Pages

Saturday, September 21, 2024

Halal cert distraction that took your focus from GISBH











Mariam Mokhtar
Published: Sep 20, 2024 1:01 PM



COMMENT | When the government wants to bury bad news, it will do its best to distract us from the real issues. This is the reason why the halal certification issue became headline-grabbing news.

The ruse worked because few people failed to connect the dots and failed to express curiosity as to why the nation was suddenly gripped with halal fever.

The halal certification public spat was a battle from which there could be no real winners.

It was a non-issue because it aimed to distract us from the real news of successive administrations, especially the Welfare Department, the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry, the Health Ministry and the Religious Affairs Department, which over the years, have abrogated their responsibilities, and failed in their duty of care towards our children.

The authorities knew that the Global Ikhwan Service and Business Holding (GISBH) scandal would be reported, as police investigations had been ongoing for six months. They had unearthed a serial child abuse scandal of epic proportions. It could not be easily buried.


Perlis mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin


Perlis mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin already raised the alarm with the Islamic Development Department (Jakim), the body which is tasked to administer Islamic affairs in Malaysia.

Asri was incandescent and getting impatient with Jakim, especially as the Perlis fatwa council had expressed their concern and anger about Jakim's failure to act and investigate the faith deviation involving GISBH.

One reason amongst several that Asri posited for Jakim's reticence is found at minute 1.30 in the Malaysiakini video clip. He said, "...kerana ada campur tangan pihak yang tinggi terutama didalam penguat-kuasaan dan keselamatan"… (because of interference from higher up, in particular in the enforcement of power and security).

This is extremely worrying and raises more questions than answers. Did the failure of Jakim to investigate, come from the Home Ministry or the Prime Minister's Office (PMO)?

What is highly embarrassing and damaging that must be kept from public viewing? Was it linked to the high-powered GISBH delegation visit to the PMO, in April last year?

These are questions that the rakyat would like answered. With the police investigations nearing completion, raids imminent and Asri keenly waiting on the sidelines, someone in the government probably created the halal certification plan, to create a distraction.


The timeline

The timeline is roughly as follows.

On Sept 2, a police report about GISBH was made. Did those who lodged the report know of the ongoing intelligence gathering by the Royal Malaysia Police? Did alarm bells ring in Putrajaya?

Out of the blue, on Sept 4, Jakim said Johnny’s Restaurants, Black Canyon, Dolly Dim Sum, Mr Dakgalbi, and Bungkus Kaw Kaw had no Malaysian Halal Verification Certificate. These restaurants are popular with Muslim patrons.




On Sept 6, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Religious Affairs) Mohd Na’im Mokhtar, proposed to make halal certification mandatory for restaurants and food companies that do not serve pork or alcohol. Those in government predicted correctly, the reaction of the non-Malays.

Later that same day, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok disagreed with the proposal and said that companies would be burdened with unnecessary costs, and that halal certification should be voluntary.

Kok was merely expressing the views of her constituents and those of non-Malay business owners about halal certification. If truth be told, many rational-minded Muslims were glad she spoke-up.

Within a few days, the halal certification furore built into a crescendo, with Bersatu Youth chief, Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal demanding an apology from Kok and a retraction of her statement about Naim's proposal.

The Umno-Baru Youth, with its motor-mouth leader, Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh, could not resist a dig at DAP. He criticised Kok for interfering in religious matters.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim waded into the controversy by reprimanding Kok and her statement about halal certification, which he claimed, sparked an irrelevant controversy.

The public spat continued, and the halal certification furore was in full swing and at its zenith, just about everyone from former politicians, lawyers, MCMC, other political parties and even the leader of the Indian restaurant association, had plenty to add.

Then, on Sept 11, the media reports about the police raid on Global Ikhwan-run homes with sodomy and child sexual abuse, child labour and slave labour, shocked the nation and created international headlines.

However, the whole nation was still gripped by the halal issue, with Muslims demanding their halal rights, and non-Malays objecting to forced halal certification.


Damaging Madani image

Despite most Malaysians pausing momentarily to express their disgust at GISBH, they continued for another one week in halal and non-halal mode.

The sodomy cases in GISBH did not receive the full impact it should have had. The scrutiny about Jakim's incompetence and failure of enforcement were not properly addressed.

