Pages

Thursday, November 28, 2019

What price's Malaysia's honour, and Mahathir's so-called 'dignity'?


MM Online:



The former Communist Party of Malaya secretary-general known as Chin Peng but born Ong Boon Hua was last photographed celebrating his 85th birthday at a Bangkok hotel on October 14, 2009

Picture by Debra Chong

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 27 — Datuk Ngeh Khoo Ham has asked Putrajaya today if the previous Barisan Nasional (BN) administration had violated the terms of the three-way peace treaty with the Malaysian and Thai governments, as well as the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), known as the Hat Yai Accord.

Speaking in the Dewan Rakyat, the DAP MP said this was in relation to former CPM secretary-general Chin Peng’s failed bid to enter Malaysia, after the then government banned him from entering the country.

“Deputy Speaker, I intend to only ask the government one thing. Is it true that the Malaysian government under BN had violated an agreement which was inked between the government and the Communist on December 2, 1989, when the peace treaty between the government and the Communist Party was signed?”

“I would like to read this agreement, as it is only four paragraphs. And I would like to get an explanation from the government, so that Malaysians know truthfully, what was agreed upon, and that we can understand that the ashes of the late Chin Peng was brought back according to facts,” he added.


Notorious for breaking international agreement-treaties and local promises for his own interests, he has no scruples nor qualms about doing so

Eg. Hat Yai Peace treaty 1989, Extradition Treaty with India, refusing to sign Rome Statue, ICERD and blatantly refusing to honour Pakatan pre-GE14 manifesto promises including handing over PM-position to Anwar Ibrahim, accepting UMNO frogs into his PRIBUMI etc etc etc

he is so shameless, thick-skin and emptied of 'Malay dignity' (bearing in mind he is NOT a true Malay, wakakaka) that he has the brazen nerve to say of the manifesto:

“We thought we were going to lose. We put in tough things in the manifesto so that if we lose, the (BN) government would be in a quandary (after winning the polls).

“But now, we are the government. We are victims of our own manifesto.”


Mahathir: “We thought we were going to lose. We put in tough things in the manifesto so that if we lose, the (BN) government would be in a quandary (after winning the polls). 


1. Badmouthed Tunku, 2. Sabo Ku Li, 3. Incarcerated opposition in Ops Lalang but mainly to frighten his own UMNO wannabe 'challengers', 4. Jailed Anwar on dodgy charge, 5. Undermined AAB kaukau - & there's more, wakakaka 

The Beruas MP then used his floor time to pose the question, in which he also raised one of the agreement’s terms, on allowing CPM members to live in Malaysia.

Among the terms of the Hat Yai Accord signed on December 2, 1989, CPM members who laid down their arms would be allowed to return to their homeland if they wanted.

Among the communist party members allowed home included its chairman Abdullah CD, though Malaysia had routinely denied Chin the same courtesy.


The Sitiawan-born former guerrilla fighter had launched a legal campaign to be allowed back into Malaysia in 2009, but lost his bid in the Federal Court in 2010.

He had lived a reclusive life in exile, mostly in Bangkok, Thailand, where he died on September 16, 2013, but the BN government also blocked efforts to bring his cremated remains back into the country.

News emerged yesterday, however, that his ashes have been brought into country and scattered at undisclosed locations near his birthplace.


While debating the Ministry of Defence’s allocation in Budget 2020, Ngeh also reminded the government on the image Malaysia would have globally, if it breaks international agreements which it had jointly signed.

“Why didn’t we follow the agreed terms? If we cannot follow an international agreement, to me, this is not good for Malaysia, as Malaysia’s name will be bad. And the agreement inked by us, if we don’t follow it, truly, people would not trust our integrity and our honesty,” Ngeh added.

In 2013, the late DAP leader Karpal Singh had also raised similar sentiments, lamenting that Putrajaya’s refusal to allow former Chin Peng — born Ong Boon Hua — to be buried in his Perak hometown, was a stain on the country’s honour.

