Pages

Monday, November 24, 2025

Short hemlines, sexy dress not an insult to Islam; rightist Muslims told to get a sense of perspective





Short hemlines, sexy dress not an insult to Islam; rightist Muslims told to get a sense of perspective





CONTRASTING moral values. Therein lie the crux of the matter.

This was the point made by influencer with penchant for fashion شكينة (@_nsyakinah) who equated disrespecting Islam with inflammatory actions such as burning the holy book, vandalising mosques and spreading Islamophobia.

The donning of short skirts or sexy outfits do NOT fall into this category.

The poster was reacting to criticism from conservative Muslims outraged over girl band Dolla’s latest music video.




To re-cap, the clip for the trio’s single Question has caused all sorts of consternation as too much skin and flesh were purportedly on show, especially as one member – Wan Sabrina Wan Rusli a.k.a. Sabronzo – is, gasp, a Muslim.

“How dare she?” has been the reaction of many a walaun (slang for hardcore PAS supporters).

The poster went on to passionately argue that this issue of covering up one’s aurat (body parts which must not be exposed according to Islam) was “a personal journey”.

It was not meant for others to cast aspersions upon, let alone for the authorities to criminalise or punish people for their wardrobe choices.

She also felt that the Madani government was using this issue as an excuse to implement restrictive and authoritarian measures that further impugn civil liberties.



Needless to say, the post elicited a heated debate. It was highlighted by one commenter that the criticism was only aimed at the Muslim member of Dolla, and not Sabronzo’s non-Muslim band colleagues. It was argued that there are other ways to express oneself artistically.



The same commenter further contended that a Muslim has an obligation to politely reprimand a fellow Muslim if he or she has erred from the righteous path (as opposed to being a busybody).



However, as rightly pointed out by the poster, too often guidance or advice comes in the form of insults, noting that polite advice was a rarity. She also argued that threatening the Muslim Dolla member with criminal offences was totally unacceptable.



Somehow echoing the poster, one commenter urged the holier-than-thou types to get a sense of perspective as there were loads of pertinent issues which can be classified as insulting to Islam.



This point had previously been raised by high profile legal experts who argue that the religious authorities have no business interfering in this most personal of spheres.

Human rights activist and lawyer Siti Kasim had quite simply said that “if dressing as such is a sin, then it is for the sinner to bear the burden”. Former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner and lawyer Latheefa Koya also claimed that it was not a minister’s job to prosecute citizens for their dress sense.

What these legal eagles and the poster seem to be dead set against is more interference by the authorities. They are also fighting against a mob mentality where people are pressured to conform to certain Islamic values.

It is these episodes that is causing alarm among non-Muslim Malaysians that a modern, multi-plural society is fast slipping into hardline, Taliban-style rule. – Nov 24, 2025

9 comments:

  1. Pauline Hanson does it again. They wouldn’t ban the burka in Parlimen so she wore it.😀👍

    https://x.com/ozraeliavi/status/1992842320602177907?s=46

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now Muslims are mad because Pauline wore a burqa, which has been declared lawful.

    Ms Faruqi should wear a nun’s habit and they can call it even.

    https://x.com/ausvstheagenda/status/1992873723842728376?s=46

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. making fun of others' religious beliefs, well, that's racist Pauline

      Delete
  3. If non-Palastins can wear kaffiyeh to Palimen why can’t non-Muslims wear masks covering face?

    ReplyDelete
  4. If Pauline is disrespecting / making fun of Ishmaels by wearing burka then are Palastins doing the same to Isaac’s by wearing kaffiyeh?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think they were envious of Pauline’s legs ha3

    PAULINE: “I have a private member’s bill to introduce, to ban the burqa in Australia”

    LEFTIES, LIDIOT and FARUQI: “No, we won’t let you introduce it, women can wear what they want!”

    PAULINE: “Ok, I’ll just duck out and come back wearing a burqa”

    LEFTIES, LIDIOT and FARUQI: “No, we meant YOU can’t wear what you want, you bigoted racist Islamophobe!” 🤡

    https://x.com/markwrowley/status/1993079677431452133?s=46

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, individuals have committed crimes while wearing a burqa or similar face-covering garments, using them as a disguise to conceal their identity. Law enforcement officials and security experts have noted instances of this occurring in various countries.

    Examples of such incidents include:
    Bank Robberies: In 2009, two men wearing niqabs robbed a bank in Amman, Jordan. A similar incident involving a man in a veil robbing a bank occurred in Oadby, UK, in 2015.

    Terrorism/Escape: In the UK, a terror suspect evaded surveillance in 2013 by disguising himself in a burqa. In 2015, two women dressed in religious garments carried out suicide bombings in Fotokol, Cameroon.

    Insurgency: An anecdotal example from Yemen cited by UK police involved a man dressed in a burqa with a machine gun hidden underneath who fired at soldiers.

    The use of face-covering garments in crime is often seen as a specific type of disguise, similar to wearing a mask or other concealing clothing. In response to security concerns and the use of such attire in criminal acts, some countries like Chad, Cameroon, and Gabon have implemented bans on full-face veils in public spaces.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Several countries have banned the burqa, including France, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, and Switzerland. Other countries have enacted partial bans in certain sectors or specific regions, such as Germany (education and public services) and China (Xinjiang region). Tajikistan has also banned the burqa and hijab.
    Countries with full or partial bans on the burqa
    France: Was the first European country to ban full-face veils in public in 2011.
    Belgium: Banned full-face coverings in public spaces in 2011.
    Austria: Introduced a ban on face coverings in public spaces in 2017.
    Denmark: Has a ban on face coverings in public.
    Switzerland: Has banned the burqa.
    Tajikistan: Banned the burqa and hijab.
    Germany: Has partial bans in specific sectors, like education and public services.
    China: The ban is specific to the Xinjiang region.
    Tunisia: Has banned the burqa.
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Restrictions on religious symbols apply in judicial institutions.
    Other countries: Variations of restrictions exist in Morocco, Sri Lanka, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, the Netherlands, the Republic of the Congo, Kosovo, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Muslim immigrant from Pakistan- Mehreen Faruqi says that she should be able to wear costumes & use props in OUR Parliament including a scarf worn by HAMAS terrorists but Australian born Senators should not be allowed to do the same.

    Mehreen hates White people & calls everything including our own National flag ‘racist’ while insulting & demonising our country & White Australians at every opportunity she has.

    All she does is advocate for Muslims & Islamic nations. This is foreign interference & treason.

    This entitled, intolerant, hateful hypocritical woman should not be in a position of power in Australia.

    https://x.com/truthfairy131/status/1993104392023949432?s=46

    ReplyDelete