Pages

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Mahathir the man who cannot be trusted


Malaysiakini - Mahathir’s shifting stand shows he can't be trusted by P Gunasegaram

"We are mobile, we are not fixed" - Dr Mahathir Mohamad when asked about party hopping


COMMENT | It’s rare that a newly elected leader (only for an interim period), elected by the rakyat because of promises made by the coalition he heads, breaks key promises in a short space of time, and says with a straight face that re-assessment has to be made in the face of changing developments.

This man, Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who came to power as a result of a mass uprising against the kleptocratic Umno/BN government and who promised that he would not take defecting Umno/BN MPs, just two days ago handed out membership cards to seven such people with not so much as an apology for his action. Two others had defected earlier, making nine in all.

They were Jeli MP Mustapa Mohamed (a former minister) who crossed over in October, Bagan Serai MP Dr Noor Azmi Ghazali who joined a month later, Masjid Tanah MP Mas Ermieyati Samsudin who crossed over in December, Larut MP Hamzah Zainuddin (who is also a former minister), Mersing MP Abdul Latif Ahmad, Tasek Gelugor MP Shabudin Yahaya, Sabak Bernam MP Mohd Fasiah Mohd Fakeh, Hulu Terengganu MP Rosol Wahid and Tanah Merah MP Ikhmal Hisham Abdul Aziz.

He justified this acceptance of the Umno MPs into the fold with his trademark twisted logic. Examples, as reported in theSun:

“I am now sitting on the same side as leaders I once attacked and mocked, but politicians are sometimes forced to jump ship according to circumstances.

“If you are tied to only one leader or party and stay with them even if they rob the people, then you are not a politician, but one who only cares for yourself.

“I was previously in Umno, and I left to join DAP, PKR and Amanah. But if they are no longer loyal to the country, I will also move to other parties. We are mobile, we are not fixed," he added.

In his replies (you can watch the full press conference here), he ignored the fact that he is prime minister by virtue of other parties supporting him, for his own Bersatu had only 13 seats compared to PKR’s 47 and DAP’s 42 at the end of the last polls. What he is doing now, by accepting Umno MPs into the fold now, is a tacit support of those who, by omission, clearly supported the previous kleptocratic government.


Not just that, it has been reported that all Umno divisions received money from former premier Najib Abdul Razak’s personal account which, it was quite clear at the time and well before the elections of May 9 last year, received money which came from 1MDB.


In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported in July 2015 that some US$700 million had come into Najib’s accounts from 1MDB funds. This was confirmed later by the US Department of Justice which gave in detail the money trail. These people did not oppose Najib at all, but supported his kleptocratic acts by not voicing their concern and accepting to stand in the elections. They are, therefore, irrevocably tainted.


Bolstering his own position

Mahathir does not care if they are corrupt or immoral. The only reason that Mahathir is accepting these tainted people into Bersatu is to bolster his own position within the coalition from the paltry 13 MPs he had at the end of the election to 22 now, making it bigger than PAS with 18 MPs.

That is purely as a result of nine defections. The defections are legal partly because Mahathir, during his previous rule, refused to make it illegal to jump parties. However, they remain ethically and morally extremely repugnant and go against the grain of reform promised by Harapan.

Mahathir acquiescing to defections despite earlier opposition, opens the door very wide for Bersatu to accept virtually all of the other Umno MPs - some 40 odd, if you exclude those who are clearly unacceptable like Najib. In addition to some 16 others in Sarawak and perhaps four independents in Sabah, there are some 60 more. This could swell Bersatu’s combined support to some 82 MPs.

The implications of this are enormous. If DAP and Amanah throw in their lot with Mahathir, a total of 53 seats, Mahathir’s numbers increase to 135, enough to command a handsome majority in the 222-member house, even if PKR were to leave the coalition. Another 13, not forgetting possible defections from PKR’s 50 odd members, will give him a two-thirds majority.

If PKR, DAP and Amanah stuck it out and stayed together, then they will have some 103 seats. Include Warisan’s eight, and it takes the tally to 111, which comes to exactly 50 percent of the seats in Parliament. This puts PAS in a very strong position with their 18 seats, as kingmaker.

Things, of course, may not pan this way. Any number of things can happen in the interim. But it is very clear that the situation has become very fluid and uncertain because Mahathir has changed the rules of the game to suit himself and Bersatu, something he has done throughout his 22 years at the top between 1981 and 2003.


All this means that the political situation in this country has turned rather unstable because of Mahathir and because he has been constantly shifting his position and openly in defiance of coalition politics. He wants to be in total control all the time. Hopefully, he won’t have it his way this time around.


There were many who had misgivings about Mahathir joining the Harapan coalition, including this writer, given his past record as a dictator and an autocrat who used his party’s two-thirds majority in Parliament to introduce authoritarian laws and to control government institutions which should have remained independent.


A dangerous weapon

This is what I wrote in an article titled “Can Mahathir be trusted?” in April 2017, when there were moves to get Mahathir into the Harapan coalition: “If any one takes the trouble to remember what this man did and stood for, he would be mad to think that Mahathir is the solution - he was, and is, the problem. Without him and his 22 years of misrule, Malaysia would not have descended to what it is today.