The then Opposition party chairman chided the federal government for breaking the peace deal it inked 30 years ago in Hat Yai with the CPM and the Thai government that put an end to the decades-long guerrilla war that threatened the two South-east Asian nations’ democracy and economic growth.


COMMENT by Terence Netto in Malaysiakini's
Rahim Noor injects sense into ashes row:

Former
 Inspector-General of Police Abdul Rahim Mohd Noor has weighed in on the debate – firmly on the side of us keeping our solemn commitments as outlined in an international peace agreement.

Chin Peng, longtime Secretary-General of the Communist Party of Malaya, was denied entry into Malaysia and now that he is dead, his ashes are barred from being brought into the country for interment, presumably at the Chinese cemetery in the village of Pundut, in Lumut, where the graves of the CPM leader’s parents lie.

The disbarments, according to Rahim Noor (photo above), are in violation of the Hatyai Peace Accords signed in December 1989 between the governments of Malaysia, Thailand and CPM.

If it wasn’t for the fact that former IGP was the man who headed the Malaysian team in the negotiations that led to the Hatyai Peace Accords, his opinion that we are making an international “laughing stock” of ourselves in refusing Chin Peng’s ashes to be interred here would not have mattered, given the nature of the public debate, suffused as so many things are in Malaysia with racist sentiment.

Rahim has weighed in the public debate on the sanest side possible in this wrangle. This is the side of the letter of the Hatyai agreement that brought peace to the Malaysia-Thailand border, the focal area, between 1960 and 1989, of the conflict between communist terrorists belonging to the CPM and Malaysian and Thai security forces.

As Special Branch head at the time of accords with the CPM and as the government’s lead negotiator, Rahim should know the terms and conditions of the Hatyai agreement.

If there is anybody who can hold forth authoritatively on the contentious matter of whether Chin Peng had a right to come back to Malaysia and, now that he has died, have his ashes buried in his hometown of Sitiawan, it is Rahim.

Rahim said the government was in violation of the agreement when it barred Chin Peng from returning to Malaysia as the former Secretary General of the CPM desired and, when he was baulked, petitioned the Malaysian courts for recourse.

The courts upheld the government’s bar on Chin Peng’s return and now the government thumbs its nose further at the Hatyai accords by barring the entry of the CPM leader’s ashes.

Rahim believes in keeping his word

Rahim’s opinion that the government is behaving less than honourably is the more remarkable because he has appeared in recent years at public forums organised by Perkasa, the Malay right wing group that is prominent among the voices defending the government’s disbarments of Chin Peng.

At least, Rahim believes in keeping his word and in the government keeping theirs, but the NGO Rahim has seen fit to patronize does not.


Today in NST's
Group that brought Chin Peng's ashes back to Malaysia slammed, we read that:

PVATM president Datuk Sharuddin Omar said there was no need to bring back Chin Peng’s ashes as the former communist leader had chosen to live in Thailand and become a Thai national. [...]

“Moreover, the peace treaty between PKM and the government in 1989 stated that Chin Peng had agreed to stay in Thailand, where he died six years ago,” he said.


This bloke must be utterly stupid, ignorant or issuing fake news. As we all know (except Sharuddin Omar, wakakaka) Chin Peng was denied entry back into Malaysia as per the Hat Yai Peace Accords (1989), because a "someone" who has a notoriety for violating International Treaties-Agreements and local promises to the rakyat, reneged on the terms of above-mention Peace Accord which allows Chin Peng to return home to Sitiawan, thus Chin Peng was forced to stay in Thailand - thanks to the generosity and compassion of the Thai government, unlike a renegade Malaysian government at that time.