For decades, similar sodomy scandals in tahfiz schools, religious schools, and by individual ustaz were never really satisfactorily resolved. The perpetrators escaped scot-free, or with a rap on the knuckles. The victims languished. All these scandals escaped our scrutiny as it did with GISBH, last week.

Then, like a flash flood appearing out of nowhere, the halal controversy ended just as suddenly as it had begun. On Sept 18, Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi revealed the cabinet's decision that non-Muslim restaurants need not be halal certified.

What we were not aware of at that time, was that 19 people, including the GISBH CEO Nasiruddin Mohd Ali and his two wives, had been arrested in a dawn raid the same morning Zahid made his announcement.



GISBH CEO Nasiruddin Mohd Ali


The following day, the 19 were taken to face the magistrate at the Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Court Complex. Later that same day, Zahid declared that the public spat between Akmal and Kok was over.

Both the distraction and scandal management had gone according to plan.

The GISBH scandal and Jakim's incompetence, are potentially damaging for the Madani administration, especially with billions of ringgits pumped into Jakim and nothing to show for it. Jakim claims it does not investigate, yet it selectively investigates and interferes in issues, like the socks bearing the word “Allah” debacle.

The shame is that the full resources of the government and the rakyat's attention were focused on the halal non-issue. The government avoided our intense scrutiny when we should have been pressing for answers about the unresolved decades-old child abuse racket and Jakim's apathy.

Our children are once again betrayed. Where is the political will to punish the perpetrators and not just the scapegoats?



MARIAM MOKHTAR is a defender of the truth, the admiral-general of the Green Bean Army, and the president of the Perak Liberation Organisation (PLO). Blog, X.


***


kt comments: 

As I mentioned previously, most Islamic authorities seem damn sh*t-scared of criticizing-commenting on the sodomy-abuses scandals in GISBH. Why??? 😡😡😡


Is govt serious about ending rent-seeking?











R Nadeswaran
Published: Sep 21, 2024 10:06 AM



COMMENT | At the height of the movement control order following the outbreak of Covid-19, the Petaling Jaya City Council closed the wet market indefinitely.

With a view to reopening after the casualty numbers dropped, the council called for a meeting of all stallholders to brief them on hygiene and cleanliness requirements.

Among those who attended were a few who had never stepped into the market but were licensees, hence their presence.

They were the “Pajak Kings” who had leased their licences to third parties, including migrants, and collected a princely sum in rent every month.

Rent-seeking, in a small way, was condoned and acknowledged as an acceptable practice by successive governments of the past because it enriched some members of the ruling party.



An MBPJ banner outside the PJ wet market prohibiting the hiring of migrant workers by licence holders


Hence, the demand for such arrangements thereby provides the proviso of creating more rent-seekers.


Hardly unique

Such a practice is replicated in scores of other stalls and eateries around the country, where this kind of Ali Baba (or Ali Bangla as it is known these days) enterprise is thriving.

The authorities previously saw nothing wrong with the practice if they had a share of the spoils.

I had previously advocated a licensee-operated system that would have ended this kind of trade but it was ignored, and old habits are hard to correct and have become institutionalised.

But then, this is not restricted to hawker stalls. Titled people living in million-ringgit bungalows also have taxi permits and contracts to supply goods and services, which are then leased to a third party to execute the requirements.

In July last year, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that the government would formulate laws to end “Ali Baba” business practices.




He said such a practice negatively impacts the economy, causing an estimated one percent in losses to gross domestic product.

In a statement, Anwar said such practices cover acquisitions, licensing, permits, quotas, and giving subsidies and grants.

The task of formulating policies and legislation to stamp out “Ali Baba” practices was to be headed by the Economy Ministry and the Attorney-General’s Chambers.


All but silence since

Five months later, Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli said the proposed “anti-Ali Baba” legislation to end rent-seeking practices could be used against owners who abuse their business licences, which leads to an influx of foreign-controlled establishments in the city.

Taking to X, he responded to another X user who raised concerns over an influx of migrants benefiting from government subsidies or facilities intended for citizens.



Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli


“The anti-Ali Baba legislation will allow action to be taken against Malaysians who give ‘Ali Baba licences’ to migrant workers without meeting the conditions,” he said.

