back to c&p. U r doing a lousy job.

      Delete