Pages

Thursday, July 02, 2026

China’s remarkable contribution to the clean energy movement


From the FB page of:


China’s remarkable contribution to the clean energy movement was highlighted in a new chart by Jostein Hauge of Cambridge University in the UK, released last night.
“China now manufactures 89% of the world’s solar panels, 70% of the world’s wind turbines, 83% of the world’s batteries, and 75% of the world’s electric vehicles — all at a lower cost than the West,” he said.
After posting the chart on X, he received the usual hostile comments that China still uses coal.
The simple response to that is that every major economy still uses coal – the question is whether they are following targets to ween themselves off it and create alternative energy sources.
China, clearly, is.
Other countries? Well, some have spotty records, while others are going in reverse.
People concerned about the future of the environment will recall the works of Rachel Carson, a scientist-author credited with triggering the start of widespread awareness of these issues, with a 1961 book called Silent Spring.
The movement she inspired grew in the west in the 1960s, and is now global. Everyone has now heard of the need to move to cleaner energy.
But some do a lot of talking, while others actually make the switch.




17 comments:

  1. To power half of the US with wind we would need more than a million turbines.

    Each 2 MW turbine requires almost 1,700 tons of material, including 1,300 tons of concrete, 295 tons of steel, 48 tons of iron, 24 tons of fiberglass. And on top of that rare minerals too.

    In total that's 3.7 trillion pounds of raw material.

    Mining for these materials is one of the most polluting industries on the planet, all for a turbine that will wear out in 15 to 20 years.

    And it's not just the turbines themselves, billions of tons are needed for transmission lines and batteries.

    This isn't a 'green transition,' it's an endless and expensive cycle of mining and rebuilding for no discernible benefit.

    Note: they are only useful on windy days. Not Reliable.

    https://x.com/electroversenet/status/2072274019974525012?s=46&t=8K6fzabO3g6uaj4KxwSSjg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wakakaka… know-nothing fart of sour grape!

      Mfer, what other power generating ecosystem SAN all those supporting infrastructures u f*coed about?

      Restricted usefulness?

      Which power generating system has NO opertional restrictions?

      Ooop…yr yankee/zionist state have 200% perfect production!

      Delete
  2. The full financial and environmental cost of a looming disposal crisis is impossible to calculate.

    This is precisely because the economics of recycling fail when recovery costs outstrip the value of the reclaimed material. Up to two thirds of ageing wind turbines and solar panels will need replacing before the Net Zero deadline in 2050.

    While solar capacity has surpassed a 2.5 terawatt milestone - spurred by an installation rate that surged by 40% in 2025 alone - the geographic and material footprint is emerging as a major spatial crisis (International Energy Agency).

    As this capacity multiplies, so does the inevitable e-waste graveyard hangover. Between 2038 and 2053, almost all current installations will reach their expiration dates. Many countries are already cracking down on blade graveyards, terrified of leaching toxins from decades-old solar panels or the indestructible properties of composite turbine blades.

    Around 77% of recent growth has occurred in China, which now operates roughly 690,000 turbines. Massive deployment today guarantees an equally massive disposal crisis tomorrow.

    And wind turbines only work on windy days.

    https://x.com/peterdclack/status/2072613754525605966?s=46&t=8K6fzabO3g6uaj4KxwSSjg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wakakakaka… sour grape fart of inconsequential!

      Delete
  3. Solar panels?

    You need to clear land to place the panels. So which rainforest or fertile agricultural/residential/commercial land should we sacrifice?

    Eg to power Penang on solar we need hundreds of sq km of solar panels.

    With a small Nuklear plant by the sea - only 1 sq km. 1 GW Cukup.

    And solar only works on sunny days Even haze can reduce efficiency. . Not reliable. Nuklear is stable and reliable, rain, shine or cloudy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oooop… u read nothing about how solar farms turn wasteland desert into grassland for sheep husbandry in China!

      Delete
  4. Devastating environmental impact of nickel mines in Yindonesia.

    https://youtu.be/0nLCENfWfAg?si=F2NCBQ7OS-Gwa8Q8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so, u DON'T need nickel?

      Ooop… not that nickels, mfer

      Delete
  5. Similar environmental concerns over mining of lithium, cobalt and rare earths.

    The most environmentally friendly car to drive is the one you are driving now, just look after it and use only when absolutely necessary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wakakakaka…

      So drilll, baby drills as the yanks fart while facing record high temperature!

      Delete
  6. Nothing Green in CCP,s ACTUAL energy expansion.

    China has 1,250 GIGAWATTS of coal fired power plants in operation. Another 300 GIGAWATTS of coal fired power plants are also under construction in China.

    Solar, Wind , Nuclear are just the surface.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so?

      Anymore REAL Technical details, that u can f*ck about?

      Delete
  7. Up to current date, China is the ONLY country on earth that has consistently following,her promised green earth policies.

    All those western developed demoNcratic countries r just paying lip services on set sgreed policies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's A SCAM....I worked it out.....

    They Say That The Sun (Solar) Lasts Forever, But Not The Panels Lah.....

    To replace global fossil fuel consumption with solar would take 274 billion panels.

    (That occupies 600,000 sq km, equal to the size of Ukraine)

    The energy to mine, manufacture and install those panels translates to 96 billion barrels of oil, 374 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 23 billion tons of coal.

    Then there's the fact that solar panels last only 15 to 20 years before needing replacing, meaning the cycle of mining, smelting and building repeats every generation.

    Even if 274 billion panels were built and installed, solar doesn't deliver 24-7 power. Massive backup systems, batteries, gas plants or other infrastructure would still be required, demanding billions more tons of material.

    You can't mine and manufacture your way out of the second law of thermodynamics.

    Solar is not a one-time build. It's an industrial treadmill: endless mining, endless rebuilding, endless waste -- all to chase an illusion of replacing the dense, affordable and reliable energy we already have.

    https://x.com/Electroversenet/status/2072636409551147216?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wakakaka… a f*cked dickhead enlisting entropy to strangle its lie!

      Delete
  9. I put solar in my house for a purpose, and saving the planet is not it.

    ReplyDelete