US recognizes opposition candidate González as the winner of Venezuela’s presidential election

 

US recognizes opposition candidate González as the winner of Venezuela’s presidential election

The stakes grew higher for Venezuela’s electoral authority to show proof backing its decision to declare President Nicolás Maduro the winner of the country’s presidential election after the United States on Thursday recognized opposition candidate Edmundo González as the victor, discrediting the official results of the vote.

The U.S. announcement followed calls from multiple governments, including close allies of Maduro, for Venezuela’s National Electoral Council to release detailed vote counts, as it has done during previous elections.

The electoral body declared Maduro the winner Monday, but the main opposition coalition revealed hours later that it had evidence to the contrary in the form of more than two-thirds of the tally sheets that each electronic voting machine printed after polls closed.

“Given the overwhelming evidence, it is clear to the United States and, most importantly, to the Venezuelan people that Edmundo González Urrutia won the most votes in Venezuela’s July 28 presidential election,” U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement.

Maduro responded with a quick admonishment: “The United States needs to keep its nose out of Venezuela!” — AP News

Our Take: There we have it. The ultimate reverse indicator.

I hope this serves as a potent reminder to those who immediately regurgitated globalist talking points coming out of Venezuela regarding a "stolen election," and using 15-second videos of SpAntifa thugs burning stuff, known gang members lobbing threats and out-of-context images of big crowds as their only evidence.

As I've been saying since the very first thing I wrote in the Info War, it is FAR easier and more useful for the purposes of awakening to hunt down falsehoods, contradictions and logical fallacies than it is to "discover" truth through a digital kaleidoscope of Fifth-Gen Warfare deployments.

Reverse or negative indicators abound in the Info War.

When ALL of the worst people, figures and apparatus start saying the same thing, in unison, the opposite stance might not be entirely accurate, BUT ... it's a much better place to start than marching in lockstep with a regime bent on your continued subjugation and stupefaction.

But then, perhaps this sentiment is best expressed via a loose timeline:

In 2016, they told you the election was stolen.

In 2020, they told you the election was "fortified."

In 1995 & 2002, they told you the elections of Saddam Hussein were "show elections." What followed was the 2003 invasion of a sovereign nation by western terrorists, a literal show trial by an Iraqi court installed by the US and an execution of a sovereign leader who had threatened the petrodollar.

In 2011, Muammar Gaddafi warned that the "Arab Spring" movement was a color revolution after threatening the petrodollar's hegemony. He was dragged through the streets, sodomized with bayonets and killed. Hillary Clinton infamously cackled in delight over these events. Years of Obama-funded bloodshed ensued.

In 2014, the Obama and CIA-backed Maidan Revolution culminated in the ousting of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and the genocide of ethnic Russians in the Donbas.

In 2024, Ah, never mind. I'm sure they're telling us the truth about Venezuela now ...

And the US come November. — Burning Bright