Pages

Thursday, July 01, 2021

Australia’s top medical body refuses to endorse PM’s announcement that under-40s can get AstraZeneca

Guardian (Aus Ed):

Australia’s top medical body refuses to endorse PM’s announcement that under-40s can get AstraZeneca

Exclusive: AMA says Scott Morrison’s announcement about younger people getting AZ Covid jab goes against advice from vaccine safety body


Prime minister Scott Morrison on the screen while in quarantine at The Lodge. His announcement that anyone under 40 can get the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine has not been endorsed by the AMA. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP

The president of the Australian Medical Association, Dr Omar Khorshid, says he does not endorse the prime minister’s announcement that anyone under 40 can receive the AstraZeneca vaccine from their GP, adding it took him by surprise.

The advice from the independent Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation – that Pfizer is the preferred vaccine for under-60s due to an increased risk of rare clotting events linked to the AstraZeneca jab – is unchanged. Despite this, Scott Morrison on Monday night encouraged under-60s “to go and have that discussion with your GP” if they wish to receive the AstraZeneca vaccine.



“It took us by surprise, and it’s hard to know how to take that announcement because I think it’s going to be a limited number of people to take it up, given that they would be going against the expert Atagi recommendation,” Khorshid told Guardian Australia on Tuesday.

“Our recommendation is still really for patients to follow the Atagi advice. Be patient and have the Atagi-recommended vaccine when it’s available. I am certainly still backing the expert advice at this stage.”

Atagi comprises independent infectious diseases physicians, microbiologists, epidemiologists, public health nurses, GPs and consumer representatives. Its advice states there is “a higher risk and observed severity of thrombosis [clotting] and thrombocytopenia [low platelet count] syndrome related to the use of AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine observed in Australia in the 50-59 year old age group than reported internationally and initially estimated in Australia”.

Asked why he thought the government had made the announcement without informing the AMA, given that doctors will now be responsible for administering the AstraZeneca vaccine to under-60s who want it and leading discussions about risk, Khorshid said: “My guess is that they are wanting to provide nervous Australians who are going into lockdown this week with something that they can actually do to improve their chances of getting through this and to push the nation’s vaccination program forward.

“We do have surplus doses that are currently not being used so there is some capacity to bump up the delivery. Of course, if Delta really does ingrain itself in our community and the lockdowns aren’t successful or they’re too slow, then speeding up the vaccination program by using more options on the table is wise. The problem, of course, unfortunately, is that for the Delta virus you need both doses to get reasonable protection against Delta and for AstraZeneca, that’s a minimum of eight weeks apart.”

But he said the move “addresses a demand that is out there in the community” for vaccines, and he has previously said that any vaccine that is unused should be made available to vulnerable groups and countries in need. He said he had already heard from GPs who said that they had been receiving calls from the public keen to take up the AstraZeneca vaccine. But he said doctors needed to be kept informed.

Khorshid said a priority for the AMA in light of Monday night’s announcement would be extending the new Medicare item number which covers consultations with a GP about the vaccine to include other age groups. The item number now only applies to those over 50.



“I’ve spoken to the chief medical officer and I understand he’s going to get some advice out as soon as it is written to GPs,” Khorshid said. “We need to patch that little hole, fairly promptly.”

Others shared Khorshid’s concern about the government’s advice. Queensland’s chief health officer, Dr Jeannette Young, said the clinical advice was clear.

“So the clinical advice from Atagi is that people under the age of 60 should preferentially get Pfizer,” she said. “The advice in the UK is that people under the age of 40 should get Pfizer. That’s the clinical advice, but there are some people who have been asking to get AstraZeneca although the clinical advice is that they should not preferentially should not.”

There are some vaccination clinics that have been offering the AstraZeneca vaccine to those under-60 who want it, so long as they understood the risks, even before the prime minister’s press conference, because of excess supply and patients saying they just wanted to be vaccinated given that the risk of the rare clotting is so low.

Victoria’s health minister, Martin Foley, said those aged 18 to 39 needed to be patient if they did decide to take the AstraZeneca vaccine through their GP. This follows reports from GPs that they were unprepared for the announcement.

“There’s a degree of confusion out there with the GPs, as we seek to roll this out,” Foley said. “As soon as we get all the information and clarification from the commonwealth, we will implement the system as quickly and as smoothly as we possibly can.”

***

SBS (extract):

This is what Australia's top vaccine advice body says about AstraZeneca and under-40s



Prime Minister Scott Morrison meeting with CSL staff working on the COVID vaccine while at the company's facility in Melbourne Source: NCA NEWSWIRE POOL

ATAGI co-chair Christopher Blyth said the advice around the AstraZeneca shot has not changed, and people under 60 should only be considering it in "pressing" circumstances.

The man responsible for providing official expert advice on vaccines has sought to clear up confusion around who should receive the AstraZeneca jab, as Queensland's top medical officer rejects suggestions she is scaremongering by advising younger people against the shot.

