Pages

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Running Dogs

Malaysiakini - MCA action 'barbaric' say Malaysians for Beng Hock and Teoh Beng Hock's sister arrested in Galas

MCA Senator Heng Saie Kie went to campaign in the Galas by-election. Teoh Lee Lan, the sister of Teoh Beng Hock and her hubby Sor Cher Hai also went there to seek MCA’s help in calling for a Royal Commission to investigate into Teoh Ben Hock’s unexplained death while in MACC custody. Lee Lan and party had to use the Galas opportunity because they could never get hold of MCA politicians under normal circumstances.

While attempting to present a petition to the senator, her minders rough-housed Sor, shoving him aside but with such force he fell down and hurt his knee.

As if Sor’s bleeding bruised knee caused by the MCA people wasn’t enough, Teoh Lee Lan has now been detained by our remarkable police for ‘campaigning’ in Galas. Our remarkable police had acted swiftly on such a complaint – guess from whom?

Our remarkable police is all the more remarkable because they claimed to have acted on the complaint that Lee Lan’s group was campaigning despite the well publicised announcement by Teoh Lee Lan and party much much earlier that she intended to seek MCA and other BN politicians at Gua Musang for help in calling for a Royal Commission into Teoh Beng Hock’s unexplained death. How could this be considered as campaigning for either the UMNO or PAS candidate?

And the stench of the police double standards reeks to high heaven when we consider that Sor hah earlier lodged a police report for the assault on him, but of course thus far merited no police action, whereas a report by ‘someone’ sees Lee Lan being detained within 24 hours of that report.

Senator Heng is of course one of those BN back-door senatorial unrepresentative & unelected swill, appointed deputy minister for whatever on the good grace of her Tuan. She doesn’t care whether the Chinese disapprove of her deliberate snub of Lee Lan, or her minders behaving like thugs, because she owes her position not to voters but her UMNO Tuan.

She now has the gall to issue a bullsh*t willingness to see Lee Lan in KL but not in Gua Musang. The claimed preference of a different location is nothing more than an excuse, because Lee Lan could never get hold of any MCA leaders in KL.

And Heng's rotten excuse is all the more pathetic and implausible when the opportunity was there in Gua Musang for her to shine and show her concerns for a member of the constituency her party claims to represent? It merely demonstrates MCA’s far greater concerns for UMNO's feelings than that of Chinese Malaysians.

She and her MCA colleagues most deservedly earn the most shameful label of chao kow (running dogs).

If MCA leaders think March 2008 had been a tsunami, we'll show then they are wrong, because comes GE 13, we'll teach MCA kau kau and eliminate the party for good like Gerakan - sorry to those MCA mates of mine but we'll have to punish you as collateral damage for Senator Heng's cruel cowardly and callous treatment of the family of Teoh Beng Hock, an unforgiveable act.

14 comments:

  1. well said, tq !!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is the war of the running dogs all over again. This time werwill win regardless of how much UMNO supports these dogs. Remember the first step in stopping these dogs is to kick their Achilles economic heel. You want to gamble bear in mind the 'alternatives'. Take the 8% excise and 6% sales tax and give them to the 'alternative' workers. They may not kowtow to you out of gratefulness but at least this money will not go to the UMNO running dog masters who uses the money to do you in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If the Teoh family have to bring this issue up in Galas.
    This might means that micheal chong refuses to meet the Teoh family.
    Thank you KT for bringing this up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Heng is deplorable... but she's senator appointed by the Perak state government... so theoretically she's still "elected" and "representative"...

    The problem is, she appointed by the BN haram state government...

    ReplyDelete
  5. "chao kow" - exactly the first thing that came to my mind after reading the news. the kind of bullshit that we have to swallow these days from the malaysian chao kow association

    ReplyDelete
  6. Defeated in 12 GE but appointed a deputy minister, way to go, old cow!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm normally quite easy and comfy with MCA people as I have many friends there, but the way Heng treated the family of the late Teoh BH really pissed me off.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Please refrain from calling these MCA politicians as dogs. It's an insult to the canine family!

    ReplyDelete
  9. ALL the Chinese votes MUST go to PR !

    ReplyDelete
  10. if i were see her family members, i will tell them she is a truly MCA "sang chi" running dog and should be sent to the vets immediately.

    Rather than be an accomplice to the killing of Teoh by complicity than to seek the truth, MCA deserves to be condemned to hell. So are the MCA leaders. Go Chua, have a good frolicking time.Damn you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We may be dogs. But we are not as low as that. Please do not associate us with that animal. From Dogs

    ReplyDelete
  12. chua,

    go screw your girlfriend and enjoy yourself. you bastards have no shame. PTUI, chua.
    may the dogs urinate on your grave after you died.

    ReplyDelete
  13. //may the dogs urinate on your grave after you died.//

    What? No defecation allowed on his grave? What a shame!

    ReplyDelete
  14. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON TYPES OF DEMOCRACY

    USA, UK and Malaysia, are *Representative Democracies* (2nd class version of democracy) and thus not even truly an open system being limited to the whims and facies of parliamentarians alone. *Participatory Democracy* (1st class version of democracy) is a process emphasizing the broad participation of constituents in the direction and operation of political systems.

    It avoids the concept of the people having a single view with the inevitable limitations that come from trying to agree what that view is. Government is heavily decentralized into smaller independent groups to allow personalized preferences within groups to be expressed in a functional manner PREFERRED by each particular group.

    The system seeks to avoid problems with centralized and electoral governance, while still providing a stable democratic system and ensuring all forms of human expression especially those diametrically opposed to be allowed expression. For example theocrat moralists / and sin industries (adult or gambling) can all be represented and functional even while proponents within each group do not use or believe in the other.

    Under *Participatory Democracy*, all expressions will have their own place, albeit in a highly separated manner.

    ReplyDelete