And as we have shown above, even former IGP Rahim Noor said so in support of the return of Chin Peng to Sitiawan Malaysia in accordance with the Tripartite signed Peace Treaty (Malaysia, Thailand and The now-defunct CPM). He also said (as reported by The Star):

"... the Hat Yai agreement was signed on Nov 21 1989. There were two agreements - the main agreement signed in public and the other from Thailand as the communist was based in Thailand. Chin Peng and Rashid Maidin represented the CPM. The secondary agreement was about administrative arrangements for them to return."

"One was signed by me as director of Special Branch and as one of the representatives from Malaysia and by CPM people including Chin Peng and Rashid Maidin."

"Both agreements covered everybody including men from the lowest ranking (people’s army) until the highest. It covered everyone including Chin Peng. We kept our promises and CPM kept their part of the bargain. The Thai government also kept their agreement with the communist. There was a separate agreement between CPM and Thailand. They (the Thais) give them a lot of things in their territory. They gave land equivalent to six acres. Thailand even gave them PR status. I am not sure whether they got citizenship. They also gave them seeds and life stock. I am not sure whether they gave allowance, like we did."

"We were lucky in this whole issue; earlier Thailand had not bothered about the problem. Their National Security Council perceived the CPM as our problems."

"The meeting in Hat Yai only started after we discussed with the Thais and their National Security Council. They also had their own problems at the border. Not only were they facing the communist problem but also the Islamic (threat) in Southern Thailand."

"On Chin Peng's application to come back, I think as the agreement covered all, Chin Peng under the agreement is entitled to come back. According to the agreement, he was given one year to decide if he wanted to come back or not."


Rahim added: "We (Malaysia) are making an international “laughing stock” of ourselves in refusing Chin Peng’s ashes to be interred here."

And Mariam Mokhtar narrated in MySinChew.com's Even in death, Chin Peng still stirs strong emotions (extracts only):

... when World War II broke out, the British made contact with Chin Peng, through their commandos in Force 136. They gathered intelligence behind enemy lines, and started a guerrilla war, to fight the Japanese who had conquered Malaya, Singapore and East Asia.


Head of SOE's Force 136 (Malaya) Col John Davis DSO, CBE (center) with Force 136 (Malaya) Tham Sian Yen (left), and Wu Chye Sin, in Singapore, September 1945. (BBC)

The Japanese army and their Kempeitai caused untold suffering to the residents of Malaya. Attractive girls were selected to become comfort women for the army and scores of thousands of able-bodied men were forced to build the infamous death railway to Burma. Very few returned.


Lim Bo Seng - the freedom-fighter who was tasked to establish Force 136, a guerrilla task force backed by Special Operations Executive (SOE). However, he was captured by Japanese forces and died while interred. After the war, he is remembered as a war hero in Singapore.

Lim Bo Seng was the head of the Labour Services Corps and he provided the British government with labourers for the war effort before the Japanese invasion. When the Japanese troops began advancing towards Singapore from Malaya, he and his men attempted to destroy the Causeway.

Right before Singapore fell, Lim Bo Seng left his seven children to his wife and went to India. He trained to fight in the jungle and later recruited resistance fighters for Force 136, which was a special operations force formed by the British in June 1942 to infiltrate and attack enemy lines.

After Lim Bo Seng had organised everything in China and India, he sent the first batch of Force 136 agents to Japanese-occupied Malaya in 1943 to set up an an intelligence network in the urban areas in Pangkor, Lumut, Tapah and Ipoh. To avoid detection by the Japanese, secret messages were smuggled in empty tubes of toothpaste, salted fish and even in the Force 136’s members’ own diaries. Lim Bo Seng even pretended to be a businessman at checkpoints under disguise. He also had an alias, Tan Choon Lim.

He was betrayed and died in prison.
Lai Teck, one of Force 136’s members who was a triple agent between Force 136, the British and Japanese, betrayed Force 136 and Lim Bo Seng. He leaked out valuable information that allowed the Japanese to pick up coded messages from Force 136.