In response, the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) wanted the “anti-Ali Baba” law to be implemented promptly to deal with the issue of undocumented migrant workers in the country.

“The influx of migrant workers for purposes other than employment is indeed a cause for concern and a national problem which must be dealt with comprehensively and transparently,” said its president, Soh Thian Lai.

It has been 14 months since Anwar’s announcement, and the only news we had was from Rafizi, who told Parliament in February that the government is conducting a study on the framework for the Anti-Rent-Seeking Act.

In a written reply published on Parliament’s website, the Economy Ministry said input from stakeholders will be obtained for a draft of the act.




“The government aims to present this Act in Parliament by the year’s end,” he said.

Will we see it as law in three months’ time, or will delays be caused by “representation” from affected parties?

Why is it taking such a long time for the government to promulgate, debate, and present bills in Parliament, which subsequently became laws?

Through such a system, only a few well-connected elites enrich themselves at the expense of most hardworking Malaysians. Hopefully, it will be done as promised.



R NADESWARAN is a veteran journalist who writes on bread-and-butter issues. Comments: citizen.nades22@gmail.com


Raise assault case with AG and regent, Hanipa dared








Raise assault case with AG and regent, Hanipa dared


Published: Sep 21, 2024 9:30 AM


An academic has censured Mohamed Hanipa Maidin for targeting Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim over the delay in prosecuting the police personnel who assaulted a deaf e-hailing driver.

Tajuddin Mohd Rasdi also challenged the former deputy legal affairs minister to raise the issue with Attorney-General Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh and Johor Regent Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim.

The professor of architecture said he was surprised that Hanipa (above), a former Amanah MP, had used such language and tone on Anwar and the Amanah leadership.

According to him, the former deputy minister appeared “ungrateful, cynical and rude”.

“I have known Hanipa as a fighter for justice since the days of Reformasi. I challenge him to bring the matter of the deaf driver straight up to the attorney-general.

“Secondly, I challenge Hanipa to question the regent himself concerning why this matter has not been resolved. Why does Hanipa not do so seeing that he seems very courageous?” he said in a statement to Malaysiakini.



Academic Tajuddin Mohd Rasdi


The driver, Ong Ing Keong, was assaulted outside a hotel in Kuala Lumpur on May 28 by a police personnel escorting Tunku Ismail.

The regent later said he does not condone illegal actions and urged the police to conduct a thorough investigation.


Why blame Anwar?


Tajuddin said since the investigation papers are with the prosecutors, it is the AG’s call on whether to press charges.

“Why blame and drag Anwar into this matter? If Anwar interferes one way or another that means he has absolute control of the AG which is not proper, or is it?” he added.

Yesterday, Anwar, when questioned on the matter, said that certain cases were time-consuming, prompting Hanipa to offer a cynical riposte that the prime minister perhaps considers the assault to be more complex than the 1MDB scandal.



Disabled e-hailing driver Ong Ing Keong


Prior to this, the former deputy minister, who expressed frustration with the slow progress of the case, said if he were the Amanah president, he would push for an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to decide if the party should remain in the coalition government.

Commenting on this, Tajuddin said Hanipa’s remarks were “foolish and undiplomatic”.

He reminded Hanipa that Pakatan Harapan did not win the last general election and the current government was not “created by the charisma of Anwar”.

“In that regard, Anwar does not hold all the cards like (former premier) (Dr) Mahathir (Mohamad) during his days as the prime minister for BN.

“Hanipa speaks more like a Perikatan Nasional member. Perhaps, he should go to the other side and let us settle this once and for all,” he added.

Apart from Hanipa, Anwar’s response also drew criticism from Lawyers for Liberty (LFL), which is representing Ong, and the Disability Advocacy and Welfare Network (Dawn).



Lawyers for Liberty director Zaid Malek


Accusing the prime minister of being evasive, LFL director Zaid Malek said Anwar’s “flippant” response had raised more questions.

On Sept 5, Ong and LFL submitted a memorandum and the dashcam recording of the incident to the Prime Minister’s Office asking for an independent commission of inquiry to be established.


***


kt comments:

While I like BOTH Tajuddin Mohd Rasdi and Mohamed Hanipa Maidin, and I admire Prof Tajuddin  for defending an (in this case) indefensible Anwar, I support Hanipa Maidin in his sarcastic criticisms against the PM in being flippant to queries regarding delays in judicial resolution of the assault case.

