tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11109306.post5508211540340615940..comments2024-03-29T21:31:08.609+08:00Comments on KTemoc Konsiders ........: Summary of some headlinesKTemochttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09951253039042572381noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11109306.post-90825367364026566542008-06-13T22:22:00.000+08:002008-06-13T22:22:00.000+08:00Haha Ktemoc, too clever by half.I have nothing aga...Haha Ktemoc, too clever by half.<BR/>I have nothing against the Australian Democrats, but lets get some facts right.<BR/><BR/>Don Chipp was not appointed to any Ministerial position when Malcolm Fraser became the Liberal PM, even though Don had held a Ministerial position in the caretaker government (long story, I won't go into the Gough Whitlam sacking saga), as well as shadow minister while in the opposition. He quit the Liberal Party in disgust. I think he was a radio commentator for exactly two weeks. Technically, not a frog, I guess. In reality ?Monsterballhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05482725674818312298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11109306.post-85659213634402408752008-06-12T18:02:00.000+08:002008-06-12T18:02:00.000+08:00kk46, don't be naughty and aver that the Australia...kk46, don't be naughty and aver that the Australian Democrats were frogs from the Liberals. Don Chipp the founder was a retired Minister as well as a bloke having already resigned from the Liberal Party to become a radio commentator on public affairs. He was admired by many and urged to form a centrist party - you could hardly call him a frog, hardly.<BR/><BR/>In 1977 he headed the new party which were made up by a merger of the Australia Party and the New Liberal Movement. The Australia Party was a splinter group from the Liberal Party, calling itself the Liberal Reform Group, who opposed the Libreal Party's policy of conscription and military involvement in the Vietnam War. Again hardly frogs.<BR/><BR/>Years later when Senator Cheryl Kernot became the leader of the Australian Democrat she left it to join the Labour Party because she felt she could contribute better by being in one of the two main parties BUT she did so only after surrendering her Senate position.<BR/><BR/>In Oz, froggies are given short shift by the voters - froggies are held in utter contempt. In Malaysia some people actually idolise a frog hunter (1994 in Sabah and 2008). It shows their hero worshipping blindness or their political immaturity or their inability to remember what had been their driving ideology (thus degenerating from reformasi to deformasi)KTemochttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09951253039042572381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11109306.post-54074613999483869452008-06-12T11:59:00.000+08:002008-06-12T11:59:00.000+08:00It is absolutely illegal, unconstitutional and imm...It is absolutely illegal, unconstitutional and immoral for the government executive to interfere with judicial decisions through carrots and sticks.<BR/><BR/>Frog-MPs are controversial, arguably immoral, still theoretical at this moment (as far as PR is concerned) , and is not illegal in this country per se. If there is evidence, emphasise evidence, corruption involved, yes, its illegal. You may laugh, but in history, some frogs ARE voluntary you know.<BR/><BR/>By the way, almost the entire Australian Democrat party was at its beginning "frogs" from the Liberal Party.<BR/><BR/>I'm afraid Ktemoc is such a heavy user of Ibrahim-brand blinkers, he has lost his moral compass in the wider scheme of thinks.<BR/><BR/>By the way, I'm a Barisan Nasional supporter for today.Monsterballhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05482725674818312298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11109306.post-89701111783644388392008-06-12T04:20:00.000+08:002008-06-12T04:20:00.000+08:00How dare you compare an MP to a judge? Their circu...How dare you compare an MP to a judge? Their circumstances can't be of the same and their tasks can't be of the same magnitude despite both being valuable. Moreover, while an MP announces his leave and joins another party or grouping, a judge is secretly making deals and makes ghost judgements in line with the secret deal. An MP or ADUN will also have another meet with the people, through an election and they can replace him/her but a fraudster judge who issues Lingam type ghost judges can't be replaced at anytime. Moreover, the more you go to the top echelons of justice, the more you finf Eussof Chin type and Lingam appointed evil people, and therein lies another perpetual problem that can't be solved. Justice and politics can't be equalised at any given time for the judges hold the soul of a nation and its higher ideals. And if any MPs or ADUNs have defected in the past or quit their parties to join another party, then it was under Mahathir as well, that's why Param is not looking at petty political moves of elected representatives but judges who collude with tin pot dictators to issue ghost judgements on behalf of their masters, yet their actions can't be rectified for the whole system is rotten and full of Lingam boys.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com