In March 1944, Lim Bo Seng was captured by the Japanese. Even when he was being cruelly tortured by the Japanese, Lim Bo Seng refused to reveal the names of the people who worked with him against the Japanese. In prison, he often shared his food with the other prisoners. Unfortunately, the lack of food and unhealthy living conditions in the prison made him very ill. On 29 June 1944, he died in Batu Gajah jail in Perak at the young age of 35.

He has his own memorial.
The Lim Bo Seng Memorial at Esplanade Park is a tribute to Major-General Lim Bo Seng. On 13 January 1946, the British brought Lim’s remains to Singapore and reburied him with full military honours at MacRitchie Reservoir, where his grave still lies today.

There is a 3.6-metre-high octagonal pagoda made of bronze, concrete and marble which is the only structure in Singapore that commemorates an individual from World War II. The pagoda has a three-tiered bronze roof, with four bronze lions at the base. Do take the time to read the four bronze plaques that give an interesting account of Lim’s life in English, Chinese, Tamil and Jawi (Malay).

After the war, King George VI, honoured Chin Peng with two campaign medals and an Order of the British Empire (OBE) for his services to the Crown in Japanese occupied Malaya. He refused to accept the honours, because he was aware that these enticements would have meant he would have to disband his fighters in the Malayan Peoples Anti-Japanese Army (MPAJA).


Order of the British Empire (OBE) 

Soon after the surrender of the Japanese, the British returned to re-establish their hold on the nation. The threat of civil unrest was real. There was terrible hardship in the land.

According to Chin Peng's account of 'The Emergency', in his book, "My Side of History", people were starving, they wanted jobs, they wanted rice to feed their families. Food supplies were running out and prices soared, because of corruption.


He claimed that on 21 October 1945, British troops fired live rounds on tens of thousands of demonstrators in Sungai Siput, Ipoh, and Batu Gajah. This fuelled the simmering discontent of the local population against the returning British.


Instead of organising national resistance against the British, the CPM sought to influence the population using moderation and respect for order. They encouraged the formation of people's committees, clubs, unions and organisations for workers, including young women and youths. [...]

... will Malay nationalists, demand that the friends and colleagues who brought Chin Peng's ashes back home, be punished?

How will they justify this, especially as the majority of Malaysians, are furiously against the repatriation of ISIS fighters? Some of the al-Qaeda and ISIS inspired Malaysian terrorists are chemical engineers and explosive experts, who will bomb nightclubs to kill and maim innocent civilians. They intend to kidnap tourists or westerners and decapitate them. Others want to use anthrax, to kill people.


Yazid Sufaat reputed to be unrepentant and the MOST DANGEROUS MAN in Malaysia - now released by police and residing in Ampang

and clowns are making noises over the ashes of Chin Peng
  

After a peace treaty was brokered by the Thai government, and signed by the Malaysian government, the Thai authorities and the CPM in Hadyai, in 1987, the former CPM guerillas were allowed to return to Malaysia, given Malaysian citizenship and reintegrated into society; however, Chin Peng was forbidden from entering Malaysia.

When he died at 88, in Bangkok, on 16 September 2013, Chin Peng's funeral was attended by retired generals of the Thai army and a former Thai prime minister, but his ashes were not allowed to be interred in his ancestral grave, in Sitiawan. Some Umno-Baru politicians claimed that he had left a trail of bloodshed, and they did not want people to make his tomb a shrine.

How do some nationalists justify the memorial which was built in Kedah, in March 2019, to honour the "Japanese heroes", who invaded Malaya? In the Japanese Imperial conquest of Malaya, Borneo and the Far East in WWII, millions died, and 200,000 civilians perished in the Nanking Massacre.



Anger as wartime memorial in Malaysia calls Japanese troops 'heroes'

History, as it is taught in our schools, needs a revamp. Education Minister, Dr Maszlee Malik must present our children with both sides of the story and let them figure out why things happened.

Chin Peng went from liberator, to public enemy.

