Pages

▼

Saturday, September 26, 2026

New rape cases revive questions over why India’s tougher laws have not curbed sexual violence — and why women remain at risk





New rape cases revive questions over why India’s tougher laws have not curbed sexual violence — and why women remain at risk



National Akali Dal party activists hold placards to protest against the alleged gang-rape and murder of a 19-year-old woman in Uttar Pradesh state, demanding justice against the accused during a demonstration in New Delhi October 4, 2020. A string of rape cases in India has reignited debate over women’s safety and raised questions about why sweeping legal reforms and tougher punishments have failed to curb sexual violence. — AFP pic


Summary

  • Recent rape cases in India, including the gang rape of a 17-year-old by men posing as police, have renewed concerns about women's safety despite stricter laws.
  • Activists argue the reforms are insufficient without addressing societal mindsets blaming women for assaults, and enforcement challenges exacerbate the issue.
  • Legal experts highlight systemic issues like case backlogs and under-resourced police and courts, resulting in a low conviction rate and long legal processes.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 9:00 PM MYT


NEW DELHI, Sept 25 — A string of rape cases in India has reignited debate over women’s safety and raised questions about why sweeping legal reforms and tougher punishments have failed to curb sexual violence.

Hundreds of students marched through the streets of New Delhi on Wednesday, shouting slogans and holding placards demanding stronger safety measures following the latest high-profile case.


In that incident on Monday, three men posing as police officers allegedly gang-raped a 17-year-old girl in a public park in the heart of the capital city, according to authorities.

The case evokes the 2012 gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old physical therapy student on a bus, which triggered nationwide protests and led to more robust laws against sexual violence.


But campaigners say those changes, which included a broadening of the definition of sexual offences and the introduction of stronger punishments for rape, have proven inadequate.


“Nobody is working on the actual solution, which is the mindset change,” women’s rights activist Yogita Bhayana told AFP.

“The mentality (is still) that it is a woman’s fault to be out of home late, or men policing women if they are seen with another man,” she said.


“It is outrageous that society still thinks this way.”

India recorded an average of 80 rape cases per day in 2024, according to the latest available official data. That compares with around 68 per day in 2012, the last year before the stronger laws came in.

Activists say the true number of sexual assaults is likely far higher because many victims never file a report, often fearing stigma in a deeply patriarchal society.


Lack of enforcement

The alleged assault on Monday followed the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl whose body was found by police in a decomposed state, and the alleged rape of a 17-year-old girl by a bus driver and a conductor who offered her a lift during heavy rain.

Both cases occurred in recent weeks in Delhi — often called India’s “rape capital” — but other regions are not immune, with a video that surfaced this month showing a teenage girl being sexually assaulted in the eastern state of Bihar.

Each case has brought arrests, political condemnation and a public outcry.

After the watershed 2012 case — the woman is known nationally as “Nirbhaya” or “Fearless”, as Indian law does not allow the press to publish a rape victim’s name — the government expanded the criminal definitions of penetration and consent.

Gang rape became punishable by at least 20 years in prison, and the death sentence was introduced for repeat rape offenders.

Lawyers and activists say the challenge lies in enforcement.

Overstretched police forces and courts lack the means to investigate cases thoroughly enough, hindering the reforms’ impacts, criminal lawyer Shilpi Jain, who has represented survivors of sexual violence, told AFP.

“The problem is not in the law but with the people who are implementing it,” she said.

“Overworked judges. Overworked cops. One police station handles 200,000 to 300,000 people. How will it work? This is a vicious cycle.”

India’s conviction rate for rape has remained largely stable since 2012, hovering at around a quarter of all cases that make it to trial.

But the criminal justice system struggles with a vast case backlog.

Less than 10 per cent of the more than 200,000 rape cases before the courts in 2024 were actually completed, according to official data.

“An average rape case takes seven to eight years. If the case goes to the Supreme Court, then 20 years, so criminals lose fear of law and victims lose hope,” Jain said.

For gender rights activist Poonam Muttreja, legal reforms alone cannot solve a problem rooted in social attitudes and inequality.

Deep-seated cultural taboos and political resistance have hampered the effectiveness of government programmes to raise awareness of sexual violence, experts say.

“Prevention must begin much before a crime is committed: in homes, schools, communities, digital spaces and police systems,” Muttreja said. — AFP

* If you are experiencing sexual violence, the following hotlines offer free and confidential support: Talian Kasih at 15999 or WhatsApp 019-2615999 (24/7); All Women’s Action Society at 016-2374221/016-2284221 (9.30am-5.30pm); and Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO) at 03-30008858 or SMS/WhatsApp TINA 018-9888058 (24/7)


***


The 2012 case involved MORE than gang rape - sadly that incident deteriorated into sadistic crimes ending in the cruel death of a young woman (medical undergraduate) in Singapore Mt Elizabeth Hospital to where she was medivac-ed from India due to the seriousness of her injuries.


***


I recall the earlier tragic case and even blogged on it - but here's what Google AI says:


The 23-year-old victim of the brutal December 2012 New Delhi gang rape, Jyoti Singh Pandey, passed away at Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore on December 29, 2012. She had been airlifted there in critical condition following a severe, life-threatening assault on a bus, but ultimately succumbed to massive internal organ failure and brain damage.





