Pages

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Anwar: "Wei, Cina balek Tiong Sun lah"???

Saifulbahri Kamaruddin, a Malaysiakini reader, and self-confessed former Malaysian journalist wrote this letter regarding Anwar Ibrahim:

all underlining are mine

I am writing to comment on Luk's letter in which he quoted Anwar Ibrahim as saying that when Dr Mahathir Mohamad was in power, the latter used subtle racist tactics. It appeared that Luk was trying to absolve Anwar of such discriminatory practices.

Luk acknowledged that Anwar's view was that of an ‘insider’ in the ruling party Umno. And this should already show Anwar's own conduct while in power. While the current and past polemics on the strained ties between Malaysia and Singapore is debatable, one should not make the mistake that Anwar was separate from the rest in government.

If the Malaysian side or Mahathir was racist, then Anwar was very much part of the whole setup, giving inflammatory speeches that set the pulses of Chinese on both sides of the causeway racing. Anwar was certainly not innocent of such a practice, if indeed the Malaysian leadership did conduct racism. For that matter, Lee Kuan Yew, when he was in power, was really no different - thus the accusations and rhetoric reverberated on both sides of the causeway.

I was a journalist in the mainstream media for over 20 years, and very often I covered Anwar's functions, especially involving Umno, its youth wing and Abim (Islamic Youth Movement of Malaysia). I had never heard of one speak with so much disdain of the Chinese before. We, the journalists, knew that Anwar was trying to be all things to all people, so when he addressed ‘kampung’ people with a skewed view of inter-communal affairs, he would tell them what they wanted to hear.

The reporters would duly file their stories to the editors, who then would mangle the reports to make Anwar look good, even if that meant less accuracy. Yes, indeed - Anwar appointed most of the editors in the mainstream media, and he certainly did not mince his words when it came to relations with Singapore or the ethnic Chinese. At one Umno youth rally in 1987, he ranted and raved, urging Chinese Malaysians to ‘go back to China’ if they were not happy in Malaysia. But, of course, that was not published for fear of damaging his image.

So, now the former deputy prime minister is trying to be an angel, supposedly innocent of everything that occurred when he was in power. It was the same with his accusations of the government being corrupt, the very institution of which he had been part of for 15 years and had enjoyed its largesse and dispensed patronage in a way typical of Umno even now.

It insults my intelligence to read of him accusing his former compatriots and colleagues of being what he himself was wholeheartedly.


Well, if what Saifulbahri Kamaruddin has written had been true, what can I say ...

Related:
(1)
Anwar Ibrahim - Too little, too late!
(2)
The Haunting of Anwar Ibrahim
(3)
Aptet II Disgrace - He who cannot be named!
(4)
Petronas Accountability - He who cannot be named!
(5)
Anwar oh Anwar ...
(6)
Malaysia's Mr 'Not Responsible'
(7)
Anwar Ibrahim - Pot Calling Kettle Black
(8)
Anwar Ibrahim: "Mahathir held RM 8 billion"
(9)
Anwar Ibrahim's Crocodile Tears
(10)
Malaysia's Mr 'I Don't Know'
(11)
Malaysia's Mr 'Forgetful'
(12)
The Government's 30 (Billion) Pieces of Silver
(13)
Anwar Ibrahim needs a mirror

2 comments:

  1. Sorry to deviate from your topic, KTemoc. Have you seen today's Sun (Oct 12, 2006)? Turn to page 6. Seen it? Then refer back to the previous day's Sun (Oct 11, 2006), Page 4. Someone is 'taking advantage' of another by observing that the another was not assaulted or harmed when he handed over the first memorandum receivd by the Indonesian Embassy! Once a mamak, always a mamak!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AI, even up to today, tries to be all things to all people.
    I do believe that he served an unfair sentence, but that does not negate my certainty that he is not to be trusted.
    It amazes me how he was in government for 16 years, watched what he now calls "injustice" and "wrongdoing" happening, but didn't do anything.

    ReplyDelete