Pages

Tuesday, October 04, 2022

Halt criminal cases against politicians until new AG appointed, says Zaid




Halt criminal cases against politicians until new AG appointed, says Zaid


Zaid Ibrahim says allegations about the judiciary and selective prosecution by former attorney-general Tommy Thomas have the potential to bring the justice system into disrepute.


PETALING JAYA: Former law minister Zaid Ibrahim has called for all pending criminal prosecutions against politicians to be suspended until a new attorney-general (AG) is appointed.

Zaid said the investigation into potentially criminal elements contained in a book authored by former AG Tommy Thomas raised concerns of selective prosecution.


He said the alleged inaction by Thomas’ successor, Idrus Harun, did not help the situation.

“Pending the appointment of a new AG, which is bound to take place after the coming general election, all high-profile cases ought to be suspended,” he said.

These include the cases against Lim Guan Eng (DAP), Syed Sadiq Syed Abdul Rahman (Muda) as well as Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Shahrir Samad (both Umno), he said in an interview with FMT.

On Friday, Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob said a special task force formed to study Thomas’ memoirs had narrowed down potentially offensive material contained in the book to four main issues.

Among them were allegations about the improper appointment of judges and various other abuses by Thomas of his powers, which Zaid said included instances of selective prosecution.

“Those two issues are extremely troubling as they have the potential to bring the justice system into disrepute,” said Zaid.

On Idrus, he said the current AG has also done nothing to inspire confidence in Malaysia’s system of justice.

He said this was clear during Najib Razak’s SRC International criminal trial and appeals.

“Everyone knows trial judge Nazlan Ghazali ought to have recused himself from hearing the trial as he was biased and under a serious conflict of interests,” he said.

He said it was now “public knowledge” that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) had issued a report confirming Nazlan’s conflict of interest.

“That report was submitted to AG Idrus Harun three months ago. Its contents, which were subsequently leaked on the internet, have never been denied by the AG or MACC.

“On top of that, MACC’s chief commissioner, Azam Baki, confirmed last week that investigations into the matter had been completed and that the final report had been submitted to the AG,” he said.

“Despite this, the AG has not said a word on the matter.”

The senior lawyer said it was more than likely that a combination of “Thomas’ indiscretions” and “Idrus’ inaction” had resulted in Najib Razak being “denied his constitutional right to a fair trial, wrongly convicted and languishing in jail”.

“Unfortunately, the failure of our justice system means that the burden of addressing this matter falls on the Yang di-Pertuan Agong via a petition of clemency,” he said, adding that he trusts that the King would exercise his wisdom in the most appropriate way “to correct this grave injustice”.

Zaid also pointed to the “negative perception” created among members of the public by Idrus’ unexplained withdrawal of charges against Baling MP Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahman.

“This clearly shows the deplorable state of affairs in our justice system,” he said.

“We cannot allow our justice system to be hijacked by any party for use as their political tool.

“A brief moratorium pending review by the next AG of all criminal cases involving politicians will go a long way towards reducing tensions in preparation for the coming elections.”


4 comments:

  1. There is this tiny any that Zaid Ibrahim has been trying to boost up into an elephant, purely politicising.

    There is NO evidence that Judge Nazlan should have refused himself.
    The MACC investigation was triggered by RPK hot air.
    At the time the story was, "The allegation must be investigated by MACC"... fair enough, but everything else that has been added upon is just hot air

    ReplyDelete
  2. Zaid is essentially saying the Agong MUST extend the royal pardon to Najib because of what Zaid contends was a "grave injustice" meted to Najib.

    I wonder what is driving Zaid on his crusade to defend Najib. He seems bent on casting aspersions on the independence of the judiciary in general and in the Federal Court in particular with the Najib appeal being dismissed.

    I hope the Agong will decide Najib's appeal for a royal pardon very soon so that the issue of Najib attending parliament becomes moot either way.

    Frankly, allowing Najib to attend parliament despite being a convict, will not reflect well on Malaysia's justice system nor parliament.

    ReplyDelete
  3. notice only umno is insisting a probe as they say to get even with tommy for prosecuting their national embarrassment to fire up their bases ala adip

    in other parts of the globe they would be probing the culprits and wrongdoers but in our country they're investigating the messenger instead

    zaid has to say something to secure a seat

    ReplyDelete