Then, from The Malaysian Insider via OneWorldTalk's What price Malaysia’s honour?:

by Debra Chong
Malaysia Insider 4 Dec 2009

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 – Twenty years ago today, Malaysia made a pact to put an end to an armed conflict that was costing incalculable damage to lives and the country’s economy.

The two-document deal, inked in a small hotel in Hatyai, bore the names of Malaysia’s highest-level government officials, their Thai counterparts and the leaders of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM).

The first document, termed the “Agreement Between The Government Of Malaysia And The Communist Party Of Malaya To Terminate Hostilities” was signed by the then home affairs ministry’s secretary-general Datuk Wan Sidek Wan Abdul Rahman, chief of defence forces General Tan Sri Hashim Mohd Ali and police inspector-general (IGP) Tan Sri Haniff Omar.

A second document, detailing the terms and conditions of the peace treaty, was signed by then deputy IGP Datuk Rahim Noor and the director of Special Branch (SB) Datuk Zulkifli Abdul Rahman on behalf of Malaysia and Chin Peng, the CPM secretary-general, and central committee comrade, Rashid Maidin, on the same day and in front of the Thai government.




former IGP Rahim Noor 

The three-way treaty, also known as the Hatyai Peace Accord, was met with international support then.

In a nutshell, the two countries agreed to stop hunting down CPM members, who had been waging a jungle war against the governments for over 40 years.

The guerrillas were allowed to settle down and live peacefully in a country of their choice and their slates wiped cleaned.

In return, they must dispose off their weapons and swear to be loyal to King and country and follow the rule of law.

But today, the Federal government has gone back on its word in its repeated refusal to allow Sitiawan-born Chin Peng to return home and, in the process, may have caused irrevocable damage to Malaysia’s reputation as a democratic country.

Article 3 on the one-page first document states: “Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are of Malaysian origin and who wish to settle down in MALAYSIA, shall be allowed to do so in accordance with the laws of Malaysia.”

In the second document, the terms are laid out more clearly for those who want to live in Malaysia.

Ex-CPM members have a one-year grace period to decide where they want to live: in Malaysia, Thailand or elsewhere and arrangements shall be made to fulfil their wishes.

The Malaysian government is to supply the necessary identity cards to those who want to return; and shall replace the documents for those who lost theirs, after verification.

Chin Peng, who has since reclaimed his given birth name of Ong Boon Hua, had applied to return to Malaysia, which the IGP Haniff acknowledged in an NST report dated April 28, 1991.

“Chin Peng submitted his application quite late ... towards the end of the period,” the English daily quoted him saying then.

On Sept 9 that same year, NST reported then Special Branch director Datuk Zulkifli Abdul Rahman as saying Chin Peng’s application “was being processed” and would be given the same treatment as the rest, after announcing that the first batch of 13 ex-CPM members had returned home.

The next day, IGP Haniff was reported saying Chin Peng’s application was being “studied.”

In the end, the cops denied the communist leader had ever put in his application to return.


Chin Peng mooted a suit in 2005 that also failed when the Federal Court upheld two lower court judgments requiring him to produce his birth certificate to prove his citizenship claim, despite his argument that he had lost them during World War II when he left home to fight the Japanese army.

The Malaysian Insider recently received a bundle of documents from Chin Peng’s lawyers, including copies of declassified information, which showed the government flipping and flopping over his status in the years that followed the signing of the deal.

Among them were documents to support his claims to having been born here, such as his parents’ Malaysian citizenship papers, his mother’s Malaysian passport and his only son’s Malaysian birth certificate.

Yes, what about MCP leaders like, for example, Syed Hamid Ali and Shamsiah Faekah who were allowed back into Malaysia to settle down as Malaysian citizens? Did they have still have identification papers showing their citizenship? Did they spilled Malaysian blood?


Yet Ong Boon Hwa (Chin Peng) after his death could not even have his ashes buried in Sitiawan, his place of birth.