Her tragic passing in Singapore sparked widespread, historic protests across India. The intense public outrage and demands for justice subsequently forced the Indian government to enact significantly stricter anti-rape laws and fast-track procedures for trying sexual offenses.

You can read more about the timeline of the attack and the global response on Wikipedia's 2012 Delhi Gang Rape Page or view archival reports on BBC News.

What the rapists did to her was horrific, not only raping her per se but using iron rods to 'shaft' her in her 'private parts' to such an extent her internal organs were ripped to shreds, which was why she was airlifted from India to Singapore for a surgery at Mount Elizabeth, but sadly, it was too late.


Her perpetrators were utter evil beasts!









5 comments:

  1. Bungkus Saja Lah.

    Apparently the latest pro-Palestinian outrage is:
    “What is the purpose of the UN if Netanyahu is allowed to speak there?”

    Excellent question.

    What is the purpose of the UN?

    Saudi Arabia chaired the UN Commission on the Status of Women - while Saudi law still requires a woman to have a male guardian to marry, gives men far greater unilateral divorce rights, and can penalize wives for “disobeying” their husbands. Women’s-rights activists themselves have faced imprisonment and travel bans.

    Iran chaired the UN Human Rights Council’s Social Forum - while persecuting women for refusing compulsory hijab and executing political dissidents. In 2026 alone, authorities executed tens of thousands protesters.

    Gaddafi’s Libya chaired the UN Commission on Human Rights - while Libya was notorious for political imprisonment, torture, disappearances and repression.

    Assad’s Syria presided over the Conference on Disarmament - while his government was facing international findings and allegations over the use of chemical weapons.

    And in 2026, Iran became a vice-president of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference - while Iran itself is at the center of an international nuclear proliferation crisis.

    You genuinely couldn’t write better satire.

    Then there’s UNIFIL, watching Hezbollah turn southern Lebanon into a military fortress.

    UNRWA, where a U.S. inspector-general investigation referred 101 current or former employees over evidence of Hamas military-wing affiliation and/or participation in October 7.

    And the ICC, whose own independent review documented major institutional problems - before chief prosecutor Karim Khan was ultimately removed for serious misconduct.

    Even Guterres - Arafat’s old BFF - is now explaining that parts of the UN human-rights apparatus operate independently and are out of control.

    But Netanyahu being allowed to speak is where we’re supposed to discover the system is a farce?

    The problem isn’t Israel.

    The problem is an international system where the regimes violating the rules get to administer the committees supposedly enforcing them - and then those institutions lecture Israel and Western democracies about human rights.

    So yes. We agree.

    Shut it down.

    https://x.com/destinationXIX/status/2103351309990846819?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mfer, the real problem of UN is the sopo plays exhibited within the pan geopolitical strategies of various powers that hold fort in that setup.

      For far too long, that direction has been controlled & manipulated by western theme, especially under the drive of yankee.

      If there is no such schema, then all those farts u mentioned WOULDN'T even exist!

      ME wouldn't be what it's today with that europe rejected zionist state running wild w/o control.

      Delete
  2. I Agree With James Chin.

    Same Principle: Why Should Isaacs who have Built Israel into a World-Leading Ekonomy Simply Hand Over Chunks of Their Wealthy Country to Ishamaels Who Have Contributed Nothing But Rockets, Boms, Intifadas and Oct 7s?

    How is one supposed to make sense of this?
    The world in Malaysia seems to be upside down, and I keep staring at it as if some piece of the picture is missing. There are people, it appears, who feel no shame in taking a 30 percent share by force, without having worked for it. We are talking about small businesses. Many tuition centres are one-person proprietorships. And yet a business chamber thinks it is acceptable to compel someone to hand over 30 percent of their business- simply because of race. They speak often of justice and fairness in their religion. So how, then, is it also acceptable to force a person to surrender 30 percent? I cannot quite fit the two together.
    In most countries this would be a moral outrage. In Malaysia it is treated as normal and even encouraged. Racism is alive here, and it seems to grow more ordinary by the day. Is there a solution? I cannot see one. A whole generation appears to believe it is fine to grab whatever they want in the name of racial supremacy under the pretext of public policy.
    What puzzles me most is this: not a single religious leader or political leader has come forward to say that this is wrong, that this is pure racism. The right wing calls me the racist for even raising the matter. How does that work? Those who point out racism are accused of being the racists, while the ones practising it are branded race nationalists. Is this not an upside down country?
    #Malaysia #Racism #NewEconomicPolicy #RacismIsNormal #KetuananMelayuIslam

    https://x.com/jameschin110/status/2103616681516118288?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mfer, don't u twisted prof chin's article to suit yr surprisingly fart

      Delete
  3. There is Talk within the country for Brazil to Leave BRICS Since It Is Aligned with Western Bully.

    Kazakhstan Was Accepted as a "partner country" in 2025.

    Pakistan has also applied and When Accepted This Grouping Will Be Renamed PRICKS.

    ReplyDelete