A bitter spat has broken out between politicians and health officials over the coronavirus vaccine rollout, with conflicting messaging fuelling fear and confusion over who should get what vaccine.

On Monday, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said in a late-night press conference people under 40 could talk to their GP about getting the AstraZeneca jab.

Mr Morrison has offered GPs legal protection to vaccinate all adults and provided patients Medicare cover for their consultations.

But several state premiers and their medical advisers have pushed back against the announcement, and GPs have said they were blindsided by it.

On Thursday, after days of confusion, Christopher Blyth, who co-chairs the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), said the group's advice remained that people under 60 should get the Pfizer vaccine.

Professor Blyth said people in that age group should only be considering AstraZeneca in "pressing" circumstances.

"There are some situations where that would be warranted, but they are quite small," he told ABC radio.

"The ATAGI advice is that Pfizer is our preference for those under the age of 60 years."



9 comments:

  1. They should get Sinovac.
    Zero side effects whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Scott Morrison has to ask his Dage first

      Delete
    2. Wakakakakaka…


      Wakakakaka…

      Delete
    3. Singapore Government played its game very deftly.

      Approved Sinovac for people to get vaccinated privately if they so wish, but not under the free government National Vaccination program.

      Delete
    4. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/covid-19-rush-sinovac-vaccine-clinics-get-calls-non-stop-long-queues

      Wakakakakaka…

      The kiasi-ness of the s'poreans r helping them to 'revolt' the RedDot double play under the twisted arm of dage!

      Delete
    5. On Bullyland’s CCP grand 100th birthday the Little Red Dot gives them A Big Red Face….ha ha ha…..

      QUOTE
      Singapore Withholds Privileges From People With Sinovac Shots
      By Kwan Wei Kevin Tan
      June 30, 2021

      Sinovac users have to undergo testing before attending events

      Govt does not view Sinovac as an alternative to mRNA jabs

      Residents in Singapore who opt for the vaccine made by Chinese company Sinovac Biotech Ltd. won’t get the same benefits as those with government-approved messenger RNA vaccines from Pfizer Inc. and Moderna Inc., reflecting the challenges facing people with less-effective inoculation as countries move to reopen safely.

      Doctors are required to tell patients receiving vaccines under the city-state’s special access route -- which Sinovac has qualified for -- “that they may not be regarded in the same manner as those vaccinated under our national programme,” the Ministry of Health said in a statement on Wednesday.

      These individuals will still need to undergo pre-event testing, the statement said, referring to precautions that those with the Pfizer or Moderna shots are exempted from.

      The move raises the likelihood that those with Sinovac shots will also not be eligible for other easing measures that the Singapore government has signaled are forthcoming, such as being able to travel without serving a 14 day quarantine upon entering the border. With growing evidence that mRNA vaccines are not just more effective at preventing serious illness and death, but can also curb transmission, governments are scrambling to backstop their use of non-mRNA shots like those from the Chinese makers and AstraZeneca Plc.

      While those vaccines are able to prevent acute illness or death, they’re less able to stop onward transmission. Rapid spread of new mutations like the delta variant are also fueling concerns that only the super-effective mRNA shots can provide comprehensive protection. Bahrain has started offering a Pfizer vaccine as a booster shot to people fully inoculated with Chinese maker Sinopharm’s vaccine.
      UNQUOTE

      Delete
    6. Wakakakaka…

      "Rapid spread of new mutations like the delta variant are also fueling concerns that only the super-effective mRNA shots can provide comprehensive protection"

      Truly know nothing fart & equally blurred c&p trash!

      https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-dangerous-is-the-delta-variant-and-will-it-cause-a-covid-surge-in-the-u-s/

      Ditto in UK & most of the western Europe!

      AND many of these countries r using mRNA derived vaccines for their covid immunization!

      Facts & numbers tell REAL stories. Not twisted propaganda just to boost syiok-sendiri ego.

      But then, small minds need simple twists of facts/numbers to make them happy.

      Remember, laugh the last & laugh the loudest!

      Delete
    7. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/covid-19-rush-sinovac-vaccine-clinics-get-calls-non-stop-long-queues

      Ya, ya, Sing just like Malaysia, and to a much lesser extent Ozland, has its share of CCP fanboys.

      Also, Sing has many residents who are China citizens, and they need Sinovac to be able to resume travelling back to China.

      Delete
    8. Wakakakakaka…

      CCP fanboys!

      Old moneyed mfer, go check the s'pore ministry of health for the data.

      If the overwhelming number is any indicator, then more than half of singgies r red!

      Knowing-nothing lie is just yr past time hobby.

      "they need Sinovac to be able to resume travelling back to China"

      China accept all kind of vaccination as long as the person tested negative upon arrival in China!

      Yr China bashing knows no end!

      Delete