Can we ignore the blatant double standards exhibited by the government in their treatment of Ong Boon Hwa, a Chinese former CT, and Malays like mass murderers Azahari and Noordin Top and former CT Syed Hamid Ali and Shamsiah Faekah, and now returning failed IS terrorist-murders?

Another former CPM core member, a colleague of Chin Peng, CD Abdullah, preferred to retire with his Chinese wife (also CPM member) in Thailand, was even given an audience with Al Marhum Sultan Perak, Raja Azlan Shah.



CD Abdullah 



Suraini Abdullah
née Eng Ming Ching
 



(left) CD and wife Suraini at reception in Malaysia in recent years

Suraini was married to CD for more than 60 years. She finally passed away in 2013 (age 90) leaving CD with a daughter

This has been Mahathir's "Mamak Indignity" - Podah.


Related:

Shame on thick skin Mahathir (and thus Malaysia).




17 comments:

  1. "This has been Mahathir's "Mamak Indignity" - Podah."

    Mamak IS just the front man of those ketuanan freaks, thus an easy target for the writer's overwhelming attacks using this emotive issue to stirr the underlying discontents if the Chinese M'sians.

    W/O the backing of the ketuanan hives, would anyone, except those minute self-awareness melayu, DARE to voice for Chin Peng's return - alive or death?

    Pariah true & through, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. just quietly bring home, y do it as if want the whole world know?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I abhor the current campaign by some to turn Chin Peng into a hero.
    He led the MPAJA which fought the Japanese, for which he was honoured.

    His subsequent leadership of the murderous campaign of terror against Malayan/Malaysian civilians negates whatever good he did during the war against Japan.

    Just as you treat Lim Kit Siang as a traitor, I regard Ong Boon Hwa as a traitor against his country.

    Yah, let his ashes come back and his relatives scatter them where they want.

    But , to me , Ong Boon Hwa is a murderous traitor.
    He actually deserved what the Americans did to Baghdadi and Osama, only he had scurried to safety on Beijing when things got too hot in Southern Thailand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now where is it that I describe or attempt to turn Chin Peng into a hero? You are such a blatant liar, but then you'd do ANYTHING including TELLING BLATANT LIES to defend Mahathir

      Whether Chin Peng scurried back to China or went there for conference etc isn't my concern. My concern is and has always been Mahathir reneging on International peace treaties, which as his dedak-fed lapdog & attack hound you aren't interested in

      Delete
    2. Is there ANY past attempts or current campaign by some to turn Chin Peng into a hero?

      If u r insisting in justice & trying to extend yr 'understanding' of democracy then here is a fair comment vis-a-vis Chin Peng's saga:

      AG: Even Chin Peng entitled to legal representation - in according to a SIGNED international treaty.

      The saddest part was the govt of the day had turned that piece of treaty into a soiled toilet paper!

      Along the way making bolihland an international laughing stock & untrustworthy signatory of any agteements!

      Any M'sian of the right mind WOULD want to put Chin Peng's saga into a right prospective within the historical formation of a young nation crawling out from colonialism.

      Tragically, that part of the history has been denied & distorted by people like u & the whole bunch of ketuanan freaks.

      "His subsequent leadership of the murderous campaign of terror against Malayan/Malaysian civilians negates whatever good he did during the war against Japan."

      That's the part of the victor history that u would like to propagate to massage yr anti Communism ego!

      Have u ever thought about the equally murderous campaigns of terror against Malayan/Malaysian civilians who opted for their choice of sopo idealism by their opponents?

      Mfer, collateral damages happen to both warring sides with shared equal treacherous programs! Remember that to yr grave!

      Who's the real traitor?

      Someone who fighted for the freedom of a self governing nation according to his/her ideology that's differed from the winning side?

      To surmise that Chin Peng actually deserved what the Americans did to Baghdadi and Osama, has just prove yr evil demoncratic indoctrination as so well camouflage in the name of war against tyranny by the west!