It's also INTERESTING, yes very INTERESTING that Prof Tajuddin challenged Hanipa to raise the issue with the Johor Regent Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim. Maybe Prof Tajuddin knows more than he has revealed (or failed to) thus far - hmmm 😏😊😁😂😅


Let’s be a pluralistic rather than a mono-istic nation

 

FMT:


Let’s be a pluralistic rather

than a mono-istic nation

-

The mono-ism of the recent past is leading to a dead-end.

3
Shares
Total Views: 246

Free Malaysia Today

By Terence Netto

When Italy was formed from a mosaic of principalities and statelets in the late 19th century, one of its founders, Maximo Tabarelli, memorably remarked: 

We have created Italy. Now we must create Italians.

Twenty-five, 50 or even 80 years is a long time in the lives of people, but in the course of human history it is a fleeting moment.

It is good to bear this in mind as we remembered the 61st anniversary of the creation of the Malaysian nation.

The Malaysian nation was born on Sept 16, 1963 when Sarawak and Sabah, together with Singapore, federated with Malaya.

Singapore was 

turfed out
, as Lee Kuan Yew once put it, before the agreement on the territories’ merger was two years old, but the remnants still struggle to jell together, after 61 years of cohabitation.

Their peoples have not coalesced as a nation.

The reason for that is obvious: the country has for the past four decades at least been made to tap on one source, one wellspring, one fount of how to achieve a sense of unifying community.

The effort has been unavailing.

Can we, from the lack of results of this mono-ism, draw some conclusions?

We may if we take the example of what has happened in India where for the past 10 years, the ruling party has pushed the polity from its plural foundational moorings to something decidedly singular.

This effort, on the basis of the results of the general election held in the middle of this year, is said to have failed to obtain the endorsement of the electorate despite 80 percent of the people professing the same religion of the exponents of religious mono-ism.

It was a surprising result given the undoubted popularity of the Pied Piper of this monism: prime minister Narendra Modi.

Pundits held that India’s inherent religious pluralism, despite the 80 percent hold on its people of its dominant confession, was resistant to religious monism.

The mono-ists are not likely to give up after suffering a setback to their designs.

They continue to flail away at the chief perceiver of and architect of India’s philosophical foundations: Jawaharlal Nehru.

His critics have done him down but they could not bury him.

And that is because he was right in grasping the meaning of the Latin phrase E pluribus unum – out of many one – as the basis for forging a united nation.

This saying essentially holds that acceptance of diversity as the way to unity.

The founder of our nation Tunku Abdul Rahman took his inspiration from Nehru.

Who is to say he was not right in doing so?

The religious mono-ists of Malaysia would be loath to take a lesson from what has happened to their counterparts in India.

But they would do well to do so.

 

Terence Netto is a veteran journalist and an FMT reade

3-6 months is reasonable for sinkhole repairs, says minister

 

FMT:


3-6 months is reasonable

for sinkhole repairs, says

minister

-

Dr Zaliha Mustafa responds to a claim by a business association who said the time required was too long.

1
Shares
Total Views: 71
Free Malaysia Today
A tourist from India disappeared into the sewer system when the road collapsed outside Malayan Mansion in Kuala Lumpur last month. (Bernama pic)

PETALING JAYA
Federal territories minister Dr Zaliha Mustafa has urged businesses on Jalan Masjid India to be patient, following complaints over a timeframe of three to six months to repair a sinkhole that led to the disappearance of a tourist from India.

The timeframe of three to six months for repairs is considered reasonable. I hope the association will be patient for the sake of the security and wellbeing (of users),
 she told FMT.

Zaliha was responding to Ameer Ali Mydin, president of the Masjid India Business Association, who said the time required for the repairs was too long.

He urged the authorities to speed up the repairs at the area where Jalan Masjid India collapsed to restore safety and stem the huge business losses caused by lost customer traffic.

Ameer said businesses have experienced a decline of up to 80% in sales, particularly as the road has been cordoned off to allow repairs to take place.

On Aug 23, visiting Indian national Vijayaletchumy disappeared into the sewer system when the road collapsed while she was walking to Malayan Mansion. Search and rescue operations were called off after nine days.