“Mahathir was accountable to no one. Not the people, not the party, not the judges. He could do almost anything he pleased and get away with it using the apparatus and machinery of control he had put in place.

He made opaque many decisions of government, putting anything marked secret by the government as secret under the law by removing the power of judges to judge even if the secret posed no danger to the country, but only embarrassed the government and exposed its corrupt ways.

“That was the legacy he left behind - and a leader who followed him used it to do nasty things, some worse than that by Mahathir. Now we expect Mahathir - the source of all this - to save us Malaysians from Najib!


“Is that why Mahathir is sticking his neck out? For the good of the country? But remember he had his chance - 22 years of it. He bungled - all he did was to stay in power and do the greatest damage to the country ever by any one, prime minister or not.


“His goal now is not to get into power, but to ensure that whoever comes into power does not destroy him. As far as Mahathir is concerned, it is always about him - not Malaysia, not Malaysians, not even the Malays.”

Now there are those who argue that he needs to get Umno members to obtain a two-thirds majority to change the constitution in order to reform. How stupid! Much of the reform that is needed can be done by just amending and scrapping laws which only needs a simple majority in Parliament.

To give Mahathir a two-thirds majority is to put into his hands a mega-weapon which he will not hesitate to use against anyone who opposes him. It is a dangerous weapon to put in the hands of a man who can not be trusted and who alters his promises to suit his ulterior motives.

Mahathir is not the person to reform this country, simply because he was ultimately responsible for most of its ills. His actions show he does not believe in reform or fair play. Mahathir blithely talks of loyalty to the nation for his shifting stand. Let’s not let him betray the rakyat who are what makes the nation.


6 comments:

  1. Time to resurrect Bossku back to power....hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  2. This old man, he plays one.
    He plays knick Knack on everyone.
    Knick Knack, paddywack,
    Give a dog his bone.
    This old man's son goes running home.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Talking about TRUST, now even our Judiciary cannot be trusted. Who appointed these judges? They were working hand-in-hand with corrupt government officials. Which government? From which party?

    What else did the "Pencuri Hati" and his Gang of Forty Thieves curi?

    QUOTE
    In shocking affidavit, judge claims members of judiciary worked with private parties to scam govt

    Published on 14 February 2019

    By Azril Annuar

    KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 14 — A Court of Appeal judge has alleged that there are members of the judiciary who have been working with private parties to scam the government.

    In an affidavit filed today, Justice Datuk Hamid Sultan Abu Backer claimed that this occurred when nominees of certain politicians created contracts with the government where the government later fails to adhere to the contract.

    The private parties would then claim compensation from the government in court.

    “I will give an example. The government will enter into a contract with a political nominee with no intention of honouring it. Subsequently, the government will terminate the contract and the nominee will sue the government for breach of contract.

    “The government may record a consent judgment accepting liability and agreeing to assess damages. This modus operandi was to deprive the exchequer by false claims,” said the judge in a lengthy affidavit filed by Sangeet Kaur Deo to declare a chief justice’s failure in defending the integrity of the judiciary in two cases.

    Hamid stressed that there was a need for a Royal Commission of Inquiry to be established to look into the issue.

    At the time, he had also developed a jurisprudence relating to fraud on the exchequer or contracts which had unfair terms with the government to stop what he said was illegal.

    His work did not allow the contracts to be enforceable due to public policy grounds but his move raised the ire of some top judges.

    Hamid also said a chief justice he named as “Antagonist of Rule of Law and Constitution (ARLC)” had behaved like a tyrant and tried to dictate how other apex court judges decided.

    Apparently, ARLC also interfered in the promotion of some of the judges and those who made decisions contrary to his instructions had their career progression blocked.

    “One lady judge refused to abide by the instruction of ARLC and in consequence, the conviction was affirmed by majority. I must say the lady judge who refused to abide was one of the most hardworking judges, with most number of judgments, and well known for her knowledge, candour, courtesy and fairness.

    “She had also affirmed with me the interference and it will appear many other judges also knew of the interference even before I came to know of it.

    “Her refusal to abide to ARLC instruction later became fatal to her promotion and she was deliberately bypassed in elevation to the Federal Court, in which bypassing the present Chief Justice as well as one of the top judges and a Federal Court judge were present,” Hamid alleged.
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Win-win all around ! Politicians in cahoots will get major share of the loot, the judges get their cuts, and the government ( meaning DUmno ) gets their cut which goes into their party's treasury. The only loser is the rakyat as this will add to its mounting country's debt. If this country collapse, these politicians, judges and bumiputra elites will just pack their suitcase and fly to their overseas mansions, malu apa ?

      Delete
  4. I can agree with some, not all of Gunasegaram's writing.
    What concerns me is the shrill and vindictive tone that it is written in.

    It gives the impression of a person with an axe to grind against Mahathir, and I question his capacity to view the issues objectively.

    ReplyDelete