      What had Chin Peng done to be equal to these two known evil jihadists?

      How naïve!

      Chin Peng's war is to liberate the country from bloodsucking colonialism while those two zombified f*ckheads were aimed to spread radicalized jihadism to the world!

      Pariah!

      Delete
    3. hker learn well from cp, the best is hker dun use gun.

      Delete
    4. Mfer, the HK 废青 don't know head from tail about who Chin Peng is!

      Learn well - definitely from their demoncratic masters from the west. Especially since they have close to 150 yrs of k9 incubation under the supervisions of the pommie.

      Don't used gun?

      Bcoz their master forbids their usage as the moment guns r been used, the 1country2systems promise is over. & the scheming 'democratic' protestors would be toasted, rendering the premature failure of a demoncratic showpiece!

      Delete
  4. You have used really derogatory and insulting terms to attack Mahathir on this issue.... but much of the events of the long years of what I term "The Chin Peng controversy" occurred when Mahathir was not in power, and it seems none of the other Prime Ministers deserve to be held accountable ?
    Not even using polite and level-headed critiques, let alone the offensive words that you use in the attacks on Mahathir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mahathir was in his earlier PM-reign ruling Malaysia from 1981 to 2003, Hat Yai Accord was in 1989, so stop your dedak-driven kok-tok about him not being in power

      Delete
    2. As I said, you Aussie guy thousands of kilometers away, are out of touch with the reality on the ground.
      You spend all your time reading antiPakatan and antiMahathir screeches...

      Delete
  5. Your maths aims lousy.
    1989 - 2003 14 years
    2004 - 2018 14 years - other PMs.

    Nowhere did I state Mahathir was not in power. But I correctly pointed out 1/2 the time other PMs were in power. But your Deak-driven attacks have only 1 target.

    May you choke on your ill-gotten Lucre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you wrote "... "The Chin Peng controversy" occurred when Mahathir was not in power"

      since 1990 Chin Peng (still alive) was denied entry into Malaysia - who was the PM?

      May you choke on your ill-gotten Lucre

      Delete
  6. Ah Yes, this is so repetitive but I have to pont out:

    YET AGAIN it takes another brave DAP MP Datuk Ngeh to ask a pertinent question:

    Did the BN government break the Hatyai peace accord where it was clearly agreed that past communist party members could return to Malaysia, and many did, but Chin Peng was not allowed back.

    PAS and UMNO are against CP’s ashes being brought back. Wee Ka Siong is sitting on the fence - the COWARD.

    All those 29 years while BN was in power after the Hatyai Peace agreement was signed MCA said and did nothing to help Chin Peng return. Now in opposition let’s see if they will still be lapdog to UMNO or if they will suddenly “see the light” and support Chin Peng’s last wish to be brought home.

    DAP is not saying we should love communists or be insensitive to our armed forces or polis, all they are asking is did the BN government keep its promise, just like the BN opposition is now saying the Harapan government is not keeping its manifesto promises?

    The Hatyai peace agreement was signed in 1989 and yes Toonsie was PM then. Yes he did not keep his word. But who was PM from 2003-2018? Badawi and Jibby. 15 years. They did not right the wrong either. Why?

    And why KT always blame Toonsie but not the two PMs after Toonsie who never corrected his mis-deeds? Was Malaysia in some kind of limbo or Bermuda Triangle between 2003-2018 where nothing happened?

    And MCA was in government from 1989 right up till 2018. But again KT never mentioned MCA and why they did nothing for 29 years?

    29 years......MCA did not make a poop or peep. Just blindly support BN/UMNO. Why?

    So now Toonsie is back in power – this issue suddenly becomes so important. As usual BN/MCA left a decades-old problem for Harapan to solve in 18 months.

    The ashes have been brought back and scattered. Fait accompli.

