Pages

Wednesday, April 08, 2020

Navy Secretary Thomas Modly fell on his sword


FMT:


US Navy chief quits over handling of virus outbreak on ship


Modly says the Roosevelt’s captain had betrayed his service and may have been ‘too naive or too stupid’

AP pic

WASHINGTON: US Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly resigned Tuesday over his mishandling of an outbreak of the coronavirus on the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier, Defence Secretary Mark Esper announced.

Modly stepped down five days after removing the Roosevelt’s captain, Brett Crozier, for writing a letter – that was leaked to the media – describing the virus-struck vessel’s dire situation and alleging the Pentagon was not paying adequate attention to it.

The removal of Crozier, respected in the military and popular with his crew, was seen as heavy-handed and decided too quickly, before an investigation was carried out.


Modly sparked outrage Monday after he flew from Washington to Guam, where the warship is docked, to defend his actions to the crew.

In a forceful, profanity-laced speech, he accused Crozier of “betrayal”, called him “too naive or too stupid” and suggested the sailors’ love for him was misplaced.

😠😠😠

Hours later, back in Washington, Modly issued an apology, but President Donald Trump publicly questioned Crozier’s treatment and said he would get directly involved.

Modly “resigned of his own accord, putting the Navy and the sailors above self so that the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and the Navy as an institution, can move forward”, Esper said in a statement.

Esper said Modly’s replacement as acting Navy secretary will be current Army Undersecretary Jim McPherson, a retired admiral.


Ship captain’s letter sparked ‘panic’

Modly was the second navy chief to depart in just over four months.

In November, Esper fired Navy secretary Richard Spencer after he pushed back against Trump’s protection of Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher, who had been charged with war crimes and convicted of lesser charges.

Gallagher was demoted and was to lose his identity as a member of the elite SEAL corps until Trump stepped in, drawing accusations that he was undermining the authority of the military leadership by condoning Gallagher’s behaviour.

But that case, according to some analysts, put pressure on Trump to also give some support to

Crozier, whose career was spotless.


Captain Brett Crozier
(Note: Navy Captain is equivalent to an Army full colonel) 

The navy veteran had written a letter to his superiors in late March complaining of an uncontrolled Covid-19 outbreak among the Roosevelt’s 4,800 crew, and called on the Pentagon to allow him to vacate the nuclear-powered ship and sterilise it.

“The spread of the disease is ongoing and accelerating,” Crozier wrote.

“We are not at war. Sailors do not need to die.”
The letter was published by the San Francisco Chronicle, a leak Esper and Modly insinuated was deliberate and violated the Pentagon’s chain of command.

Crozier “demonstrated extremely poor judgment in the middle of a crisis” in his handling of the letter, Modly said.

“It misrepresented the facts of what was going on the ship” and created “a little bit of panic” that was unnecessary, he said.

Still, the Roosevelt has been docked for 11 days in Guam so the crew, with well over 100 confirmed coronavirus cases, can be tested and the vessel cleaned.


USS Theodore Roosevelt 

Trump said Tuesday that he was not involved in Modly’s departure, but said Crozier was wrong for writing the letter and that Modly “probably shouldn’t have said quite what he said”.

“I didn’t speak to him but he did that, I think, just to end that problem,” he said of Modly’s resignation.


Related:

(1) US aircraft carrier or virus carrier?

(2) As predicted re Commander of US aircraft carrier.

(3) End of the road for Captain Brett Crozier USN.

(4) Pentagon's hypocrisy on aircraft carrier's covid case met with signature campaign.

(5) Sacking of aircraft carrier hurts crew morale, fuels community mistrust.

3 comments:

  1. us hv a president that care for whistleblower for benefit of their people, unlike ccp n umno that treat whistleblower like criminal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mfer, read AGAIN since yr understanding of England is sub oar!

      “demonstrated extremely poor judgment in the middle of a crisis”

      Sums up adequately what meet like u & those us politics handle critical issues - just shot from the mouth!

      Delete
    2. So what happened to whistle blowers like Assange and Snowden ? Hehehehe...the US still have a President that "care for whistleblower for the benefit of their people" ? Aiyoo..just go for your dangdut lah...hehehe

      Delete