    What can the authorities do? Jail all his descendants and friends? Let’s see how Toonsie 2.0 handles this issue but KUDOS to DAP for standing up. With 42 seats in Parliament, or nearly 20%, they are the most effective opposition from within the government, Toonsie’s itchy rash in the side that won’t go away. Don’t quit, otherwise you will be a barking dog from outside like MCA now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wakakakakaka…

      How Toonsie 2.0 handles this issue??

      https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2019/11/28/you-want-us-to-collect-chin-pengs-ashes-and-return-it-asks-dr-m/

      The best part:

      "Mahathir also said that no one kicked up a fuss when former communist leader Shamsiah Fakeh returned.

      “Is it because she is Malay, maybe?”"

      Delete
    2. i think mahathir said this to get the support of ketuanan chinese freak, who might hv the support of ccp china.

      it seem this mahathir is nothing but a zombie, whatever he do or dun do is due to either ketuanan malay or ketuanan cina. its better we elect again najib as pm, he is truly a ccp pal.

      Delete
    3. Typically rd moron on stage, showing his pura2 ignorance!

      The contradictions of mamak1.0 & mamak 2.0 on Chin Peng saga PROVE conclusively that the Chinese M'sians r the kingmaker of the country for a foreseeable future!

      The ketuanan freaks can't do anything about it. Neither can the zombies.

      Meanwhile k9 caretaker & mom lier have to manufactured stories that DON'T jive with present circumstances, just to earn their keep!

      Delete
  7. So now Toonsie has confirmed he accepts Chin Peng's ashes, undoing what he has done previously and what Badawi and Jibby did not do for 15 years (2003-2018).

    So will KT at least be a tiny bit magnanimous?

    And by the way KT's good mate RPK had some very nasty things to say about Chin Peng. He equates Chin Peng with Hitler. Will KT please rebut his good mate? I am not RPK's good mate, in fact I suspect he deliberately blocks me.

    QUOTE
    Dr M: Shamsiah and Rashid came back, why not Chin Peng's ashes?

    Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has questioned the motives of those playing up the repatriation of the remains of communist leader Chin Peng.

    He pointed out other Communist Party of Malaya leaders had returned to Malaysia without a fuss, and other oppressors such as the Japanese occupation were also forgotten.

    “It is not like we can do anything, only his cremains have returned. We have allowed Shamsiah Fakeh to returned and no one complained, perhaps because she is a Malay. Rashid Maidin too came back to Malaysia.

    “There are others whom we accepted but not Chin Peng because he is the leader.

    “Yes, we know the guerrillas fought a war, and they have killed many people in the war. We killed many people too. So what is the point of raising issues like this? Who are we appeasing?

    “Are you telling us to pick up his cremains and send him back (to Thailand)? These petty things are being dug up to cast the government in a bad light,” he said, rubbing his forehead a few times when asked to comment on the issue.
    UNQUOTE

    QUOTE
    Jews Don’t Forgive Hitler, Why Must Malays Forgive Chin Peng?
    NO HOLDS BARRED
    By Raja Petra Kamarudin Last updated Nov 28, 2019

    The bottom-line is the Chinese are politicising the issue of bringing back Chin Peng’s ashes to Malaysia. This has nothing to do with a dying man’s “last wish”. So now, as the Chinese want, this matter has become political — and a hot political potato on top of that. You want it so now you have got it. Live with it.

    In Germany, the law considers swastikas and SS sig runes the symbols of anti-constitutional organisations. Displaying them publicly or selling goods that sport them is illegal and displaying Nazi symbols in Germany can be punished by three years in jail. The Nazi salute and statements such as “Heil Hitler” are also banned in public.

    In 2005, the European Union proposed the ban in all 25 member-countries. Luxembourg’s justice minister, Mr Luc Frieden, said, “We must conclude on this issue. The discussion has been going on for too long. We owe it also to the victims of Auschwitz and other concentration camps.”
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete